Welcome, Guest! - or

Richmond, VA - Charedi Rabbi Removed From Position For Rejecting Zionism

Published on:   September 29, 2009 02:19 PM
Change text size Text Size  
Bookmark and Share
Rabbi Joseph Kolakowski, his wife Chavah and their daughter Faith. Photo by Scott ElmquistRabbi Joseph Kolakowski, his wife Chavah and their daughter Faith. Photo by Scott Elmquist

Richmond, VA - Rabbi Joseph Kolakowski, a Bialer Chassid, was recently fired from his position as rabbi of Young Israel  of Richmond, Virginia. The synagogue members stated clearly in a newsletter that their objection was to Rabbi Kolakowski’s anti-Zionist views.

Rabbi Kolakowski has encouraged members of the Richmond Jewish community to reject Zionism.

According to the newspaper run the Jewish Federation of Richmond, called “The Reflector” page 7  the synagogue announcement stated the following:

“The Young Israel of Richmond/Congregation Kol Emes announces the appointment of its new Rabbi and Rebbetzin, Rabbi Eitan M. Allen and his wife, Miriam. Rabbi Allen is a New England native, hailing from Massachusetts and Connecticut. He describes himself as a person from a small town with a focus on individuals. He joins the Congregation from Baltimore, where he has lived and studied for almost a decade…He is a proud lover of the land of Israel, which he has visited many times and where much of his family resides…

Advertisement:

“A recent article in the Style  Magazine [posted here by VIN News] may have given the wrong impression about the Young Israel of Richmond(YIR) and its members. When Abraham and Emil Dere founded the YIR in 1964 they sought to establish an Orthodox Shul with a then 20th Century orientation, while maintaining ties to the lengthy Jewish History in Richmond, stretching back to 1789 when the first Orthodox Synagague in Richmond was formed. The Richmond Hebrew Day School was the flagship around which the synagogue was based. The day school today now has 150+ students in Richmond and Goochland County and goes from Kindergarten to 12th grade. The founders and majority of the members have been imbued with a strong sense of religious Zionism and support of Israel. Many members have moved to Israel, served honorably in its army, and integrated into the fabric of its society. We give this background to explain that the governing bodies we belong to, the National Council of Young Israel and the Orthodox Union are the two largest synagogue networks in mainstream orthodoxy.

“In contrast to what was described in the August article in Style magazine we do not belong to any ultra orthodox or Hassidic group. The only Hassidic member of our Synagogue was the ex-Rabbi, Joseph Kolakowski, who has in fact been barred from membership because of his anti state of Israel views. Rabbi Pesach Lerner, Executive Director of the National Council of Young Israel, which is comprised of over 150 synagogues around the country and in Israel, informed us that in light of Rabbi Kolakowski’s positions on the State of Israel he would not be able to remain in the position of rabbi of the shul.

“We at Congregation Kol Emes state here emphatically, that we believe deeply that God has put it in the hearts of many of our people to relocate to the land of Israel and our policy is to support a Jewish Israel governed by Jews. We at Congregation Kol Emes feel strongly that we must support our brothers and sisters in the Holy Land.”


More of today's headlines

Washington - A key Senate committee has voted against creation of a new government-run health insurance plan. Some Democrats on the Finance Committee had been pushing... Edison, NJ - The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today offered a reward of up to $1,000 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the perpetrators of the...

 

Total185

Read Comments (185)  —  Post Yours »

1

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:00 PM Anonymous Says:

It says, Eyzehu Chochom, Hamakir Es M'komo, he has to know the type of crowd he's dealing with and lecture them accordingly.

2

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:00 PM mythoughts Says:

What a shame!!! They look like they would have fit right in at the Young Israel of Richmond, VA.

3

 Sep 29, 2009 at 02:47 PM yenta Says:

He is a BT chasidishe guy, and I was always wondering what he is doing in a YI shul in the first place. Bashing Israel is only ok in WB. Everywhere else it is not a very smart thing to do.

4

 Sep 29, 2009 at 02:47 PM Bibbur hit Says:

That shul owes everything to him! It was a nothing place with barely a minyan. He made it grow into a mosdos. To fire him over a political ideology, is stupid.

5

 Sep 29, 2009 at 02:47 PM Anonymous Says:

That pic is very confusing! A chareidishe girl named Faith?! A chassidishe rabbi in Young Israel? I would love an explanation and more info on this family...

