Welcome, Guest! - or
Easy to remember!  »  VinNews.com

Israel - Shas' Female Workers Across the Country Orderd to Wear Full Head Covering

Published on:   May 6, 2009 07:39 AM
News Source: Ynet
Change text size Text Size  
Bookmark and Share

Israel - A new regulation at Shas’ Maayan Torah education network prohibits female workers from showing up to work without a head covering that covers their hair completely.

A letter ordering women to dress accordingly signed by the network’s Director General Yoav Ben-Zur has been distributed to all employees this week. Shas’ school network caters to tens of thousands of children across the country and receives funding from the state.

Many female workers were outraged by the new directive, and claimed that a lot of ultra-Orthodox women do not regularly wear all-concealing head covering. “The new regulation is odd and infuriating,” said one worker. “It refers to haredi women who ordinarily wear a head covering and reveal very little hair as it is.”

Advertisement:

Another worker stressed that the new rule bans women from wearing wigs and requires them to only wear scarves. She added that employees have already been threatened with dismissal should they continue to wear a wig to work.

“Please help us,” she pleaded. “Have we become Iran? Are we like Hamas? This place is turning into Khomeinistan… we are merely women trying to work and support our Torah studying husbands, without getting involved in Shas’ internal politics.”

Shas’ spiritual leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef has in the past ruled that wigs are forbidden as a head covering.


More of today's headlines

New York - Bernie Madoff's longtime secretary is spilling the beans on her Ponzi king boss -- revealing for the first time how he hurled vicious insults at underlings... New York, NY - The city debuted its new 911 dispatching system with hopes that a new streamlined system will reduce response times to emergencies. The new system will...

 

Total71

Read Comments (71)  —  Post Yours »

1

 May 06, 2009 at 06:58 AM mottel Says:

What are the women whining about? Every employer is entitled to enforce a dress code; you don't like it, leave and open your own business!
Since their posek requires scarves, and total coverage of hair, this is the example they wish to set to the children in their school

2

 May 06, 2009 at 06:54 AM Anonymous Says:

Another dangerous step in the Talibinazation of Judaism. (and another scary example of what would happen if these crazies ever got control of the the Israeli government.) I only hope the poor women have the courage, strength and support to standup to Mullah Yosef and his fatwahs.

3

 May 06, 2009 at 07:24 AM honestlyfrum Says:

Even if they are not married? making up new halachos as they go along.

4

 May 06, 2009 at 07:23 AM whats with you. Says:

Reply to #2  
Anonymous Says:

Another dangerous step in the Talibinazation of Judaism. (and another scary example of what would happen if these crazies ever got control of the the Israeli government.) I only hope the poor women have the courage, strength and support to standup to Mullah Yosef and his fatwahs.

who do you think you are to talk like that against Maran Rav Yosef and the torah. if that's the Halach that's what we do period. you better do Teshiva for thinking like that. you made a hugh chillul Hashem.

5

 May 06, 2009 at 07:45 AM Chassid Says:

Whats next?, It seems that Rabbi Ovadya loves contoversy. It it well accepted for Ashkenasic women to just wear a wig which covers all the hair verses a snood like the Seferdim with all the hair sticking out. So Rabbi please look into the matter urguntly with your blind eye sight.

6

 May 06, 2009 at 07:43 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #2  
Anonymous Says:

Another dangerous step in the Talibinazation of Judaism. (and another scary example of what would happen if these crazies ever got control of the the Israeli government.) I only hope the poor women have the courage, strength and support to standup to Mullah Yosef and his fatwahs.

WOW! wheather you agree with the Rav or not he is still a Rav!! What happened to Kavod HAtorah. Is this a jewish site.

7

 May 06, 2009 at 07:42 AM ashkenazi Says:

Reply to #2  
Anonymous Says:

Another dangerous step in the Talibinazation of Judaism. (and another scary example of what would happen if these crazies ever got control of the the Israeli government.) I only hope the poor women have the courage, strength and support to standup to Mullah Yosef and his fatwahs.

Are you crazy, are you at all jewish? Comparing thr torah law to talibanizim?

8

 May 06, 2009 at 07:40 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #4  
whats with you. Says:

who do you think you are to talk like that against Maran Rav Yosef and the torah. if that's the Halach that's what we do period. you better do Teshiva for thinking like that. you made a hugh chillul Hashem.

There is no daas torah that requires this extreme treatment of frumme women working in these institutions who rely on public funds and tzadakah from the wider community to survive. Without hurling insults at Rabbi Yosef (whose views are obviously out of synch with most of the other Gadolim in EY) he risks having this position reversed in the courts and incurring financial penalties if they illegally discharge women for failure to obey this mindless edict. Why don't they focus on the lack of midos and derech eretz among their men and bochurim on their T'znius squads who are truly Taliban like and frightening. They are a much greater threat to Klal Yisroel than a frumme woman who has a few hairs showing.

9

 May 06, 2009 at 07:30 AM yoelyg Says:

Kol hakuvd to shas! hope all schools will do the same & musiac will come soon, by torh laws woman must be cover'd fully, MI KAMCU YISROEL

10

 May 06, 2009 at 07:54 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #7  
ashkenazi Says:

Are you crazy, are you at all jewish? Comparing thr torah law to talibanizim?

it's not Torah law!! Unmarried women do not cover their hair, and waht about Ashkenazim?

11

 May 06, 2009 at 07:54 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #7  
ashkenazi Says:

Are you crazy, are you at all jewish? Comparing thr torah law to talibanizim?

The Torah doesn't say women must not show their hair. That's only one interpretation. In prior years, many wives of respected Rebbes just wore hats that left much of their hair showing. Talibanization is taking the most extreme views and requiring everyone to follow only that one view.

12

 May 06, 2009 at 07:53 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #1  
mottel Says:

What are the women whining about? Every employer is entitled to enforce a dress code; you don't like it, leave and open your own business!
Since their posek requires scarves, and total coverage of hair, this is the example they wish to set to the children in their school

and if another employer bans all head coverings and beards, that'll be okay?

