Teaneck, NJ – Shmuley Boteach Responds To Steinsaltz Op-Ed; Rejects Steinsaltz’s Call For Rabbis As “Spiritual Sissies”

    37

    Teaneck, NJ – Responding to Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz’s recent op-ed “Who Will Be Our Rabbis?” —in which Steinsaltz pines for the emergence of a more compassionate leadership style among today’s rabbis—Rabbi Shmuley Boteach has responded with an op-ed of his own, saying that he “rejects” Steinsaltz’s call for rabbis to become “spiritual sissies,” and instead, demands rabbis possessing the “courage and gumption to go out and fight the battles of the Jewish people.”

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    In his THE TIMES OF ISRAEL (http://bit.ly/1hSycWb) op-ed “Rejecting the Rabbi as Spiritual Sissy,” Rabbi Boteach first pays homage to Steinsaltz, calling him “is a rabbinic giant of our time.”

    “I have been a student and admirer of Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz for 25 years,” begins Boteach. “While I was rabbi at Oxford University it was my privilege to host him several times, including at a historic debate with atheist Richard Dawkins which I moderated. Years later, in 2009, Rabbi Steinsaltz was one of the keynote speakers at an International Conference on Jewish values which I hosted in New York. In 2012, Rabbi Steinsaltz was honored by Israeli President Shimon Peres with the Presidential Award of Distinction for his monumental commentary on the entire Talmud. Peres praised Steinsaltz ‘for his unique and extraordinary contribution to Jewish culture and education.’ I agree wholeheartedly. Steinsaltz is a rabbinic giant of our time.”

    That, according to Boteach, is what “just makes his recent column, “Who will be our rabbis?” all the more bizarre. In it Steinsaltz essentially argues that rabbis today need to embrace the Bill Clinton model: they have to feel the community’s pain. It doesn’t’ much matter whether or not they have answers for the Jewish community’s problems. Indeed, Steinsaltz seems to prefer rabbis who are blissfully clueless, so long as they can admit to their ignorance and cry along with their congregants.”

    Boteach states that, “Drawing upon the analogy of the rabbis as ‘the head’ and the Jewish people as ‘the physical body,’ the head feels the pain of the other organs. ‘Similarly,’ he writes, ‘the leader is supposed to sense the problems and feel the pains of everyone.’”

    Continuing, Boteach writes, “He illustrates his point with a lengthy story of a rabbi who was approached by a young man, a mamzer who was prohibited by Jewish law from marrying because he was illegitimate. The rabbi could do nothing for him. But ‘… the young man [was] sitting in the rabbi’s lap and both were weeping.’ Rabbi Steinsaltz says, ‘This is the kind of rabbi I am looking for.’”

    “I bet it’s not the kind of rabbi the young man was looking for,” muses Boteach. “Does anyone really believe that this poor adolescent was comforted by a life of loneliness because some rabbi with a rainbow vest felt his pain?”

    “Judaism is a religion of action, not empty emotion,” states Boteach. “People are not looking for rabbis to mirror their agony – they are looking for someone to give them keys to redemption and to direct them out of the labyrinth of life. A rabbi, as its Hebrew name implies, is a teacher. Rabbis today need to be problem solvers. CEO’s of their communities and synagogues. They have to arrive in a city, see the empty pews, and figure out how to fill them up. If the service needs to be shorter and more explanatory, if the yodeling of the Cantor has to disappear in favor of a question and answer session, then do that. But sitting and weeping the death of the community will be seen by his congregants as cowardly and pathetic.”

    Along those lines, Boteach writes, “A rabbi is a man on a mission. His purpose: to rebuild Jewish life. To establish schools, mikvahs, adult education classes, debates, seminars, weekend retreats, and stimulating communal events. He is not empathizer-in-chief but programmer in chief.”

    Questioning further, Boteach asks, “Of what use does a man whose wife wants to leave him have for a rabbi who sits and weeps with him? Will that heal the man’s shattered heart? Will it stop his children from being yoyo’s pulled between parents on alternate weekends? Will his rabbi hold him tight at night and erase his agonizing loneliness? Is that the rabbi’s role or the role of a spouse?”

