Tokyo – Japan’s Leader Says He Will Express Remorse For World War II

    3

    Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (C) and his cabinet ministers are escorted by security officers during a customary New Year's visit at Ise shrine in Ise, central Japan, in this photo taken by Kyodo January 5, 2015.  REUTERSTokyo – In a year that marks the 70th anniversary of World War II’s end, a question weighs on the minds of policymakers in Asia and as far away as Washington, D.C.: What will Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe say about his country’s role in the war?

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    At a year-opening news conference Monday, he sought to reassure the world that he wouldn’t veer from past official statements on Japan’s wartime responsibility. Many analysts have speculated that Abe, known for his nationalist views, might downplay Japan’s responsibility for the war in a move that would roil relations with China and South Korea.

    “The Abe Cabinet will uphold the general stance on history of successive prime ministers, including the Murayama statement,” he said, referring to a 1995 apology made by then-Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama on the 50th anniversary of the war’s end.

    He said the government would draft a new statement “that includes Japan’s remorse for the war,” though he stopped short of saying it would again apologize. Abe spoke to reporters in the city of Ise after visiting an important Shinto shrine there.

    The statement is expected to be issued around the anniversary of the end of the war on Aug. 15.

    Seventy years on, the scars of World War II still poison relations in Asia, particularly between Japan and nearby China and South Korea, both victims of Japan’s wartime aggression. Commemorative events will be held around the world, but here it’s not just about remembering the past. The tenor of the events and the specific words chosen by leaders in each country will have current-day implications for Japan’s still strained relations with its neighbors.

    That prospect worries the U.S. government, which fears more tensions at a time when China’s emergence as a military power is shifting the power balance in a region where the U.S. military has long dominated the seas.

    The liberal Asahi newspaper devoted a recent editorial to the statement, saying Abe needs to face up to Japan’s war responsibility.

    “If … Japan starts talking about the future without seriously facing up to its past, countries that suffered from Japan’s wartime behavior could start wondering if the Japanese are saying, ‘Let’s forget the past,'” it wrote.

    Analysts said it’s too early to predict what Abe will say seven months from now. While he may not revise the Murayama statement, he can still undermine it, said Koichi Nakano, a liberal professor of contemporary politics at Sophia University in Tokyo.

    “There has been growing concern that Abe might try to effectively overwrite the Murayama statement with the ‘Abe statement,'” he said.

    Emperor Akihito, in his annual New Year’s message, also stressed the need to remember the past.

    “So many people lost their lives in this war,” he said in a statement. “I think it is most important for us to take this opportunity to study and learn from the history of this war, starting with the Manchurian Incident of 1931, as we consider the future direction of our country.”

    The proof, China says, will lie in Japan’s actions.

    “We hope Japan can match its words, honestly facing up to its history of aggression, (and) abide by all the solemn statements and promises it has made on the issue of history,” Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said Monday.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    3 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    9 years ago

    About time!

    9 years ago

    An apology at this point, doesn’t mean a thing. To this date, Japan has not paid one penny in compensation to the thousands of slave laborers (including American POWs), who were systematically beaten, tortured, starved, and had medical experiments conducted on. Many of the Japanese industries which are prosperous today, have also not paid any compensation. In addition, Japan has never paid any compensation to the thousands of Korean and Chinese comfort women, which were forced to service the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy. Unfortunately, there was no Simon Wiesenthal in Japan, pursuing Japanese war criminals. Hence, many Japanese war criminals got away with their heinous crimes. The US Government was not helpful, either. When former POW’s (including Jewish-American POWs) tried in recent years, to get some compensation, the US Government was not supportive, and in some cases, interfered. Let us never forget the atrocities which the Japanese perpetrated, including forcing captured civilians on the decks of submarines, and then submerging. If they didn’t drown, the sharks got them.