13

 May 06, 2009 at 07:52 AM meira Kingberg Says:

That is the Sephardic halacha, ladies. Don't like it, become Ashkenazi.
#2 How dare you refer to Maran Rav Ovadia that way. Only an Ashkenazia would say such a thing. It is not in the Sephardic middot to do so. YOU are the "poor" woman not I. Thinking so little of yourself and your husband. And what does he think of you? Are you treasured and respected as you should be? See my last paragraph. Beauty knows no age nor style of shmatas. It is in your spirit and soul or it isn't. And it is recognized more in modesty than in brazenness. Trust me, if I were single, a shidduch would not be a problem. So what are you really looking to prove by going naked, my modern Lady Godiva?

Honestlyfrum, Not being made up as we go. That's the halacha. If I were single could I go down King George without a blouse just cause I'm not married?Covering is a modesty issue not a respect during tefillah one.

I'm 62 and newly religious about 3 years. I wear head coverings all the time because I am married and still at my age have hair to die for. Which makes another point. Since it is so great and has been mistaken for a sheitle, when I was starting on the path, why should I pay thousands to wear someone else's. I'd rather wear a nice scarf and make a personal statement.
It is not the Taliban. Because of the above, I feel more free, not like a piece of meat walking, yes even at 62. Call it good genes. . And BTW, I agree with "What's with you," completely.

14

 May 06, 2009 at 07:48 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #4  
whats with you. Says:

who do you think you are to talk like that against Maran Rav Yosef and the torah. if that's the Halach that's what we do period. you better do Teshiva for thinking like that. you made a hugh chillul Hashem.

Teshuvah? For calling out tyranny?? I say again, kol hazak, kol hakavod, may hashem provide these women with the strength to stand up to this madness.

15

 May 06, 2009 at 07:30 AM yoelyg Says:

Kol hakuvd to shas! hope all schools will do the same & musiac will come soon, by torh laws woman must be cover'd fully, MI KAMCU YISROEL

16

 May 06, 2009 at 08:07 AM Meira Kingberg Says:

Reply to #5  
Chassid Says:

Whats next?, It seems that Rabbi Ovadya loves contoversy. It it well accepted for Ashkenasic women to just wear a wig which covers all the hair verses a snood like the Seferdim with all the hair sticking out. So Rabbi please look into the matter urguntly with your blind eye sight.

Chassid, Ashkenazim are Ashkenazim and Sefardim are Sefardim. There are two halachot. So, with all the respect yo did not accord my Rav, we do not wear snoods with "all our hair sticking out." The only hair I see sticking out of any place is on Ashkenazia heads, at least here in Jerusalem. Occasionally, because we have imperfectly formed heads, a bit of the hairline will show at the edge of a scarf, hence the snood that covers ears even in 95º weather but this bit of flattened, pulled back hair is considered acceptable to most since it is not a style issue and not meant to enhance appearance.

Thank you ##6-7-9.

10, What about Ashkenazim? Consult your own rabbis but if you work in our schools please understand we want our children to learn OUR ways, in fact we are required to ensure they do so. An dyes unmarried women particular widows an divorcees are required to do so.
Do your virgin daughters go about topless? It's the same basis for the halacha.

17

 May 06, 2009 at 08:06 AM JUST THINKING Says:

These are schools, where their job is to educate the children. Shas has every right to ask the the teachers to come in a way that would educate the children that that is the Halacha for Sepharadim. At home go how ever you want, but if you want to educate Sephardic children you must follow their rules. Can a Jew teach in a Christian school with a Magen David necklace? would you want a teacher wearing a cross in the class?
Rabbi Ovadia Yosef has shown time and again that he is not scared of any one and will say what he believes is right. That's a true Gadol!

The schools are funded by people who want it to follow the path of Rabbi Ovadia Yosef. He is not making this rule a secret . If any donor doesn't like it, he can stop donating. As for me. I will God Willing double my yearly donation to their schools

18

 May 06, 2009 at 08:01 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #4  
whats with you. Says:

who do you think you are to talk like that against Maran Rav Yosef and the torah. if that's the Halach that's what we do period. you better do Teshiva for thinking like that. you made a hugh chillul Hashem.

The Jewish religion is about love to G-D not forcing human beings against their will!!

19

 May 06, 2009 at 07:57 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #1  
mottel Says:

What are the women whining about? Every employer is entitled to enforce a dress code; you don't like it, leave and open your own business!
Since their posek requires scarves, and total coverage of hair, this is the example they wish to set to the children in their school

So are you against the minimum wag rule? Because every boss can do everything??

20

 May 06, 2009 at 08:14 AM Taliban? Says:

Reply to #8  
Anonymous Says:

There is no daas torah that requires this extreme treatment of frumme women working in these institutions who rely on public funds and tzadakah from the wider community to survive. Without hurling insults at Rabbi Yosef (whose views are obviously out of synch with most of the other Gadolim in EY) he risks having this position reversed in the courts and incurring financial penalties if they illegally discharge women for failure to obey this mindless edict. Why don't they focus on the lack of midos and derech eretz among their men and bochurim on their T'znius squads who are truly Taliban like and frightening. They are a much greater threat to Klal Yisroel than a frumme woman who has a few hairs showing.

I agree there are other area he needs to focus on also. But that should not detract from dealing with this issue.
If he is Taliban, then we need more Taliban like him.

21

 May 06, 2009 at 08:14 AM Anonymous Says:

Just by the way R' Elyuashiv and R'Chaim Kanievsky also hold that shaitels are assur even for ashkenazim!!!!

22

 May 06, 2009 at 08:28 AM Torah Modesty Says:

"Please help us," she pleaded. "Have we become Iran? Are we like Hamas? This place is turning into Khomeinistan… we are merely women trying to work and support our Torah studying husbands, without getting involved in Shas' internal politics."

No this is Torah ! You need to rid yourself of your western definition of modesty and come back to the Torah definition of modesty!

