Welcome, Guest! - or
Easy to remember!  »  VinNews.com

New York - NYT Editorial: Snowden 'Justified,' Deserves Lighter Punishment

Published on: January 2, 2014 12:00 PM
By: Reuters
Change text size Text Size  
Bookmark and Share
FILE - The signature on the letter of fugitive former U.S. spy agency contractor Edward Snowden is pictured during a news conference in Berlin, November 1, 2013. ReutersFILE - The signature on the letter of fugitive former U.S. spy agency contractor Edward Snowden is pictured during a news conference in Berlin, November 1, 2013. Reuters

New York -  The U.S. government should grant former NSA contractor Edward Snowden clemency or a plea bargain given the public value of revelations over the National Security Agency’s vast spying programs, the New York Times editorial board said on Thursday.

In its lead editorial, the newspaper said Americans now more fully understand how widely their phone calls, emails and other information are tracked. Information provided to journalists by Snowden has also prompted needed legal review of the intelligence gathering and led a presidential panel to call for a major overhaul of the agency, it said.

Advertisement:

“Considering the enormous value of the information he has revealed, and the abuses he has exposed, Mr. Snowden deserves better than a life of permanent exile, fear and flight. He may have committed a crime to do so, but he has done his country a great service,” the New York Times’ editorial board wrote.

The Guardian, a British newspaper that along with The Washington Post received Snowden’s leaked documents, also called for President Barack Obama to pardon Snowden in its own editorial published on Wednesday.

“We hope that calm heads within the present administration are working on a strategy to allow Mr Snowden to return to the U.S. with dignity, and the president to use his executive powers to treat him humanely and in a manner that would be a shining example about the value of whistleblowers and of free speech itself,” The Guardian wrote.

Snowden, living in Russia with temporary asylum, last year leaked documents he collected while working for the NSA. The United States has charged him with espionage, and more charges could follow.

The disclosures have sparked a debate over how much leeway to give the U.S. government in gathering information to protect Americans from terrorism, and have prompted numerous lawsuits.

Last week, a federal judge ruled that the NSA’s collection of phone call records is lawful, while another judge earlier in December questioned the program’s constitutionality. The issue is now more likely to move before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Snowden’s Russian amnesty is due to expire in August. He could face at least 30 years in prison over current charges but is more likely to face up to life in prison, the Times said.

NSA’s incoming deputy director, Rick Ledgett, recently told CBS News he would favor negotiating an amnesty with Snowden in exchange for securing the documents in his possession, but the White House has dismissed that suggestion.

The New York Times editorial board said Snowden “was clearly justified” in his leaks given that current whistleblower laws do not cover private contractors.

The editorial listed several ways the NSA had violated the public trust, saying it broke federal privacy laws “thousands of times a year,” undermined the Internet’s basic encryption system and breached the communications links of data centers around the world.

Obama, who has called on Snowden to return to the United States, should instead give him “an incentive to return home,” it said.

“When someone reveals that government officials have routinely and deliberately broken the law, that person should not face life in prison at the hands of the same government,” the newspaper wrote.


More of today's headlines

New York - Snapchat, the disappearing-message service popular with young people, has been quiet following a security breach that allowed hackers to collect the... New York - The historic bible once owned by FDR used for Mayor Bill de Blasio’s swearing in ceremony went missing New Year’s Day. The New York Post...

 

Total12

Read Comments (12)  —  Post Yours »

1

 Jan 02, 2014 at 12:20 PM bennyt Says:

The liberal trash anti-semitic and anti-Israel New York Times will soon disappear off the face of the planet so let them have their last licks.

2

 Jan 02, 2014 at 12:53 PM charliehall Says:

I guess if Jewish rags can claim that Pollard's espionage was justified, then the NY Slimes can claim that Snowden's espionage was justified. (That is the first time I've ever used that derogatory term, but it fits in this case.)

3

 Jan 02, 2014 at 01:12 PM Anonymous Says:

Gelt makes the simple jealous

4

 Jan 02, 2014 at 01:16 PM The Commish Says:

And what of Pollard?

5

 Jan 02, 2014 at 01:43 PM jay Says:

I agree with NYT

6

 Jan 02, 2014 at 02:09 PM The_Truth Says:

Reply to #2  
charliehall Says:

I guess if Jewish rags can claim that Pollard's espionage was justified, then the NY Slimes can claim that Snowden's espionage was justified. (That is the first time I've ever used that derogatory term, but it fits in this case.)

Why are you all blaming / cursing / trashing the messengers? Forget the editorials in the media - what do you think should happen to Pollard or Snowden? Do you think either was justified?

7

 Jan 02, 2014 at 02:27 PM YITZCHOKLEVI Says:

Reply to #5  
jay Says:

I agree with NYT

That's all, no explanation?

8

 Jan 02, 2014 at 02:27 PM Liepa Says:

The NYT editorial board (bored), please don't make me cry from laughter. In order for the USA to possibly prevent another 9/11 the NSA needs to do what it needs to do. Yes, the methods might be ugly at times but terrorism on innocent people isn't pretty and is in fact uglier when compared to what the NSA has ever done.
Snowden is a traitor, nothing less and deserves the book thrown at him for the untold damage he's caused this country.

9

 Jan 02, 2014 at 02:46 PM Pops Says:

Snowden is such a hero? Let him run for President of the United States. Can't do much worse than the current liberal in office.

10

 Jan 02, 2014 at 03:38 PM jay Says:

Reply to #7  
YITZCHOKLEVI Says:

That's all, no explanation?

After reading the artical no explanations are needed

Looks like only people still agreeing with NSA are VIN commentators

11

 Jan 02, 2014 at 05:51 PM Liepa Says:

Reply to #5  
jay Says:

I agree with NYT

Who cares!

12

 Jan 02, 2014 at 07:27 PM Ray_from_PA Says:

The NYT is again for anything that weakens the US. If he was so interested in safeguarding US citizens, he could have spoken with Rand Paul, Darrel Issa, Mike Lee, and others. They understand the meaning of personal liberty. By revealing our secrets to our enemies, he is an enemy of the state.

13

Sign-in to post a comment

Scroll Up
Advertisements:

Sell your scrap gold and broken jewelry and earn hard cash sell gold today!