Welcome, Guest! - or
Easy to remember!  »  VinNews.com

Washington - Senate Committee Cuts Pakistan Aid Over Conviction

Published on: May 24, 2012 04:13 PM
By: AP
Change text size Text Size  
Bookmark and Share
A Pakistani man selling cold drinks pushes his bicycle between oil tankers, which were used to transport NATO fuel supplies to Afghanistan, in a compound in Karachi, Pakistan, Thursday, May 24, 2012. (AP Photo/Fareed Khan)A Pakistani man selling cold drinks pushes his bicycle between oil tankers, which were used to transport NATO fuel supplies to Afghanistan, in a compound in Karachi, Pakistan, Thursday, May 24, 2012. (AP Photo/Fareed Khan)

Washington - A Senate panel expressed its outrage Thursday over Pakistan’s conviction of a doctor who helped the United States track down Osama bin Laden, cutting aid to Islamabad by $33 million — $1 million for every year of the physician’s 33-year sentence for high treason.

The punitive move came on top of deep reductions the Appropriations Committee already had made to President Barack Obama’s budget request for Pakistan, a reflection of the growing congressional anger over its cooperation in combatting terrorism. The overall foreign aid budget for next year had slashed more than half of the proposed assistance and threatened further reductions if Islamabad failed to open overland supply routes to U.S.-led NATO forces in Afghanistan.

Advertisement:

Pushing aside any diplomatic talk, Republicans and Democrats criticized Pakistan a day after the conviction in Pakistan of Shakil Afridi. The doctor ran a vaccination program for the CIA to collect DNA and verify bin Laden’s presence at the compound in Abbottabad where U.S. commandos found and killed the al-Qaida leader in May 2011.

The United States has called for Afridi’s release, arguing that he was acting in the interest of the U.S. and Pakistan.

“We need Pakistan, Pakistan needs us, but we don’t need Pakistan double-dealing and not seeing the justice in bringing Osama bin Laden to an end,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who pushed for the additional cut in aid.

He called Pakistan “a schizophrenic ally,” helping the United States at one turn, but then aiding the Haqqani network which has claimed responsibility for several attacks on Americans. The group also has ties to al-Qaida and the Taliban.

“It’s Alice in Wonderland at best,” said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. “If this is cooperation, I’d hate like hell to see opposition.”

One of the most forceful statements came from Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who also serves that the chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. She pointed out that Pakistan has suffered at the hands of terrorists yet misconstrued what is treason in convicting Afridi. She also insisted that Afridi was not a spy.

“This conviction says to me that al-Qaida is viewed by the court to be Pakistan,” said Feinstein, who said it made her rethink U.S. assistance.

The committee approved Graham’s amendment to cut the assistance by $33 million on a 30-0 vote.

In crafting the overall legislation, the committee reduced Obama’s request to aid Pakistan by 58 percent as resentment and doubts linger on Capitol Hill a year after bin Laden was killed deep inside Pakistan. Tensions between Washington and Islamabad have increased as Pakistan closed overland supply routes to Afghanistan after a U.S. attack on the Pakistani side of the border killed 24 Pakistani soldiers in November.

The United States and Pakistan failed to resolve the issue at the recent NATO summit in Chicago.

The congressional anger over the conviction and the supply routes extended to the Senate Armed Services Committee, which completed a $631.4 billion defense budget Thursday that restricts military assistance to Pakistan unless the supply routes are opened.

“This shows a common outrage,” Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., told reporters.

Members of the Senate Appropriations Committee also complained about mafia-style extortion by Pakistan in seeking truck fees in exchange for opening the supply lines. The cost had been $250 per truck prior to the attack. Pakistan is now demanding $5,000 per truck. The United States has countered at $500.

The bill would provide just under $1 billion in aid to Pakistan, including $184 million for State Department operations and $800 million for foreign assistance. Counterinsurgency money for Pakistan would be limited to $50 million.

The legislation also conditions the counterinsurgency aid on Pakistan reopening the supply routes.

Islamabad won’t get any of the funds for counterinsurgency or money in prior legislation unless the secretary of state certifies to the Appropriations committees that “the government of Pakistan has reopened overland cargo routes available to support United States and North Atlantic Treaty Organization troops in Afghanistan, and funds appropriated under this heading can be used efficiently and effectively by the end of the fiscal year,” the legislation says

If the secretary can’t certify to Congress, the money would be transferred to other accounts.