23

 May 06, 2009 at 08:12 AM Taliban? Says:

Ah.... new words to make fun of, and marginally the observant:

It used to be "fanatics"
now it became "Ultra-Orthodox"

and the latest "Taliban tactics"

Anyone who knows and understands the tactics of propaganda is aware of this.

All posters who use the above terms, do so with the intent of making the non-observent appear foolish, crazy, or over the top, in their observance. This way we can dismiss what they do.

It is a way to marginalize all observant Jews.

Bottom line is that we observe Torah, and the rules of our rabbonim.
That is what Judaisim is.

Yes, we have a situation today, with barely observant rabbis, ignorant rabbis, liberal rabbis, or ones who just need to be lenient because of their communities, go against the rulings of the holiest, and most learned of the recent generations.

We all know, (if you don't know this, it is because you don't want to know), that the vast majority of the frum rabbonim have taught us to cover a married woman's hair completely.
Some prefered a teechel, and every feels that is best.
Some allow a shaitel.
Chabad actually prefers the shaitel.
Some allow a snood.

But NONE have ever allowed a married woman to go out with her own hair exposed.

All agree that a married woman's hair must be fully covered.
Many prefer that even a shaitel be covered, at least partially.
Some object to long-haired "sexy looking" shaitlech.

This is not new. This is what we have been taught for generations.

However every time it is attempted to be be enforced, those Liberal factions of Mod Orth and others who were/are lenient on this shout out and want their liberal rabbi to be the one we all listen to.

The great tzadkim of the past, those who taught us and ruled for us, for generations, become "Taliban" or "Ultra Orthodox" people to ignore.

I remember as a bochur I was at a Kol Nidre drasha of one of the great tzadikim of the previous generations. And we cried out to everyone against those fancy shaitlech. He was against shaitlech which did not "look like a shaitel".... if the wig looked real enough to look like your own hair, he felt it was ossur!
And this is a Tzadik EVERYONE raved about how great he was.

But, here he may be called a Taliban! How sad.

24

 May 06, 2009 at 08:08 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #13  
meira Kingberg Says:

That is the Sephardic halacha, ladies. Don't like it, become Ashkenazi.
#2 How dare you refer to Maran Rav Ovadia that way. Only an Ashkenazia would say such a thing. It is not in the Sephardic middot to do so. YOU are the "poor" woman not I. Thinking so little of yourself and your husband. And what does he think of you? Are you treasured and respected as you should be? See my last paragraph. Beauty knows no age nor style of shmatas. It is in your spirit and soul or it isn't. And it is recognized more in modesty than in brazenness. Trust me, if I were single, a shidduch would not be a problem. So what are you really looking to prove by going naked, my modern Lady Godiva?

Honestlyfrum, Not being made up as we go. That's the halacha. If I were single could I go down King George without a blouse just cause I'm not married?Covering is a modesty issue not a respect during tefillah one.

I'm 62 and newly religious about 3 years. I wear head coverings all the time because I am married and still at my age have hair to die for. Which makes another point. Since it is so great and has been mistaken for a sheitle, when I was starting on the path, why should I pay thousands to wear someone else's. I'd rather wear a nice scarf and make a personal statement.
It is not the Taliban. Because of the above, I feel more free, not like a piece of meat walking, yes even at 62. Call it good genes. . And BTW, I agree with "What's with you," completely.

With deep respect for your words and your commitment to frumkeit -- I've always found that the newly frum can be the most rigid and least compromising as they take on the burden of the mitzvot. A full yeshivah education/lifetime experience provides exposure to the complexity and sublety of halacha which its sometimes easy to miss at a first look. And calling an unmarried woman who doesn't want to be forced to cover her hair "brazen" is a little much.

25

 May 06, 2009 at 08:33 AM Anonymous Says:

Religious schools should be able to adopt whatever dress code and behavior code for employees while at work as they wish, however, there is plenty of room for legitimate argument that those schools who take public funds should be limited on the religious restrictions they place on their employees. Publicly-funded institutions should be teaching tolerance and respect for those with different views. Public money should not be used to favor one particular religious view over another.

26

 May 06, 2009 at 08:38 AM Whoa now... Says:

Reply to #2  
Anonymous Says:

Another dangerous step in the Talibinazation of Judaism. (and another scary example of what would happen if these crazies ever got control of the the Israeli government.) I only hope the poor women have the courage, strength and support to standup to Mullah Yosef and his fatwahs.

We are in the period of mourning over the 24K students that passed away because they didn't 'respect' each other. While you may disagree with Harav Ovadia Yosef's views and opinions, he is definately one of the top rabbonim of our generation, and a halachic expert. If that is his shita, and you don't agree with it, who are you to go and denounce him? Maybe you shoud consider this the next time you "klap al cheit". Moshiach is coming real soon, it's not too late...

27

 May 06, 2009 at 08:36 AM Gadolwannabe Says:

These are female government workers, not workers in private businesses. I realize that Israel has no constitution and therefore makes the rules of law up as they go along, but it is scary to think that one can lose a job because they do not comply with some edict of a religious leader, be it a Chacham or an Ayitolah. Our Rabbanim should try to educate, give musar, plead and pray not force people to do something which does not harm society.

28

 May 06, 2009 at 08:45 AM sherree Says:

Reply to #22  
Torah Modesty Says:

"Please help us," she pleaded. "Have we become Iran? Are we like Hamas? This place is turning into Khomeinistan… we are merely women trying to work and support our Torah studying husbands, without getting involved in Shas' internal politics."

No this is Torah ! You need to rid yourself of your western definition of modesty and come back to the Torah definition of modesty!

Please go back to the Torah yourself and show me where it says women have to cover their hair with shmates? Stop picking on women already what changes are being imposed on men to assure safe schools and safe kids?

29

 May 06, 2009 at 08:42 AM sherree Says:

Reply to #1  
mottel Says:

What are the women whining about? Every employer is entitled to enforce a dress code; you don't like it, leave and open your own business!
Since their posek requires scarves, and total coverage of hair, this is the example they wish to set to the children in their school

you are right mottel these horrible women should leave and send their husbands to work instead!

