Welcome, Guest! - or
Easy to remember!  »  VinNews.com

Williamsburg, NY - Isaac Abraham Responds To Those Who Criticize Him For Refusing To Attend Meeting in Church Building

Published on:   March 18, 2009 08:20 PM
News Source: VIN News By Isaac Abraham NYC Council Candidate
Change text size Text Size  
Bookmark and Share

Williamsburg, NY - For those of you who comment if I’m right or wrong, win or lose, stable or mental, the first question that should be asked is “why would they hold a debate in a tax exempt place and in a religious institution” why not hold it in a public place.
if you create a Jewish political club and hold a debate in a shul or synagogue, you would have many of the outside world yelling “that’s its not right to mix politics and religion” my obligation is to stand by my believes and if a question arises to ask my Rabbi, and when I did, I was told to “stay away” and that’s what I’m doing.
Few Rabbunim from Williamsburg, Boro Park and Flatbush who were debating this question since I raised it, could not find a single halacha for me to go in.
as for, if this will hurt my campaign because I’m restricted, in my 35 years I was an “unelected” city councilman, have worked on every issue with all City, State and Federal agencies, with all elected officials from Democrat to Republican, from Conservative to Independent, with issues as, affordable housing to better health care, from fighting crime to congestion pricing, from better environmental to fighting rent increases, all these and many more, have benefited not only the Jewish Community, but also Latino’s, African American and Asians, and never was my religion in jeopardy or an obstacle, you can bend some rules, but you can’t bend religion, it was engraved in stone, if I start to bend them now, by election night I will be bent over the edge.
I also represent over 5,000 families in Mitch-Llama housing multi ethnic (you didn’t know), they never had a problem with my religion
For CBID President Lucy Koteen to state “how can someone who has so many restrictions on his life represent us” and she continues” “you have to go to funerals when someone gets shot, you are not going because it’s a Catholic Church?” shame on her, is this is her only problem “getting shot” maybe she did not see what I saw when I served a Volunteer ambulance EMT for over 25 years and have seen many, but in the church?, I saw them in the hospital, from Sea View Hospital in Staten Island to Columbia Presbyterian in the upper part of Manhattan, and all Hospitals in between as well as serving the board of Cumberland and then Woodhull for over 20 years. and if that wasn’t enough, being at the Medical Examiner’s office gave you a first hand view, Mrs. Koteen should google my name and she might be shocked with my accomplishments for over 35 years, and google doesn’t know I’m Jewish with restrictions.
Mrs. Koteen is desperately trying to find blame and fault on me “represent us” who is the us, I was just invited by another party for a debate and its being held on a neutral (not religious) ground and I accepted the invitation, are they us? or other political parties such as Democrat, Republican, Workman’s Family and Independence part of “us”? is there a “you” “me” and “us”? and “how many” so far you only have one that you made a questionable choice of location not taking into consideration that it might create a problem.
it’s your action that asked for my reaction.
maybe she believes that everyone shot, dies on the spot and goes straight to a church, she fails to mention all the issues that are presently concerning the cost of living, health care and child care, more affordable housing and better quality of life issues, increase in taxes and transportation, etc;
as for the other City, State and federal elected officials who are observant Jews, never go into a church, Sen. Lieberman never went with car or voted on Sabbath, Assemblyman Sheldon Silver, Councilman Shimcha Felder, etc; and they represent the people very well.
Mrs. Koteen needs to apologize to the entire Jewish Community for her comments, and at the same time have the CBID search what the needs and the problems of the people in the city are, and when she does, she will learn that I’m the best candidate for the council seat that is being vacated by Yassky without being at the debate.
I will do my best to let the people in my district know where I stand on issues, what my agenda and plans are when I win and to back it up-inform them of my 35 years of accomplishment and achievements not only for the Jewish Community, but for all residents of Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Cobble hill, Park Slope etc;
and will do it respectfully, not attacking anyone’s religious believes or violating his or her civil rights.
I hope that you will come to the conclusion that I can be your best messenger and loud speaker representing your needs and concerns to the City Council


More of today's headlines

Edinburgh, Scotland - Muslim leaders have offered to stand guard outside a Scottish synagogue after it was vandalised in an alleged anti-Semitic attack. Two men have... New York - In tough economic times, a centuries-old financial lifeline might be one of the best-kept secrets in the Jewish community. It is a secret whose roots go back...

 

Total92

Read Comments (92)  —  Post Yours »

1

 Mar 18, 2009 at 07:32 PM Mordechai Says:

You are 100% correct, Reb Yitzchok Avraham, and don't let the politically crazy world tell you differently.

I also would NEVER attend any function in a church, social or professional, because I am a Jew who fears G-d and respects Jewish Law.

If I lived in your jurisdiction, I would vote for you in a moment. You're the kind of public servant I'd like in office.

Be strong and of good courage.

2

 Mar 18, 2009 at 07:31 PM Anonymous Says:

You've got my vote and definitely Hashem's vote on this one.

3

 Mar 18, 2009 at 07:28 PM Anonymous Says:

its a Locale. a local community center. this is not new. such events, meetings and forums take place in houses of worship all the time in every neighborhood in every county in every state in the country. it is not sponsored or endorsed by the building or its owners. it is merely utilized as a convinience. a local location know to the people who live near it, that is suitable for the forum be it in its location, its size, its facilities.

By the way, why is the rabbi who made the spak such a big secret?

quite telling indeed is your poor writing, lack of common knowlege and obvious lack of second grade grammar skills .

4

 Mar 18, 2009 at 07:26 PM Anonymous Says:

A bit long but point received.

5

 Mar 18, 2009 at 07:45 PM Anonymous Says:

if want to run for public office you need to be open to all inclding basements of chruches. dont make a needless chilul hashem.

7

 Mar 18, 2009 at 08:20 PM Anonymous Says:

well said. I agree!

8

 Mar 18, 2009 at 08:17 PM za003 Says:

Kol Hakoved to R' Yitzchak a man who stands by his beleifs is indeed an honorbale man and one who I would like to represent me

9

 Mar 18, 2009 at 08:16 PM Anonymous Says:

Yasher Koach!!!
Finally, a man who puts Hashem first and not "politics"

10

 Mar 18, 2009 at 08:03 PM Anonymous Says:

Your problem is that you view this as a chilul Hashem while I believe most of us would call that a Kidush hashem.....

Were you embarrassed by the Israeli offensive in Gaza, Too, what you don't want Jews to be seen in society, your philosophy is probably let us Jews lay low till Moshiach comes, right ??

The opposite is true, if we follow our religion to the end, we will looked up to rather than ridiculed (see Sen. Lieberman VS. Madoff).

11

 Mar 18, 2009 at 08:31 PM Anonymous Says:

Why not just say that you want a neutral site so members of all communities will feel at home at the debate. Offer them a shul or public school auditorium.

12

 Mar 18, 2009 at 09:10 PM cp Says:

I'm so tired of people who keep commenting on stories like this and say it's not asur to go to a church. Here's the fact: all we have to rely on are the numerous tshuvos that have forbidden going into a church for any reason. When the gedolei yisroel say it's ok to go for a debate, then please let me know. Until then, no matter how good your argument is that you should be allowed, even if you are the great haskel lookstein, you do not have the right to do something clearly against ALL the poiskim - ESPECIALLY IN PUBLIC!

13

 Mar 18, 2009 at 08:45 PM tsvika55 Says:

this is a true Kidush Hashem by a great Yid and a Great American

15

 Mar 18, 2009 at 09:24 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #12  
cp Says:

I'm so tired of people who keep commenting on stories like this and say it's not asur to go to a church. Here's the fact: all we have to rely on are the numerous tshuvos that have forbidden going into a church for any reason. When the gedolei yisroel say it's ok to go for a debate, then please let me know. Until then, no matter how good your argument is that you should be allowed, even if you are the great haskel lookstein, you do not have the right to do something clearly against ALL the poiskim - ESPECIALLY IN PUBLIC!

