Albany, NY - Advocates For NY Poor Want Minimum Wage Hike |
|
(File: AP)Albany, NY - A raise in the minimum wage will be a major focus of the 23rd annual People’s State of the State rally this week.
Mark Dunlea of the Hunger Action Network says he’s hoping that Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s State of the State address on Wednesday will call for raising the minimum wage to $10 an hour. Dunlea says the Assembly’s minimum wage proposal isn’t enough.
The People’s State of the State rally is scheduled for Tuesday at noon at the Capitol.
Besides raising the minimum wage, key issues for 2013 will include increasing funding for emergency food, ending childhood hunger, fair taxes and campaign finance reform.
After the event, the group will deliver a People’s Litmus Test for the upcoming session to Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos.
More of today's headlines
“Washington - Ten major banks and mortgage companies agreed Monday to pay $8.5 billion to settle federal complaints that they wrongfully foreclosed on homeowners who...” Washington - Ten Banks, Mortgage Firms To Pay $8.5B In Foreclosure Settlement
Antwerp - Sons of Former Neturei Karta Member Enrolled in All-Girls Yeshiva in Belgium (video)


Total16
Read Comments (16) — Post Yours »
1
Jan 07, 2013 at 11:46 AM UseYourHead Says:Report as Inappropriate
The minimum wage helps the few - if any - and hurts the many.
2
Jan 07, 2013 at 01:02 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
where are the advocates for the middle class who have not gotten raises in years and have to work overtime without getting paid time and a half?
3
Jan 07, 2013 at 01:33 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
A $10/hr minimum wage translates into roughly $21,000/year pre-tax income and about $18,400 after taxes annually. Its hard to even survive in NYC on less than $80,000-$100,000 year so I cannot imagine anyone objecting to such a minimum wage. At a time when NYC's big law firms just announced that the starting scale for FIRST YEAR associates next year will be $172,000/year plus about an $18,000 bonus, a $10/hr minimum wage seems the least we can pay to those who clean our offices, care for our elderly parents in nursing homes or serve us food and wash the dishes in our restaurants.
4
Jan 07, 2013 at 02:02 PM UseYourHead Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ A $10/hr minimum wage translates into roughly $21,000/year pre-tax income and about $18,400 after taxes annually. Its hard to even survive in NYC on less than $80,000-$100,000 year so I cannot imagine anyone objecting to such a minimum wage. At a time when NYC's big law firms just announced that the starting scale for FIRST YEAR associates next year will be $172,000/year plus about an $18,000 bonus, a $10/hr minimum wage seems the least we can pay to those who clean our offices, care for our elderly parents in nursing homes or serve us food and wash the dishes in our restaurants. ”
Who are you to decide what a person can hire himself out for? If someone wants to work for $5/hour, what business do you have in stopping him? Mind your own business and get on with it!
5
Jan 07, 2013 at 03:09 PM A Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ The minimum wage helps the few - if any - and hurts the many. ”
Who are you hurting by making sure that poor people might have enough money to put food on their tables?
People who are asking for a raise in the minimum wage are not asking for handouts, they are not taking government money, they are not raising your taxes.
I truly do not understand this bias against poor people that I keep seeing on VIN.
6
Jan 07, 2013 at 03:39 PM DavidCohen Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Who are you hurting by making sure that poor people might have enough money to put food on their tables?
People who are asking for a raise in the minimum wage are not asking for handouts, they are not taking government money, they are not raising your taxes.
I truly do not understand this bias against poor people that I keep seeing on VIN. ”
You are missing the point. If someone wants to work for me for less I should have the right to hire him or her. If I am offering an hourly rate and nobody will accept the position, then I will need to offer more. That's how markets work. Forcing employers to overpay hurts employers, makes us less competitive, and is proven to actually hurt employment numbers. This is not a bias against the poor, it's recognizing that politicians make big gestures that will get them reelected, not because they are right or make sense or will actually help.
7
Jan 07, 2013 at 06:49 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Who are you hurting by making sure that poor people might have enough money to put food on their tables?
People who are asking for a raise in the minimum wage are not asking for handouts, they are not taking government money, they are not raising your taxes.
I truly do not understand this bias against poor people that I keep seeing on VIN. ”
Its called projection. This is not a new phenomenon. The poor and working classes, ashamed and humiliated that they are wards of the state, dependent in part on government handouts, tune into right wing carnival bakers who make them feel as if they are wealthy, independent, self-made frontier men, looking down from their high perch on the lazy poor. Of course they are only living vicariously. Unfortunately, in the frum community there are high concentrations of poverty, and the callousness you see displayed on these pages is but a reflection of that reality.
The Baal Shem Tov famously stated that the world is a mirror... the faults you see in others are your own.