6

 Sep 29, 2009 at 02:46 PM Anonymous Says:


Forget about whether they were right or wrong in his firing, the question though is, what was HE
thinking?

Did he really believe he would last in a shul where the memebrs are obviously PRO ISRAEL?

Sometimes you must wonder if some of these people just have no brains at all....

7

 Sep 29, 2009 at 02:45 PM punch Says:

i didn't think he'd last there for too long. however, rabbi, i incourage you to continue with your great work in being Mekarev yiden from all sorts.

8

 Sep 29, 2009 at 02:43 PM yi member Says:

than why did they ever hire him?

9

 Sep 29, 2009 at 02:42 PM Anonymous Says:

this is a real kidish hasam

10

 Sep 29, 2009 at 02:40 PM Kanoi Says:

Its time we rid ourselves of these people. Let them go and live with the Palestinians.

11

 Sep 29, 2009 at 02:39 PM Neturei karta Says:

Couldnt he become a zionist for a few dollars?

12

 Sep 29, 2009 at 02:36 PM Anonymous Says:

The rabbi had an agenda. When being hired for any job one should know what they are getting into and knowing it's policies. What this "rabbi" dod was utterly stupid. To ruin a job in todays economy because one just can't control ones belief system and to shove it down an entire community who believes in another is just unbelievable. All young israels operate under guidleines and one of them being that israel belongs to the jewish people so if the rabbi did not like the belief and policy he should have never accepted the job.

13

 Sep 29, 2009 at 02:24 PM Anonymous Says:

The shul did the right thing. Young Israel cannot be associated with anyone who would endorse this meshugaas. This photo of the rav and rebbitzen also seem to be distorted to make them look like somthing out of a horror movie.

14

 Sep 29, 2009 at 02:22 PM Anonymous Says:

He is a tzaddik please don't bash him

15

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:13 PM Shunda Says:

The should immediately change the name of the Shul! It does not deserve the title Kol Emes!!! Shame on them! Perhaps they should disavow the Chofetz Chaim or Rav Avigdor Miller ZTl for their positions against a formal Jewish state!

16

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:06 PM Babishka Says:

Chabad wouldn't throw him out, even if he is a non-Zionist. Does he have a problem going to Chabad?

17

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:06 PM Anonymous Says:

Neturi Karta should take him in. I feel bad fior the kid to be born to such ppl. What kind of Jew is anti-israel?

18

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:26 PM Anonymous Says:

It turns out that this rabbi is Neture Karta. Obviously he had to be fired.

19

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:32 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #17  
Anonymous Says:

Neturi Karta should take him in. I feel bad fior the kid to be born to such ppl. What kind of Jew is anti-israel?

A Torah believing Jew, like the Chofetz Chaim zt'l and Satmar Ruv zt"l, he is entitled to think like the gedolei yisroel that didn't share the ideology of the apikores and Torah hater Theodor Herzel.

20

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:32 PM mythoughts Says:

Reply to #4  
Bibbur hit Says:

That shul owes everything to him! It was a nothing place with barely a minyan. He made it grow into a mosdos. To fire him over a political ideology, is stupid.

You're joking right? A chassidishe place would probably fire somebody for having the wrong color shoelaces or wearing a tie. He should have expected to get the boot when you don't agree with one of the central beliefs of your employer.

21

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:31 PM Clear thinker Says:

He may be a tzaddik. No one should bash him. No one has to agree with his silly political stand.. No one has to retain him as the Rabbi of a Young Israel. To "Nuturei Karta": Israel aside for a moment. Not a bit of shame for allying yourself to Iran where the president denies the holocaust. It is not a matter of dollars it is a matter of embarrassment. If you know any survivors, or have you lost people in the Shoah. What are you thinking?

22

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:30 PM Rochel Says:

Reply to #17  
Anonymous Says:

Neturi Karta should take him in. I feel bad fior the kid to be born to such ppl. What kind of Jew is anti-israel?

anti-israeli governement not anti-israel land

23

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:30 PM Anonymous Says:

he is a bt, she a giyorres. he wears vaise zokken and a vaise bekishe. far far far out. he is an intelligent guy, college educated (i think), but obviously not so smart. like all bt's he took the extreme route. i feel sorry for him.

24

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:38 PM Moshe knowitall Says:

Just FYI he started out as the rabbi of Cong. Kol Emes he built up the minyan and community then they merged with YI against his wishes and the rest is history......

