Washington – House intelligence chairman Devin Nunes met on the White House grounds with the source of the claim that communications involving President Donald Trump’s associates were caught up in “incidental” surveillance, the congressman’s spokesman said Monday.
Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
The meeting occurred before Nunes disclosed at a news conference that U.S. spy agencies may have inadvertently captured Trump and his associates in routine targeting of foreigners’ communications.
“Chairman Nunes met with his source at the White House grounds in order to have proximity to a secure location where he could view the information provided by the source,” Nunes spokesman Jack Langer said.
Previously, Nunes, R-Calif., would not say where he met his secret source. He has still not revealed who that source is.
Nunes’ connection to the White House has raised concerns that his committee’s investigation is not a bipartisan, independent probe. He was a member of Trump’s transition team, as well.
The White House was asked repeatedly last week about whether it was the source of Nunes’ information.
On Thursday, White House spokesman Sean Spicer mocked the idea, suggesting it didn’t pass “the smell test.”
“I don’t know why he was coming up to brief the president on something that we gave him,” Spicer told reporters, adding: “It doesn’t really seem to make a ton of sense.”
Nunes’ office said the information provided to the chairman came from “executive branch documents that have not been provided to Congress.”
“Because of classification rules, the source could not simply put the documents in a backpack and walk them over to the House Intelligence Committee space,” Langer said. “The White House grounds was the best location to safeguard the proper chain of custody and classification of these documents, so the chairman could view them in a legal way.”
The bizarre disclosure about the intelligence reports brought criticism from Democrats, especially those who sit on his committee and are working with him on an investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election. That investigation is also looking into possible ties between Trump associates and the Kremlin. Nunes said the intelligence reports were not related to Russia.
“The chairman is extremely concerned by the possible improper unmasking of names of U.S. citizens, and he began looking into this issue even before President Trump tweeted his assertion that Trump Tower had been wiretapped,” Langer said.
The top Democrat on the House intelligence committee, Rep. Adam Schiff of California, said Nunes’ meeting with his source appeared to have been “a dead-of-night excursion.”
On Sunday, Schiff said on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” ”I think the chairman has to make a decision whether to act as a surrogate of the White House — as he did during the campaign and the transition — or to lead an independent and credible investigation.”
Nunes’ office did not immediately say what time the chairman met his source on White House grounds.
Any White House staffer can sign off on someone coming to the White House campus.
Wow, if this isn’t the Keystone Kops or the Gang that Couldn’t Shoot Straight, I don’t know what it is. This Trumpf is ‘a great leader’? The ‘only one who can fix this’? This muddled attempt to misdirect the Russian hacks by blaming Obama and other intelligence surveillance only points the finger at Trumpf and Bannon. Schmutz.
Maybe the source can also uncover and release a copy of Trump’s tax returns.
The article said, “Because of classification rules, the source could not simply put the documents in a backpack and walk them over to the House Intelligence Committee space,” Langer said.
That’s an extremely deceptive, but technically true statement (based upon my past training and experience working with highly classified material). The rules DO provide a straightforward, pretty simple, and very commonly used method for being one’s own courier of highly classified material within DC.
No article I read ever mentions the simple fact that Nunes was a team member on Trump’s transition.
But even Nunes claims that Trump’s tweet was wrong, and he only claims mishandling the information (which are typically not factual arguments, but subjective in nature).
Then Fox News quotes him saying that “Trump is half wrong”, where they conclude that if someone is half wrong, he must be “half right”. (fair and balanced).
Bottom line, even according to the (subjective) information Nunes (Trump’s transition team member) unearthed, Trump lied (halfways).
Can anyone explain me what exactly is a half a lie?
Gee, what a surprise…the GOP watch dog turns out to be an administration lapdog. This is only getting worse…or, frankly, “better” if one is a Democrat. I just love it.
Maybe the source can also uncover and release a copy of Trump’s tax returns.
What did we expect from a Republiclown lapdog? Garbage in, garbage out.