30

 May 06, 2009 at 08:54 AM Get it straight Says:

Reply to #27  
Gadolwannabe Says:

These are female government workers, not workers in private businesses. I realize that Israel has no constitution and therefore makes the rules of law up as they go along, but it is scary to think that one can lose a job because they do not comply with some edict of a religious leader, be it a Chacham or an Ayitolah. Our Rabbanim should try to educate, give musar, plead and pray not force people to do something which does not harm society.

#28 mentioned that, "Our Rabbanim should try to educate, give musar, plead and pray not force people to do something which does not harm society.”

But it does harm society! Every little thing that we do has a hasboa on the surrounding society. In the states there is a city called 'SF' which has a lot of 'mishkav zachoornics' and the scientists noted that in that city, even the birds act in the same way!

So they are trying to protect society by enforcing these rules. They are not enforcing it on you or me, they are enforcing it amongst their workers, whoe should be teaching by example. Now if they go and protest, what is that teaching the students, co-workers, children, and the 'hamoin am'?

If they don't like it, find another place of employment! But to speak out against such a huge gadol batorah, and compare his sheetas to talibanization? That is a tremendous act of 'azus' and i daven that the aibishter will have rachmonos on the people that can speak such 'nivel peh'.

What will be when Moshiach comes? Will you also rebel when when the Borei Olam reveals Himself through the neviim, and tells us the halochos?

Because of such people He isn't letting Mashiach come. Wake up already! Such a shame...

"Toirah - ma tehei olayha"?

31

 May 06, 2009 at 09:07 AM egghead Says:

Amazing how people just talk and make statements and showing off what big am ha'aretz they are, nowhere in this article was mentioned that girls have to cover their and nowhere in halacha is it required for girls to cover their hair, so people before screaming check your facts

32

 May 06, 2009 at 09:03 AM well said Says:

Reply to #30  
Get it straight Says:

#28 mentioned that, "Our Rabbanim should try to educate, give musar, plead and pray not force people to do something which does not harm society.”

But it does harm society! Every little thing that we do has a hasboa on the surrounding society. In the states there is a city called 'SF' which has a lot of 'mishkav zachoornics' and the scientists noted that in that city, even the birds act in the same way!

So they are trying to protect society by enforcing these rules. They are not enforcing it on you or me, they are enforcing it amongst their workers, whoe should be teaching by example. Now if they go and protest, what is that teaching the students, co-workers, children, and the 'hamoin am'?

If they don't like it, find another place of employment! But to speak out against such a huge gadol batorah, and compare his sheetas to talibanization? That is a tremendous act of 'azus' and i daven that the aibishter will have rachmonos on the people that can speak such 'nivel peh'.

What will be when Moshiach comes? Will you also rebel when when the Borei Olam reveals Himself through the neviim, and tells us the halochos?

Because of such people He isn't letting Mashiach come. Wake up already! Such a shame...

"Toirah - ma tehei olayha"?

OT AZOIY!!! Excellent! Very well said.

33

 May 06, 2009 at 09:01 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #20  
Taliban? Says:

I agree there are other area he needs to focus on also. But that should not detract from dealing with this issue.
If he is Taliban, then we need more Taliban like him.

NO he is not Taliban, but he is forcing his religion like the Taliban!! It's dangerous!

34

 May 06, 2009 at 08:58 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #23  
Taliban? Says:

Ah.... new words to make fun of, and marginally the observant:

It used to be "fanatics"
now it became "Ultra-Orthodox"

and the latest "Taliban tactics"

Anyone who knows and understands the tactics of propaganda is aware of this.

All posters who use the above terms, do so with the intent of making the non-observent appear foolish, crazy, or over the top, in their observance. This way we can dismiss what they do.

It is a way to marginalize all observant Jews.

Bottom line is that we observe Torah, and the rules of our rabbonim.
That is what Judaisim is.

Yes, we have a situation today, with barely observant rabbis, ignorant rabbis, liberal rabbis, or ones who just need to be lenient because of their communities, go against the rulings of the holiest, and most learned of the recent generations.

We all know, (if you don't know this, it is because you don't want to know), that the vast majority of the frum rabbonim have taught us to cover a married woman's hair completely.
Some prefered a teechel, and every feels that is best.
Some allow a shaitel.
Chabad actually prefers the shaitel.
Some allow a snood.

But NONE have ever allowed a married woman to go out with her own hair exposed.

All agree that a married woman's hair must be fully covered.
Many prefer that even a shaitel be covered, at least partially.
Some object to long-haired "sexy looking" shaitlech.

This is not new. This is what we have been taught for generations.

However every time it is attempted to be be enforced, those Liberal factions of Mod Orth and others who were/are lenient on this shout out and want their liberal rabbi to be the one we all listen to.

The great tzadkim of the past, those who taught us and ruled for us, for generations, become "Taliban" or "Ultra Orthodox" people to ignore.

I remember as a bochur I was at a Kol Nidre drasha of one of the great tzadikim of the previous generations. And we cried out to everyone against those fancy shaitlech. He was against shaitlech which did not "look like a shaitel".... if the wig looked real enough to look like your own hair, he felt it was ossur!
And this is a Tzadik EVERYONE raved about how great he was.

But, here he may be called a Taliban! How sad.

I don't have even a slim desire to hurt your feelings, BUT
The conventional law about a sietel is in Shilchen orach # 75 that it is indeed permitted!!! Especially look at the raav -Lubavicha rabbi, so how con you force innocent women??

35

 May 06, 2009 at 09:10 AM Cassid Says:

Reply to #16  
Meira Kingberg Says:

Chassid, Ashkenazim are Ashkenazim and Sefardim are Sefardim. There are two halachot. So, with all the respect yo did not accord my Rav, we do not wear snoods with "all our hair sticking out." The only hair I see sticking out of any place is on Ashkenazia heads, at least here in Jerusalem. Occasionally, because we have imperfectly formed heads, a bit of the hairline will show at the edge of a scarf, hence the snood that covers ears even in 95º weather but this bit of flattened, pulled back hair is considered acceptable to most since it is not a style issue and not meant to enhance appearance.

