Welcome, Guest! - or
Easy to remember!  »  VinNews.com

London - Britain Releases Documents on Lockerbie Bombing Release

Published on: September 1, 2009 05:15 PM
By: AP
Change text size Text Size  
Bookmark and Share
Released Lockerbie bomber Abdel Baset al-Megrahi, is seen in a hospital bed in Tripoli Sunday Aug. 30, 2009. Libyan Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Mohammed Siala, said Monday Aug. 31, 2009  that Abdel Baset al-Megrahi was in the hospital and described him as a dying manReleased Lockerbie bomber Abdel Baset al-Megrahi, is seen in a hospital bed in Tripoli Sunday Aug. 30, 2009. Libyan Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Mohammed Siala, said Monday Aug. 31, 2009 that Abdel Baset al-Megrahi was in the hospital and described him as a dying man

London - Britain released documents on Tuesday detailing confidential exchanges  over the Lockerbie bomber’s release — letters it hoped will end speculation that Abdel Baset al-Megrahi’s freedom was used to sweeten economic and political deals between Libya and the U.K.

Advertisement:

But the documents are more likely stir more anger in the United States, which was opposed to freeing al-Megrahi all along.

The letters show that British authorities deferred to Scotland on whether to release the only man convicted in the 1988 airline bombing, but those same officials also repeatedly stressed the importance of growing U.K.-Libyan interests. There was no evidence that British officials warned of diplomatic fallout with the United States should al-Megrahi be released.

Al-Megrahi, 57, was convicted in the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, that killed 270 people — many of whom were American college students returning for Christmas.

Scotland freed al-Megrahi on compassionate grounds Aug. 20 after doctors said he had three months to live due to advanced prostate cancer.

Britain has regional governments in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland that are responsible for local issues but retains power over national issues such as foreign affairs and the military.

Bob Monetti, whose 20-year-old brother Richard from Cherry Hill, N.J. was among those killed, said the letters confirmed families’ suspicions.

“The fix has been in for a while,” he said. “The U.K. has put incredible pressure on Scotland to do this thing, and they finally caved in.”

As the British and Scottish governments released more than a dozen documents, Libya celebrated the 40th anniversary of the coup that brought Col. Moammar Gadhafi to power — an extravaganza meant to celebrate the return of the former pariah state into the international fold after terrorism.

British talk shows late Tuesday buzzed with suggestions that al-Megrahi’s release was no coincidence ahead of Gadhafi’s lavish celebrations and the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

The released letters from 2007 to 2009 showed that British officials warned Scotland that excluding al-Megrahi from a prisoner transfer agreement could damage U.K.-Libyan relations.

Justice Secretary Jack Straw wrote to his Scottish counterpart Kenny MacAskill in July 2007 that it would be possible to exclude al-Megrahi from the prisoner transfer agreement — which would have eliminated one of the ways al-Megrahi could have been freed if he had not become sick. But Straw later changed his view, writing on Feb. 11, 2008, that he opposed excluding al-Megrahi from such a release.

“Developing a strong relationship with Libya, and helping it to reintegrate into the international community, is good for the U.K.,” Straw said in that letter to Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond. “Libya is one of only two countries to have ever voluntarily and transparently dismantled its weapons of mass destruction program. Having sponsored terrorist attacks in the past, it is now an important partner in the fight against terrorism.”

Straw then stressed the importance of the prisoner transfer agreements but said ultimately such a release — which could have seen al-Megrahi being transferred to a jail in Libya — would be up to Scotland.

“I do not believe that it is necessary, or sensible, to risk damaging our wide ranging and beneficial relationship with Libya by inserting a specific exclusion into the PTA (prisoner transfer agreement),” Straw wrote.

Washington reacted to the disclosure, saying it had disagreed with Scotland’s decision to return al-Megrahi to Libya.

” ...It won’t be the first disagreement we’ve had with a close ally and it won’t be the last,” said State Department spokesman Ian Kelly.

The releases follow claims in the British press that the British government struck a deal with Libyan authorities to include al-Megrahi in a prisoner transfer agreement because that was in Britain’s best interests at a time when a major oil deal was being negotiated.

Britain has growing economic interests in Libya — from oil exploration to financial services. Last year, British imports from Libya topped some 1 billion pounds ($1.6 billion).

But the British government has repeatedly denied its role in the release and said there was no pressing commercial deal.

Straw, whose letters were released Tuesday, denied suggestions that economic considerations had an effect on the decision to free al-Megrahi.

Anger has been percolating on both sides of the Atlantic since al-Megrahi flew home to a hero’s welcome in Libya.