    Indirectly answering his own questions, Boteach says, “Rather, the rabbi’s purpose in that situation is to counsel the couple and find out what went wrong. Perhaps the man never gave his wife a compliment? Maybe he paid more attention to other women than her. And if so, then the rabbis’ role is not warmth and comfort but tough love. He has to tell the man directly and forcefully that women marry men to feel special. That they give up everything – including their very names – to become a wife. And what they ask for in return is to be the one and only. And your job is to make her feel that way and win her back. And if you haven’t done it yet, then get off your lazy derrière and do it. You will not get sympathy from me for allowing your family to fall apart.”

    “It’s true,” Boteach writes, “as both Socrates and the Zohar state, that a truly wise person knows how much he doesn’t know. That being said, we are not free to shirk our responsibilities to fix problems in the world. Neither Socrates nor the great Kabbalistic text implied that in our ignorance we could absolve ourselves of the responsibility of offering guidance where it was warranted. It just means that such advice has to always be offered with humility and a keen awareness of our own limitations.”

    “Since I was a teenager,” Boteach continues, “I have strived to follow King Solomon’s advice in Proverbs (3:5), ‘Betach el Hashem b’chol libecha, v’el binat’cha al tisha’en.’ ‘Trust God with all your heart and do not rely on your own understanding.’ In high school, I borrowed the passage for my yearbook entry, using the original Hebrew as a play on my own name (Betach/ Boteach).”

    “Today’s rabbis aren’t being asked questions in Jewish law, like whether a chicken’s broken wing renders it unkosher, as Rabbi Steinsaltz rightly states. Today’s rabbis are expected to act as marriage and family counselors. They’re expected to help resolve questions people have about God’s goodness when they suffer. They’re expected to guide people as to how to find purpose and meaning in life and overcome feelings of emptiness and depression,” says Boteach.

    Looking back, Boteach writes, “When I first started writing self-help books in the early 1990’s I was criticized by fellow rabbis. Such criticism became outright condemnation with the publication, in 1999, of Kosher Sex. But the book stemmed from all the dysfunctional sexual relationships I witnessed in counseling married couples. People trashed the book as something outside the remit of a rabbi. Rabbis should be teaching the Parsha, not teaching couples how to sustain erotic desire. Such criticism was ridiculous, as time would bear out and as the book, and those that followed, garnered international audiences and mainstream embrace. And why? Because if Judaism cannot demonstrate that it has real-world guidance on how to have passionate marriages, raise moral and inspired children, overcome deadening materialism, and countless other real-life matters, then it has no shot at survival. Aside from a small band of the Orthodox, it will die.”

    “People in the West want guidance to overcome emptiness and lust for money that has come to define Western culture,” Rabbi Boteach instructs. “They want more than investing in stocks and bonds. It’s why thousands of Americans still decide to go to college and study humanities and not business. Even in a world where Wall Street, in your first year, will pay you a million bucks, students study history, art, philosophy, and language. Many of them look to religious leadership and religious texts to find that same inspiration but walk away empty and frustrated.”

    “I reject Rabbi Steinsaltz’s view of the rabbi-as-emotional-co-traveler, the rabbi who feels but does not guide,” writes Boteach. “On the contrary, I want to see precisely the opposite. The muscular rabbi who, firm in his convictions, offers a definitive moral philosophy to his congregants. Who, armed with the facts, offers a robust defense of Israel. Who, having earned the respect of the men and women in his shul, tells them, directly, that infidelity is beneath them and that they must electrify each other in bed.”

    “I reject the rabbi as spiritual sissy. The rabbi who cries while Jews die is a moral coward. He is guilty of abrogation of leadership. Jewish life is a living drama, not a soap opera,” Boteach adds.

    “The reason why Judaism is waning today, as revealed in this past fall’s Pew Research study on American Jewry, is because Judaism isn’t being shown to work for people,” writes Boteach. “IPhones can make phone calls, surf the net, and give you hundreds of apps to make life easier. But why would anyone go to shul unless we can show that religious attendance makes us less materialistic, less stressed, wiser, more accepting of others, and more content?”