Its a shame he worked so hard, to get booted its sad ....

25

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:37 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #14  
Anonymous Says:

He is a tzaddik please don't bash him

“ He is a tzaddik please don't bash him ”

Any so called "rav" who denies the very existence of medinas yisroel and whose words would threaten the lives of millions of yiddin both in EY and galus, is not tzadik; to the contrary, he is beyond contempt.

26

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:36 PM Yonason Herschlag Says:

The term "Anti Zionist" means different things for different people. A few people are against Jews living in Israel. Some people are against Jews ruling the land of Israel before mashiach comes. Many people (myself included) are against this particular group of (anit-Torah) murderous hoods who took control of the land by force, and disguise their governing as though it would be a democracy.

The point is, that there may not really have been such a great difference of opinion between YI and this local rabbi. It could be that he merely placed the emphasis on being against this particular government, and that via misunderstandings, people construed his words to be against YI's positions.

Sounds like a loss for the community. He accomplished a lot there. But I'm sure that Hashem has another community for him, that will benefit even more.

27

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:57 PM Kogan Says:

Reply to #16  
Babishka Says:

Chabad wouldn't throw him out, even if he is a non-Zionist. Does he have a problem going to Chabad?

“ Chabad wouldn't throw him out, even if he is a non-Zionist. Does he have a problem going to Chabad?”

Chabad would not welcome a naturei karta type of a guy. While Chabad is not pro-Zionist it is not anti-Zionist either. So any kind of anti-... goes against chabad philosophy.

28

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:49 PM Anonymous Says:

They should move to WB where they belong!

29

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:04 PM Fermischt Says:

Not long ago it would be a zionist Rabbi being kicked out of an Orthodox Shul because of their position. Now we see the world is topsy turvy! So tell me who kept the derech and who strayed?

30

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:03 PM Clear thinker Says:

Reply to #26  
Yonason Herschlag Says:

The term "Anti Zionist" means different things for different people. A few people are against Jews living in Israel. Some people are against Jews ruling the land of Israel before mashiach comes. Many people (myself included) are against this particular group of (anit-Torah) murderous hoods who took control of the land by force, and disguise their governing as though it would be a democracy.

The point is, that there may not really have been such a great difference of opinion between YI and this local rabbi. It could be that he merely placed the emphasis on being against this particular government, and that via misunderstandings, people construed his words to be against YI's positions.

Sounds like a loss for the community. He accomplished a lot there. But I'm sure that Hashem has another community for him, that will benefit even more.

Perhaps he could try Teheran.

31

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:02 PM Askupeh Says:

Funny; rather sad. In Rabbi Avigdor Miller's Shul on Ocean Parkway there is a sign "Young Israel of Rugby", and Rabbi Miller was a strong Anti Zionist. Ok, he probably bought it from them. Does anyone know? It is sad because that Shul didn’t function as a “Young Israel” Shul, just in name only, and now because of his publicity, they woke up that hey, something is wrong here. If he was good before the publicity then he should be good now. Removing him once installed is despicable.

32

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:43 PM Anonymous Says:

biala is zionist so he cant be a biala chusid he is a satmar chusid

33

 Sep 29, 2009 at 03:41 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #16  
Babishka Says:

Chabad wouldn't throw him out, even if he is a non-Zionist. Does he have a problem going to Chabad?

Chabad is real anti Zoinsest, they just have a difrant approch

34

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:29 PM PMO Says:

I'm sure this guy meant no harm. However, he used very poor judgment here. He was well within his rights to seek employment there and keep his opinions on this issue to himself. He chose not to, knowing it would offend separate himself from the community he was trying to lead.

The community should forgive his single act of poor judgment and help him find new employment elsewhere where he can be effective.

Secondly, the shock that a few posters had that a chussid would work at a Young Israel shul is appalling. YI is responsible for bringing more yidden back to a Torah life, and strengthening the lives of the MO than any other. This guy (along with YI) were trying to bring people closer to H". I have nothing but praise for both Rav Kolakowski and Young Israel. They were both doing something that most are too lazy to do... bring yidden closer to H".

35

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:26 PM jax Says:

Reply to #19  
Anonymous Says:

A Torah believing Jew, like the Chofetz Chaim zt'l and Satmar Ruv zt"l, he is entitled to think like the gedolei yisroel that didn't share the ideology of the apikores and Torah hater Theodor Herzel.

