Beijing – Beijing Faces Decision On How To Respond To Trump’s Tweets

    17

    A front page of a Chinese newspaper with a photo of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump and the headline "Outsider counter attack" is displayed at a newsstand in Beijing, China, Thursday, Nov. 10, 2016. Trump is a mixed blessing for Chinese leaders. His threats to tear up trade deals and hike tariffs on Chinese goods could chill thriving commercial ties when Beijing is struggling to shore up economic growth. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan)Beijing – Chinese leaders face a challenge: How to deal with Donald Trump.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Weeks before taking office, the incoming American president is riling Beijing with confrontation and online statements that appear to foreshadow a tougher foreign policy toward China.

    China awoke Monday to sharp criticism posted by Trump on Twitter, days after Beijing responded to his telephone conversation with Taiwan’s president by accusing the Taiwanese of playing a “small trick” on Trump.

    Trump wrote, “Did China ask us if it was OK to devalue their currency (making it hard for our companies to compete), heavily tax our products going into their country (the U.S. doesn’t tax them) or to build a massive military complex in the middle of the South China Sea? I don’t think so!”

    That was apparently prompted by China’s response to Trump’s talk Friday with Tsai Ing-wen, the first time an American president or president-elect is known to have spoken to a Taiwanese leader since the U.S. broke off formal diplomatic relations in 1979.

    So far, China has avoided responding with open hostility. On Monday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said China would have “no comment on what motivated the Trump team” to make the tweets, but said he believed both sides would continue to support a “sound and a stable bilateral relationship.”

    “For us, for China, we do not comment on his personality,” Lu said. “We focus on his policies, especially his policies toward China.”

    China’s reaction to Trump’s call with Tsai was relatively low-key given the sensitivity China places on Taiwan.

    The U.S. and Taiwan retain strong unofficial ties, and the U.S. sells weapons to the self-governing island. But American leaders have for decades avoided any official recognition in deference to China, which claims Taiwan as part of its territory, to be captured by force if necessary. Trump’s reference in another tweet to Tsai as “the President of Taiwan” was sure to inflame China, which considers any reference to Taiwan having a president as a grave insult.

    But China only said it would make a “solemn representation” in Washington, and Lu declined to expand on that statement Monday. Instead, China seemed to offer Trump a face-saving way out of an apparent blunder by blaming the Taiwanese. English-language commentaries then appeared in two state-run newspapers known to be used by China’s ruling Communist Party leadership to send messages abroad.

    “Trump might be looking for some opportunities by making waves,” the Global Times said in a Monday editorial headlined, “Talk to Trump, punish Tsai administration.”

    “However, he has zero diplomatic experience and is unaware of the repercussions of shaking up Sino-U.S. relations,” the newspaper said. “It is certain that Trump doesn’t want a showdown with China, because it is not his ambition, and neither was it included in his promise to the electorate. He puts out feelers to sound China out and chalk up some petty benefits.”

    China’s response was characteristically coded. But it now faces an incoming president who deals in outspoken tweets, not communiques.

    Trump used a platform banned by censors in mainland China to renew several of his criticisms during the U.S. presidential campaign. Some of his arguments aren’t true.

    Taiwan’s official Central News Agency, citing anonymous sources on Saturday, said Edwin Feulner, founder of the Washington-based Heritage Foundation, was a “crucial figure” in setting up communication channels between the sides.

    Vice President-elect Mike Pence said Sunday that the phone call shouldn’t necessarily be interpreted as a shift in U.S. policy. He shrugged off the attention to the incident as media hype.

    “It was a courtesy call,” Pence told NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

    Ned Price, a spokesman for the White House National Security Council, said Trump’s conversation does not signal any change to long-standing U.S. policy — although some in Taiwan expressed hopes for strong U.S. support from the incoming administration.

    In terms of Trump’s criticisms, Chinese imports are taxed at standard U.S. rates, while Washington has recently slapped painful punitive tariffs on Chinese steel, solar panels and other goods.

    And while China once kept a tight grip on the value of the yuan, also known as the renminbi, it now allows it to trade within a bandwidth 2 percent above or below a daily target set by the People’s Bank of China.

    The yuan is currently trading at around a six-year low against the dollar. But economists now conclude that the currency is more or less properly valued in relation to the dollar and other foreign currencies. And with economic growth slowing considerably and more Chinese trying to move money out of the country, the government is now spending massively to hold up the yuan’s value rather than depressing it as Trump and other critics accuse it of doing. It has also imposed strict controls on Chinese moving money out of the country.

    China has built up its military and constructed man-made islands in the South China Sea, and made sweeping territorial claims over almost the entire critical waterway. Those claims were broadly rejected in June by an international tribunal in The Hague.

    Shi Yinhong, a professor of international relations at People’s University in Beijing, predicted China would not lash out immediately, but calibrate its response over the next several months after Trump enters the White House.

    “Trump’s remarks will certainly raise the concerns of Chinese leaders,” Shi said. “But at the moment, they will be restrained and watch his moves closely.”


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    17 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    yonasonw
    Member
    yonasonw
    7 years ago

    Trump’s comments to the leaders of Taipei, Pakistan and Kazakhstan represent “possible” major policy reversals, reversals that diverge from decades of coordinated bipartisan policy positions, and from well understood international norm…and which ally him with brutal dictators who are international pariahs.

    I say “possible,” because Trump seems to be a loose cannon who shoots first, apparently thinks not an iota as to consequences, and who makes up all kinds of post-facto excuses when challenged…so no one knows what he really intends to do. It worked well in his anti-intellectual populist political campaign…but it will not fly in the larger diplomatic world.

    Radical policy reversals, when unplanned, not thought out and uncoordinated, can start wars. Will Pakistan feel emboldened to move in Kashmir? Will China now feel it needs to make new territorial claims in the South China Sea or the Straights of Formosa?

    Not in my worst fears of Trump could I have imagined such a lack of discipline, and the extent to which, apparently dafka, he refuses State Department policy briefings. Tell me how such a loose cannon is going to make anything “great again.”

    Buchwalter
    Buchwalter
    7 years ago

    Donald Trump is a neophyte in diplomacy. He will have a rude awakening. The first awakening is that Israel does not want to cancel the nuclear agreement. The second kick in the gluteal muscle he will get from that group which he promised Medicare and Social Security is sacrosanct. Trump policy is how the wind blows and right now he is on the side of the Republicans and instead the populist he pretended. In diplomacy he never heard of Machiavelli or Metternich. He is perfect for the hot shot neophytes on this website