Washington – Judge Declares Obama Immigration Action Unconstitutional

    8

    Washington – President Barack Obama’s new plan to ease the threat of deportation for 4.7 million undocumented immigrants violates the U.S. Constitution, a federal judge found on Tuesday, handing down the first legal ruling against the plan.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    The ruling has no immediate impact, with the government saying there was no reason for Judge Arthur Schwab of the Western District of Pennsylvania to address the issue in the case, which concerns 42-year-old Honduran immigrant Elionardo Juarez-Escobar.

    Schwab is the first judge to rule on the legality of the plan Obama announced on Nov. 20. The executive action by the Democratic president is opposed by Republicans and is already subject to other legal challenges.

    Schwab ruled that the executive action violated the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of separation of powers and the separate “take care clause,” which requires the president to faithfully execute laws passed by Congress.

    Schwab says he ruled on the executive action issue because he concluded that Juarez-Escobar could be eligible for relief under the executive action.

    Government lawyers told Schwab that Juarez-Escobar, who has pleaded guilty to re-entering the country, was not eligible because Obama’s order does not affect criminal proceedings.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    8 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    9 years ago

    May Obama’s all his dictatorial actions be challenged and all found unconstitutional.

    cookookajew
    Member
    cookookajew
    9 years ago

    now watch this. obama will issue another executive order.

    9 years ago

    A federal judge who rules on a matter not before him for a plaintiff with no standing is more worthy of impeachment than the POTUS. Even the most right wing judicial scholar will laugh at his publicity-seeking issuance which will be struck by a first year law clerk for the relevant appellate court.