The families of some American victims have said they were disgusted by the bomber’s release, which was also sharply criticized by President Barack Obama, FBI director Robert Mueller and Attorney General Eric Holder.

Britain’s Foreign Office, as part of the disclosures Tuesday, said in one letter to Scotland’s government that there was no categorical commitment given to the United States to keep al-Megrahi jailed.

In an Aug. 3 letter, Ivan Lewis, Britain’s Middle East minister, told MacAskill that “while the U.S. pressed the U.K. to provide a definitive commitment on the future imprisonment” of al-Megrahi, Britain “declined to do this on the grounds that it did not wish to bind the hands of future governments.”

He said, at the time of al-Megrahi’s 2001 conviction, ministers could “not rule out the possibility that our relations with Libya may one day change, as indeed they have.”

In a second letter, sent to Scottish government official George Burgess in July, the Foreign Office told him that Britain “did not give the U.S. an absolute commitment” to keep al-Megrahi jailed in Scotland.

Parts of both letters, including the name of the official within the Foreign Office’s Middle East and North Africa desk who wrote the July note, were redacted.

Kelly, from the U.S. State Department, said he believed there had been an understanding that al-Megrahi would be sent back to Libya.

“I think there was an understanding that — that he would serve out his sentence in Scotland — but I don’t know if I would characterize that as an agreement. If you’re talking about some specific agreement relating to a previous attorney general, I think you have to ask the Department of Justice,” Kelly said.

Some British families of Lockerbie victims reacted with fury, but for different reasons than American families. Pamela Dix from Surrey in southeast England, who lost her brother Peter, said she was surprised and frustrated by the letters.

“I fully support moves to bring Libya back into the international fold, but not at the expense of the truth in this case,” she said. “A court found him guilty, but his appeal was abandoned and now we might never know what really happened.”

In order to be considered for compassionate release, a regular feature of Scottish justice for dying inmates, al-Megrahi had to drop his appeal against his conviction.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown has repeatedly said the decision to free al-Megrahi was Scotland’s. He also said he had told Gadhafi at the Group of Eight meetings in Italy in July that his administration had no role in the matter.

“I made it absolutely clear to him then that this was not a decision, the future and fate of Mr. al-Megrahi, that we as the United Kingdom could take,” the Financial Times quoted Brown as saying. “It was a matter for the Scottish Executive, and it was their decision, and their decision alone.”

Downing Street spokesman Simon Lewis said Brown would be speaking with Obama about the bomber’s release in the coming days.

Brown’s office said not all correspondence between Libya and Britain would be released — only documents deemed to be relevant by the British or Scottish governments.

Scottish authorities decided last month that al-Megrahi would be released on compassionate grounds and allowed to return to Libya, rejecting the option of sending al-Megrahi home under the prisoner transfer agreement.

In a separate document, Abdulati Alobidi, Libya’s Minister for Europe, said junior Foreign Office minister Bill Rammell visited Tripoli in February and that Rammell told him that Britain did not want al-Megrahi to die in prison — but that it was Scotland’s decision.

A top Libyan official said Tuesday that al-Megrahi’s health was rapidly deteriorating since his release and he had been hospitalized.


More of today's headlines

Bronx, NY - ESPN and Major League Baseball have agreed to switch the starting time of a Yankees-Red Sox game to avoid conflicting with Yom Kippur, the holiest day on the... Mountain View, CA - Google’s Popular E-Mail Application Gmail is Down Tuesday afternoon, in an outage affecting both free and paid users. The outage began sometime...

 

You can now automatically hide comments - New!

Don't worry, you can always display comments when you need to.

Total4

Read Comments (4)  —  Post Yours »

1

 Sep 01, 2009 at 08:12 PM Anonymous Says:

Why is this murderer in hospital. he murdered others mercilesly now let him die a painful merciless death if not in jail then on the streets.

2

 Sep 01, 2009 at 09:10 PM chief doofis Says:

May this minuval be a kapporo for all klal Yisrael!

3

 Sep 02, 2009 at 07:40 AM fake foto Says:

The photo of him in the hospital bed looks contrived, to elicit pitiful feelings for this dying murderer. His silk pj's just don't fit the "look" of a dying man. What a hoax!

4

 Sep 02, 2009 at 03:08 PM Anonymous Says:

how do we know it is him...it is all b.s.. our farcocked president should vehemently protest..but he is weak...busy with his farcacked socialist agenda yemach shmo

5

Sign-in to post a comment

Scroll Up
Advertisements:

Sell your scrap gold and broken jewelry and earn hard cash sell gold today!