But not in a YI shul. he should stay with his own.

36

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:26 PM Anonymous Says:

Oy, it was an honest mistake. He thought he was moving to Williamsburg, Brooklyn, not Williamsburg, Virginia!

37

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:20 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #32  
Anonymous Says:

biala is zionist so he cant be a biala chusid he is a satmar chusid

Biala and Satmar chassidus are virtually indistinguishable...

38

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:36 PM Askupeh Says:

Look, ladies and gentleman, we live in a real Meshuganeh world. One post says that Chabad is not pro-Zionist (based on the Mahryats’s view 59 years ago), comes another who remembers the outspokenness of the Maharyat’s 85 years ago against Zionism, and ups it to Lubavitch being “anti-Zionist”. Both are wrong, Lubavitch “TODAY” is the most pro-Zionisty group in Klal Yisroel, and a million Pshetlich won’t change it.

Now the Zionists here see him in the worst light (see #25). They are also wrong. He is a combination of Biala (Agudas Yisroel) and Satmar plus another few views. How it played out in him I don’t know, and neither do you. I, Askupeh, on the street am considered by many as an anti-Zionist when in reality I belong a big step below that, as a non-Zionist; the same difference of Satmar and Agudath Yisroel. I don’t go around correcting anyone’s perceptions unless I see extremism, which then I open my big mouth and deliver a Kitoin Shel Shofchin. Otherwise I stay quiet, lest I make enemies of the whole world. On the one hand I can come out sharply against the leaders of the State of Israel, and in the same breath I can praise Bibi for his brazen speech. If you were raised with the proper Hashkofah’s it is no problem. The problem starts if you were taught one way and feel another way, and are in denial.

Yonason Herschlag of #26 had it right, that “The term "Anti Zionist" means different things for different people”. Let me add that the term "non Zionist" means different things for different people, and that the term "Zionist" means different things for different people. Exactly in which box we can put him nobody really knows. I wonder if you know in which box you are. Confusion and ignorance with a touch of arrogance is a concoction for bliss.

39

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:35 PM Anonymous Says:

excellent news. #16 - what is "Zoinsest" - chabad is not anti zionist, you are quite the fool. Maybe a long time ago they were. Get with the times! Look at the settlements, at the people living there, chabad is all over as well as all over the army. They are true lovers of the land and the people.

40

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:33 PM Anonymous Says:

"who has in fact been barred from membership because of his anti state of Israel views."

Fascinating that none of the commentators have a problem with that part of the statement. Note they didn't say he was no longer the Rabbi due to these views (bad enough, but a sign of the times - the congregation dictates Torah views to the Rabbi, not the other way around) but he can't be a member. What other ideological litmus tests do they have on their members?

41

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:23 PM OMG Says:

Reply to #31  
Askupeh Says:

Funny; rather sad. In Rabbi Avigdor Miller's Shul on Ocean Parkway there is a sign "Young Israel of Rugby", and Rabbi Miller was a strong Anti Zionist. Ok, he probably bought it from them. Does anyone know? It is sad because that Shul didn’t function as a “Young Israel” Shul, just in name only, and now because of his publicity, they woke up that hey, something is wrong here. If he was good before the publicity then he should be good now. Removing him once installed is despicable.

Why despicable were you there do you know all the facts relating to his hiring and firing? Maybe he did not tell them upfront his views about Zionist or better yet he let them to believe that he is a supporter of the state when in reality he is a strong anti-Zionist, I did not expect from you such harsh condemnation.

42

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:15 PM Obliko_Morale Says:

Seems good to everyone. With his and his wife's limited exposure to Yiddishe lifestyle (through no fault of their own) he is better off in a Jewish neighborhood, not in the middle of a desert. It's understandable that most BT's want to do kiruv, but this is rarely good for their ruchnius. And it's not good to get a salary from MO heretics, in physical sense of being dependent on them as well as spiritually. As far as his former congregates go, it's their loss. The new MO priest will quickly teach them how to properly love Zionist government, maybe he'll even organize a delegation to a "pride" parade in Israel.

43

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:15 PM Askupeh Says:

Reply to #27  
Kogan Says:

“ Chabad wouldn't throw him out, even if he is a non-Zionist. Does he have a problem going to Chabad?”

Chabad would not welcome a naturei karta type of a guy. While Chabad is not pro-Zionist it is not anti-Zionist either. So any kind of anti-... goes against chabad philosophy.

