Cuba – Commander: Guantanamo Order Barring Touching By Women Guards Harmful

    5

    In this photo reviewed by U.S. military officials, a U.S. soldier guards a gate within the compound of the U.S. military-run prison in the Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base, Cuba June 26, 2006.  ReutersCuba – A Guantanamo Bay military court order banning female guards from touching an accused al Qaeda commander harms soldiers’ morale and security at the prison, the commander of the prison’s secret lockup for former CIA captives testified on Wednesday.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    The November interim order bars female guards from touching Abd al Hadi al Iraqi, who faces war crimes charges. Iraqi, who is accused of leading attacks in Afghanistan, says that being touched by women guards violates his Muslim faith.

    The commander of Camp Seven, the secret part of the prison in Cuba where the United States keeps former Central Intelligence Agency captives, said the order by Judge Navy Captain J.K. Waits had made guard scheduling difficult and had sent female soldiers’ morale plummeting.

    “We have a motto, ‘One team, one fight.’ Now I have one male team and one female team,” said the Army National Guard military police officer. He testified under a pseudonym during a hearing to determine whether the interim order should stand.

    Under questioning by prosecutor Army Lieutenant Colonel David Long, he said female guards felt that being excluded from assignments was harming their careers. The order also meant less rotation among duties by soldiers, raising the danger of inmates becoming too familiar with guards’ routines, the officer said.

    In his cross-examination, defense lawyer Marine Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Jasper Jr. sought to show that meeting Iraqi’s request was a minor adjustment for guards.

    He asked the officer about different physical training standards for women, about all-women units who handled females in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the small amount of time female guards would interact with Iraqi.

    Asked if he as a commander could educate his guards about Iraqi’s request, the officer said: “I oversee the entire camp, not just one detainee.”

    The issue arose in October when a female guard tried to shackle Iraqi for the first time since he arrived in Guantanamo Bay in 2007. He refused and male soldiers shackled him and moved him back to his cell.

    Female guards have filed a sex discrimination complaint against Waits through the Defense Department. A second judge, Army Colonel James Pohl, also faces a discrimination complaint for a similar order involving Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, and four co-defendants.

    The hearing will continue on Thursday. It was monitored at a media site at Fort Meade, outside Washington.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    5 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    nphatti
    nphatti
    9 years ago

    If he would follow orders, there would be no need to touch this untouchable.

    yonasonw
    Member
    yonasonw
    9 years ago

    Ever heard of the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA)? If State Correction Officers don’t lose their morale when faced with it’s broad and extensive policing, monitoring, and auditing of State correctional practices…then their military chaverim should just man up and accept this barely intrusive order. Stupid!

    MayerAlter
    MayerAlter
    9 years ago

    Agudath Israel of America should file an Amicus Curiae brief in support of Mr. Iraqi. This is a matter of great concern to our community as well. Chas veshalom that one of our stalwarts wrongly accused of crime should find himself in a closed setting and being touched by a female other than one permitted by halocha to be in physical contact with him. This is where Aguda should stand up and be counted. This goes to the very core of America’s much vaunted concern for religious freedom. It is on a level with providing glatt kosher food for us.

    yonasonw
    Member
    yonasonw
    9 years ago

    You say “Those in Gitmo re hard core terrorists who should have zero rights. They are lower tand worse tha animals”…

    A problem is that by the government’s own admission many are not…and the others are accused, but have not been convicted or otherwise adjudicated.

    Do you get it? Do you understand that this goes to the very basis of American criminal jurisprudence?