8
Jan 07, 2013 at 07:14 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ You are missing the point. If someone wants to work for me for less I should have the right to hire him or her. If I am offering an hourly rate and nobody will accept the position, then I will need to offer more. That's how markets work. Forcing employers to overpay hurts employers, makes us less competitive, and is proven to actually hurt employment numbers. This is not a bias against the poor, it's recognizing that politicians make big gestures that will get them reelected, not because they are right or make sense or will actually help. ”
That's how markets work in your idealized mythical fantasy land. Nobody "wants to work" for $7.25 an hour, but given the choice between being unemployed and working for slave wages, they will choose latter. When you consider the masses of immigrants coming from third world countries where wages and living standards are a tenth of what they are in the US, there is never a shortage of artificial "demand" for wages, depressing the general market rate. Poor people don't have the luxury of sitting around en masse waiting out lower wages.
At the end of the day, you are simply passing on the costs to state and federal governments. $7.25 an hour simply means higher taxes to pay for food stamps, section 8, Medicaid, etc, which you ultimately end up footing the bill for anyway.
You have no evidence -- at least no concrete evidence -- that increased minimum wages hurt economies. Here are some real world minimum wage numbers, in US dollars, for countries most culturally similar to the US, all with lower unemployment rates:
Canada: $9.40
New Zealand: $11.26
Australia: $16.76
9
Jan 07, 2013 at 07:42 PM Y-Love Says:Report as Inappropriate
It's as #8 said above.
No one "wants to" "hire themselves out" for substandard wages of $5/hour or less. Especially in New York, one would only take such a position if their backs were against the wall, if the option was between slave wages and unemployment (as was said above).
What minimum wage laws is place a limit on how much an employer can take advantage of someone else's circumstances. Obviously every business wants to increase profits (and if you're publicly held, you HAVE to do so). What business wouldn't look to spend $1K/month on janitorial staffing ($250/wk, i.e., $6.25/hour, less than minimum wage) instead of the $1300 at minimum wage? What minimum wage laws do is say, "no, Mr. Employer, you can not exploit this desperate worker as much as you see fit -- EVEN IF, in their destitute state, they'd be willing to dig ditches for $1/hour. No, you must give them what they deserve as a worker - NO LESS than $7.25/hour."
It's the basics of a fair society. No one should have to toil all week for $10.
10
Jan 07, 2013 at 07:45 PM kosher Says:Report as Inappropriate
This is such a bad idea. While there are very few jobs that actually pay the minimum wage, legislating a rise in the minimum wage will throw more people into unemployment, leave little opportunity for handicapped people to be proud workers, and kill summer jobs for teenagers. It will also make employers more likely to hire illegals.
What it mostly will do is raise other things that are based on the minimum wage. That means higher welfare payments and the like. The government is broke already with 47% of the population on the dole. Dumb moves like this will just accelerate the time until the government collapses.
11
Jan 07, 2013 at 09:05 PM DavidCohen Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ That's how markets work in your idealized mythical fantasy land. Nobody "wants to work" for $7.25 an hour, but given the choice between being unemployed and working for slave wages, they will choose latter. When you consider the masses of immigrants coming from third world countries where wages and living standards are a tenth of what they are in the US, there is never a shortage of artificial "demand" for wages, depressing the general market rate. Poor people don't have the luxury of sitting around en masse waiting out lower wages.
At the end of the day, you are simply passing on the costs to state and federal governments. $7.25 an hour simply means higher taxes to pay for food stamps, section 8, Medicaid, etc, which you ultimately end up footing the bill for anyway.
You have no evidence -- at least no concrete evidence -- that increased minimum wages hurt economies. Here are some real world minimum wage numbers, in US dollars, for countries most culturally similar to the US, all with lower unemployment rates:
Canada: $9.40
New Zealand: $11.26
Australia: $16.76 ”
Wrong, if the pay is too low they won'e accept the job! If someone is willing to do it for less then that is all the job is worth. I am a small business owner, I have 4 employees, all of whom I pay higher than the minimum wage because I want to and my employees are worth me paying them more. But if someone came along who could do the same job or better for less, then opting to hire them should be my choice.
As for countries where minimum wages are higher, there are numerous articles from economists validating the fact that higher minimum wages equates to more pay for fewer employees, especially on the lower end of the pay scale. WSJ, Forbes, and others, publications by and for people who actually understand business and the economy (as opposed to bleeding heart feel gooders) have written on this one extensively.
But hey, don't let annoying little things like facts get in the way.
12
Jan 07, 2013 at 10:28 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Wrong, if the pay is too low they won'e accept the job! If someone is willing to do it for less then that is all the job is worth. I am a small business owner, I have 4 employees, all of whom I pay higher than the minimum wage because I want to and my employees are worth me paying them more. But if someone came along who could do the same job or better for less, then opting to hire them should be my choice.