The overall legislation would fund the State Department, foreign operations and other programs at $52.1 billion, which is $2.6 billion less than what Obama requested for the 2013 fiscal year beginning Oct. 1 and $1.2 billion below current spending.

The panel also cut money Obama proposed for Iraq by 77 percent, citing the deteriorating security situation there. The bill would provide $1.1 billion for Iraq, including $582 million in foreign assistance but no money for the police development program.

The panel also cut $5 million from the $250 million in economic assistance for Egypt. Graham said it equaled the amount the U.S. spent to get non-government workers out earlier this year, including Sam LaHood, son of Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood.

Wading into the dispute over Palestinian refugees, the panel approved a version of an amendment from Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., that would require the secretary of state to submit a report to Congress on the number of Palestine refugees who were displaced by the 1948 Arab-Israeli conflict, the number of descendants and who receives assistance from the United Nations Relief and Works Agency.

The issue of whether to count refugees and their descendants is a divisive one. Some 5 million Palestine refugees receive assistance from the U.N. agency. A third of registered refugees live in camps in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

The State Department and Jordan opposed the original Kirk amendment and it was modified by Leahy.


More of today's headlines

Dallas, TX - Miniature laundry detergent packets arrived on store shelves in recent months, touted as a solution to bulky bottles and messy spills. But doctors across... New York - The New York Yankees say they aren't for sale. The Daily News reported Thursday that there were rumors in Major League Baseball and New York banking...

 

Total9

Read Comments (9)  —  Post Yours »

1

 May 24, 2012 at 04:59 PM pushkin Says:

finally

2

 May 24, 2012 at 05:08 PM LoveHashem Says:

Yeah let's see how long this lasts before obama puts his foot down and says we must continue to fund the paki's because they're our "friends," and it's in "our own interests," just like he did with the pali's after they went to the UN to try and declare statehood.

3

 May 24, 2012 at 05:48 PM cynic Says:

Some of us might remind everyone, especially San Fran Nan and her colleagues (both D and R) that the US taxpayer is still kicking them a billion, as in "b", dollars this year (more or less) to win their hearts and minds.
- Didn't work in Indochina. Didn't work in Afghanistan. Didn't work in Iraq. Isn't working in Latin America.

4

 May 24, 2012 at 06:16 PM hershel Says:

We aren't giving them 33,000,000.00 of the 1,000,000,000.00 we are already giving them every year. some punishment.
We are also rewarding Iran a billion a year.
Why are we supporting they terrorist groups again?

How about budget cuts from terrorist funding?

5

 May 24, 2012 at 06:24 PM amerikaner Says:

should cut ALL aid to our "friend" who willingly harbors terrorists and supports them with US Taxpayers money

6

 May 24, 2012 at 07:27 PM Thoughtful Says:

Why the heck are they getting ANYTHING??? Cut the aid COMPLETELY!!!!

This government is insane.....

7

 May 24, 2012 at 07:33 PM Denker Says:

Reply to #3  
cynic Says:

Some of us might remind everyone, especially San Fran Nan and her colleagues (both D and R) that the US taxpayer is still kicking them a billion, as in "b", dollars this year (more or less) to win their hearts and minds.
- Didn't work in Indochina. Didn't work in Afghanistan. Didn't work in Iraq. Isn't working in Latin America.

All the comments are missing the main point. Pakistan is a nuclear country and the USA is trying as much as possible to stay friendly with them because of this.

8

 May 24, 2012 at 07:52 PM Anonymous Says:

Big mistake on Bush"s part. He should have gone after Pakastain after Afganhastain not Iraq. They were our real enemies and we could have totally choked Al-Qeda. And in those days pre Iraq we had the wordl's respect and support. I know we were scared because they have nukes but something should have been done.

9

 May 24, 2012 at 08:17 PM SEAL-TEAM-6 Says:

Is the obama administration wouldn't have leaked the info. About this doctor then pakistan wouldn't know about it.

10

Sign-in to post a comment

Scroll Up
Advertisements:

Sell your scrap gold and broken jewelry and earn hard cash sell gold today!