Washington – Obama At AIPAC: Loose Talk Of War With Iran Drives Up Oil Price

    13

    President Barack Obama prepares to shake hands as he walks onstage to address the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Policy Conference's opening plenary session in Washington, Sunday, March 4, 2012. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen)Washington – President Barack Obama said Sunday that United States will not hesitate to attack Iran with military force to prevent it from acquiring a nuclear weapon, but he cautioned that “too much loose talk of war” recently has only helped Tehran and driven up the price of oil.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Speaking to a powerful pro-Israel lobby, Obama appealed to Israel for more time to let sanctions further isolate Iran. He sought to halt a drumbeat to war with Iran and hold off a unilateral Israeli strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities.

    “For the sake of Israel’s security, America’s security and the peace and security of the world, now is not the time for bluster,” Obama told thousands at the annual American-Israel Public Affairs Committee’s policy conference. “Now is the time to let our increased pressure sink in, and to sustain the broad international coalition that we have built.”

    Quoting Theodore Roosevelt, Obama said he would “speak softly, but carry a big stick” — and warned Iran not to test U.S. resolve.

    Obama’s widely anticipated speech came one day before he meets at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who planned to address AIPAC late Monday. Three GOP presidential candidates — Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich — were scheduled to speak to the conference via satellite on Tuesday, a critical day in the campaign when 10 states vote.

    To Israel and to Jewish voters in this country, Obama promoted his administration’s commitment to the Mideast ally.

    “You don’t have to count on my words. You can look at my deeds,” Obama said. He defended his record of rallying to Israel’s security and political sovereignty, saying: “We have been there for Israel. Every single time.”

    Obama’s comments were heavily laced with the politics of the campaign. He blamed distortions of his record on partisan politics.

    The Israeli president, Shimon Peres, spoke before Obama and said that a nuclear Iran would be a menace to the world, not just to Israel’s security.

    Peres, whose country sees its existence threatened by the potential development of nuclear arms, said: “Iran is an evil, cruel, morally corrupt regime. It is based on destruction and is an affront to human dignity.” He said Israel knows the horrors of war and does not seek one with Iran, “but if we are forced to fight, trust me. We shall prevail.”

    Iran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. U.S, Israel and many allies see no sign of that, and Israeli leaders openly have discussed the possibility of a military strike.

    “Let’s begin with the truth that you all understand: No Israeli government can tolerate a nuclear weapon in the hands of a regime that denies that Holocaust, threatens to wipe Israel off the map and sponsors terrorist groups committed to Israel’s destruction,” Obama said.

    Obama said he would use all sources of American power, but that only true resolution would come from diplomacy.

    U.S. officials worry that an Israeli attack on oil-power Iran could drive up pump prices and entangle the U.S. in a new Mideast confrontation during this year’s presidential election season. They want to give diplomacy and economic penalties more time to work.

    The United States and Europe have pursued more severe banking and other economic penalties separately. The toughest take effect this summer and target Iran’s oil business and powerful central bank.

    “I firmly believe that an opportunity remains for diplomacy — backed by pressure — to succeed,” Obama insisted.

    And in his greatest detail to date, Obama spelled out the consequences of a military campaign against Iran.

    “I would ask that we all remember the weightiness of these issues,” Obama said. “Already, there is too much loose talk of war.”

    The economic implications were on Obama’s mind, too, as gas prices soar to the forefront of American concern ahead of the election.

    In Israel, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said American pressure would not affect Israeli thinking on how to cope with the threat.

    “We are an independent sovereign state, and at the end of the day, the state of Israel will make the most correct decisions as we understand them.”


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    13 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    qazxc
    qazxc
    12 years ago

    Thank Gd we have such staunch support from the leader of the most powerful nation on earth. Chasdai haborai.

    12 years ago

    It is so easy to blame the Israeli/Iranian crisis for the rising prices of gasolene. However, the oil speculators, along with their friends at OPEC, and the oil companies here, are the ones who are behind the rise in gasolene prices. Demand for gasolene has been down, the supply is high, yet the prices keep going up. The domestic oil companies are even exporting gasolene to China and India!

    12 years ago

    As much as people hate Obama, he was there for Israel every time it counted.

    12 years ago

    Hmmm……why hasn’t the US demanded that the Medinah disarm from its 320 atomic warheads and sign the non-proliferation treaty, huh? Imagine if there was an AIPAC supporting Iran……….Politicians are for sale to the highest bidder, we all know that. And Obama knows perfectly well that “attacking Iran” which is a HUGE country would not end the nuclear energy program at all, but bombing Dimona would be a totally differnet matter………

    12 years ago

    There is no assistance to “Eretz Yisroel.” There is assistance to the regime called MEDINAS YISRAEL. But I guess rednecks like you don’t really know the difference anyway – and if you did, you would think that the difference between Zionism and Judaism is like the difference between Nusach Ashkenaz and Nusach Sfard.