As for countries where minimum wages are higher, there are numerous articles from economists validating the fact that higher minimum wages equates to more pay for fewer employees, especially on the lower end of the pay scale. WSJ, Forbes, and others, publications by and for people who actually understand business and the economy (as opposed to bleeding heart feel gooders) have written on this one extensively.
But hey, don't let annoying little things like facts get in the way. ”
So I take it manufacturing jobs are only "worth" $2.12 an hour being as that's what Foxconn employees who build your iphones "accept"? I don't think I have to bother expanding on this.
Telling me about "numerous articles" without any citations other than some vague reference to your favorite right-wing publications, is hardly evidence of anything. Conveniently ignoring actual real world examples of parallel cultures and economies with lower unemployment rates and significantly higher minimum wages, is called denial.
"Facts" are hardly your forte.
13
Jan 08, 2013 at 12:15 AM I_Am_Me Says:Report as Inappropriate
With everything going up, so should minimum wage & it actually pains me to see yiden who are more wealthy refuting the increase.
14
Jan 08, 2013 at 09:11 AM DavidCohen Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ So I take it manufacturing jobs are only "worth" $2.12 an hour being as that's what Foxconn employees who build your iphones "accept"? I don't think I have to bother expanding on this.
Telling me about "numerous articles" without any citations other than some vague reference to your favorite right-wing publications, is hardly evidence of anything. Conveniently ignoring actual real world examples of parallel cultures and economies with lower unemployment rates and significantly higher minimum wages, is called denial.
"Facts" are hardly your forte. ”
Actually, yes, exactly! If manufacturing is cheaper in China then instead of artificially raising the costs and then being unable to compete, we need to refocus on what we can and should excel in. Industries evolve, and those who still want to keep jobs that are now inefficient or obsolete are doomed to fail. The introduction of electricity killed entire industries while creating new ones. Replacing horse and carts with trains and cars did the same. High tech and robotics are doing it yet again. There will always be jobs at the lower end of the scale that cease to be of value and become marginalized. The solution is not to demand higher pay for jobs no longer worth those rates, but to focus on jobs higher up the ladder.
As for the articles, VIN won't let me paste links, but read Forbes article "The Effect of the Minimum Wage on Youth Unemployment", or the more recent WSJ article "Wage Debate Takes the Stage" for starters.
To #13, no, what pains me are individuals so poorly educated and so handicapped by a system that discourages them actually getting ahead that they have no choice but to take jobs that can be outsourced or replaced by machines.
15
Jan 08, 2013 at 10:25 AM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Actually, yes, exactly! If manufacturing is cheaper in China then instead of artificially raising the costs and then being unable to compete, we need to refocus on what we can and should excel in. Industries evolve, and those who still want to keep jobs that are now inefficient or obsolete are doomed to fail. The introduction of electricity killed entire industries while creating new ones. Replacing horse and carts with trains and cars did the same. High tech and robotics are doing it yet again. There will always be jobs at the lower end of the scale that cease to be of value and become marginalized. The solution is not to demand higher pay for jobs no longer worth those rates, but to focus on jobs higher up the ladder.
As for the articles, VIN won't let me paste links, but read Forbes article "The Effect of the Minimum Wage on Youth Unemployment", or the more recent WSJ article "Wage Debate Takes the Stage" for starters.
To #13, no, what pains me are individuals so poorly educated and so handicapped by a system that discourages them actually getting ahead that they have no choice but to take jobs that can be outsourced or replaced by machines. ”
Nice try. Most minimum wage jobs are in the service sector, not manufacturing. Fast food, hotels, box stores, and 7-11's aren't going anywhere. I only brought up Foxconn as an example of how wages are not driven by choice but by desperation. The Chinese slaving away at $2.12 an hour are not doing so because of any objective choice, but because they have no other options.
In your idealized Ayn Rand fantasy land, if everyone was well educated and capable of waiting out hire wages, we wouldn't have any service sector employees, or alternatively you would pay $14 for a slice of pizza. The fact is that the world -- by Hashems design -- has always been comprised of the rich and the poor, the haves and have not's, the educated and the uneducated. It is our responsibility as a civilized people, not to exploit the desperate in the name of supposedly free markets.
16
Jan 08, 2013 at 11:03 AM &Mrs; AmHaAretz Says:Report as Inappropriate
? Ever any discussions about economic/ societal/ moral pros & cons to setting a "MAXIMUM wage," or rather - salary plus expenses & benefits, for those at the light-years-beyond-a-living-wage end of the employment spectrum?