Washington – Flying Drones Near Stadiums Could Face Up To A Year In Jail

    3

    Washington – Operators who fly drones or model planes near or over large sports stadiums and auto racetracks are breaking the law and can be fined and imprisoned for up to a year, the Federal Aviation Administration warned in a notice posted on the agency’s website.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    The notice marks the first time the FAA has sought to criminalize the use of drones and model planes, attorneys representing drone users said.

    The notice, posted on Monday, updates a previous notice to pilots warning that aircraft are prohibited from flying below 3,000 feet and within 3 miles of a Major League Baseball, National Football League and NCAA Division I college football game for national security reasons. The NSCAR Sprint Cup, Indy Car and Champ series auto races are also included. The prohibition extends from one hour before the events until one hour after.

    The original version of the notice was issued shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and has been previously updated. The original and most recent prior version of the notice, issued in 2009, make no mention of drones or other remotely controlled aircraft.

    The agency decided to update the notice again this week in order to include a new web address, said FAA spokeswoman Laura Brown. While drafting the update, FAA officials decided to “clarify” that drones and model aircraft are included in the prohibition since both are considered “aircraft,” she said.

    New York attorney Brendan Schulman, who represents several drone operators, said the notice is “another attempt by the FAA to impose legal restriction on drones or model aircraft that never existed before.” He said the restrictions “do little or nothing” to prevent terrorist attacks since the three-mile perimeter can be traversed by a plane in minutes or seconds.

    Kenneth Quinn, a former FAA general council who represents several clients concerned about the agency’s drone-related regulations, said sports team have expressed concern to the FAA that drones will be used to photograph or record games, diminishing the value of the teams’ contracts with television networks. He said there is also concern they might crash into spectators.

    On the other hand, sports teams also want permission from the FAA to use drones themselves to make videos of their practices to use in training and to make videos of other teams, said Quinn.

    The Washington Nationals baseball team used a small drone with a camera to shoot photos and video of spring training until learning the FAA bans all commercial use of unmanned aircraft. In August, a man was detained by police for using a small drone a Carolina Panthers football game at Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte, N.C. Police detained a student for flying a small drone at a University of Texas football game in September.

    The prohibition applies to about 150 stadiums in the U.S. that seat 30,000 people or more, Schulman said.

    Many small drones weigh only a few pounds and are virtually indistinguishable from model aircraft, which have grown in sophistication and capability.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    3 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    brachavehatzlocha
    brachavehatzlocha
    9 years ago

    Of course the FAA doesn’t really have the power to enact any legislation. They’re trying to redefine R/C craft (including drones) to have the same legal status of a Boeing 747 or other commercial aircraft so that existing laws will retroactively apply to them. I gotta tell you, they’re not, and they don’t. It would require Congress or state governments to pass laws specifically regulating these devices, which may or may not happen. Some states have already passed drone-specific statutes related to privacy or safety. This whole area is still wide open.

    PaulinSaudi
    PaulinSaudi
    9 years ago

    Security reasons or copyright reasons?

    brachavehatzlocha
    brachavehatzlocha
    9 years ago

    Of course the FAA doesn’t really have the power to enact any legislation. They’re trying to redefine R/C craft (including drones) to have the same legal status of a Boeing 747 or other commercial aircraft so that existing laws will retroactively apply to them. I gotta tell you, they’re not, and they don’t. It would require Congress or state governments to pass laws specifically regulating these devices, which may or may not happen. Some states have already passed drone-specific statutes related to privacy or safety. This whole area is still wide open.