Welcome, Guest! - or

Bermuda - Guantánamo Four Stir Up Tropical Storm

Published on:   Jun 15, 2009 at 03:10 PM
News Source: AP
Change text size Text Size  

 ONCE DETAINEES NOW TOURISTS The four freed Uighurs toured the historic district of St. George in Bermuda on Sunday. They have been greeted with hospitality by the islands residents.
ONCE DETAINEES NOW TOURISTS The four freed Uighurs toured the historic district of St. George in Bermuda on Sunday. They have been greeted with hospitality by the islands residents.
Bermuda - The four men in short-sleeve shirts looked like ordinary tourists, enjoying a Sunday lunch and butter pecan ice cream afterward as they observed the sparkling waters surrounding this Atlantic resort island.

But they are Uighurs, Muslims from the vast stretches of western China, an arid and rugged land that is a far cry from Bermuda's sandy beaches and quaint narrow streets lined with pastel Victorian-era buildings.

They once were terrorism suspects, but even after U.S. authorities determined the men weren't a threat to the United States, they were kept at the Guantanamo prison for years because no nation would take them — until a few days ago, when Bermuda agreed to let them in as refugees.

Advertisement:

"When we didn't have any country to accept us, when everybody was afraid of us ... Bermuda had the courage and was brave enough to accept us," said Abdulla Abdulgadir, who at 30 is the youngest of the four men who relished their first weekend of freedom in seven years.

The men were among a larger group of Uighurs who had fled what they called Chinese persecution of Muslims in western China and spent part of 2001 in a Uighur camp in Afghanistan. They fled, apparently unarmed, when the Americans bombed the camp and were later turned in to the authorities by Pakistani villagers in return for an American bounty.  Photo: Justin Maxon/The New York Times
The men were among a larger group of Uighurs who had fled what they called Chinese persecution of Muslims in western China and spent part of 2001 in a Uighur camp in Afghanistan. They fled, apparently unarmed, when the Americans bombed the camp and were later turned in to the authorities by Pakistani villagers in return for an American bounty. Photo: Justin Maxon/The New York Times

Abdulgadir eagerly embraced his new island home. "We are not moving anywhere," he said.

He and his companions have traded drab prison jumpsuits for comfortable cotton pants and knit shirts, and razor wire-encircled jail compounds for beach cottages. They hope to quickly find jobs in Bermuda — one of the world's wealthiest places because of its financial and insurance sector — and eventually start families.

The four Uighurs (pronounced WEE'-gurs) also have immediate priorities, such as learning to drive, scuba dive and bowl, said Glenn Brangman, a former military official who is helping reintroduce them to the world outside prison.

"I told them one step at a time," Brangman said. "They're beginning to live all over again."

For these four, the arrival in Bermuda appears to be the end of a difficult journey. Thirteen other Uighurs at Guantanamo are hoping to move to the Pacific island nation of Palau.

All of them were captured in Pakistan and Afghanistan as suspected allies of the Taliban and al-Qaida, but the men claimed they had only fled oppression by China and were never enemies of the U.S.

"We only have one enemy, and that's the Chinese," one of the men, Ablikim Turahun, told a military tribunal in 2004. "They have been torturing us and killing us all: old, young, men, women, little children and unborn children."

Years into their captivity, American officials concluded that the men should not be considered enemy combatants. Last October a court ordered their release, but it was delayed by the inability to find a host country and a court reversal that prevented their move to American soil. The four freed Uighurs toured the historic district of St. George in Bermuda on Sunday and had ice cream. They have been greeted with hospitality by the island's residents.  Photo: Justin Maxon/The New York Times
Years into their captivity, American officials concluded that the men should not be considered enemy combatants. Last October a court ordered their release, but it was delayed by the inability to find a host country and a court reversal that prevented their move to American soil. The four freed Uighurs toured the historic district of St. George in Bermuda on Sunday and had ice cream. They have been greeted with hospitality by the island's residents. Photo: Justin Maxon/The New York Times

U.S. officials eventually declared the Uighurs innocent of any wrongdoing and authorized their release, but they couldn't be sent back to China because U.S. law forbids deporting someone to a country where they are likely to face torture or persecution.

Albania took in five Uighurs in 2006 but refused to take any more, and other countries balked at resettling any of the others, until Bermuda stepped forward last week.

The surprise move, made without consulting Bermuda's colonial rulers in Britain, angered some of island's 68,000 people and prompted a call by the opposition for the local Parliament to hold a no-confidence vote on the government.

Brangman said he wants some of the attention to dissipate before he lets the Uighurs live on their own.

"I want to give them more exposure, but certainly a controlled exposure," Brangman said. "Not everybody is keen about what the government did."

For now, the men are savoring the most basic of experiences, interpreter Rushan Abbas said.

They encountered a fisherman while walking along the beach and became curious about the art of fishing, she said.

