Washington – Attorney General Says Sanctuary Cities May Lose Federal Grants

    10

    U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions (R) joins White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer (L) for the daily press briefing at the White House in Washington, U.S., March 27, 2017.  REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst Washington – U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said on Monday that cities and states that protect immigrant felons from federal immigration laws may lose grants from the Justice Department.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    “Failure to deport aliens who are convicted of criminal offenses puts whole communities at risk, especially immigrant communities in the very sanctuary jurisdictions that seek to protect the perpetrators,” Sessions told a White House news briefing.

    His statement drew swift pushback from New York state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who said his office would continue helping local governments “have the tools they need to protect their immigrant communities.”

    Sessions said the Justice Department would withhold, and potentially claw back, grants to so-called sanctuary cities and other localities, such as counties, that are not in compliance with federal immigration law.

    Sessions, who heads the Justice Department, said one of his agency’s offices was expecting to award more than $4.1 billion in grants this fiscal year.

    Sanctuary cities help illegal immigrants avoid deportation by limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities and other agencies.

    “I strongly urge our nation’s states and cities and counties to consider carefully the harm they are doing to their citizens by refusing to enforce our immigration laws and to rethink these policies,” Sessions said.

    He gave as an example Kate Steinle, who was shot to death in San Francisco two years ago by illegal immigrant Francisco Sanchez, who had already been deported five times and had seven felony convictions.

    The city had earlier released Sanchez from custody even though immigration authorities had filed a request that he be kept in custody until they could pick him up for removal, Sessions said.

    In his response to Sessions, Schneiderman, a Democrat, called the Republican president’s immigration polices “un-American.”

    “Despite what Attorney General Sessions implied this afternoon, state and local governments and law enforcement have broad authority under the Constitution to not participate in federal immigration enforcement,” Schneiderman said in a statement. “As my office’s legal guidance makes clear, President Trump lacks the constitutional authority to broadly cut off funding to states and cities just because they have lawfully acted to protect immigrant families.”

    Schneiderman said that public safety depends on trust between law enforcement and those they serve, but that Trump’s policies “only serve to undercut that trust.”

    Last week, Maryland’s Democratic-controlled House of Delegates approved legislation to bar police statewide from checking the immigration status of individuals they arrest or from keeping them locked up longer than otherwise warranted at the request of federal agents seeking to deport them.

    The state’s Republican governor, Larry Hogan, has said he would veto the bill if it came to his desk.

    The Maryland measure was in line with dozens of municipalities and local jurisdictions across the country that have declared themselves sanctuary cities, including New York, San Francisco, Chicago, Boston, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Seattle and Washington.

    So far no such statewide designations have been enacted.

    President Donald Trump in January signed an executive order seeking to withhold federal funds from local governments that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    10 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    7 years ago

    These people are called illegal aliens, not emigrants. The proper terminology should be used in this case to clarify the problem.By jumping the border these people show that they don’t wish to follow the laws of america.If not for these laws limiting emigrants , our country will collapse, as uncounted millions of aliens will pour into this land.

    ayinglefunadorf
    ayinglefunadorf
    7 years ago

    sanctuary cities like NY, LA, Chicago etc where 98% of frumme Yiden live b”h we are safe from the deportations etc. I wish there would have been Sanctuary Cities in Germany , Poland, Hungary and the rest of Europa. yasher Kaech to the Governors and Mayors of NY. Cal. NJ etc

    PaulinSaudi
    PaulinSaudi
    7 years ago

    It is as if the GOP is trying to lose votes.

    Mark Levin
    Mark Levin
    7 years ago

    There’s no doubt they should lose every penny of federal funding. This includes belligerent counties like Ocean County, NJ. YOU HEAR THAT LAKEWOOD???? YOU’RE IN​ DEEP TROUBLE.

    7 years ago

    So many comments that show a complete lack of historical understanding as well as lack of simple logic, as well as a sick use of semantics. So I will try to make this simple instead of all-encompassing. As example, let’s say someone wishes that “sanctuary cities” existed in WWII for Jews. The problem is that if it is only for Jews, then it is not a “sanctuary city”, it is a Jewish colony instead. A “sanctuary city” by its functional definition and meaning as used today would be a “sanctuary” for everyone, and that includes being a “sanctuary” for the anti-Semites who were committing the genocide. That is to say, the German Nazis would simply have followed the Jews to the cities and killed the Jews there anyway. The very safety the Jews had enjoyed in America in WWII was exactly and precisely and only because the Nazis were banned.

    7 years ago

    If I may continue with the example of Francisco Sanchez as mentioned in the article. Wikipedia shows at least 6 convictions for serious drug (heroin) charges including manufacturing, before the latest incident. The latest Federal arrest was for illegal re-entry (caught red-handed) so he was in Federal custody already and in Federal jail. It was San Francisco that requested that the Feds hand over Sanchez to face outstanding drug charges (this time for marijuana!) The Feds agreed but placed a retainer so that San Francisco was required to return Sanchez back to the Feds who had handed him over to them in the first place. BUT, when San Francisco finished with Sanchez they released him free. Sanchez claims that during this free release he “found” a gun (the gun is shown to have been stolen from an officer’s vehicle by an unknown person during the period that Sanchez was released) and simply shot it randomly near a tourist area claiming not knowing there was anyone there, but it ended up killing Kathryn Steinle.