Thank you ##6-7-9.

10, What about Ashkenazim? Consult your own rabbis but if you work in our schools please understand we want our children to learn OUR ways, in fact we are required to ensure they do so. An dyes unmarried women particular widows an divorcees are required to do so.
Do your virgin daughters go about topless? It's the same basis for the halacha.

Maby the Rabbi should look at what is taking place in the Safardic comunity in the US or other parts of the world, not only Yerishuliym. Here in the US a big % of the snood covoring Safardim are not modes to say the least. I think it would be much more znius for them to wear wigs.

36

 May 06, 2009 at 09:17 AM Just Thinking Says:

BY THE WAY Many ashkenazic schools for example the SEMINAR CHADASAH in jerusalem force the women to wear wigs and NOT Head head coverings.
Hypocrits at their best
#31 if you want to see Rabbi Ovadia Yosef's reasoning he has several responsa in YAbia Omer, and I have a feeling he knows a bit more then all of us

37

 May 06, 2009 at 09:16 AM izzy Says:

This is not Jewish law its extremism.

38

 May 06, 2009 at 10:25 AM WolfishMusings Says:

I see two conflicting points of view here.

For starters, I don't think it's beyond the pale to have halacha play a role in determining the dress code in a religious office in Israel. If there is anyplace where the rules of halacha should apply in determining a dress code, then perhaps that's the place.

On the other hand, I find the lack of recognition of other streams of frum Judaism to be disturbing. There are millions of frum women all over the world who cover their heads with wigs. The practice of doing so does not belong to some fringe movement -- it takes place all over the world and is endorsed by people who are, by all accounts, talmedai chachomim and gedolim. The fact that the movements and customs of all these women are being marginalized is very disturbing.

I'm also left to wonder where this will lead. If one allows an employer to impose his view of halacha as the standard for the workplace, then where does it end? Should an employer be allowed to raid an employee's lunch box to see if the meat in the sandwich meets his approval? Should he be allowed to tell his employees that they can't go to a certain local resturaunt for lunch because it doesn't meet his standards (real or imagined)? Should he be able to sack an employee for taking a non-mehadrin bus to work when a mehadrin one is available? In short, where does it end?

Furthermore, is it right to deprive a worker of the benefits of employment simply because they follow a version of halacha that is widely followed in the world but not up to the standards of the boss? Intangible benefits such as seniority, reputation, familiarity with co-workers and the like all have benefits and should not be lost simply because a boss becomes "more frum" or decides to impose a higher standard after employment has been contracted.

It's simply not fair to ask your employees to live up to your standard of halacha when the standard that they currently live up to is accepted worldwide.

The Wolf

39

 May 06, 2009 at 10:50 AM meira Kingberg Says:

Reply to #24  
Anonymous Says:

With deep respect for your words and your commitment to frumkeit -- I've always found that the newly frum can be the most rigid and least compromising as they take on the burden of the mitzvot. A full yeshivah education/lifetime experience provides exposure to the complexity and sublety of halacha which its sometimes easy to miss at a first look. And calling an unmarried woman who doesn't want to be forced to cover her hair "brazen" is a little much.

Thank you but i am not committed to "frumkeit." I am committed to a Torah life, pleasing to Hashem. After 62 years in Galut, I am probably the least rigid person you will meet. I'm sorry, those are not my words but the words of our Chachamim including The Ben Ish Hai. Brazenness is the opposite of modesty. It isn't limited in Jewish thought to bar hopping and "coming on" to the opposite gender. It is any behavior that a woman uses to proclaim her availability. We are to be discrete and yes, even shy. In other words feminine. Something sorely lacking in today's Western female.
With respect to you, a full yeshiva education is something foisted upon Sepharedim to turn them into the Ashkenazi version of what a "proper' Jew is supposed to be. We have always taken the more tolerant and real life rather than purely Academic approach. What 62 years isn't enough life experience and learning comes many ways. Who said I didn't study in that time. I wasn't in bars or traveling to Tibet to find myself. I was searching in the Judeo-Christian literature and found my foundation was there all along. Please do not condescend to gray heads. It is disrespectful and not halachic.

40

 May 06, 2009 at 10:36 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #18  
Anonymous Says:

The Jewish religion is about love to G-D not forcing human beings against their will!!

Ok, so let's toss out the Torah and Halacha because there are things in ther eI'm not crazy about doing. I'll just go to the Kotel every day and tell G-d how much I love Him, He'll understand.
First of all "religion" is about rules and doing the things we don't want to do. Second, Judaism isn't a "religion" it's a way of life and when adults grow up, they learn that life often includes doing things we don't want to because they are the right things to do. So either way you are wrong and need to GROW UP!

41

 May 06, 2009 at 10:32 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #17  
JUST THINKING Says:

These are schools, where their job is to educate the children. Shas has every right to ask the the teachers to come in a way that would educate the children that that is the Halacha for Sepharadim. At home go how ever you want, but if you want to educate Sephardic children you must follow their rules. Can a Jew teach in a Christian school with a Magen David necklace? would you want a teacher wearing a cross in the class?
Rabbi Ovadia Yosef has shown time and again that he is not scared of any one and will say what he believes is right. That's a true Gadol!

The schools are funded by people who want it to follow the path of Rabbi Ovadia Yosef. He is not making this rule a secret . If any donor doesn't like it, he can stop donating. As for me. I will God Willing double my yearly donation to their schools

Actually, most christian schools would allow the Magen David because it is not a symbol of hate as is the cross. A lot of them have started wearing it to "identify" with their "roots." We wouldn't have to promote Christianity but we would be expected to refrain from speaking doctrines that contradict theirs e.g. that their false messiah is just that and that we consider the NT a false book.

