New York – Law Enforcement Experts: Trooper Had The Law On His Side When He Shot Unarmed Escapee

    7

    Police stand over David Sweat after he was shot and captured near the Canadian border Sunday, June 28, 2015, in Constable, N.Y. Sweat is the second of two convicted murderers who staged a brazen escape three weeks ago from a maximum-security prison in northern New York. His capture came two days after his escape partner, Richard Matt, was shot and killed by authorities. (AP Photo)New York – A state trooper had the law on his side when he shot unarmed prison escapee David Sweat, apparently in the back, as the convicted killer ran toward a forest near the Canadian border.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    State and federal law allows the use of deadly force to prevent an escape if the officer believes the escapee poses a significant threat. Law enforcement experts say this shooting was clear-cut.

    “There cannot be any cleaner situation than this one,” said Maria Haberfeld, head of the law and police science department at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. “You cannot shoot any fleeing felon, but certainly you can shoot the one who poses a real threat. There was no reason to believe this person who had killed a police officer before was not posing a real threat.”

    The same legal reasoning applied to the killing of his accomplice, Richard Matt, who was shot three times in the head on Friday. Unlike Sweat, he was found with a weapon, a 20-gauge shotgun.

    Sweat eluded capture for two more days, until he ran across Sgt. Jay Cook, a 21-year veteran who was part of the huge manhunt for the two convicted murderers, who had used power tools to break out of the Clinton Correctional Facility in upstate Dannemora on June 6. Sweat had been serving life without parole in the killing of a sheriff’s deputy, and Matt had been serving 25 years to life for the killing of his former boss.

    Cook was alone in his car when he spotted someone walking along the side of a road less than 2 miles from the Canadian border. He got out of his car, approached the man and said, “Hey, come over here,” New York State Police Superintendent Joseph D’Amico said.

    Sweat fled, and Cook chased him, firing twice, fearing he would lose the fugitive in the trees, officials said. Photos appeared to show emergency crews tending to Sweat’s back as he sat bloodied in a field. He was listed in serious condition Monday.

    A 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case known as Tennessee v. Garner laid out how force can be used to capture a fleeing suspect: Deadly force can’t be used to prevent escape unless “the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.”

    New York state law also allows for deadly force if a dangerous convict is escaping from a detention facility, which is why armed guards may be stationed in towers at prisons.

    Sweat’s shooting differs from the recent killing of Walter Scott in South Carolina because Scott was stopped for a minor traffic infraction, was unarmed and was not considered a dangerous criminal, experts said. The white officer who shot the black man five times in the back has been charged with murder.

    “But these prisoners, they’ve gone through the justice system,” said Bill Johnson, head of the National Association of Police Organizations. Because they were convicted, “they’re not presumed to be an innocent citizen walking down the street.”

    Some people online questioned the decision to fire, but many lauded the trooper. Gov. Andrew Cuomo called Cook a hero and congratulated him on his “great police work.” Onlookers erupted in cheers when the ambulance carrying Sweat passed by.

    Carl Thomas lives about a half-mile from where Sweat was captured and said troopers made the right decision by killing Matt and shooting Sweat.

    “If he would’ve got in the woods right there, there would be no chance” to catch him, Thomas said of Sweat.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    7 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    8 years ago

    People can have an opinion on this, but you can’t really disagree with the law.

    8 years ago

    he was white so Sharpton won’t demonstrate…………..

    bsnow
    bsnow
    8 years ago

    Let’s say the truth
    I’m sure Obama and Holder would disagree if they we’re black.

    LionofZion
    LionofZion
    8 years ago

    Let’s file this one away for the next time Israel needs to gun down a Palestinian terrorist.

    Facts1
    Facts1
    8 years ago

    But why did they shackle him? They are so indoctrinated, they lost common sense.

    longislanddave
    longislanddave
    8 years ago

    Sweat should consider himself very lucky that the trooper did not shoot to kill. Let’s be honest – the escaped convict is an indicted and convicted murderer. n He is serving a life sentence without parole for murdering a sheriff’s deputy. The trooper could have shot at Sweat with intent to kill to ensure he did not ever have the chance to shoot him or any other law-enforcement officer again.