    “‘Which rabbi or rabbinic organization in the State of Israel cares about the young prostitutes at the Tel Baruch beach?’ Rabbi Steinsaltz asks his audience. ‘Most of them do not even know what is happening there.’ Yes, Rabbi Steinsaltz is courageous in calling on rabbis to care for those Jewish society has forgotten. It is paramount for Israeli rabbis, who are often aloof and detached from the fringes of Israeli culture, to know about the problems in their own backyard. We need to care about the myriad of problems that promotes these awful circumstances – poverty, destitution, drug addiction, and the breakdown of the family. But in invoking the prostitutes of Tel Aviv as one of the first callings of a rabbi, Rabbi Steinsaltz sounds like he wants us to emulate Jesus who famously tried to save prostitutes like Mary Magdalene, even as the Jewish people as a whole went to pot. Romans were torturing and murdering Jews by the tens of thousands. The priesthood was corrupt. Israel was under foreign occupation by a brutal power that suppressed their faith. But Jesus was focusing on saving the prostitutes. (And incidentally, I reject this view of Jesus utterly in my book ‘Kosher Jesus’). Yes, those seemingly smaller challenges are very important. Every individual counts. But let’s also have a sense of proportion and priority,” Boteach states.

    Continuing, Rabbi Boteach writes, “Rabbi Steinsaltz is an exalted spiritual leader and a giant among men. But his calling seems so much smaller than the grandness of his once global vision. The Jewish people are suffering on a global scale. On campuses throughout the Western world Israel’s reputation is nearly as bad as North Korea’s. Our shuls are empty except for the Yom Kippur appeal. The Jewish community is approaching a 50 percent divorce rate. According to the recent Pew Research Poll, a third of Jewish Americans own Christmas trees. The same number believe that Jesus is compatible with Judaism. The rabbis at Hillel and Chabad are losing the battles for Israel on campus because they are often afraid of appearing right-wingers and alienating the largely left-wing student body—the last thing we need is rabbis to weep over this stuff.”

    “Empathic rabbis are nice,” says Boteach. “But give me a real leader any day over some mushy, emotional sissy-man who feels my pain. Give me a Martin Luther King who is prepared to march. Give me a Billy Graham who fills stadiums with a call to Christians to return to the gospel. Give me a Pope Francis who sees his Church obsessed with gays and abortion and says, finally, enough, let’s rescue the Church from terminal decline. We need rabbis of courage and gumption to go out and fight the battles of the Jewish people, not a bunch of warm-hearted flower children who cry while the Jewish people go to the grave.”

    “Above all else,” Boteach concludes, “give me leaders like my own teacher, and that of Rabbi Steinsaltz, the great, wise, and incomparable Lubavitcher Rebbe, who saw the Jewish people people in cardiac arrest and applied defibrillators. He was a man with answers and transformed the Jewish world because he had solutions. Yes, he offered comfort to the bereaved and hope to the afflicted. He helped single mothers raise proud Jewish children (I am an example) and extended his tender heart to all in need. But above all else, he flexed his muscles and transformed the Jewish world as we know it. He did not ask, but demanded of his students to leave the comforts of New York and Jerusalem and travel to Katmandu. Witnessing the ravages of the Holocaust and the destruction of assimilation, he didn’t weep, he didn’t wail, he didn’t mourn. Rather, like a brazen lion, he went into action. He sent his followers to Vietnam and South Africa, Kentucky and Australia. He told them they would live there and if need be die there. But the one entity that would not die is the Jewish people, into whom they would breathe new life. When the world condemned Israel for holding on to its ancient lands of Judea and Samaria, conquered in wars of annihilation launched by Nasser and Hussein, the Rebbe railed and thundered that returning these lands would invite further aggression and more dead Jews. He did not care for the price he paid in popularity. He did not care if he was labeled immoderate. He had seen too many dead Jews during the Holocaust to simply cry over more. He made up his mind that, so long as he led them, the Jewish people would live.”