It's not an equivalent argument but I agree, if an Ashkenazi person has a problem with the ruling, he/she can decline to participate.

42

 May 06, 2009 at 10:14 AM Anonymous Says:

Finaly someone has the guts to stand up and demand torah values.

43

 May 06, 2009 at 10:53 AM Yehuda Says:

Reply to #5  
Chassid Says:

Whats next?, It seems that Rabbi Ovadya loves contoversy. It it well accepted for Ashkenasic women to just wear a wig which covers all the hair verses a snood like the Seferdim with all the hair sticking out. So Rabbi please look into the matter urguntly with your blind eye sight.

As a matter of fact the Lubavitcher Rebbe stated that a wig is prefable since all the hair is covered while with scarves or hats it is possible for hair to end up showing.

44

 May 06, 2009 at 10:10 AM Askenaz Says:

To all of you,
I work in a frum company and the policy about dress code is the women should wear skirts and not pants what so ever. So all the Goim should get up and scream and say please help us. But this is our company's policy and they respect that. why are we Jews have to act different even towards our own Rabbis?
Do Teshuva!! and respect Rab Ovadia's pesak.

45

 May 06, 2009 at 11:09 AM Yiddene Says:

I have news for all of you out there. My father at the age of 96 just passed away. He had Smichas from the biggest gedolai hador, Yonasson Shteif, Pressburger Rebbe etc. and he told me... ladies listen up. The right way and what the Torah says is that THE HALACHA IS THAT A WOMEN MUST COVER HER HAIR! Covering hair does NOT MEAN COVERING HAIR WITH A "WIG" or another persons hair, or synthetic hair (whom are we fooling) covering hair means COVERING WITH A SCARF! and when Moshiach comes we will ALL COVER OUR HAIR THE "RIGHT" WAY WHICH IS A SCARF!! So prepare yourselves.....

46

 May 06, 2009 at 11:07 AM Anonymous Says:

A very dangerous precedent, to say all the wig wearing women do not meet the halachic standard. The need for rabbis to keep adding more stringent rules/guidelines is a real shame and they should keep busy working on real issues/difficulties facing our community. it is a blessing that at the end of the day the prohibition of wig wearing will be accepted only by a minority of women (as with bullet proof stockings).

47

 May 06, 2009 at 11:44 AM Torah Truth Says:

Reply to #5  
Chassid Says:

Whats next?, It seems that Rabbi Ovadya loves contoversy. It it well accepted for Ashkenasic women to just wear a wig which covers all the hair verses a snood like the Seferdim with all the hair sticking out. So Rabbi please look into the matter urguntly with your blind eye sight.

Hey Michutzaf... have a little Derech Eretz for a Gadol B'Yisrael. I am not a Sefradi and my wife wears and Sheitel, but a little Derech Eretz is in order. BTW, his p'ssak was for Shas institutions so what does the Ashkenazi Minhag have to do with this?

48

 May 06, 2009 at 12:16 PM Getzel the Pretzel Says:

Reply to #46  
Anonymous Says:

A very dangerous precedent, to say all the wig wearing women do not meet the halachic standard. The need for rabbis to keep adding more stringent rules/guidelines is a real shame and they should keep busy working on real issues/difficulties facing our community. it is a blessing that at the end of the day the prohibition of wig wearing will be accepted only by a minority of women (as with bullet proof stockings).

Why blog if you do not know what you are talking about?

The heter for wearing a wig is based on the shiltei giborim in Shabbos. Look at the Be'er Sheva responsa 17 that asks numerous questions on this heter. Especailly the mashmaos from rashi in Erechin. Also look at the Maharil Diskin in the teshuvos.

I could go on and on. I will let the "whatever I am in the mood to write regardless of the facts" bloggers add to the conversation.

Also, the heter that we have is very fragile. Accusing people of adding on chumros when not knowing the facts is pathetic.

49

 May 06, 2009 at 12:42 PM Anonymous Says:

#48 Why so personal you could have made your point without the negative personal comments…

Wearing a wig was/is accepted halachicly no one can argue that point, and that will/should not change because a few gedollim have their opinion, .

50

 May 06, 2009 at 12:49 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #16  
Meira Kingberg Says:

Chassid, Ashkenazim are Ashkenazim and Sefardim are Sefardim. There are two halachot. So, with all the respect yo did not accord my Rav, we do not wear snoods with "all our hair sticking out." The only hair I see sticking out of any place is on Ashkenazia heads, at least here in Jerusalem. Occasionally, because we have imperfectly formed heads, a bit of the hairline will show at the edge of a scarf, hence the snood that covers ears even in 95º weather but this bit of flattened, pulled back hair is considered acceptable to most since it is not a style issue and not meant to enhance appearance.

Thank you ##6-7-9.

10, What about Ashkenazim? Consult your own rabbis but if you work in our schools please understand we want our children to learn OUR ways, in fact we are required to ensure they do so. An dyes unmarried women particular widows an divorcees are required to do so.
Do your virgin daughters go about topless? It's the same basis for the halacha.

do you accept Ashkenazi money to help run your schools?

51

 May 06, 2009 at 12:55 PM heilig Says:

Reply to #2  
Anonymous Says:

Another dangerous step in the Talibinazation of Judaism. (and another scary example of what would happen if these crazies ever got control of the the Israeli government.) I only hope the poor women have the courage, strength and support to standup to Mullah Yosef and his fatwahs.

i'm not sure this was sent under the directive of Hacham Ovadia Yossef Shlita the fact that he paskened like that does not mean that he wants to enforce it on those who are not religious after all he ruled on thousands of other issues like hilchot shabbat ,tziyzis, tfillin,meat and milk and myriads of other it is possible that he wants to impose tzniut because there are boys in the school system who should not be exposed to pritzut. Be it as it may the comparison to murderers and terrorists is way out of line to fathom that if they do not comply threir fate would the same as the taliban advocates and acts on is totally outrageous

52

 May 06, 2009 at 02:09 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #43  
Yehuda Says:

As a matter of fact the Lubavitcher Rebbe stated that a wig is prefable since all the hair is covered while with scarves or hats it is possible for hair to end up showing.