The man offered to teach them, and one of the former prisoners, Khelil Mamut, tossed a line into the ocean. He caught a 25-centimeter (10-inch) fish to the cheers of the other men, she said.

Brangman later took them swimming and watched as they climbed the rocks and jumped into the ocean like he did as a boy.

"Normally Bermudians test the temperature of the water," he said. "But they just went to the edge and jumped straight in."


More of today's headlines

New York - The Catskills! About as close to Gan Eden as we can get! Fresh mountain air, no congestion, wide open spaces. We can hardly wait for those summer... New York - Stocks tumbled Monday as a key manufacturing gauge came in weaker than expected and the dollar made a comeback. Major indexes were down more than 2...

 

Total11

Read Comments (11)  —  Post Yours »

1

 Jun 15, 2009 at 04:51 PM Anonymous Says:

do you think?

2

 Jun 15, 2009 at 05:28 PM Anonymous Says:

Yes!! Tell the world!! if you do terrorist activity, we, america will send you to tan & scuba dive!

3

 Jun 15, 2009 at 05:10 PM Anonymous Says:

and america is paying for these terrorists dont get fooled they are terrorists who confessed

4

 Jun 15, 2009 at 08:28 PM FVNMS Says:

So you're essentially saying the US govt is lying to us these men are terrorists who are just being kicked out of Gitmo?

5

 Jun 15, 2009 at 10:18 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #4  
FVNMS Says:

So you're essentially saying the US govt is lying to us these men are terrorists who are just being kicked out of Gitmo?

The government has never said they're not terrorists; just that they are no longer believed to pose a threat, so there's no reason to keep them locked up.

6

 Jun 16, 2009 at 06:40 AM SHmuel Says:

Twist it any way you want not every Muslim is a terrorist, and just because someone was in Guantanamon doesn't mean that they should of been there

7

 Jun 16, 2009 at 09:24 AM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #6  
SHmuel Says:

Twist it any way you want not every Muslim is a terrorist, and just because someone was in Guantanamon doesn't mean that they should of been there

Yes, it does. Otherwise they'd have been released years ago.

8

 Jun 16, 2009 at 10:46 AM Raphael Kaufman Says:

Reply to #7  
Milhouse Says:

Yes, it does. Otherwise they'd have been released years ago.

The article says that "U.S. officials eventually declared the Uighurs innocent of any wrongdoing and authorized their release..." and that the reason for their extended stay was because no country (besides China, who would prosecute them). would accept them. Based on the description of their "capture" in the article, I believe that they are not, and never were, a threat to the U.S. or Israel. China, of course, considers them terrorists and, perhaps they are, as far as China is concerned.

It would have been a different situation if they had been armed and captured in battle. As "foreign mercenaries" under the the Geneva convention, they would have been subject to summary execution. In that event, keeping them in Gitmo would have been a rachmones.

9

 Jun 16, 2009 at 11:07 AM Anonymous Says:

These men were turned in as "enemy combatants" by Pakistani villagers in exchange for money. The BUSH administration cleared them of any wrongdoing several years ago. They were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. The least the world can do is leave them alone after being locked up for 7 years, including a year of solitary, for NO REASON.

10

 Jun 16, 2009 at 12:12 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #9  
Anonymous Says:

These men were turned in as "enemy combatants" by Pakistani villagers in exchange for money. The BUSH administration cleared them of any wrongdoing several years ago. They were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. The least the world can do is leave them alone after being locked up for 7 years, including a year of solitary, for NO REASON.

Garbage. These guys were radical Islamic terrorists. They were in camps with heavy military security, set up with Taliban approval. They were training with small arms (including AK-47s and RPGs), heavier weapons, and explosives, and being indoctrinated in jihadist philosophy and tactics of terrorism. The best that can be said of them is that they probably would have rather attacked Chinese targets than American ones.

11

 Jun 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #8  
Raphael Kaufman Says:

The article says that "U.S. officials eventually declared the Uighurs innocent of any wrongdoing and authorized their release..." and that the reason for their extended stay was because no country (besides China, who would prosecute them). would accept them. Based on the description of their "capture" in the article, I believe that they are not, and never were, a threat to the U.S. or Israel. China, of course, considers them terrorists and, perhaps they are, as far as China is concerned.

It would have been a different situation if they had been armed and captured in battle. As "foreign mercenaries" under the the Geneva convention, they would have been subject to summary execution. In that event, keeping them in Gitmo would have been a rachmones.

And why do you suppose it is, that no country would accept them for so many years? If they're so innocent and not-at-all-dangerous, you'd think there would be plenty of countries willing to let them immigrate.

12

If you wish to post anonymously do not fill out this field.
Says:

Your email address will not be published.

Reply to #  
Says:

Important: Please read the rules before submitting your opinion.
Scroll Up
Advertisements: