Albany, NY - New "Madoff" Bill Would Charge Rich Inmates for Jail |
|
Albany, NY - For anyone who believes crime doesn't pay, tell that to the New York state legislator who introduced a "Madoff" bill today. Rich New Yorkers convicted of crimes would be forced -- if this bill becomes law -- to pay the state and federal governments for how much it costs to keep them in jail.
The bill's moniker is a nod to Bernard Madoff, who began serving a 150-year prison sentence last week in a federal prison in North Carolina for running a Ponzi scheme considered to be Wall Street's biggest investment fraud. Before his arrest in December, Madoff had lived a life of luxury with a Park Avenue penthouse apartment and luxury homes in other glamorous locales, as well as yachts, designer clothes and collectible watches with eye-popping price tags.
"Far too often, taxpayers are stuck with the bill for criminals who have extensive personal wealth waiting for them once they are discharged from our state's penal system," Republican Assemblyman Jim Tedisco said in a statement.
Like many states, New York has looked at various ways of driving drive down the cost of keeping people in jail.
The state comptroller, Thomas DiNapoli, a Democrat, estimated in 2007 that it costs the counties around $1 billion a year, based on daily costs of $80 to $90 a day for each inmate.
Though federal prosecutors sought to strip Madoff of all of his assets before he went to prison, Tedisco told Reuters that his bill would force drug dealers and other high-profile people who serve jail time to pay for their prison upkeep.
If such a law had been in effect at the time, it could have targeted such wealthy inmates as Martha Stewart, the lifestyle guru who was sentenced to five months in prison in 2004 for lying to investigators about a stock trade, and Leona Helmsley, the high-end hotelier who was sentenced to prison in 1989 for tax evasion. Helmsley's prison sentence was reduced to four years, but she only served about a year and a half.
Tedisco said the need for his bill was demonstrated by "an incident in lower Manhattan's Tombs prison," a reference to an inmate's costly bar mitzvah that Mayor Michael Bloomberg has said the city is investigating.
A sliding scale would determine how much convicts would have to pay, based on their assets, under Tedisco's bill. Those who are worth $200,000 or more would pay the entire tab, while those whose net worth is $40,000 or less would pay nothing.
Convicts' homes "or any equity found in it" would not be counted in determining their assets nor would their mortgage payments, tax bills or payments for child or spousal support, Tedisco said. The idea, Tedisco said, is not to punish the convict's family, and in particular, it is not meant to deprive an inmate's children of a home or parental support.
More of today's headlines
“New York City - A war of words over mayoral control of the city schools is escalating between Mayor Michael Bloomberg and some Democratic State Senators. The fight...”
New York City - State Senators And Assmblyman Blast Bloomberg Over Nazi Remark
New York - Is It Permissible To Buy a New Car During The 3 Weeks?



Total18
Read Comments (18) — Post Yours »
1
Jul 20, 2009 at 05:57 PM Lebediger Says:
we have to remember that its not Madoff's money
2
Jul 20, 2009 at 06:33 PM bubby green Says:
Oy ah broch!
3
Jul 20, 2009 at 06:47 PM Anonymous Says:
Not a bad idea for the extreme rich. Unfortunately the cost of defending yourself is enough to make a rich man poor. And then your family loses there bread winner (or rather bread stealer) while you are incarcerated.
4
Jul 20, 2009 at 06:36 PM Anonymous Says:
If you don't pay will you go to jail? :-)
5
Jul 20, 2009 at 07:23 PM Anonymous Says:
Madoff is in Federal lockup. What does New York State have to do with it?
6
Jul 20, 2009 at 07:21 PM Raphael Kaufman Says:
This is stupid political pandering of the worst sort and, if past into law, doesn't have a prayer of standing. How do you determine who's "rich"? Thieves steal money from people and need to make restitution to their victims. There are civil courts and procedures for this recovery. The State of New York has no standing to collect money from a convicted thief unless the money was stolen from the State itself in which case the proper recourse is to sue.
7
Jul 20, 2009 at 07:17 PM Anonymous Says:
Let them go free they are not a danger to society. Let them work for the government
8
Jul 20, 2009 at 07:06 PM Loshon Hora Says:
Madoff is peniless, and has been very poor many years. Other's money doesn't count or deoes it?
Maybe the jail job makes a little money to pay the jail, but what is to force an alte k...ake like Madoff fromsitting idle or striking?
9
Jul 20, 2009 at 08:28 PM Anonymous Says:
If they are paying, I am sure they will pay for upgrades like first class. I wonder if ther will be frequent flier upgrades.
10
Jul 20, 2009 at 09:10 PM Not rich Says:
$200,000 is not rich if that is all that your family has while your in jail. Although they should allow inmates to work on behalf of society and get redit for less time.
11
Jul 20, 2009 at 10:13 PM A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have... Says:
A state CANNOT force you to pay the Feds for anything. States have no jurisdiction that way so either Reuters is wrong or the NYS Legislator is a moron and should go back to washing dishes. Considering the Assemblyman, I am leaning toward Reuters being incorrect --- again.
12
Jul 20, 2009 at 10:18 PM Anonymous Says:
This law dosen't have a prayer of passing. It is clearly unconstitutional as it violates the equal protection clause.
13
Jul 20, 2009 at 11:11 PM Anonymous Says:
NY already charges some people for jail time-I believe its around 40 dollars a day.
14
Jul 20, 2009 at 11:38 PM Anonymous Says:
“ This law dosen't have a prayer of passing. It is clearly unconstitutional as it violates the equal protection clause. ”
Wealth is not a protected class. There is no violation. This is actually a brilliant idea...though the 200k is rather low.
15
Jul 21, 2009 at 12:27 AM na nach Says:
what a system anyway.. murderers get set free, and a ganav gets all this big attention. let him go work rather and pay back his keepers
16
Jul 21, 2009 at 08:10 AM Anonymous Says:
I agree, and those sentenced to death should pay for the bullet,etc.
17
Jul 21, 2009 at 01:16 PM The Truth Says:
Now everyone wants a piece of the pie. Just because Madoff was caught, should not mean the Feds or the NYS can get their hands on the money he stole.
18
Jul 23, 2009 at 05:40 AM Milhouse Says:
Harotzachto gam yorashto? If you convict someone of a crime, fine, lock him up, but where do you get the chutzpah to make him pay for it? This is pure rish'us and kin'ah.