Washington - Obama Names Former Clinton Chief of Staff Panetta As C.I.A. Director |
|
Mr. Panetta has a reputation in Washington as a competent manager with strong background in budget issues, but has little hands-on intelligence experience. If confirmed by the Senate, he will take control of the agency most directly responsible for hunting senior Al Qaeda leaders around the globe, but one that has been buffeted since the Sept. 11 attacks by leadership changes and morale problems.
Given his background, Mr. Panetta is a somewhat unusual choice to lead the C.I.A., an agency that has been unwelcoming to previous directors perceived as outsiders, such as Stansfield M. Turner and John M. Deutch. But his selection points up the difficulty Mr. Obama had in finding a C.I.A. director with no connection to controversial counterterrorism programs of the Bush era.
Mr. Deutch, now a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said Mr. Panetta and Dennis Blair, who was selected by Mr. Obama to become director of national intelligence, were an “absolutely brilliant team,” and called Mr. Panetta a “talented and experienced manager of government and a widely respected person with congress.”
He said that given global environment, there are indeed good reasons for Mr. Obama to select a C.I.A. veteran to lead the C.I.A. But he said that two of the agency’s most successful directors, John McCone and George H.W. Bush, had little or no intelligence intelligence experience when they took over at C.I.A.
Aides have said Mr. Obama had originally hoped to select a C.I.A. head with extensive field experience, especially in combating terrorist networks. But his first choice for the job, John O. Brennan, had to withdraw his name amidst criticism over his role in the formation of the C.I.A’s detention and interrogation program after the Sept. 11 attacks.
Members of Mr. Obama’s transition also raised concerns about other candidates, even some Democratic lawmakers with intelligence experience. Representative Jane Harman of California, formerly the senior Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, had hoped to get the job, but she was ruled out as a candidate in part because of her early support for some Bush administration programs like the domestic eavesdropping program.
In disclosing the pick, officials pointed to Mr. Panetta’s sharp managerial skills, his strong bipartisan standing on Capitol Hill, his significant foreign policy experience in the White House and his service on the Iraq Study Group, the bipartisan panel that examined the war and made recommendations on United States policy. The officials noted that he had a handle on intelligence spending from his days as director of the Office and Management and Budget.
“He will bring a wealth of knowledge of the government to the C.I.A. post and an outside perspective that I think might be helpful at this juncture in the C.I.A.’s history,” said Lee Hamilton, the former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and a co-chairman of the Iraq Study Group.
As C.I.A. director, Mr. Panetta would report to Mr. Blair, a retired admiral. Neither choice has yet been publicly announced. The C.I.A. has settled down from years of turmoil after the Sept. 11 attacks and fallout from flawed intelligence assessments about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction programs.
At the same time, it faces uncertainly about where it fits in the constellation of spy agencies operating under the director of national intelligence. In recent months, Michael V. Hayden, the current C.I.A. director, has clashed with Mike McConnell, the current director of national intelligence, about Mr. McConnell’s efforts to fill top intelligence jobs overseas with officers from across the intelligence community, not just the C.I.A.
Mr. Panetta, a native of Monterey, Calif., served eight terms in the House representing his home region before becoming the chief budget adviser to President Bill Clinton in 1993. He then served as Mr. Clinton’s chief of staff from July 1994 to January 1997.
Given the focus on the intelligence apparatus in the wake of the terror attacks and the ongoing conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, Mr. Obama’s selections in the intelligence field are expected to be closely examined.
Mr. Hamilton said that if confirmed, Mr. Panetta will have the advantage of moving to the agency headquarters in Langley, Va. with a strong relationship to Mr. Obama, which can translate into influence within the broader intelligence community. He said Mr. Panetta’s lack of hands-on intelligence experience can be supplemented by others.
“You have to look at the team,” he said. “You clearly will want intelligence professionals at the highest levels of the C.I.A.,” he said.
More of today's headlines
“Manhattan, NY - A prosecutor says disgraced financier Bernard Madoff violated bail conditions by mailing about $1 million worth of jewelry and other assets to relatives...”
Manhattan, NY - US Govt To Judge: Jail Madoff Without Bail
Jerusalem - Former Head of Mossad: Talking To The Enemy is The Only Answer




Total18
Read Comments (18) — Post Yours »
1
Jan 05, 2009 at 03:18 PM Lo Hoyu Avodecha Meraglim Says:
Someone who's not an intel good o' boy is more likely to fix a broken system.
2
Jan 05, 2009 at 04:18 PM Anonymous Says:
dude look at his resume. he is deffinitely intelligent
3
Jan 05, 2009 at 04:45 PM Anonymous Says:
so much for change!
4
Jan 05, 2009 at 04:45 PM Anonymous Says:
Ye this is the major change we need.
Change the white house to all clintonites.
5
Jan 05, 2009 at 04:30 PM Anonymous Says:
“ dude look at his resume. he is deffinitely intelligent ”
But how is this Change we can believe in?
6
Jan 05, 2009 at 06:05 PM Anonymous Says:
“ But how is this Change we can believe in? ”
because its not the corrupt group of loonies we have had for the last 8 years.
7
Jan 05, 2009 at 07:14 PM Anonymous Says:
Another brilliant Obama decision - bring in another Clinton failure to run a critically vital organization.
