Welcome, Guest! - or
Easy to remember!  »  VinNews.com

Jerusalem - Israel's Hamodia Blasts Mishpacha For Cover Shot Depicting Hillary Clinton

Published on: November 6, 2016 02:11 PM
Change text size Text Size  

Jerusalem - Mishpacha magazine’s cover photograph showing a shadowed silhouette of Hillary Clinton’s face has drawn criticism from an Israeli newspaper for lowering the standards of Charedi journalism.

An editorial which appeared in the Israeli edition of Hamodia pulled no punches in its criticism, reported Arutz Sheva.

“True Charedi newspapers would never publish pictures of women at all, even those who have reached high ranking office,” read the editorial.  “These are the directives by which we live our lives and the precautions that surround us and they do not change in the realm of politics.”

The Hamodia editorial said that the secular world understands that Charedi publications subscribe to a high standard of modesty that precludes the inclusion of photographs of women and that they realize that a lack of photo coverage does not indicate a lack of support for a particular individual but is part of the way that G-d fearing Jews conduct their lives.

Advertisement:

The cover of the November 2nd issue of Mishpacha showed similar images of both candidates on opposite sides of the page, divided by the headline “Down to the Wire.”  Both the picture of Donald Trump and that of Hillary Clinton were overlaid with images of campaign posters that somewhat obscured their faces. 

A response from Mishpacha said that halachic authorities were consulted before the cover design was finalized.

“Every decision is made after speaking with the spiritual committee of communal rabbis in America and that is why we decided to publish the picture in the fashion we did.”


More of today's headlines

Washington - The FBI said on Sunday it stood by its earlier recommendation that no criminal charges were warranted against Democrat Hillary Clinton for using a private... New York - Eritrea's Ghirmay Ghebreslassie has won the New York City Marathon in the men's field. Ghebreslassie finished his debut in New York with an unofficial time...

 

Total38

Read Comments (38)  —  Post Yours »

1

 Nov 06, 2016 at 02:35 PM ShatzMatz Says:

Well, guess what. This issue of Mishpacha flew off the shelves. You couldn't get a copy in any store this Friday. So if seems like the public doesn't give a hoot the taliban rules imposed about discredited rabonim.

What was much worse was when several chareidi newspapers photoshopped hillary out of existence. That was a chillul hashem. Now that she is going to be the leader of the free world it would behoove the chareidi press to come up with a workable compromise that would allow he photo to be shown in certain circumstance as long as certain guidelines are followed. Such as no face closeups and lower resolution picture. But what should certainly not be done is pixelate or blurr her out of pictures.

2

 Nov 06, 2016 at 03:12 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #1  
ShatzMatz Says:

Well, guess what. This issue of Mishpacha flew off the shelves. You couldn't get a copy in any store this Friday. So if seems like the public doesn't give a hoot the taliban rules imposed about discredited rabonim.

What was much worse was when several chareidi newspapers photoshopped hillary out of existence. That was a chillul hashem. Now that she is going to be the leader of the free world it would behoove the chareidi press to come up with a workable compromise that would allow he photo to be shown in certain circumstance as long as certain guidelines are followed. Such as no face closeups and lower resolution picture. But what should certainly not be done is pixelate or blurr her out of pictures.

They were available in the 2 supermarkets I was at Friday.

3

 Nov 06, 2016 at 02:40 PM Baron Says:

Hamodia... =Taliban publication

4

 Nov 06, 2016 at 02:51 PM jack-l Says:

"Lowering the standards of chareidi journalism" now that is the definition of an oxymoron.

5

 Nov 06, 2016 at 03:11 PM ALTERG3 Says:

Why are they not saying clearly the names of the rabbi's?
Had a few workmates that they unsuscribe friday form hamodia,
its really a shame from them jews had standards & we souldnt break it.

6

 Nov 06, 2016 at 03:18 PM sighber Says:

The first mention of tznius in the Torah is in this week's Rashi in parshas Lech Lecha. Avraham Avinu was not aware of his wife's beauty because of the tznius of them.
It also seems to be the opposite of tznius for a woman to in politics.

7

 Nov 06, 2016 at 03:52 PM Judith Says:

Hamodias reaction is laughable. Nothing wrong with a tznius picture of a woman, just like there's nothing wrong with a picture of a tznius man.

8

 Nov 06, 2016 at 03:54 PM SammyPos Says:

I def don't think there's any issue of Chilul Hashem here at all. Everybody understands our standards, Hillary even more, if she knows her husband! It's a very acceptable practise, even though England, Scotland, Ireland, Germany etc all have woman leaders, we will not portray them.

9

 Nov 06, 2016 at 03:59 PM LionofZion Says:

It is preposterous that any mainstream orthodox publication would subscribe to any of these seyugim and gedarim. Chasidim can and should create whatever publications they like, but non-Chasidim do a disservice to Halacha and our own Mesorah when we cave in to their Chumros. There are plenty of problem in the Chadidish community, but the greatest is that they are so caught up in the extra curricular stuff that they mess up with real Halacha, things like mishkav Zachor in their Mikvaos, support for the guy raping a teenager behind a door with three locks, child abuse in Yeshivos by Rebeim who feel it is okay to hurt little boys without cause, and all of the financial stuff that has gotten us inoculated, shamefully, from the sight of "Frum" people getting arrested regularly.
There is no good reason to keep Hillary Clinton off the cover of a newspaper. Let's focus on what is important like keeping her out of the White House.

10

 Nov 06, 2016 at 04:03 PM Anonymous Says:

The irony here is that hillary gets cut out of pictures but she's endorsed for by the very same corrupt people

11

 Nov 06, 2016 at 04:13 PM amerikaner Says:

she's not going to be the leader of the free world - so no need to worry after nov 8

12

 Nov 06, 2016 at 04:31 PM Anonymous Says:

PAthetic.

13

 Nov 06, 2016 at 04:34 PM Anonymous Says:

Do "high standards of modesty " include cursing frum soldiers coming to daven ????

14

 Nov 06, 2016 at 05:13 PM Anonymous Says:

How does mishpacha justify their staff interaction with their female employees, writers, journalists, and graphic artists, probably a good portion being live females? If so, then what is a silhouette on a cover? Sounds somewhat hypocritical.

15

 Nov 06, 2016 at 05:47 PM Reb Yid Says:

There's no mesorah on journalism that anyone can say "this is the din." It goes according to the daas Torah of the contemporary poskim, and we're pretty sure Mishpacha knows a posek or two. And Hamodia, being nogeiah bedavar, is hardly in a position to be paskening.

16

 Nov 06, 2016 at 06:16 PM ALTERG3 Says:

Why are they not saying clearly the names of the rabbi's?
Had a few workmates that they unsuscribe friday form hamodia,
its really a shame from them jews had standards & we souldnt break it.

17

 Nov 06, 2016 at 06:33 PM RebelSheep Says:

Women are only immodest if they are immodest. They are not immodest simply by existing, and there is nothing wrong with a picture of a woman who is dressed modestly.

18

 Nov 06, 2016 at 06:52 PM Anonymous Says:

Hillary Clinton always dresses modestly ( for a Gentile woman pants are very modest ) and is known for her intelligence and professional achievement . For most frum Jews there is no reason to be offended at having her picture in a publication.

19

 Nov 06, 2016 at 06:53 PM Anonymous Says:

So Hamodia is frummer than Mishpacha, and they're both frummer than G-d. Who knew?

20

 Nov 06, 2016 at 07:41 PM Communal Rabbis in America Says:

to quote Mishpacha's response
“Every decision is made after speaking with the spiritual committee of communal rabbis in America and that is why we decided to publish the picture in the fashion we did.”

I've requested 3 times from Mishpacha in the past to name me their rabbinical board, never received a response from them, which only leads me to conclude that they DON'T HAVE ONE and do whatever they feel like it.

21

 Nov 06, 2016 at 07:53 PM chaimtw Says:

The Jewish Observer, an Agudah publication for many years, did have photographs of chareidi women on occasion. The statement made in the Modea is either ignorant of this or considers American Agudah less than chareidi.

22

 Nov 06, 2016 at 08:50 PM getitright Says:

i am now going to order a subscription to mishpacha.

i hope modia doesn't get commission for the surge in mishpacha sales.

btw - i had the mag in my home ( we buy it often) and didnt notice and could hardly see the woman they are tumuling about.
seriously , is everything so good in their lives that this is what they have time for?

23

 Nov 06, 2016 at 09:00 PM joseph Says:

Why is Mishpacha adamantly refusing to identify any members of their alleged "spiritual committee of rabbis" that they claim approved this picture?

The Chareidi public cannot be expected to accept Mishpacha's say-so on their word alone if they cannot name even a single rabbi they claim approved of it.

24

 Nov 06, 2016 at 09:43 PM schmaltzy Says:

It's stupid vs stupider.

25

 Nov 06, 2016 at 11:14 PM yosher Says:

Bateil Be-shishim

26

 Nov 06, 2016 at 11:33 PM berelw Says:

we don't give a hoot about hamodia says...
its ironic they care,and make a fuss about the wrong things

27

 Nov 06, 2016 at 11:50 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #1  
ShatzMatz Says:

Well, guess what. This issue of Mishpacha flew off the shelves. You couldn't get a copy in any store this Friday. So if seems like the public doesn't give a hoot the taliban rules imposed about discredited rabonim.

What was much worse was when several chareidi newspapers photoshopped hillary out of existence. That was a chillul hashem. Now that she is going to be the leader of the free world it would behoove the chareidi press to come up with a workable compromise that would allow he photo to be shown in certain circumstance as long as certain guidelines are followed. Such as no face closeups and lower resolution picture. But what should certainly not be done is pixelate or blurr her out of pictures.