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    37 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    10 years ago

    Rabbi to the stars??

    10 years ago

    Why is it that the word “I” is the most often-found word in anything Boteach writes or says. It’s always about HIM. “I hosted rav Steinsaltz” “I moderated the debate” “I wrote books” “I was attacked”. This could be what Rav Steinsaltz was getting at. We don’t need Rabbis who can’t see beyond their own egos and self-promotion. For ONCE, I’d like to see Boteach write something that does not center on HIMSELF.

    JacobN
    JacobN
    10 years ago

    but what answer does R’ Shmuley have for R’ Steinsaltz’ example of the mamzer?

    Facts1
    Facts1
    10 years ago

    Shmuly, you authored some books, can you name them on a site like VIN?

    thegreatone
    thegreatone
    10 years ago

    My opinion if anyone cares:
    Orthodox Jews should and could care less what rabbi Shmuley Boteach and rabbi Adin Steinsaltz have to say about who is or isn’t a gadol.

    The fact that Steinsaltz was honored by Israeli president SHIMON PERES “with the Presidential Award of Distinction for his monumental commentary on the entire Talmud. Peres praised Steinsaltz ‘for his unique and extraordinary contribution to Jewish culture and education” should be enough reason that Steinsaltz does not talk to US FRUM YIDDEN.

    The fact that BOTEACH wrote books on a CERTAIN TOPIC that frum jews are not allowed to discuss publicly and he dwells in it SHOULD be enough reason that we dont care what he has to say anything regarding judaisim.

    Yitzchok
    Yitzchok
    10 years ago

    I concur with rabbi Steinzaltz. However nobody is stopping rabbi Boteach from becoming the rabbi he thinks a rabbi should be based on his article. I say to rabbi Boteach “Emor mayaat, v’asei harbeh” G-D knows that we can use both the leaders that rabbi’s Steinzalts AND Boteach speak of.

    Secular
    Secular
    10 years ago

    Not adressed to the Orthodox crowd.

    …or is it?

    NYlawyer
    NYlawyer
    10 years ago

    The following is 100% accurate: Shmuely has mischaracterized Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz’s recent op-ed “Who Will Be Our Rabbis?”; Rabbi Steinsaltz’s is not and does not need to be a publicity hound; Shmuely is and needs to be a publicity hound (not necessarily a bad thing); Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz is an intellectual heavyweight; Shmuely is in a different category then Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz (not necessarily a bad thing). A picture is worth a thousand words. Look at the photo.

    10 years ago

    To give him some credit, he does help many of our abused wives and helps them change their lives. He also tells it like it is to the husbands who beat their wives. Sometimes, he makes a difference and brings hope.

    FarRockDude
    FarRockDude
    10 years ago

    Steinzaltz vs. Boteach. Gee….who do you cheer for?

    qazxc
    qazxc
    10 years ago

    Shmuly, intellectually you are still in diapers compared to R’ Steinsaltz. No purpose in reading anything you wrote in response to his article.

    DovidT
    DovidT
    10 years ago

    Atleast 12 “I”s counted. I read it mostly as “I, Shmuely.” It was too distracting to see what he actually wrote…

    zackk
    zackk
    10 years ago

    Makes me wonder if boteach is more interested in writing an article than the actual message… If your foot hurts obviously you do something! boteach adds nothing to article.

    10 years ago

    Somehow the Gematria of Boteach must equal Ego. The man can not stop talking about himself.

    2smart
    2smart
    10 years ago

    שטיינזאלץ, גאון עולם, מחבר כ-100 ספרים
    בוטח, רודף פרסום, ועוד

    זה לעומת זה? שואל סתם

    bored
    bored
    10 years ago

    Omg & Lol! I couldn’t have thought of a funnier twist to this fiasco. It’s like watching the nature channel with one frog stalking its prey and all the while it itself is stalked upon by another frog!

    yathink
    yathink
    10 years ago

    Let’s forget for a moment that the author is the same person to bring you books titled Kosher…. and Kosher JES_S….

    “It’s true,” Boteach writes, “as both Socrates and the Zohar state……..

    He has the CHUTZPAH to use and compare Socrates & the Zohar in the same sentence.

    Do you need any further reason to stop reading his nonsense?

    InsideOne
    InsideOne
    10 years ago

    Steinsalz: What happened to “we”?
    Boteach: “We is for sissies.” And lest anyone forget, it’s all about “Me, me, me.”

    And the rest is commentary.

    10 years ago

    The only sissie rabbits I know are reform,conservative or open orthodox who support gay marriage. The real Rabbis are not sissies. They don’t cave in to the secular atheists like peres and company.Its the sissies that support evolution and other such science fiction nonsense.

    YITZCHOKLEVI
    Active Member
    YITZCHOKLEVI
    10 years ago

    Wow! Boteach really has a “Phobia” about being called a sissy. He thinks that really connecting to another Jews pain is “sissy” like. I wonder what that’s about.

    BEHAC
    BEHAC
    10 years ago

    I did not, initially, wish to get involved in this subject, but SB’s final comment about the Lubavitcher Rebbe being the ‘ideal’ about whom Rabbi Steinsaltz was referring to, just convinces me that this is exactly what Rabbi Steinsaltz was aiming at, without, in fact, verbalising it.
    Rabbi Steinsaltz is actually looking for Rabbis of this calibre and outlook on the future of Yiden and Yiddishkeit and not the type of ‘Rabbis’ that SB is suggesting might help.

    10 years ago

    Shmuley Boteach is to the rabbinate the same way that a beach is to a clock tower. I do not think that his synopsis is of any value and clearly his books were not worth a penny to me in my true Voice of Jewish Freedom.

    But let him have his say. I do not think he has a method that brings any true vision to true redemption.

    hashomer
    hashomer
    10 years ago

    In debating we call this setting up a straw man, a weak misrepresentation of your opponent’s position, easily knocked down. Reb Steinsaltz is a giant, Shmooley is a celebrity rabbi for TV. Too bad the Shmool had to attack the Reb to get some point across.

    zackk
    zackk
    10 years ago

    Makes me wonder if boteach is more interested in writing an article than the actual message… If your foot hurts obviously you do something! boteach adds nothing to article.

    10 years ago

    Rabbi Steinsatz is being honest and simply saying we don’t need Rabbis to pretend that they know everything and have all the answers, just be human instead of putting on a show for the masses. Rabbi Boteach is a charismatic intellectual but is too busy admiring himself in the mirror.

    bsocheami
    bsocheami
    10 years ago

    Would Carlbach qualify for Stensaltz picture of a Godol ? Hes got the ahavas yisroel and the sissy stuff. He sings and dances too. I vote Carlbach.

    10 years ago

    While I am not knocking chabad’s good work they do have some of the problems that R Stiensalz’s points out in the article.
    If you are not interested in becoming one of them they get very cold and won’t talk to you. They are only interested in being mekarav people who will become Lubvatichers. To them other sects of yiddishkit is not worthwhile looking at or talking to. And if you are a frum litfak forget about it. Do you know how many times I have crossed paths with them and the first thing they will say is oh your a lakewooder ech your a litfak get out of here.

    Oh and by the way I don’t look at chabad that way. I consider them full jews and would do anything to help any chabadska in need even if not my mehlach hchaim.

    shlishkes
    shlishkes
    10 years ago

    I didn’t think I could have any less respect for Boteach but now he’s plunged even lower in my estimation. He is not even close to the caliber of an Adin Steinsalz yet has the extreme chutzpah to lash out against the Rav in public. While he was cavorting with Michael Jackson and bringing him home for Friday night meals with his family, Rav Steinsaltz was completing translation of the Talmud. While he was and continues to write filth, Rav Steinsalz continues to teach and inspire.

    BTW, Boteach was stripped of his shlichus status at Oxford and is not accepted at all in Chabad and would probably not dare to speak of the Rebbe if he were alive.