Camden, NJ - Neulander Killer Seeking to Overturn His Sentence |
|
Jenoff, the key prosecution witness against Neulander in two trials, has claimed in papers filed in court that he was not properly represented by his defense attorney when he worked out a plea deal with prosecutors.
Jenoff, 62, pleaded guilty to aggravated manslaughter in the death of Carol Neulander, who was found beaten to death in her Cherry Hill home on Nov. 1, 1994.
Jenoff was represented by attorney Francis J. Hartman when he agreed to cooperate more than five years after the murder. In his filings, Jenoff alleges that Hartman was often inattentive at court proceedings and meetings in which his plea agreement was worked out. Hartman has long been considered one of the top defense attorneys in South Jersey.
Jenoff said the "sweetheart deal" he was promised was a five-year prison sentence. He also claimed in the letter that he tailored his testimony, which he described as "rehearsed and often false," to please investigators.
On the witness stand during two trials, Jenoff detailed how Fred Neulander promised him $30,000 if he would kill his wife. He said Neulander wanted his wife dead.
Jenoff said he met Neulander while attending Alcoholics Anonymous meetings at his synagogue, Congregation M'kor Shalom in Cherry Hill. Jenoff said he was only paid $7,500 for the hit.
He pleaded guilty and testified for the prosecution.
Neulander, 66, was convicted of first-degree murder in November 2002 and is serving a life sentence with a stipulation of no parole for 30 years. He has been in jail for about eight years.
The case is before Superior Court Judge Thomas A. Brown.
More of today's headlines
“Queens, NY - Two rookie cops are under investigation for a scam involving overtime pay and possibly bogus summonses. The officers, assigned to the 113th Precinct...” Queens, NY - Cops Probed in Bogus Summons Scam
Brooklyn, NY - Former Arabic School Principal Faces Defamation Suit




Total10
Read Comments (10) — Post Yours »
1
May 18, 2008 at 12:58 AM Anonymous Says:
a murder belongs of the street for his entire life nomateer what or even death penelty. some diagrees?
2
May 18, 2008 at 01:25 AM Anonymous Says:
I believe you mean to say:
A murderer belongs off the streets for his entire life no matter what, maybe they even deserve the death penalty. Down anyone disagree?
And thank you for that highly intelligent, thought out and double read comment
3
May 18, 2008 at 01:26 AM Anonymous Says:
Sorry about that the last two lines should have been:
Does anyone disagree?
And thank you for that highly intelligent, thought out and double checked comment
4
May 18, 2008 at 04:31 AM lavdafka Says:
WOW ... funny thing .. they just aired it tonight as a documentary ‘suburban secrets’ .. it was well done program!
5
May 18, 2008 at 12:07 PM larry Says:
am i missing something here?
the one who did the murder gets 5 years while the one who hired him gets 30 years
6
May 18, 2008 at 02:45 PM murray Says:
yep--welcome to the world of plea bargaining.
7
May 18, 2008 at 08:42 PM tzaddik Says:
With reshoim like these,who needs anti semites? MURDER is a capital crime even if someone asked you to do it. The killer should get the stronger punishment.
8
May 19, 2008 at 12:23 AM Anonymous Says:
ain shliach lidevar aveira...
9
May 19, 2008 at 04:18 AM Matzahlocal101 Says:
>And thank you for that highly intelligent, thought out and double read comment
One does not begin a sentence with "And".
You also forgot a comma and a period. The proper phrase is "proofread", not "double read".
I believe you meant to say:
Thank you for that highly intelligent, thought out, and proofread comment.
10
May 19, 2008 at 04:22 AM Matzahlocal101 Says:
>ain shliach lidevar aveira...
That is correct as the Rambam points out: If Reuvain pays Shimon to kill Levi. Reuvain correctly taynas that I didn't touch Levi and I didn't force Shimon to take the money. Ain shliach l'dvar avairah. And Bais Din says: "You are absolutely right", as they usher him into the Kippa, for the sake of tikun oilum.