U are a typical self hating Jew , go hate ur self leave everyone else out , thanks

28

 Nov 07, 2016 at 12:05 AM HA! Says:

Try living in Bet Shemesh, where the local Taliban riot, attack soldiers & police, & rip off any signs - even with drawings - of little girls. Oh and let's not forget the women in FULL Arab garb (including veils) in Bet. Sick people - I stopped buying Hamodia years ago, even in NY.

It's interesting, though.... all you supporters of Hamodia have no problem going on the Internet, which Hamodia & other radicals condemn. I wonder what you are looking at.

29

 Nov 07, 2016 at 12:28 AM Anonymous Says:

Most yeshivos including the Mirrer Yeshiva has a female secretarial staff

30

 Nov 07, 2016 at 01:31 AM ayinglefunadorf Says:

Reply to #11  
amerikaner Says:

she's not going to be the leader of the free world - so no need to worry after nov 8

"She is not going to be the leader..." Americaner? Will change your name when she wins to Russianer? or lets try Syrianer? after all they are Trumps biggest supporters.

31

 Nov 07, 2016 at 07:55 AM SammyPos Says:

Obviously a well dressed woman is modest, it's the standard we need to keep - women or no women? Who's going to decide otherwise who's dressed modestly?

32

 Nov 07, 2016 at 08:13 AM planned Says:

this was a planned media stunt , no one cares if they do or dont the 2 competing teams hate each other anything for publicity

33

 Nov 07, 2016 at 09:36 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #5  
ALTERG3 Says:

Why are they not saying clearly the names of the rabbi's?
Had a few workmates that they unsuscribe friday form hamodia,
its really a shame from them jews had standards & we souldnt break it.

Hypocrite why are you on VIN then?

34

 Nov 07, 2016 at 09:40 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #5  
ALTERG3 Says:

Why are they not saying clearly the names of the rabbi's?
Had a few workmates that they unsuscribe friday form hamodia,
its really a shame from them jews had standards & we souldnt break it.

Your history of sexist and hateful comments against women speaks for itself...to try to frame the issue as "standards" is an oxymoron since there is no halachic basis to not show a tzinisus picture of a woman leader. As to "unsubscribing" from Hamodia, thats is a net gain for the tzibur overall.

35

 Nov 07, 2016 at 10:43 AM observerette Says:

I spoke with the mother of an author who put out a well known biography and there were many family pictures with women in it. She told me that there were many consultations with rabbanim and they ok'd it. They seemed to feel there was a difference between a book and a newspaper. A newspaper is open to all whereas a book was different in that you had to look for pictures. I don't quite get the distinction. In any event, on the topic of pictures in general, I do feel that girls should see frum women as role models and someone to look up to. Let them at least have part of the magazine like Ami Living or Family First dedicated to women only. The famous picture of the Chofetz Chaim in front of his house was around for decades till we became frum and then they expunged the woman (and left her shoes in). When I read about a choshuve woman who was niftar I would like to see her picture, not those of her father, husband,brother, father in law, third cousin on her uncle's side, etc. Do we also have to worry about the meshugener who looks at a woman who is no longer living and have inappropriate thoughts?

36

 Nov 07, 2016 at 11:49 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #23  
joseph Says:

Why is Mishpacha adamantly refusing to identify any members of their alleged "spiritual committee of rabbis" that they claim approved this picture?

The Chareidi public cannot be expected to accept Mishpacha's say-so on their word alone if they cannot name even a single rabbi they claim approved of it.

They don't need to name the rabbis. They don't even need to have rabbis. What they did was post a negative side profile of a modest and independently rather unattractive woman, and everyone lost their minds.

37

 Nov 07, 2016 at 11:52 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #35  
observerette Says:

I spoke with the mother of an author who put out a well known biography and there were many family pictures with women in it. She told me that there were many consultations with rabbanim and they ok'd it. They seemed to feel there was a difference between a book and a newspaper. A newspaper is open to all whereas a book was different in that you had to look for pictures. I don't quite get the distinction. In any event, on the topic of pictures in general, I do feel that girls should see frum women as role models and someone to look up to. Let them at least have part of the magazine like Ami Living or Family First dedicated to women only. The famous picture of the Chofetz Chaim in front of his house was around for decades till we became frum and then they expunged the woman (and left her shoes in). When I read about a choshuve woman who was niftar I would like to see her picture, not those of her father, husband,brother, father in law, third cousin on her uncle's side, etc. Do we also have to worry about the meshugener who looks at a woman who is no longer living and have inappropriate thoughts?

They shouldn't print pictures of men in case they get gay thoughts.

38

 Nov 07, 2016 at 03:40 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #29  
Anonymous Says:

Most yeshivos including the Mirrer Yeshiva has a female secretarial staff

Ssshhh.....

39

Sign-in to post a comment

Scroll Up
Advertisements:

Sell your scrap gold and broken jewelry and earn hard cash sell gold today!