You are 100% on target.

16

 Mar 18, 2009 at 09:58 PM Grammar Girl Says:

The fact that you would not go into a church does not, in my opinion, affect your ability to to be an effective councilmen. I would however be concerned about the fact that you are apparently unable to construct a proper English sentence (never mind a paragraph or article) -- this is by far and away the most poorly written post I've seen on VIN (and let me tell you, that's a mouthful).

17

 Mar 18, 2009 at 08:41 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #10  
Anonymous Says:

Your problem is that you view this as a chilul Hashem while I believe most of us would call that a Kidush hashem.....

Were you embarrassed by the Israeli offensive in Gaza, Too, what you don't want Jews to be seen in society, your philosophy is probably let us Jews lay low till Moshiach comes, right ??

The opposite is true, if we follow our religion to the end, we will looked up to rather than ridiculed (see Sen. Lieberman VS. Madoff).

Sorry but #6 is right. Do you even know what a chillul Hashem is? I don't care what YOU perceive it to be...if non-Jews are offended by something like this because they don't understand the halacha, it's a chillul Hashem. End of story. As pointed out, no one is mad that he is sticking to his beliefs; good for him. Rather, we don't want a representative having to check with his rav for everything, just like you wouldn't want a Christian politic checking with his reverend for every decision. If the two don't mesh than he simply shouldn't be in that field.

And Gaza is not comparable. It is not a chillul Hashem because they are right to defend themselves, and you don't have to base your actions on world opinion in such a matter where your civilians' lives are at risk. In this case, no one is forcing Abraham to be in politics.

18

 Mar 18, 2009 at 08:38 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #3  
Anonymous Says:

its a Locale. a local community center. this is not new. such events, meetings and forums take place in houses of worship all the time in every neighborhood in every county in every state in the country. it is not sponsored or endorsed by the building or its owners. it is merely utilized as a convinience. a local location know to the people who live near it, that is suitable for the forum be it in its location, its size, its facilities.

By the way, why is the rabbi who made the spak such a big secret?

quite telling indeed is your poor writing, lack of common knowlege and obvious lack of second grade grammar skills .

You have a problem with his grammar? Have you ever listened to the current city council members talk? half or maybe even most of them you wouldn't even understand a word they are saying, hack, our past president's grammar was that of a foreign kindergarten studen ...

19

 Mar 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM Anonymous Says:

Theres no such thing as separation of shul and church.
It's church and state how dare you compare or C"v equate?


"The Dobrinner Rav and other true gadolim who are the authorities on this issue have held that as long as one does not directly participate in avodah zaroh, it is mutar to enter a church."

Do you know what they pasken in this case? I have asked and been told its assur under any circumstance to go into the sanctuary and a shailoh for each case separately in the bldng.

20

 Mar 18, 2009 at 10:07 PM Anonymous Says:

Nor have people who insist on holding public meetings in houses of worship.

21

 Mar 18, 2009 at 10:23 PM torah nitzchi Says:

The whole idea of the separation of church and state is a ludicrous idea, which will inevitably lead to the destruction of all morals in this society, especially since if something does contradict halacha it is quite obvious what needs to be followed. Furthermore it has been proven time and time again that only someone that stands up for his beliefs will be respected.

22

 Mar 18, 2009 at 10:28 PM 1084 Says:

never!!!!!! can u say such a thing what u commented . its totally a huge kidush hashem i cant believe what i read here arguing about going downstairs of a church it 1000% isser gumer. poskim are never wrong

23

 Mar 18, 2009 at 10:27 PM toras emes Says:

Be proud with your belive, as a willy resident i did not had in mind to vote for you. but today i changed my mind. dont forget from where you come, after election.

24

 Mar 18, 2009 at 10:27 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #17  
Anonymous Says:

Sorry but #6 is right. Do you even know what a chillul Hashem is? I don't care what YOU perceive it to be...if non-Jews are offended by something like this because they don't understand the halacha, it's a chillul Hashem. End of story. As pointed out, no one is mad that he is sticking to his beliefs; good for him. Rather, we don't want a representative having to check with his rav for everything, just like you wouldn't want a Christian politic checking with his reverend for every decision. If the two don't mesh than he simply shouldn't be in that field.

And Gaza is not comparable. It is not a chillul Hashem because they are right to defend themselves, and you don't have to base your actions on world opinion in such a matter where your civilians' lives are at risk. In this case, no one is forcing Abraham to be in politics.

I knew that the conservative and reform perspectives have been, mor regularly, popping up on VIN as of late. I am saddened to see that we are now hearing outright goyishe positions.

25

 Mar 18, 2009 at 10:23 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #17  
Anonymous Says:

Sorry but #6 is right. Do you even know what a chillul Hashem is? I don't care what YOU perceive it to be...if non-Jews are offended by something like this because they don't understand the halacha, it's a chillul Hashem. End of story. As pointed out, no one is mad that he is sticking to his beliefs; good for him. Rather, we don't want a representative having to check with his rav for everything, just like you wouldn't want a Christian politic checking with his reverend for every decision. If the two don't mesh than he simply shouldn't be in that field.

And Gaza is not comparable. It is not a chillul Hashem because they are right to defend themselves, and you don't have to base your actions on world opinion in such a matter where your civilians' lives are at risk. In this case, no one is forcing Abraham to be in politics.

Sorry, but I believe #10 is right.
If a goy is offended that you won't remove your yarmulka or you won't shake a womens hand cuz they don't understand the halacha, are you suggesting its a chillul hashem and you'd have to do those things?

Don't give up on G-D.
I know the winds are blowing hard right now, but hang in there a little longer. You don't want Moshiach reading your post out lout when he gets here.
Chazak.

27

 Mar 18, 2009 at 10:36 PM think straight Says:

Reply to #17  
Anonymous Says:

Sorry but #6 is right. Do you even know what a chillul Hashem is? I don't care what YOU perceive it to be...if non-Jews are offended by something like this because they don't understand the halacha, it's a chillul Hashem. End of story. As pointed out, no one is mad that he is sticking to his beliefs; good for him. Rather, we don't want a representative having to check with his rav for everything, just like you wouldn't want a Christian politic checking with his reverend for every decision. If the two don't mesh than he simply shouldn't be in that field.

And Gaza is not comparable. It is not a chillul Hashem because they are right to defend themselves, and you don't have to base your actions on world opinion in such a matter where your civilians' lives are at risk. In this case, no one is forcing Abraham to be in politics.

a Chilel Hashem is not something that offended non jews, its something that offended Hashem, that's why its called Chilal Hashem not Chilal Akoim, for a yid to enter a church is definitely offensive to Hasaem, that's why its clearly a Chilel Hashem

28

 Mar 18, 2009 at 10:34 PM bb Says:

Reply to #5  
Anonymous Says:

if want to run for public office you need to be open to all inclding basements of chruches. dont make a needless chilul hashem.

stop using "chilul hashem" for all you thing there is a torah witch explain's that word "CHILUL HASHEM" exactly what &where it is.
& going to a church would of be the big'est "chilul hashem".

