Sydney – Australian Leader Enrages Muslims After ‘Get With The Program’ Comment

    5

    Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop (L), Education Minister Christopher Pyne (2-R) and Social Services Minister Scott Morrison (R) listen as Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott answers questions at the despatch box during Question Time at Parliament House in Canberra, Australia, 23 February 2015. EPA/MICK TSIKASSydney – Australian Muslims were outraged on Tuesday after Prime Minister Tony Abbott urged their leaders to “get with the program” and do more to combat Islamic extremism.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Abbott gave an address to the nation about security during which he offered pointed criticism of Islamic leaders and their attitudes toward extremism.

    “I’ve often heard western leaders describe Islam as a ‘religion of peace’,” the conservative leader said. “I wish more Muslim leaders would say that more often, and mean it.”

    Local Muslims condemned the premier’s remarks as divisive.

    “We continue to encourage the prime minister to reflect the set of values he espouses by utilizing a repertoire of inclusive rather than divisive language,” said Kuranda Seyit, a spokeswoman for the Islamic Council of Victoria. “The prime minister’s lack of acknowledgement or appreciation of Muslim community leaders and members who volunteer their time to consult with all levels of government and enforcement agencies misleads and incites ill-feeling from the broader community.”

    The story was originally reported by the British newspaper The Guardian.

    Abbott on Monday announced a national security crackdown that could deny welfare payments to people seen as potential threats, strip the passports of those with dual nationality and curb travel overseas.

    Abbott, bruised politically and facing pressure for dramatic action after surviving a leadership challenge this month, unveiled the measures in the wake of a hostage siege in a Sydney cafe that left three dead in December.

    He said some personal freedoms would have to be curtailed to fight a rapidly growing threat from radical groups such as Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.

    “For too long, we have given those who might be a threat to our country the benefit of the doubt,” Abbott said.

    “We will never sacrifice our freedoms in order to defend them, but we will not let our enemies exploit our decency either.”

    He was speaking a day after releasing a report on the siege, in which two hostages and a radical self-styled sheikh who had sought to align himself with Islamic State were killed.

    The conservative Abbott said new laws would remedy failings on the immigration, welfare, policing and intelligence fronts by clamping down on supporters of radicals, especially welfare recipients.

    But one opposition leader called the measures an attempt by a “failing and flailing” leader to regain popularity by stoking community fear.

    “It worked for him in opposition, he thinks it’s going to work for him in government,” Greens Party leader Senator Christine Milne told reporters. “Australians are not going to fall for it.”

    Although Abbott this month fended off a leadership challenge from within his ruling Liberal Party, his poll numbers have languished at historic lows since early last year.

    The laws will also target so-called “hate preachers”, Abbott said, citing as an example the radical but non-violent Islamist group Hizb-ut-Tahrir.

    He explicitly linked welfare to terrorism, accusing dozens of Australians fighting in Syria and Iraq of having been on the dole, and adding that payments to “individuals assessed to be a threat to security” could soon be cancelled.

    “People who come to this country are free to live as they choose. Provided they don’t steal that same freedom from others,” he said.

    Australia, a staunch ally of the United States and its action against the Islamic State group in Syria and Iraq, has been on heightened alert for attacks by home-grown Islamist radicals since last year.

    Content is provided courtesy of the Jerusalem Post


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    5 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    9 years ago

    He is absolutely correct. If radical Islamists are committing their immoral savagery in the name of Islam, then the leaders of Islam are either responsible for their behavior or they must protest it.

    Our own community has a current event of the Epstein trial. The frum community leaders have routinely stated publicly that this derech is not condoned by Torah.

    The “leaders” of Islam should either recognize their responsibility, or they should loudly reject the murder and barbaric practices of radical Islam as foreign to their “religion”.

    9 years ago

    “I’ve often heard western leaders describe Islam as a ‘religion of peace’,” the conservative leader said. “

    Of course he’s referring to Obama. If only our president has the courage of this leader, who is isn’t afraid to tell the truth, to confront the terror and state who’s committing it, and call upon their leaders, the leaders of this “religion of peace,” as Obama says, to stand up and condemn this abomination coming from their people. As Jews know well, shtika k’hoda’a, silence is agreement. The more we see the Muslim leaders don’t stand up and express their disagreement and condemnation of the terror, the more we’re naturally convinced that they, and their religion, do indeed agree with and condone the terror against infidels.

    Rafuel
    Rafuel
    9 years ago

    A dozen years ago, if anybody predicted that soon Canada and Australia will be led by straightforward decent and enlightened leaders who like Jews, and we – by an incompetent Jew hating scoundrel who will deliberately damage his country, would any of you believe it?

    grannysmith
    grannysmith
    9 years ago

    “Standing up and expressing disagreement” is fundamentally against a 1500 year old culture of loyalty that precedes Mohammad in the Arabian peninsula. It’s ‘un-arab’ so you’re not going to see it. they are a religion of peace to all who agree with them and accept their rule. those areas are called ‘Dar el Salaam’. everyplace else is ‘Dar el Harb’ (cherev). Sound peaceful to you?