Chabad isn't pro-Zionist. Your statement is outdated at least 59 years.

44

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:39 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #21  
Clear thinker Says:

He may be a tzaddik. No one should bash him. No one has to agree with his silly political stand.. No one has to retain him as the Rabbi of a Young Israel. To "Nuturei Karta": Israel aside for a moment. Not a bit of shame for allying yourself to Iran where the president denies the holocaust. It is not a matter of dollars it is a matter of embarrassment. If you know any survivors, or have you lost people in the Shoah. What are you thinking?

Not so fast. There's a question of chazakah. I wonder whether he will take them to a din torah.

45

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:13 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #30  
Clear thinker Says:

Perhaps he could try Teheran.

The USA is just fine for him, he does not have to live with wild extreme rhetoric as you and some others believe in.
Unfortunately, in the US there are millions of anti zionists.

46

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:13 PM Toras Moshe Emess Says:

I don't know which is more repulsive: the statements of the shul or the commnets posted here. Obviously, some have already forgotten what day it was just yesterday.

This pious young man was hired by a DYING shul because no one else wanted to take the job. He came in and infused it with LIFE, rebuilding it, reinvigorating it. The day after they fire him, they announce a new Rabbi has been hired, meaning they had been planning all this all along behind his back. They should be ASHAMED of themsleves. The business about his views on zionism is just an excuse to cover their own misdeeds. They knew what he was when they hired him. They knew his views all along. They used him to fill a slot until they could get somebody "better."

Their comment that he "has in fact been barred from membership because of his anti state of Israel views" is a true chillul HaShem. Is it no longer possible for Yidden to have legitimate Torah differences without hating one another? Their is NO EXCUSE for this behavior.

Yes, I said LEGITIMATE Torah differences. The Torah opposition to zionism is legitimate. It's not just the Neturei Karta. Many Gedolim have and do reject zionism, including the Chazon Ish, Rav Schach, Rav Miller, Rav Kotler, Rav Gifter, Rav Miller, Rav Hutner, the Satmer Rebbe, the Toshe Rebbe, the PREVIOUS Lubavitcher Rebbe and R' Kolakowski's rebbe, the Biala Rebbe (that's right, contrary to claims above he is NOT NK, he is a chossid of the Biala Rebbe).

Someone above asked "What kind of Jew is anti-israel?" if you mean that being anti-zionism is "anti-Israel" the please see the list above. There are many others. And I can assure you that each and every name listed was/is a FAR BETTER Jew than you (or I) will ever hope to be.

Someone else said "Its time we rid ourselves of these people." Then rid yourself of Torah because these men I listed above are/were living embodiments of Torah and you would have to throw them out as well. Who are you going to replace them with? The athiest leaders of zionism? Kach terrorists? How about Olmert, Lapid, Livni... they are the real face of the zionism you so ardently defend while condemning Gedolim. That's right: when you condemn a pios man like r' Kolakowski, you condemn all of them as well

I never ceased to be amazed by the pro-zionist crowd when they decry the lack of Ahavas Yisroel of those that oppose zionism and then turn right around and spew sinas chinam at them. And then we wonder why haShem does not then answer our prayers and send Moshiach. I think the answer is obvious.

47

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:12 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #15  
Shunda Says:

The should immediately change the name of the Shul! It does not deserve the title Kol Emes!!! Shame on them! Perhaps they should disavow the Chofetz Chaim or Rav Avigdor Miller ZTl for their positions against a formal Jewish state!

They would. Why are you so shocked ?

48

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:11 PM Anonymous Says:

Either the shul didn't ask him the right questions when hiring him or he wasn't fully open with them about his views.

49

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:40 PM Lubavitch Says:

Reply to #27  
Kogan Says:

“ Chabad wouldn't throw him out, even if he is a non-Zionist. Does he have a problem going to Chabad?”

Chabad would not welcome a naturei karta type of a guy. While Chabad is not pro-Zionist it is not anti-Zionist either. So any kind of anti-... goes against chabad philosophy.

maybe chabad but there are plenty of lubavitchers who are antizionist! Read any of the works of the 5th and 6th Rebbes. Especially the 5th Rebbe Rashab who was even opposed to religious zionism!