29

 Mar 18, 2009 at 10:40 PM Anonymous Says:

issac I agree totally with your decision. stay strong

30

 Mar 18, 2009 at 10:17 PM Anonymous Says:

Spoken like a true churchgoer.
Jews, on the other hand, make every decision based on torah as per the words of the moroh horoah to whom we ask the shailo.
Throughout the ages Gedolei Yisroel have joined or publicly lobbied non-Jewish governments as beneficial to the Jewish people despite their unshakable and unbending commitment to Torah.
Decisions regarding when a unique leniency and when one must hold strong were made by the halachic authorities of the day based on Torah not what is politically correct.
Goyim, in contrast, leave their religion in the church when they go out to the real world.

32

 Mar 18, 2009 at 10:51 PM avi Says:

6# You morons don't know what ur talking about!!!! Read carefully!! Its "freedom of religion, not freedom "from" religion"!!!! Meaning, any us citizen, including politicians can live by and practice any religion they please!! As its the government or politicians with their legislative capacity that could not "restrict any religion or root for any specifc religion" that's separation of church and state!!! Again, its "freedom of religion, not freedom "from" religion"!!!!

33

 Mar 18, 2009 at 10:48 PM Anonymous Says:

#17 you are full of it you don't have a clue what you are talking .according to you if the goy does not understand why we don't eat ham its a chilul hashem ? Are you stupid or its just an act because you did not get to the position that mr abraham is in ?

34

 Mar 18, 2009 at 11:24 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #25  
Anonymous Says:

Sorry, but I believe #10 is right.
If a goy is offended that you won't remove your yarmulka or you won't shake a womens hand cuz they don't understand the halacha, are you suggesting its a chillul hashem and you'd have to do those things?

Don't give up on G-D.
I know the winds are blowing hard right now, but hang in there a little longer. You don't want Moshiach reading your post out lout when he gets here.
Chazak.

g-d also says to be a mentsch
g-d also says "v'chai bahem"
g-d also says that everyone including goyim are created btzelem elokim.

35

 Mar 18, 2009 at 11:22 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #20  
Anonymous Says:

Nor have people who insist on holding public meetings in houses of worship.

you fail to see the point of a synagogue or church being utulized as a community center. the building in a neighborhood with space.
why do yeshivas have graduations in public school audtoriums? because its convininent. why are there blood drives in shuls and churches? come on. you are being really obtuse.

36

 Mar 18, 2009 at 11:20 PM JoeFlix Says:

Yes Mr Abraham has SERIOUS grammer problems and slight spelling probelms and VIN would be well advised to run his future writings through MS Word for spell check etc.....

BUT

His heart and mind are in the right place and he makes more sense than tons of more educated people. And, last time I checked, most New Yorkers talk and write at his level - so its good that he is not completely out of touch!

37

 Mar 18, 2009 at 11:04 PM Not secret Says:

Reply to #3  
Anonymous Says:

its a Locale. a local community center. this is not new. such events, meetings and forums take place in houses of worship all the time in every neighborhood in every county in every state in the country. it is not sponsored or endorsed by the building or its owners. it is merely utilized as a convinience. a local location know to the people who live near it, that is suitable for the forum be it in its location, its size, its facilities.

By the way, why is the rabbi who made the spak such a big secret?

quite telling indeed is your poor writing, lack of common knowlege and obvious lack of second grade grammar skills .

On the contrary, I never heard of the others but always see and hear Isaac Abraham every time there is an issue in the community. You seem like a academic. As the saying goes ..."Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach." What is the big deal to move the meeting to a public school? Unless your trying to make sure certain people don't get in. Ever heard of the separation between church and state?

38

 Mar 18, 2009 at 11:03 PM Tzaddik misnaged Says:

As long as you are not entering the inner sanctuary,the religious part of the building,it is permitted to go.The building is not considered the avodoh zorro.The religious hall is,the basement,or non-religious conferece room is neutral and is muttar. Shuls,churches and schools are used as polling places for voting and frum Jews go in and vote as well as every other citizen. Stop being 'eztra'frum. Ask the rov of your shul.

40

 Mar 19, 2009 at 06:19 AM Shmiel Says:

The problem with the liberal (jews) democratic wing is, one on side they fight church and state in the same time they want state should be only debated in a Church, if someone refuses he is condemed.
The realy Q is why are they hosting it in a church?

41

 Mar 19, 2009 at 06:10 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #3  
Anonymous Says:

its a Locale. a local community center. this is not new. such events, meetings and forums take place in houses of worship all the time in every neighborhood in every county in every state in the country. it is not sponsored or endorsed by the building or its owners. it is merely utilized as a convinience. a local location know to the people who live near it, that is suitable for the forum be it in its location, its size, its facilities.

By the way, why is the rabbi who made the spak such a big secret?

quite telling indeed is your poor writing, lack of common knowlege and obvious lack of second grade grammar skills .

Stop the hogwash. I see pretty many spelling mistakes in your article. Mr Abraham has spoken very well and spoken for all of us in the community, as his tafkid is set out to be.

42

 Mar 19, 2009 at 04:22 AM Anonymous Says:

Shame on you - America has NO problem with its elected officers believing in a higher source. With all the talk of separation of church and state, I distinctly remember a room full of clergy at one of Obama's inauguration ceremonies. When a person asks a Rabbi for advice, it is an excellent sign of someone who does not believe he is a know-it-all, but is willing to ask people and listen to their opinion. And yes, it is wonderful that it is a Rabbi he consulted, and Mr. Abraham can follow the Torah view, and still do tremendous work for the community at large. No contradiction here. I am sure your views of separation of CHURCH and state are far less vocal!!!

43

 Mar 19, 2009 at 02:24 AM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #38  
Tzaddik misnaged Says:

As long as you are not entering the inner sanctuary,the religious part of the building,it is permitted to go.The building is not considered the avodoh zorro.The religious hall is,the basement,or non-religious conferece room is neutral and is muttar. Shuls,churches and schools are used as polling places for voting and frum Jews go in and vote as well as every other citizen. Stop being 'eztra'frum. Ask the rov of your shul.

That's how you pasken. Mr Abraham asked a shayla and got a different psak. What makes your psak better than the one he got? What right have you got to demand that he follow your psak? What are you, the Sanhedrin in the Lishkas Hagozis? Maybe you should bow to his psak? In any case, once you ask a shayla you have a psak, and it doesn't matter what other people pasken. Or are you one of those people who go psak-shopping from rabbi to rabbi until you get the answer you wanted?

44

 Mar 19, 2009 at 02:10 AM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #5  
Anonymous Says:

if want to run for public office you need to be open to all inclding basements of chruches. dont make a needless chilul hashem.

This term "chilul hashem"; I do not think it means what you think it means.

45

 Mar 19, 2009 at 02:07 AM Milhouse Says:

The who???

46

 Mar 19, 2009 at 02:01 AM Anonymous Says:

It's pretty obvious they were trying to trap him to go into a church, he should have invited them to his local shul in return. If he would have gone he would have sold his soule and his community would have not voted for him. How can you compare a church with your private house? The Church was built as is with all its rooms to serve it's interest, giving it out for the night does not make it a nuteral gathering hall, would you get married there?

Just food for thought, the Chasam Sofar would not allow me to go into many of these posters synagogues. He held that a reform or conservative temple is even worse than a church. Someone who believes that there is anything independent from Torah is definitly reform. How can you just close your eyes and do something questionable without asking the proper authorities. Would you risk breaking secular law without asking a lawyer?

He asked his Rabbi and that is the main stream Ultra Orthodox acctepted view. He is no different than a Jewish politician getting sworn into office on the Torah and a Muslim on a Quran, you dont leave everything behind when you become a politician and there is nothing in the law that obligates him to enter a building he cant enter under Jewish law.

47

 Mar 19, 2009 at 01:55 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #36  
JoeFlix Says:

Yes Mr Abraham has SERIOUS grammer problems and slight spelling probelms and VIN would be well advised to run his future writings through MS Word for spell check etc.....

