New York – Judge Says Palestinian Authority Must Post Bond In Terror Support Case

    2

    FILE - Kent Yalowitz (R), lawyer for families suing over attacks attributed to the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades and Hamas, is greeted by Mark Weiss outside the Manhattan Federal Courthouse following a jury's decision in New York February 23, 2015. REUTERSNew York – A U.S. judge ordered the Palestinian Authority and Palestine Liberation Organization on Monday to post $10 million in cash or bond while they appeal a jury’s finding that they supported militant attacks in Israel.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    At a court hearing in Manhattan, U.S. District Judge George Daniels in Manhattan said the defendants must also deposit $1 million each month pending the appeal of a February jury verdict worth $655 million in favor of 10 American families.

    The order came after the Obama administration took the unusual step of urging Daniels to “carefully consider” the Palestinian Authority’s financial condition, saying too high a bond could compromise its ability to function.

    A collapse of the Palestinian Authority “would undermine several decades of U.S. foreign policy and add a new destabilizing factor to the region,” U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a court filing earlier this month.

    Daniels said that in fashioning his order he had given “serious consideration” to the State Department’s position, despite objections from the plaintiffs that the amount was far too low.

    A federal jury in February found the PLO and the Palestinian Authority liable for six shootings and bombings in Israel between 2002 and 2004, which have been attributed to Hamas and the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades.

    The attacks killed 33 people, including several Americans, and injured more than 450.

    The lawsuit, filed in 2004 by U.S. victims and their family members, was brought under a federal statute that automatically tripled the jury’s verdict of $218.5 million to $655.5 million in damages.

    A lawyer for the defendants, Mitchell Berger, said the Palestinian Authority was willing to make a $10 million upfront cash deposit and subsequent monthly payments of $1 million but warned that even those funds would severely hamper its efforts to rebuild schools and provide for needy families.

    Kent Yalowitz, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said the money was a “token amount” and criticized the Palestinian Authority, saying it made payments to terrorists in jail.

    “Instead of focusing on rebuilding schools, maybe it ought to focus on taking terrorists off its payroll,” he said.

    Berger countered that the prisoners in question are administrative detainees, not convicted terrorists, and the payments constitute “cigarette money.”

    Daniels said the full judgment would remain on hold while the appeal is ongoing, unless the defendants fail to make the monthly deposits.

    He also denied a request from the plaintiffs to add $165 million in pre-judgment interest.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    2 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Voice-of-Reason
    Voice-of-Reason
    8 years ago

    Will Nebech hamper tunnel construction.

    8 years ago

    This judge just put his future and career at risk. The Obama administration is against any judgment levied against the PA and PLO, and it has already made its intention known. I would expect some event outside the norm to remove this judge from the bench, perhaps the field of law, maybe even to impose a threat to his life to emanate from the White House. During the Clinton years, there were numerous mysterious deaths of individuals opposed to Clinton liberalism or other obsessions that characterized that administration. Plane crashes, “suicides”, etc. Remember? I have not seen enough morality associated with the current administration to expect they will behave better.