Washington – Sen. Ted Cruz vowed Thursday to continue blocking confirmation of a series of ambassadorial and other diplomatic nominees despite the Federal Aviation Administration lifting a ban on U.S. airline flights to Israel. The State Department criticized the Republican lawmaker.
Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
Cruz said he wouldn’t release the holds until the Obama administration answers his questions about the FAA’s prohibition, which went into effect Tuesday after a rocket landed about a mile from the Tel Aviv airport. The FAA ended the ban late Wednesday, after Cruz accused Obama of imposing an economic boycott of Israel while it is fighting the militant group Hamas in Gaza.
“There are still serious questions as to the decision-making that went in to the ban on flights and whether it was driven by political consideration at the White House or by objective expert opinion at the agency,” the Texas senator said Thursday.
Cruz is demanding to know why Israel was singled out, while commercial flights can still pass over Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Ukraine — where a Malaysia Airlines jet was downed, killing all 298 people on board. The FAA prohibited flights over Ukraine’s Crimea in April and has ruled out overflights of the east of the country since last week’s crash.
Cruz also wants to see any communication between the FAA, White House and State Department to see if the ban on landings in Tel Aviv was designed to punish Israel or advance cease-fire efforts. Almost 800 Palestinians have been killed in fighting over the last 16 days, mostly civilians, according to Gaza health officials. Israel has lost more than 30 soldiers and at least two civilians.
For the second straight day, the suggestion of political motivation behind the flight ban drew a sharp response from the State Department.
“It’s just perplexing,” spokeswoman Marie Harf said of Cruz’s action. “The notion that he would put a hold on State Department nominees when he really has questions for the FAA just doesn’t really make sense.”
The objective of the flight ban “was purely security and safety of American citizens, pilots, people on these planes,” she said. “The nominees we have up in the Senate are for some very critical positions. They need to move forward. If everybody’s concerned about our foreign policy, we need people in those positions.”
A day earlier, Harf called Cruz’s comments “ridiculous and offensive.”
Catherine Frazier, Cruz’s spokeswoman, fired back that Obama’s foreign policy was itself “ridiculous and offensive.”
The holds mean the U.S. cannot appoint a new ambassador to Russia as well as ambassadors to key U.S. allies including France, Norway, South Korea and Turkey. Envoys involved in arms control and nuclear nonproliferation also are affected.
The nominees would probably have been forced to wait longer anyhow. A larger Senate logjam over issues unrelated to foreign policy has brought confirmations to a crawl, prompting complaints from Secretary of State John Kerry and White House spokesman Josh Earnest.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said Thursday he recently spoke by telephone with Obama about the issue. There has been a slight uptick in confirmations in the last couple of weeks.
You mean questions such as, “Why did the FAA take this action involving Israel when it has never stopped planes from flying to Pakistan or Ukraine?”
While he’s at it, maybe he can also ensure that the IRS coughs up those missing emails that were “lost” due to 20 coincidental hard drive failures.
Thank you, Senator Cruz! You are just the a friend we need in Washington. Unrestrained, Obame would be even more hostile to Israel. Hope you will be the next President!
Good for you, senator Cruz, the FAA ban on flights to Israel, certainly smacks with political overtones. The proof of course is, that other countries, just as dangerous, if not more so, than the conflict currently ongoing in Israel, gaza weren’t banned by the FAA from flying there.
Very exciting to discover that there is an elected official who has not been emasculated.
The FAA gave these terrorists a day of victory.
In her book, “Flying Blind, Flying Safe”, the former Inspector General of the U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Mary Schiavo, has stated that the FAA could care less about unsafe airlines and passenger safety. Essentially, she stated that the FAA cares more about keeping airlines in business, than in safety issues. Therefore, I never believed the bubba-meises which the FAA floated (along with the State Dept.), that their ban into Ben-Gurion was for reasons of safety. When the Taliban recently attacked the Karachi Airport in Pakistan, not once, but twice, causing a tremendous loss of life, and damage to the terminal and aircraft, there was no ban enacted there. Nor, was there a ban pertaining to flights going to Afghanistan, Yemen, or the Ukraine. Hence, the FAA, and its puppet, the State Dept., are lying through their teeth. Essentially, the ban was a way of hitting EY in the pocketbook, and teaching it a lesson.
can anyone help start a pension to support ted Cruz efforts? lets go guys!