Where is Madeline (halfwit) Albright - maybe she can get a job too?
8
Jan 05, 2009 at 06:52 PM Charlie Hall Says:
The last person with this little experience in intelligence matters to be appointed CIA director was George Herbert Walker Bush. And we know what happened to him!
9
Jan 05, 2009 at 07:33 PM Anonymous Says:
If he wanted to put in a Democrat with absolutely no real intelligence experience (and I DON'T mean experience as the head government bean-counter numbers-crunching the CIA's budget, to nickel-and-dime his way to some pre-determined spending figure; my accountant, who, like Mr. Panetta, also has never been an intelligence professional and who also knows nothing of the shadowy and deadly world of big-league spying and covert activities, could do that task just as well), Obama should have just picked Caroline Kennedy.
Note also that Panetta is a long-time Clinton toady, and likely will play his appointed role as Hillary's puppet -- while the role of the CIA is to provide the President with INDEPENDENT intelligence assessments that he would not get from the political hack ambassadors and careerist bureaucrats at State whose main activity seems to be trying to butter up hostile nations we have to deal with (read: the Arabs) in hopes of landing themselves lucrative plum jobs as consultants once they retire from government service.
10
Jan 05, 2009 at 08:49 PM robroy560 Says:
“ The last person with this little experience in intelligence matters to be appointed CIA director was George Herbert Walker Bush. And we know what happened to him! ”
Yes, what did happen to him? I think history said he restored order to the CIA and rebuilt morale after the Senator Church hearings. The man is a patriot and a WWII hero.
No, I'm not a Bush I Kool-Aid drinker. He, Baker and others were a bunch Arabists who sold out Israel.
This is a problem because B. Hussein Obama hates the Bush intelligence. So an outsider in this case is worse. Gee, it was Jamie Goerelick's assinine wall of separation betwenn FBI & CIA that gave us no clue on what was going on before 9/11. But Jamie did fine; she went on to Fannie Mae.
Pannetta is a Clintinoid Hack. You mean there was no ex-military guy for this job? CIA is supposed to be non-partisan!
11
Jan 05, 2009 at 08:15 PM Anonymous Says:
“ If he wanted to put in a Democrat with absolutely no real intelligence experience (and I DON'T mean experience as the head government bean-counter numbers-crunching the CIA's budget, to nickel-and-dime his way to some pre-determined spending figure; my accountant, who, like Mr. Panetta, also has never been an intelligence professional and who also knows nothing of the shadowy and deadly world of big-league spying and covert activities, could do that task just as well), Obama should have just picked Caroline Kennedy.
Note also that Panetta is a long-time Clinton toady, and likely will play his appointed role as Hillary's puppet -- while the role of the CIA is to provide the President with INDEPENDENT intelligence assessments that he would not get from the political hack ambassadors and careerist bureaucrats at State whose main activity seems to be trying to butter up hostile nations we have to deal with (read: the Arabs) in hopes of landing themselves lucrative plum jobs as consultants once they retire from government service. ”
oh please. and what of bush sr. who was ciz director, then vice president and president? while nixons boy cheney became... aw skip it. you people know nothing about history anyways. this is how it goes. like how many of the current bush's admin were passed around from his daddy's presidency and the past rebpulican's; cronies? it boggels the mind.
12
Jan 05, 2009 at 08:14 PM HOPE Says:
another clinton faliure ! he is surrounding himself with rotten liberals all around .... but we believe as we're tought ... LEIV MELUCHIM V'SURIM B'YAD HASHEM hopfull for the good of the U.S.A. and especialy klal yisruel
13
Jan 05, 2009 at 11:38 PM Charlie Hall Says:
Panetta was no "Clinton failure". Remember that Clinton produced balanced budgets several years in a row. The Clinton record on budgets is a lot better than the Bush record on intelligence!
14
Jan 06, 2009 at 02:39 AM Anonymous Says:
at least these people have been around the block. not like bush appointments like mike heckuvajob brown
15
Jan 06, 2009 at 02:38 AM Anonymous Says:
“ Yes, what did happen to him? I think history said he restored order to the CIA and rebuilt morale after the Senator Church hearings. The man is a patriot and a WWII hero.
No, I'm not a Bush I Kool-Aid drinker. He, Baker and others were a bunch Arabists who sold out Israel.
This is a problem because B. Hussein Obama hates the Bush intelligence. So an outsider in this case is worse. Gee, it was Jamie Goerelick's assinine wall of separation betwenn FBI & CIA that gave us no clue on what was going on before 9/11. But Jamie did fine; she went on to Fannie Mae.
Pannetta is a Clintinoid Hack. You mean there was no ex-military guy for this job? CIA is supposed to be non-partisan! ”
he wanted brennan originally
16
Jan 06, 2009 at 02:36 AM Anonymous Says:
if you been following the news, originally obama had in mind for cia director, his own transition team intelligence advisor John Brennan who did not want the job.
17
Jan 06, 2009 at 02:34 AM Anonymous Says:
Its funny how this one appointement warrants its own article so that people can ridicule that he worked for clinton. nevermind all the other appointments made by obama today especially head of National Intelligence chief Dennis Blair.
These are all "change' indeed as it is a big change from the people and policies of the failed bush administration.
18
Jan 06, 2009 at 03:03 PM Anonymous Says:
this is a big change from all of the incompetent bush cronies!