BUT

His heart and mind are in the right place and he makes more sense than tons of more educated people. And, last time I checked, most New Yorkers talk and write at his level - so its good that he is not completely out of touch!

Very well said!! Issac you will make a great councilman for the people in your area. you got my support.

48

 Mar 19, 2009 at 07:32 AM Satmar Man Says:

Reply to #43  
Milhouse Says:

That's how you pasken. Mr Abraham asked a shayla and got a different psak. What makes your psak better than the one he got? What right have you got to demand that he follow your psak? What are you, the Sanhedrin in the Lishkas Hagozis? Maybe you should bow to his psak? In any case, once you ask a shayla you have a psak, and it doesn't matter what other people pasken. Or are you one of those people who go psak-shopping from rabbi to rabbi until you get the answer you wanted?

Well said, Millhouse.

In fact, I learned it is absolutely Ossur to ask for a second psak from another once your rov tells you no.

In fact, my rov, who was niftar about 2 years ago, used to purposely avoid using the word "Ossur" or "Possul" just to make sure you are not oiver on that if you ask someone else.

He used to say, "We don't do that." or "We would not use that."
To me that was his "Psak" as it should be. But it shows how careful he was to protect you from being nichshal in the trap of asking another rov. Many just can't help it. If they are unhappy with what their rov says, they just have to ask another.

Sometimes it is not to get an opposing view, but to get a better-understood answer. But if the other one says "do it" he still should follow the first one.

There are times I woke up the next day, and wondered about my Rov's reasonig, and asked a second Rov, but I preceded it with, Rav A. L. told me XXXXXX. He is my Rov, and I will follow his advice. But, Can you explain better to me what you believe his reasoning was?

49

 Mar 19, 2009 at 07:23 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #38  
Tzaddik misnaged Says:

As long as you are not entering the inner sanctuary,the religious part of the building,it is permitted to go.The building is not considered the avodoh zorro.The religious hall is,the basement,or non-religious conferece room is neutral and is muttar. Shuls,churches and schools are used as polling places for voting and frum Jews go in and vote as well as every other citizen. Stop being 'eztra'frum. Ask the rov of your shul.

Yes, and the rov of many shuls, and many roshai yeshivos, have said, "Better to not vote than to go into a church facility, even if it is not the room or worship."

My rov did not use the word "Ossur" ... but he said, "We don't go. No matter how seemingly important the reason. We don't go." And, yes, he was referring to an anex building, which houses only a meeting room and a fellowship hall. Not any worship at all.

So, no, I can't give you Halacha, but I can tell you my Rov said not to go.

I know many Yidden, by the way, who vote via absentee ballot just to avoid going into church-related buildings to vote.

50

 Mar 19, 2009 at 07:11 AM si habla dianglit Says:

English is not the 1st language for most NYers as a matter of fact if you go down the list of almost all City Councilman-woman most of them are Emigrants who barely speak English at a proper level.

I don't expect a doer to be fluent when it comes to grammar or speech esp. when we see 60% of our professional elected officials don't to half of what they were elected to do for us

51

 Mar 19, 2009 at 07:47 AM incredible Says:

Reply to #38  
Tzaddik misnaged Says:

As long as you are not entering the inner sanctuary,the religious part of the building,it is permitted to go.The building is not considered the avodoh zorro.The religious hall is,the basement,or non-religious conferece room is neutral and is muttar. Shuls,churches and schools are used as polling places for voting and frum Jews go in and vote as well as every other citizen. Stop being 'eztra'frum. Ask the rov of your shul.

Your name says it all,, you have the yeshus to call urself a tzadik, cool. Is it extra frum to go heter hopping? I personally voted this year in a church's social hall, but
that is what MY ruv said to do. His ruv said otherwise, shouldnt a Taddik know better and be more tolerant of others opinions? Hmmmmmmmm u confuse me. Unless perhaps you are a pey tzaddik, and then it all makes sense!

52

 Mar 19, 2009 at 07:45 AM Anonymous Says:

I respectfully disagree.

If we are Jews, we MUST follow the Torah, the Shulchan Aruch, and the psaks of our rabbonim. That is Judaism.

We may not toss that away under the guise of "We are talking about a political process and government decisionmaking..."
Following the will our our Creator is more important than the political process and government decisionmaking.

Sure, he would not need to call his rebbe about a toll. Neither must he vote his rebbe's opinions. But, he must follow his rebbe's psak for his personal behavior, even if it means losing his position.

And, NO, it should not hurt his ability to respresent all.

53

 Mar 19, 2009 at 07:43 AM OYYYYYYYYYYy Says:

Reply to #43  
Milhouse Says:

That's how you pasken. Mr Abraham asked a shayla and got a different psak. What makes your psak better than the one he got? What right have you got to demand that he follow your psak? What are you, the Sanhedrin in the Lishkas Hagozis? Maybe you should bow to his psak? In any case, once you ask a shayla you have a psak, and it doesn't matter what other people pasken. Or are you one of those people who go psak-shopping from rabbi to rabbi until you get the answer you wanted?

I think a lot of negative posters go to 1 900-dial-a-heter. It only costs your soul. Some of these comments show ignorance in its extreme. Criticizing his grammar, and showing their ga'avah, that they think they can over rule a psak din from his Rov, it is a disgrace to us, who try to do the right thing.

54

 Mar 19, 2009 at 07:42 AM Sam Says:

Where in the Torah does it say a Jew can't go into a church basement?

55

 Mar 19, 2009 at 07:40 AM Anonymous Says:

There are actually some shaylos and teshuvos in Igros Moshe on those issues.
One was about a shul being in store front or similar "section" of a building. The adjacent section was rented to a chuch. Can they still daven in the shul next door with only that one separating wall between them. And, if they must close down and move, must they do so immediately, or does the issur begin after the first service held in the new church.

I read the teshuva many years ago, and I may be misquoting it, but I remember that he said they may be a heter is they are Protestant, which implied that Catholic would indeed be ossur! Again, I admit I am pulling this out of memory, and I would appreciate if anyone had read those shaylos and teshuvos recently enough to remember the details.

But, the very existence of the shayla and teshuva, (shayla coming from another Rov) shows that it is an issue, and not something to just ignore.

56

 Mar 19, 2009 at 07:38 AM OYYYYYYYYYYy Says:

Reply to #3  
Anonymous Says:

its a Locale. a local community center. this is not new. such events, meetings and forums take place in houses of worship all the time in every neighborhood in every county in every state in the country. it is not sponsored or endorsed by the building or its owners. it is merely utilized as a convinience. a local location know to the people who live near it, that is suitable for the forum be it in its location, its size, its facilities.

By the way, why is the rabbi who made the spak such a big secret?

quite telling indeed is your poor writing, lack of common knowlege and obvious lack of second grade grammar skills .

You must be joking. When he is elected, he will have an office, with a secretary who can proofread all his stuff before it goes out in public. You think that our elected officials all have perfect grammar,, gimme a break!
Isaac, may the Aibishter be with you!

57

 Mar 19, 2009 at 08:05 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #21  
torah nitzchi Says:

The whole idea of the separation of church and state is a ludicrous idea, which will inevitably lead to the destruction of all morals in this society, especially since if something does contradict halacha it is quite obvious what needs to be followed. Furthermore it has been proven time and time again that only someone that stands up for his beliefs will be respected.

Why don't you move to Iran, where they don't separate Church and State. Our forefathers here in the USA had the foresight as to how to build a big, happy and thriving society.

You are now going to change the constitution?

