United Kingdom – Jurist Says Boycott Of West Bank Settlement Products Is Legal

    7

    Pro-Palestinian demonstration to boycott Israel. EPA FIleUnited Kingdom – European governments have every right to boycott trade with West Bank settlements, according to a leading international counsel, British newspaper The Independent reported Monday.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Cambridge professor of international law James Crawford formulated the formal opinion in a 60-page document, shown to senior officials of EU member states and obtained by The Independent.

    “There do not appear to be any EC [European Commission] laws which could be breached by a member state taking the decision to ban the import of settlement produce on public policy grounds,” Crawford asserted in the document.

    He continued that imposing a ban on trade with settlements would not breach obligations to the World Trade Organization, because “as a member of international law, the West Bank and Gaza cannot be considered to be Israel’s territory.”

    The Independent opined that this fresh development would “inject fresh momentum” into UK boycott campaigns, where settlement products in supermarkets are already distinguished from goods originating within the Green Line.

    The report came a day after a new Israeli government-initiated report on West Bank outposts criticized the actions of past administrations that led to the creation of the illegal West Bank Jewish communities, while recommending that they be transformed where possible into new settlements.

    The report was authored by three legal experts: former Supreme Court justice Edmund Levy; former Foreign Ministry legal adviser Alan Baker; and former deputy president of the Tel Aviv District Court Tchia Shapira.

    While the United Nations and EU often state that Israeli settlements are illegal under international law based on its understanding that Israel “occupies” the West Bank, the outpost report concluded that the classical laws of occupation “cannot be considered applicable to the unique and sui generis historic and legal circumstances of Israel’s presence in Judea and Samaria spanning over decades.”

    Content is provided courtesy of the Jerusalem Post


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    7 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    rikki
    Active Member
    rikki
    11 years ago

    Maybe all the countries in the world should return, boycott and reclaim all the lands won in a war..England, as well..i.e., the U.S. to the native Indians and then others would boycott us until we do so…ridiculous, right? but when it comes to Israel everyone has a different opinion and can even legitimize their claim!!! this is pure hate of Israel and anti-Semitism at the utmost!!! Hey, they got back Gush Katif and others..do you see them growing produce on these lands? NO!!!

    sane
    sane
    11 years ago

    How about a boycott of Syria products (if there are any)? How about a boycott against Saudi Arabia which discriminates against half of its population (women)?

    Butterfly
    Butterfly
    11 years ago

    Yes, a boycott of all countries who boycott us should help!! Then they complain that the euro is hurting, well, they are hurting it by themselves!! Boycotts may have problems but sometimes bring results!!