50

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:53 PM Askupeh Says:

Reply to #41  
OMG Says:

Why despicable were you there do you know all the facts relating to his hiring and firing? Maybe he did not tell them upfront his views about Zionist or better yet he let them to believe that he is a supporter of the state when in reality he is a strong anti-Zionist, I did not expect from you such harsh condemnation.

I love Young Israel as I love every single Jew with all my heart. This time they did a despicable act. The Gemorah in Horiyess says that when they were Maaver (removed) a Kohen Godel, the first Kohen Godol stayed with his title and honor, because of Eivah and Maalin Bekoidesh Veloi Moridin. To remove a sitting Rov for his views (in this setting) was wrong. It behooves them to have gone a different route. There are many routes they could have taken. This was the easiest one, and really wrong.

51

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:48 PM Babishka Says:

Reply to #27  
Kogan Says:

“ Chabad wouldn't throw him out, even if he is a non-Zionist. Does he have a problem going to Chabad?”

Chabad would not welcome a naturei karta type of a guy. While Chabad is not pro-Zionist it is not anti-Zionist either. So any kind of anti-... goes against chabad philosophy.

I seem to recall an anti-Zionist Satmar one of the Kedoshe Mumbai HY"D who was murdered at the Nariman Chabad House.

52

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:46 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #31  
Askupeh Says:

Funny; rather sad. In Rabbi Avigdor Miller's Shul on Ocean Parkway there is a sign "Young Israel of Rugby", and Rabbi Miller was a strong Anti Zionist. Ok, he probably bought it from them. Does anyone know? It is sad because that Shul didn’t function as a “Young Israel” Shul, just in name only, and now because of his publicity, they woke up that hey, something is wrong here. If he was good before the publicity then he should be good now. Removing him once installed is despicable.

Before moving to Ocean Parkway- Rav Miller was Rabbi in the YI of Rugby which was in East Flatbush-

53

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:44 PM Anonymous Says:

Shocking that a chasid would apply for a job to lead a Young Israel, and even more shocking he was hired. Not a shidduch min ha-shamayim. I don't blame the shul for not wanting a leader of a shul with storng connections to Israel, who opposes the state.

54

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:44 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #27  
Kogan Says:

“ Chabad wouldn't throw him out, even if he is a non-Zionist. Does he have a problem going to Chabad?”

Chabad would not welcome a naturei karta type of a guy. While Chabad is not pro-Zionist it is not anti-Zionist either. So any kind of anti-... goes against chabad philosophy.

You are mistaken; Chabad is definitely anti-zionist. But of course Chabad has no shortage of rabbonim, and would have no reason to take a Bialer. If Chabad took over a shul with a Bialer rov, though, they would not fire him.

55

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:43 PM Askupeh Says:

Reply to #34  
PMO Says:

I'm sure this guy meant no harm. However, he used very poor judgment here. He was well within his rights to seek employment there and keep his opinions on this issue to himself. He chose not to, knowing it would offend separate himself from the community he was trying to lead.

The community should forgive his single act of poor judgment and help him find new employment elsewhere where he can be effective.

Secondly, the shock that a few posters had that a chussid would work at a Young Israel shul is appalling. YI is responsible for bringing more yidden back to a Torah life, and strengthening the lives of the MO than any other. This guy (along with YI) were trying to bring people closer to H". I have nothing but praise for both Rav Kolakowski and Young Israel. They were both doing something that most are too lazy to do... bring yidden closer to H".

I agree with your comment except that they (the leaders of YI) are really the ones who used very poor judgment. They should have weighed where he is coming from with where his Congregation came from with a little bit of common sense. Instead they chose this wrong route. Fin Vi Nemt Men Seichal?

56

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:43 PM Anonymous Says:

What a shame. The fired Rabbi, who was affectionately called 'My Hasidic Friend' by many of Richmond's secular Jews, now has no pulpit. I just don't understand. Who will be their Hasidic Friend now? I do not think that Richmond will be able to attract another Rebbe of Rabbi Joseph Kolakowski's caliber - he was certainly one of a kind. Although, Richmond did just open up a post-high school yeshiva. They brought in a Mashgiach from Lakewood, Reb Chaim Moskowitz. I do not think that the Mashgiach had anything to do with the Rebbe's termination.

The truth is, Rabbi Kolakowski is very eccentric. He walked with a silver cane (even though he is in his 20s) and I think he only wore red-tinted glasses, like Hacham Ovadia Yosef. I think the community was just very confused by his strange hanhagos.