58

 Mar 19, 2009 at 08:02 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #27  
think straight Says:

a Chilel Hashem is not something that offended non jews, its something that offended Hashem, that's why its called Chilal Hashem not Chilal Akoim, for a yid to enter a church is definitely offensive to Hasaem, that's why its clearly a Chilel Hashem

A chillul hashem is something that offends the ONLOOKER, not Hashem. Is Hashem offended if R. Yochanan buys somthing on credit? The gemara says a chilul hashem is when somebody does not speak bnachas im habriyos, i.e., says or does something that will offend the general population.

59

 Mar 19, 2009 at 08:01 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #54  
Sam Says:

Where in the Torah does it say a Jew can't go into a church basement?

Dear Sam,
Does that matter, it is very clear that there is chalukei dayos on this matter. He asked his rov. Shouldnt that be the end?
A regular frum (try to do the best I can) housewife.

60

 Mar 19, 2009 at 07:51 AM Anonymous Says:

There are may things in shas permitted mishum eivah and many others permitted for darchei shalom. Rabban Gamliel went to a bathhouse with an idol inside.

There are voting places in shuls and churches and nobody has ever complained. Why make fights in a medinah shel chesed?

This is a chillul hashem of the highest order.

Thankfully, Rabbi Lookstein didn't insult Obama and the entire USA, and had the seichel to pasken leniently.

61

 Mar 19, 2009 at 08:35 AM City official Says:

Reply to #16  
Grammar Girl Says:

The fact that you would not go into a church does not, in my opinion, affect your ability to to be an effective councilmen. I would however be concerned about the fact that you are apparently unable to construct a proper English sentence (never mind a paragraph or article) -- this is by far and away the most poorly written post I've seen on VIN (and let me tell you, that's a mouthful).

#3 and #17 are totaly wrong. Nowadays most public officials are street boys,immigrants that are iggnorant in anything the USA stands for,yet they are our elected reps. MR.Abraham you are sharp,strong,and professional. As usual you are the natural choice for representing the Jewish People. Being that I'm also an elected official,to a city wide spot I feel that you will a future city Rep. Good Look from a secret non- jewish admirer

62

 Mar 19, 2009 at 08:32 AM PMO Says:

Reply to #46  
Anonymous Says:

It's pretty obvious they were trying to trap him to go into a church, he should have invited them to his local shul in return. If he would have gone he would have sold his soule and his community would have not voted for him. How can you compare a church with your private house? The Church was built as is with all its rooms to serve it's interest, giving it out for the night does not make it a nuteral gathering hall, would you get married there?

Just food for thought, the Chasam Sofar would not allow me to go into many of these posters synagogues. He held that a reform or conservative temple is even worse than a church. Someone who believes that there is anything independent from Torah is definitly reform. How can you just close your eyes and do something questionable without asking the proper authorities. Would you risk breaking secular law without asking a lawyer?

He asked his Rabbi and that is the main stream Ultra Orthodox acctepted view. He is no different than a Jewish politician getting sworn into office on the Torah and a Muslim on a Quran, you dont leave everything behind when you become a politician and there is nothing in the law that obligates him to enter a building he cant enter under Jewish law.

You're point about conservative and reform "temples" is correct. However, exceptions have often been made for this. For example, on issues of Kiruv there have been many exceptions.

Again, not everything is B&W here and a reliable posek should be consulted (even if you don't get the answer you were looking for).

63

 Mar 19, 2009 at 08:24 AM Lawyer Says:

Reply to #3  
Anonymous Says:

its a Locale. a local community center. this is not new. such events, meetings and forums take place in houses of worship all the time in every neighborhood in every county in every state in the country. it is not sponsored or endorsed by the building or its owners. it is merely utilized as a convinience. a local location know to the people who live near it, that is suitable for the forum be it in its location, its size, its facilities.

By the way, why is the rabbi who made the spak such a big secret?

quite telling indeed is your poor writing, lack of common knowlege and obvious lack of second grade grammar skills .

#3. Is a pure BUM. First of all he attacks the integrity of this wonderfull community leader and future City leader,and then second of all, he attacks the grammer of the future councilman,when as a matter of fact its excelent. We are so proud to represented by strong,professional,charismatic future councilman.

64

 Mar 19, 2009 at 08:23 AM Anonymous Says:

I never liked isaac, and usually don't agree with his positions. This is the 1st time I raise my hat for him. For a change Isaac is doing the right thing.
On the otherhand if because of this he'll lose, I'll be a winner.

65

 Mar 19, 2009 at 08:20 AM PMO Says:

Reply to #12  
cp Says:

I'm so tired of people who keep commenting on stories like this and say it's not asur to go to a church. Here's the fact: all we have to rely on are the numerous tshuvos that have forbidden going into a church for any reason. When the gedolei yisroel say it's ok to go for a debate, then please let me know. Until then, no matter how good your argument is that you should be allowed, even if you are the great haskel lookstein, you do not have the right to do something clearly against ALL the poiskim - ESPECIALLY IN PUBLIC!

Like every other sensitive situation in life, we need to be careful and evaluate these situations individually. If a church owns the office building next door to it, am I allowed to go there? Am I allowed into the social hall that sits behind the church but is not attached? What if a building has a small church as a tenant? Am I allowed to go into that building?

What I'm saying is that as a general rule, we should not be going into churches as the gedolim have instructed. However, cases like this need to be looked at individually. If the meeting is not in the actual worshiping room, and the event is so public that nobody would assume an endorsement of the church or that Abraham was in some way involved with the chruch itself, maybe (Im not a posek... just giving a logical train of thought) it could be permissible in order to avoid a chilul H'.

I know poskim have said that even for a funeral (this is a problem with converts especially), one should not even linger outside of a church, and I have also heard others say the opposite.

66

 Mar 19, 2009 at 09:23 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #34  
Anonymous Says:

g-d also says to be a mentsch
g-d also says "v'chai bahem"
g-d also says that everyone including goyim are created btzelem elokim.

Non-Jews are created btzelem elokim and are bnai Noach. There is even a shailah about whether bnai Noach should enter a church.

67

 Mar 19, 2009 at 09:34 AM Anonymous Says:

Why couldn't they make it in a public school or a 'Y' building?? I think there used to be one in Wmbg???

68

 Mar 19, 2009 at 09:32 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #34  
Anonymous Says:

g-d also says to be a mentsch
g-d also says "v'chai bahem"
g-d also says that everyone including goyim are created btzelem elokim.

and Reb Yitzchak is an undisputed mentsch,
and v'chai BAHEM means that you should live your life by the Torah laws,
and Reb Yitzchak treats everyone as a tzelem elokim.

Listen my friend, you can cut it any way you like, but the halacha is the halacha. He asked a sh'aylas chacham and he got his answer. He is just as forbidden to enter a church as he is forbidden to eat a ham sandwich.

Am Yisroel Chai

69

 Mar 19, 2009 at 09:47 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #60  
Anonymous Says:

There are may things in shas permitted mishum eivah and many others permitted for darchei shalom. Rabban Gamliel went to a bathhouse with an idol inside.

There are voting places in shuls and churches and nobody has ever complained. Why make fights in a medinah shel chesed?

This is a chillul hashem of the highest order.

Thankfully, Rabbi Lookstein didn't insult Obama and the entire USA, and had the seichel to pasken leniently.

The Jews in the times of Ahaverosh thought they should go to his party because it would be an insult to the king. Jews have to be like Mordechai and have the strength to stand up for the Torah. Thank you Mr. Abraham for having the courage to do what is right.

70

 Mar 19, 2009 at 10:43 AM Uber Chuchem Says:

Reply to #67  
Anonymous Says:

Why couldn't they make it in a public school or a 'Y' building?? I think there used to be one in Wmbg???