This post is hysterically funny. I shouldn't show my onw hair but someone else's is ok? How does that work?

53

 May 06, 2009 at 02:30 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #52  
Anonymous Says:

This post is hysterically funny. I shouldn't show my onw hair but someone else's is ok? How does that work?

Okay, but you're laughing of a Jewish law!! That's the halocha, look in shilchen orach chapter 75.

54

 May 06, 2009 at 02:33 PM Bugsy Siegel Says:

Reply to #1  
mottel Says:

What are the women whining about? Every employer is entitled to enforce a dress code; you don't like it, leave and open your own business!
Since their posek requires scarves, and total coverage of hair, this is the example they wish to set to the children in their school

An employer is not entitled to enforce a dress code if the employer is trying to impose religious views on its employees. A publicly funded institution does not have the right to impose a religious dress code either.

55

 May 06, 2009 at 03:49 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #45  
Yiddene Says:

I have news for all of you out there. My father at the age of 96 just passed away. He had Smichas from the biggest gedolai hador, Yonasson Shteif, Pressburger Rebbe etc. and he told me... ladies listen up. The right way and what the Torah says is that THE HALACHA IS THAT A WOMEN MUST COVER HER HAIR! Covering hair does NOT MEAN COVERING HAIR WITH A "WIG" or another persons hair, or synthetic hair (whom are we fooling) covering hair means COVERING WITH A SCARF! and when Moshiach comes we will ALL COVER OUR HAIR THE "RIGHT" WAY WHICH IS A SCARF!! So prepare yourselves.....

A SCARF DOES NOT COVER A WOMAN'S HAIR PROPERLY!!!!!!!!!!!! According to the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Z'TL, a wig is preferable because it ensures that no hair will fall out. I see women in public who wear scarves, and they always have to readjust their scarves due to their hair falling out.

56

 May 06, 2009 at 03:44 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #9  
yoelyg Says:

Kol hakuvd to shas! hope all schools will do the same & musiac will come soon, by torh laws woman must be cover'd fully, MI KAMCU YISROEL

A wig completely covers the hiar unlike scarves or snoods. Whenever I see women in my community who wear these things in public, I always see their hair falling out. Then they have to readjust them in public. Why doesn't Rav Yosef so this? Btw, Rav Mordechai Eliyahu's rebbetzin covers her hair with a wig, she is Sefardi. So is she going against Torah law, C'V?

57

 May 06, 2009 at 05:20 PM Charles Hall Says:

Reply to #49  
Anonymous Says:

#48 Why so personal you could have made your point without the negative personal comments…

Wearing a wig was/is accepted halachicly no one can argue that point, and that will/should not change because a few gedollim have their opinion, .

Chacham Ovadiah does argue with you. Is there any internet blogger of the stature to argue with him? And why should he not tell his own schools to follow his own halachic opinions?

58

 May 06, 2009 at 05:03 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #55  
Anonymous Says:

A SCARF DOES NOT COVER A WOMAN'S HAIR PROPERLY!!!!!!!!!!!! According to the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Z'TL, a wig is preferable because it ensures that no hair will fall out. I see women in public who wear scarves, and they always have to readjust their scarves due to their hair falling out.

that is untrue! women who takes the time and effort to put on a tichel properly can cover all of the hair. a soft cap must be worn underneath, this gathers all of the hair, and also keeps the tichel from slipping, and bobby pins further secure it place. those who you see with hair falling out usually tuck the cloth behind their ears. it is impossible to fully cover the hair without also covering part of or most of the ears, and if they would do this, hair would not escape. a properly worn tichel is definitely way more tzanua than a $3000 sheital that you have to scrutinize 3 time over in order to be sure that its a sheital.

59

 May 06, 2009 at 07:32 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #58  
Anonymous Says:

that is untrue! women who takes the time and effort to put on a tichel properly can cover all of the hair. a soft cap must be worn underneath, this gathers all of the hair, and also keeps the tichel from slipping, and bobby pins further secure it place. those who you see with hair falling out usually tuck the cloth behind their ears. it is impossible to fully cover the hair without also covering part of or most of the ears, and if they would do this, hair would not escape. a properly worn tichel is definitely way more tzanua than a $3000 sheital that you have to scrutinize 3 time over in order to be sure that its a sheital.

You are soooo verrrry right.

But, the "chassidishe" teechels which do cover very well, are the ones sold in Willi, BP, KJ, etc.,

The CH crowd was using "Israeli scarfs" as teechels, and they DID slip back, leaving the front of the hair uncovered. They never did seem to learn to use the real Chassidishe teechels in CH.

Also, they put these scarfs directly onto their hair with no soft caps..... DUH... and then they slipped.

Some of my friends told me they did this on purpose, because they "wanted" the scarfs to slip back. This way it was like they were not being "Frummies" and felt more comfortable in other neighborhoods.

In reality, they just wanted an "easier, softer way" to do the hair covering thing.

60

 May 06, 2009 at 07:27 PM Anonymous Says:

Yes, the Lubavitcher Rebbe liked Shaitels.

But there is a reason why he prefered Shaitels, while the rest of the Chassidishe Rebbes prefered a Teechel.

1. Among his kehilla were many baalei teshuva. He was concerned that they would be more willing to comply with a shaitel.

2. The other Chassidim usually cut thier hair rather too short to wear out doors uncovered. So, when they go out in a teechel, they are VERY careful to choose a teechel style which will not ride up and expose their short hair.

3.. For the same reason as #2, the "Scarf teechel" that is worn over long hair can easily be pulled off and disappear into the woman's purse, to be put back on when she got back to Crown Heights. This was an issue in CH at one time. Women were working in NY, wearing their own hair to work, and only covering up back in CH. That is the main reason the Rebbe preferred a Shaitel. Shaitels are less likely to spend the day in the woman's purse.

This was an appropriate decision for him to make considering his kehilla.