A y? Really?
um, hello. that has got to be the STUPIDEST comment on this thread. Do you know who runs Ys? Do you know what it stands for?
Young Men's Christian Association
YMCA or Young Mens Catholic Association (just liek in the song that every yeshiva boy knows!)
YMCA MISSION: "To put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit for mind and body for all."
Or perhaps you meant maybe the jewish Y which is sort of like a JCC (jewish community center which the yeshivishers wouldnt go to either) which is YWHA which stands for Young Women's Hebrew Association
which would obviously be as similarly unjustified or problematic as the Young mens christian association.



71

 Mar 19, 2009 at 11:21 AM Askupeh Says:

Reply to #61  
City official Says:

#3 and #17 are totaly wrong. Nowadays most public officials are street boys,immigrants that are iggnorant in anything the USA stands for,yet they are our elected reps. MR.Abraham you are sharp,strong,and professional. As usual you are the natural choice for representing the Jewish People. Being that I'm also an elected official,to a city wide spot I feel that you will a future city Rep. Good Look from a secret non- jewish admirer

Thank you City Official. I wish I knew who you were so I can give you a hug. You show more understanding of Frum Jews then our non frum brothers here. You’re not checking how well groomed his beard is, how perfect his vocabulary is, or if he is willing to throw away his beliefs for a concocted interpretation of “Chilul Hashem – Desecration of G-d’s name”; what you see is his good heart and mind and his goodwill accomplishments. You would get my vote too.

72

 Mar 19, 2009 at 11:28 AM Askupeh Says:

Who is the Dobrinner Rov? I have never heard of such a Rov.

73

 Mar 19, 2009 at 01:18 PM Schlomo Says:

I read the article posted by Mr. Abraham in the comments and his comments are frankly absurd. Church's in many cases are public places which open their doors to various community groups. In fact even synagogues do this. I have attended numerous community meetings at Churches and Synagogues. In many cases they are they only public spaces that will allow you to do this with a minimal or no charge. St Francis college is a religious institution. I can't tell you how many secular meetings I have attended there. The concept of kosher non kosher meeting places is also patently absurd. The subway and the buses are non kosher as is Brooklyn Boro hall. since the almighty is everywhere he is in the basement of a church just as much. There isn't devil worship or idolatry taking place there. In fact we pray to the same G-d. Some synagogues need extra space and in fact one of them uses the sanctuary of a church for the Jewish High Holiday services. The fact that someone won't go to a service where a body is should not be used as an excuse for not attending a meeting when no such body was present. Bodies are everywhere sometime. This whole thing is just an excuse and so far the explanation and the article he posted makes me more angry at him for hypocrisy and narrow mindedness than anything else. The Church's in our neighborhoods serve important public issues. To refuse to attend a secular event there on the excuse that it is in a Church highlights what separate us and should cause great concern. I have been inside many Mosques...and I am still Jewish. The refusal to enter in my opinion states much more about the solidness of your own beliefs that entering into one and maintaining them. Does this mean you can't sail on a ship that has a Christian chapel on it?

74

 Mar 19, 2009 at 02:04 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #73  
Schlomo Says:

I read the article posted by Mr. Abraham in the comments and his comments are frankly absurd. Church's in many cases are public places which open their doors to various community groups. In fact even synagogues do this. I have attended numerous community meetings at Churches and Synagogues. In many cases they are they only public spaces that will allow you to do this with a minimal or no charge. St Francis college is a religious institution. I can't tell you how many secular meetings I have attended there. The concept of kosher non kosher meeting places is also patently absurd. The subway and the buses are non kosher as is Brooklyn Boro hall. since the almighty is everywhere he is in the basement of a church just as much. There isn't devil worship or idolatry taking place there. In fact we pray to the same G-d. Some synagogues need extra space and in fact one of them uses the sanctuary of a church for the Jewish High Holiday services. The fact that someone won't go to a service where a body is should not be used as an excuse for not attending a meeting when no such body was present. Bodies are everywhere sometime. This whole thing is just an excuse and so far the explanation and the article he posted makes me more angry at him for hypocrisy and narrow mindedness than anything else. The Church's in our neighborhoods serve important public issues. To refuse to attend a secular event there on the excuse that it is in a Church highlights what separate us and should cause great concern. I have been inside many Mosques...and I am still Jewish. The refusal to enter in my opinion states much more about the solidness of your own beliefs that entering into one and maintaining them. Does this mean you can't sail on a ship that has a Christian chapel on it?

i once saw a yeshivishe couple on a shidduch date whatching a catholic wedding at the chapel in the brooklyn botanical gardens. rachmana litzlan

75

 Mar 19, 2009 at 02:38 PM PMO Says:

Reply to #73  
Schlomo Says:

I read the article posted by Mr. Abraham in the comments and his comments are frankly absurd. Church's in many cases are public places which open their doors to various community groups. In fact even synagogues do this. I have attended numerous community meetings at Churches and Synagogues. In many cases they are they only public spaces that will allow you to do this with a minimal or no charge. St Francis college is a religious institution. I can't tell you how many secular meetings I have attended there. The concept of kosher non kosher meeting places is also patently absurd. The subway and the buses are non kosher as is Brooklyn Boro hall. since the almighty is everywhere he is in the basement of a church just as much. There isn't devil worship or idolatry taking place there. In fact we pray to the same G-d. Some synagogues need extra space and in fact one of them uses the sanctuary of a church for the Jewish High Holiday services. The fact that someone won't go to a service where a body is should not be used as an excuse for not attending a meeting when no such body was present. Bodies are everywhere sometime. This whole thing is just an excuse and so far the explanation and the article he posted makes me more angry at him for hypocrisy and narrow mindedness than anything else. The Church's in our neighborhoods serve important public issues. To refuse to attend a secular event there on the excuse that it is in a Church highlights what separate us and should cause great concern. I have been inside many Mosques...and I am still Jewish. The refusal to enter in my opinion states much more about the solidness of your own beliefs that entering into one and maintaining them. Does this mean you can't sail on a ship that has a Christian chapel on it?

To Schlomo (#73) - There is halacha that specifically deals with this. It is always prohibited to take part in any activity in a church's sanctuary (unless it is to save a life - ie. the building is in fire and you are saving people). Reform (and Ive heard some Conservative as well) synagogues will do this at times and it is 100% prohibited. There is no G-d fearing Rav who would tell you otherwise. While I have never understood the way these movements pick and choose which of G-d's laws to follow and not follow, this one is clear and it baffles me! This is not political thinking, or a philosophical issue or an issue of narrow mindedness. It is not like arguments of defining tsnius (modesty), where the argument may be about how much of the forearm a woman may reveal. This is no less important a law than not committing adultery and it is clear.

Your point about idolatry, is incorrect. People of these faiths do worship false idols and images (the man they believe is the messiah for one).

The part about a body having been there is misplaced as well. While there are issues there, the prohibitions on going into a church have nothing to do with it.

The not so clear parts revolve around other rooms within the same building and buildings attached to it. A reliable Rav should be consulted on this as the reason for being there may influence the answer.

Your emotions regarding this issue are obviously genuine, but based on an incorrect perception of the reasons, or based on the guidance of someone who is not knowledgeable enough in halacha. There is no hypocrisy here, and one should always be careful to show appropriate respect for the good works that many of those institutions do (AA/NA meetings and feeding the homeless for example). Nothing stops you from standing out on the street with them to feed the hungry and show your appreciation for them in that way (and make a Kiddush H' at the same time).

To answer your last question, ships usually do not have churches. Then usually have non-sectarian chapels. That being said, the chapel on a ship would be like a church as a "tenant" in an office building. The building is not there for the purpose of being a church. Likewise, the ship is was not built for the purpose of being a church either.

You are clearly passionate about these things. You should seek out your local Orthodox Rabbi and talk to him for clarification.

76

 Mar 19, 2009 at 02:58 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #75  
PMO Says:

To Schlomo (#73) - There is halacha that specifically deals with this. It is always prohibited to take part in any activity in a church's sanctuary (unless it is to save a life - ie. the building is in fire and you are saving people). Reform (and Ive heard some Conservative as well) synagogues will do this at times and it is 100% prohibited. There is no G-d fearing Rav who would tell you otherwise. While I have never understood the way these movements pick and choose which of G-d's laws to follow and not follow, this one is clear and it baffles me! This is not political thinking, or a philosophical issue or an issue of narrow mindedness. It is not like arguments of defining tsnius (modesty), where the argument may be about how much of the forearm a woman may reveal. This is no less important a law than not committing adultery and it is clear.

Your point about idolatry, is incorrect. People of these faiths do worship false idols and images (the man they believe is the messiah for one).

The part about a body having been there is misplaced as well. While there are issues there, the prohibitions on going into a church have nothing to do with it.

The not so clear parts revolve around other rooms within the same building and buildings attached to it. A reliable Rav should be consulted on this as the reason for being there may influence the answer.

Your emotions regarding this issue are obviously genuine, but based on an incorrect perception of the reasons, or based on the guidance of someone who is not knowledgeable enough in halacha. There is no hypocrisy here, and one should always be careful to show appropriate respect for the good works that many of those institutions do (AA/NA meetings and feeding the homeless for example). Nothing stops you from standing out on the street with them to feed the hungry and show your appreciation for them in that way (and make a Kiddush H' at the same time).

To answer your last question, ships usually do not have churches. Then usually have non-sectarian chapels. That being said, the chapel on a ship would be like a church as a "tenant" in an office building. The building is not there for the purpose of being a church. Likewise, the ship is was not built for the purpose of being a church either.

You are clearly passionate about these things. You should seek out your local Orthodox Rabbi and talk to him for clarification.

this was not in a sacntualry it was in a basement all purpose room!

77

 Mar 19, 2009 at 02:49 PM Askupeh Says:

Reply to #73  
Schlomo Says:

I read the article posted by Mr. Abraham in the comments and his comments are frankly absurd. Church's in many cases are public places which open their doors to various community groups. In fact even synagogues do this. I have attended numerous community meetings at Churches and Synagogues. In many cases they are they only public spaces that will allow you to do this with a minimal or no charge. St Francis college is a religious institution. I can't tell you how many secular meetings I have attended there. The concept of kosher non kosher meeting places is also patently absurd. The subway and the buses are non kosher as is Brooklyn Boro hall. since the almighty is everywhere he is in the basement of a church just as much. There isn't devil worship or idolatry taking place there. In fact we pray to the same G-d. Some synagogues need extra space and in fact one of them uses the sanctuary of a church for the Jewish High Holiday services. The fact that someone won't go to a service where a body is should not be used as an excuse for not attending a meeting when no such body was present. Bodies are everywhere sometime. This whole thing is just an excuse and so far the explanation and the article he posted makes me more angry at him for hypocrisy and narrow mindedness than anything else. The Church's in our neighborhoods serve important public issues. To refuse to attend a secular event there on the excuse that it is in a Church highlights what separate us and should cause great concern. I have been inside many Mosques...and I am still Jewish. The refusal to enter in my opinion states much more about the solidness of your own beliefs that entering into one and maintaining them. Does this mean you can't sail on a ship that has a Christian chapel on it?

Schlomo, are you requesting him to become a reformed Jew? His and my religion, which is Orthodox Judaism, forbids it. It is in the Gemora and Shulchen Orech which we follow. It is sheer arrogance to request us to transgress our religion. Even a non-Jewish elected public official understood it, why can’t you?

The reason why it is forbidden is because Christianity is considered Avodeh Zorah beshutef because they believe in the Trinity. You can be friends with them and you should be nice to them, but STILL you can’t worship or even be in their place of worship; simple as that. Therefore only the sanctuary is Osur lechol Hadeiyos that I’m aware, but its college campuses can be Mutar and its hospitals are also Mutar. In Vienna a hundred years ago there was a huge hospital where all that can afford came there to be healed, and its walls were full of religious symbols. Today Good Samaritan Hospital near Monsey is used by Frum Jews. Please don’t mix apples and oranges.

78

 Mar 19, 2009 at 05:36 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #72  
Askupeh Says:

Who is the Dobrinner Rov? I have never heard of such a Rov.

There is no such person. There's an anonymous commenter who's been quoting non-existent "gadolim" (I think that's how he usually spells it) with made-up names like this. I think he recently quoted a "Rabbi Getzelvasser" or something like that. I think he's also the same person who recently referred to R Avi Weiss and lehavdil Zalman Shachter as "gadolim".

79

 Mar 19, 2009 at 05:32 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #65  
PMO Says:

Like every other sensitive situation in life, we need to be careful and evaluate these situations individually. If a church owns the office building next door to it, am I allowed to go there? Am I allowed into the social hall that sits behind the church but is not attached? What if a building has a small church as a tenant? Am I allowed to go into that building?

What I'm saying is that as a general rule, we should not be going into churches as the gedolim have instructed. However, cases like this need to be looked at individually. If the meeting is not in the actual worshiping room, and the event is so public that nobody would assume an endorsement of the church or that Abraham was in some way involved with the chruch itself, maybe (Im not a posek... just giving a logical train of thought) it could be permissible in order to avoid a chilul H'.

I know poskim have said that even for a funeral (this is a problem with converts especially), one should not even linger outside of a church, and I have also heard others say the opposite.

"Like every other sensitive situation in life, we need to be careful and evaluate these situations individually. "

That is right, which is precisely why this is the sort of situation where one has to ask a shayla. One doesn't ask shaylos about situations that are clear-cut. Open a Shulchan Aruch and see what to do. Shaylos are for cases that depend. So Mr Abraham asked a shayla, received an answer, and is following it. Kudos to him.

80

 Mar 19, 2009 at 05:27 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #57  
Anonymous Says:

Why don't you move to Iran, where they don't separate Church and State. Our forefathers here in the USA had the foresight as to how to build a big, happy and thriving society.

You are now going to change the constitution?

So, genius, where in the constitution is this separation of church and state mentioned?

The term was unknown in American jurisprudence until it was introduced by Klansman Hugo Black.

81

 Mar 19, 2009 at 05:25 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #50  
si habla dianglit Says:

English is not the 1st language for most NYers as a matter of fact if you go down the list of almost all City Councilman-woman most of them are Emigrants who barely speak English at a proper level.

I don't expect a doer to be fluent when it comes to grammar or speech esp. when we see 60% of our professional elected officials don't to half of what they were elected to do for us

The word you want is "immigrants", not "Emigrants".

Hope this helps.

82

 Mar 19, 2009 at 05:24 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #48  
Satmar Man Says:

Well said, Millhouse.

In fact, I learned it is absolutely Ossur to ask for a second psak from another once your rov tells you no.

In fact, my rov, who was niftar about 2 years ago, used to purposely avoid using the word "Ossur" or "Possul" just to make sure you are not oiver on that if you ask someone else.

He used to say, "We don't do that." or "We would not use that."
To me that was his "Psak" as it should be. But it shows how careful he was to protect you from being nichshal in the trap of asking another rov. Many just can't help it. If they are unhappy with what their rov says, they just have to ask another.

Sometimes it is not to get an opposing view, but to get a better-understood answer. But if the other one says "do it" he still should follow the first one.