Had his chassidim been from the same groups as the other Chassidim, I probably might have had alternative suggestions.

But either way, if you care about tznius, why should it trouble you to cover that shaitel? Plenty of other Chassidim wear shaitels, AND COVER THEM WITH HATS OR SCARFS

61

 May 06, 2009 at 07:25 PM Anonymous Says:

# 57 For certain the Chacham can require a dress code for his institutions.(even while receiving government funds, that’s another conversation)

62

 May 06, 2009 at 07:21 PM Anonymous Says:

# 57 Chacham Ovadiah did not prohibit wigs, only for his followers that work for his institutions. At this time the Chacam would not be able to implement such a prohibition on wigs for the majority of yiden only a very small minority. There is no need to list all the gedolim whose wives wore wigs. I am not sure what you don’t understand most rabbis for the past 50 years viewed a wig as an acceptable hair covering.

63

 May 06, 2009 at 08:35 PM MyOpinion Says:

This is a very interesting article with its comments. I gave up my wig l'kovod tznius and Shem Shomayim, because it is the right way a Bas Yisroel should look, because it didn't make sense to wear a non-jew's hair, didn't make sense to pay hundreds, then thousands of dollars to keep the business going, didn't seem quite honest that there is no 'accountability' for damaged goods, together with the careless treatment by some who profess to know how to cut a wig. But another main reason is that it robs you of 'feeling like a movie-star'. A Jewish woman should never want to look like a 'French model', and she should emulate the great Imahos, the way the Jewish man should 'strive' to be like Moshe Rabbeinu. Life in the Goldene Medene has gone too far. Even some of the men have become fashion models. If this sounds odd to your ears, it is not what is written, but what you think about what you are reading. If anyone wants to really know what some of the Ashkenazim Rabbis in Yerushalayim have said about "wigs" drop me an email, and I will send you reading material. tznius.awareness@yahoo.com

64

 May 06, 2009 at 08:52 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #12  
Anonymous Says:

and if another employer bans all head coverings and beards, that'll be okay?

No, because that is against the Torah. The Torah is more important than an employer's rights. But this is *with* the Torah. It is a valid opinion within halacha. It's not an opinion I follow, but it is one of the shiv'im ponim latorah, and an institution with a defined religious mission is entitled to insist that its employees dress as its posek says a Jewish person must. If you don't like it, go work somewhere else. There is no group within Judaism that *forbids* head scarves. Even Lubavitcher women can wear a scarf over their sheitels, and if they want to work for Shas then that's what they should do.

65

 May 06, 2009 at 08:56 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #33  
Anonymous Says:

NO he is not Taliban, but he is forcing his religion like the Taliban!! It's dangerous!

So? What's wrong with the Taliban, besides the fact that their religion is false?

66

 May 06, 2009 at 09:01 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #43  
Yehuda Says:

As a matter of fact the Lubavitcher Rebbe stated that a wig is prefable since all the hair is covered while with scarves or hats it is possible for hair to end up showing.

However the Lubavitcher Rebbe had respect for local standards of tznius and local minhagim. A Lubavitcher woman who wants to work there can wear a scarf over her sheitel.

67

 May 06, 2009 at 09:05 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #46  
Anonymous Says:

A very dangerous precedent, to say all the wig wearing women do not meet the halachic standard. The need for rabbis to keep adding more stringent rules/guidelines is a real shame and they should keep busy working on real issues/difficulties facing our community. it is a blessing that at the end of the day the prohibition of wig wearing will be accepted only by a minority of women (as with bullet proof stockings).

He is not "adding more stringent rules/guidelines", he is paskening the halacha as he sees it. He is certainly capable of paskening a din, and this is how he sees that the halacha has ALWAYS BEEN. Elu va'elu divrei elokim chayim. Nahara nahara upashteih. In your shul your rov can pasken as he sees fit, in my shul my rov paskens as he sees fit, in Shas Rav Ovadiah is the posek. I don't have to agree with his psak in order to say that in his jurisdiction it is THE halacha. See the halochos of "mokom shenohagu" and "be'asreih demar".

68

 May 06, 2009 at 09:08 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #54  
Bugsy Siegel Says:

An employer is not entitled to enforce a dress code if the employer is trying to impose religious views on its employees. A publicly funded institution does not have the right to impose a religious dress code either.

Says who? Where in the Shulchan Aruch do you find such a law?

69

 May 06, 2009 at 09:10 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #56  
Anonymous Says:

A wig completely covers the hiar unlike scarves or snoods. Whenever I see women in my community who wear these things in public, I always see their hair falling out. Then they have to readjust them in public. Why doesn't Rav Yosef so this? Btw, Rav Mordechai Eliyahu's rebbetzin covers her hair with a wig, she is Sefardi. So is she going against Torah law, C'V?

It's well known that Rav Mordechai and Rav Ovadiah don't see eye to eye on many things. She is entitled to follow her husband's psak din; but even Rav Mordechai would agree that in Rav Ovadiah's own institution his psak din must control.

70

 May 11, 2009 at 08:12 PM Anonymous Says:

Listen, this is absolute nonsense--these stupid and archaic laws are what give religion a bad name--personally I always found Jews to be strange--after all look at the stupid hats they wear--and those arrogant attitudes--and always always bitching about something like spoiled brats. The look very messy and act oh so strange.

71

 Mar 03, 2010 at 02:05 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #1  
mottel Says:

What are the women whining about? Every employer is entitled to enforce a dress code; you don't like it, leave and open your own business!
Since their posek requires scarves, and total coverage of hair, this is the example they wish to set to the children in their school

Mr i know evrything lemaisse women who wear wigs have on who to be somech instead of being so harsh put yourself in place of these girls!!!evryone goes acording to his posek and nobody has the right under any excuse to force you to accept a psak wish doesnt go lefi your minhag or rav!!

72

Sign-in to post a comment

Scroll Up
Advertisements:

Sell your scrap gold and broken jewelry and earn hard cash sell gold today!