There are times I woke up the next day, and wondered about my Rov's reasonig, and asked a second Rov, but I preceded it with, Rav A. L. told me XXXXXX. He is my Rov, and I will follow his advice. But, Can you explain better to me what you believe his reasoning was?

Actually, as I understand it you are allowed to ask for a second opinion, but you must tell him what the first rov said. Then it's up to him how to answer you.

83

 Mar 19, 2009 at 06:45 PM Educated Says:

You can't trust anything Milhouse says, because he is just plain wrong.
The phrase Seperation of Church and State actually occurred in american jurispudence in a supreme court proceeding in 1878:

"Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God; that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship; that the legislative powers of the government reach actions only, and not opinions -- I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore man to all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties."

The Hugo Black reference he makes did not occur until 1948! Thats a 70 year difference.

84

 Mar 19, 2009 at 07:16 PM Educated Says:

Reply to #70  
Uber Chuchem Says:

A y? Really?
um, hello. that has got to be the STUPIDEST comment on this thread. Do you know who runs Ys? Do you know what it stands for?
Young Men's Christian Association
YMCA or Young Mens Catholic Association (just liek in the song that every yeshiva boy knows!)
YMCA MISSION: "To put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit for mind and body for all."
Or perhaps you meant maybe the jewish Y which is sort of like a JCC (jewish community center which the yeshivishers wouldnt go to either) which is YWHA which stands for Young Women's Hebrew Association
which would obviously be as similarly unjustified or problematic as the Young mens christian association.



LOL! Seriously. This is what happens when you free flow information to those that never had any before. It is informing the uninformed. They need to have practicle basic knowlege first, before they can for opnions on the news, lest they sound like total morons.

85

 Mar 19, 2009 at 06:33 PM Educated Says:

Reply to #80  
Milhouse Says:

So, genius, where in the constitution is this separation of church and state mentioned?

The term was unknown in American jurisprudence until it was introduced by Klansman Hugo Black.

WOW, that is 100% entirely false and inaccurate.
Black's references in the SCOTUS didnt happen until the late 1940's, while Thomas Jefferson was writing about the separation of Church and State and the first ammendment in the constitution in like 1800. The phrase itself surfaced in SC cases in the late 1870's, a good 70 years before Black's cases.


86

 Mar 19, 2009 at 06:28 PM Educated Says:

Reply to #78  
Milhouse Says:

There is no such person. There's an anonymous commenter who's been quoting non-existent "gadolim" (I think that's how he usually spells it) with made-up names like this. I think he recently quoted a "Rabbi Getzelvasser" or something like that. I think he's also the same person who recently referred to R Avi Weiss and lehavdil Zalman Shachter as "gadolim".

It is entirely possible there is or was at one time a Dobriner Rov. Dobrin is the name of a city in Romania and it is also a surname originating from the region.

87

 Mar 19, 2009 at 08:31 PM OrthoDem Says:

Reply to #67  
Anonymous Says:

Why couldn't they make it in a public school or a 'Y' building?? I think there used to be one in Wmbg???

Rav Moshe Feinstein prohibited utilizing athletic facilities in a YMCA.

19Igros Moshe O.C. 4:40:26, Rivevos Ephraim 3:302:3

88

 Mar 19, 2009 at 11:00 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #83  
Educated Says:

You can't trust anything Milhouse says, because he is just plain wrong.
The phrase Seperation of Church and State actually occurred in american jurispudence in a supreme court proceeding in 1878:

"Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God; that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship; that the legislative powers of the government reach actions only, and not opinions -- I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore man to all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties."

The Hugo Black reference he makes did not occur until 1948! Thats a 70 year difference.

That's Jefferson's letter, you moron. Jefferson had no role in drafting the constitution or the Bill of Rights, and his own opinions and prejudices have no legal significance. The Supreme Court did not adopt the phrase and treat it as if it were a legal standard until Black's era. And he got it from his days in the Ku Klux Klan.

89

 Mar 20, 2009 at 01:38 AM Anonymous Says:

1. I thought it was uniform, that any Jew could not enter any other house of worship (be it mosque, or church), so what's the problem? Are they against principled men?
2. There are christians that will not even enter any other church other then their own denominations. Muslims also have similar prohibitions on them although I am not clear what they are.

90

 Mar 20, 2009 at 01:16 AM hmm Says:

jefferson's letter was quoted in the supreme court decision in 1878.
jefferson was also quoted by black in 1947.

91

 Mar 20, 2009 at 12:01 AM Educated Says:

Reply to #88  
Milhouse Says:

That's Jefferson's letter, you moron. Jefferson had no role in drafting the constitution or the Bill of Rights, and his own opinions and prejudices have no legal significance. The Supreme Court did not adopt the phrase and treat it as if it were a legal standard until Black's era. And he got it from his days in the Ku Klux Klan.

"'In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state.' It is only in recent times that separation has come under attack by judges in the federal court system who oppose separation of church and state "
- Justice Hugo Black, Everson vs Board of Education, 1947

92

 Mar 19, 2009 at 11:54 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #88  
Milhouse Says:

That's Jefferson's letter, you moron. Jefferson had no role in drafting the constitution or the Bill of Rights, and his own opinions and prejudices have no legal significance. The Supreme Court did not adopt the phrase and treat it as if it were a legal standard until Black's era. And he got it from his days in the Ku Klux Klan.

wow, you must be a really angry person.

93

 Mar 19, 2009 at 11:48 PM Educated Says:

Reply to #88  
Milhouse Says:

That's Jefferson's letter, you moron. Jefferson had no role in drafting the constitution or the Bill of Rights, and his own opinions and prejudices have no legal significance. The Supreme Court did not adopt the phrase and treat it as if it were a legal standard until Black's era. And he got it from his days in the Ku Klux Klan.

correct, sited by the justices.
all american history on the subject goes traces the term to jefferson.
even in judaism we had separation of church and state,

94

 Mar 20, 2009 at 12:00 AM Educated Says:

Reply to #88  
Milhouse Says:

That's Jefferson's letter, you moron. Jefferson had no role in drafting the constitution or the Bill of Rights, and his own opinions and prejudices have no legal significance. The Supreme Court did not adopt the phrase and treat it as if it were a legal standard until Black's era. And he got it from his days in the Ku Klux Klan.

Kuncklehead, who do you think Black cited in those supreme court decisions?
John C. Lester or Thomas Jefferson?

95

 Mar 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #94  
Educated Says:

Kuncklehead, who do you think Black cited in those supreme court decisions?
John C. Lester or Thomas Jefferson?

Black dragged out a letter from Jefferson, expressing his private view, and pretended that it was an authoritative source on the meaning of the constitution. He got this from his time in the Klan. "Separation of church and state" was never part of American jurisprudence before; and we've certainly never had anything of the kind in Judaism.

96

 Mar 20, 2009 at 01:29 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #95  
Milhouse Says:

Black dragged out a letter from Jefferson, expressing his private view, and pretended that it was an authoritative source on the meaning of the constitution. He got this from his time in the Klan. "Separation of church and state" was never part of American jurisprudence before; and we've certainly never had anything of the kind in Judaism.

nah, we only had melochim and kohanim....

97

 Mar 22, 2009 at 09:20 AM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #96  
Anonymous Says:

nah, we only had melochim and kohanim....

Um, what have kohanim got to do with anything? We had a Sanhedrin which was in charge, and we had kings who ruled according to halacha, and took orders from nevi'im. The kings were expected to stamp out avodah zarah and be'alim, and those who didn't are excoriated by the Tanach. There was no separation at all.

98

Sign-in to post a comment

Scroll Up
Advertisements:

Sell your scrap gold and broken jewelry and earn hard cash sell gold today!