57

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:00 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #44  
Milhouse Says:

Not so fast. There's a question of chazakah. I wonder whether he will take them to a din torah.

What kind of "chazakah would there be...thats lunacy. If this guy were to have authorized eating chazer fleish at a simcha at the shul, they would have fired him on the spot. Opposing the existence of EY is an even greater shanda since it puts yiddin at risk and empowers oyaveh yisroel.

58

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:58 PM From Richmond Says:

I have been living in the Richmond community for over 20 years so let me shed some light on a situation that apparantly many people think they know a lot about. A. The background of Kol Emes is that is was founded as a Young Israel over 30 years ago. Unfortunately, as with many out of town cities, the younger community moved a little farther West and a new frum shul became the center for the Richmond community. As Kol Emes fizzled out the new shul began to grow under the guidance of a young dynamic Rav, Rabbi Doniel Yolkut. Unfortunately, instead of the last 2 families merging and joining the rest of the community, they tried with futility to find a Rabbi who was going to be able to revive the shul. While no one can blame them for trying, no "normal run of the mil" Young Israel Rabbi would take the post once they came down and saw that the ENTIRE frum community was based around another shul. We are talking about a community with 30 Frum families so when 29 out of the 30 are part of one Shul one can easily imagine why it was so hard to get a rav. Now, Rabbi Kolakowski certainly means well. I have met him on numerous occasions and he certainly is serious about serving G-d to the best of his abilities. His likelihood of succeeding in a community like Richmond, was about as great as the odds of an Amish person becoming the CEO of Google. For the past 10 years, the shul has never had any consistent Minyan on Shabbos and for the occasions where it did they normally had to pay people to come down from Ner Israel. Thank G-d the Richmond community has been able to grow with its own frum girls high school and a Yeshiva which is now in its 7th year. The Yeshiva of Virginia continues to grow and has recently added a Bais Meresh program. My purpose here is to paint a full picture. Richmond, VA is too great and too small of a city to have to deal with an incident whose effect is worse by the publicity of a story than the events themselves. If you really want to experience out of town Midos, Chesed, and a close knit community than just come for a shabbos!

59

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:55 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #49  
Lubavitch Says:

maybe chabad but there are plenty of lubavitchers who are antizionist! Read any of the works of the 5th and 6th Rebbes. Especially the 5th Rebbe Rashab who was even opposed to religious zionism!

You will find many statements from the 7th against the secular government as well. Playing HaTikvah was considered forbidden in all Chabad Houses.

60

 Sep 29, 2009 at 04:55 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #5  
Anonymous Says:

That pic is very confusing! A chareidishe girl named Faith?! A chassidishe rabbi in Young Israel? I would love an explanation and more info on this family...

"Faith" means "Tikvah."

61

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:09 PM Anonymous Says:

WHH
One wonders at the wisdom of hiring him in the first place if his political views were not proportionate with Young Israel. they have to take responsibility for what happened as well as the tremendous Chillul Hashem of removing him. I think he's got a case, and I hope he wins! As for all you Young Israel degel waving arm chair Zionists, come to Israel, and be part of it, and then speak of zionism or rather its last dying breath.

62

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:09 PM Anonymous Says:

My deapest respect for a man who is willing to give up his position for his beleifs but my gut fealing tells me that there is more to the story. While the name "Rabbi Eitan M. Allen" and his daughter's name "Faith" fit well into the Young Israel setting, the picture in this article tells a different story. Something is askew and it aint me.

63

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:04 PM Askupeh Says:

Reply to #46  
Toras Moshe Emess Says:

I don't know which is more repulsive: the statements of the shul or the commnets posted here. Obviously, some have already forgotten what day it was just yesterday.

This pious young man was hired by a DYING shul because no one else wanted to take the job. He came in and infused it with LIFE, rebuilding it, reinvigorating it. The day after they fire him, they announce a new Rabbi has been hired, meaning they had been planning all this all along behind his back. They should be ASHAMED of themsleves. The business about his views on zionism is just an excuse to cover their own misdeeds. They knew what he was when they hired him. They knew his views all along. They used him to fill a slot until they could get somebody "better."

Their comment that he "has in fact been barred from membership because of his anti state of Israel views" is a true chillul HaShem. Is it no longer possible for Yidden to have legitimate Torah differences without hating one another? Their is NO EXCUSE for this behavior.

Yes, I said LEGITIMATE Torah differences. The Torah opposition to zionism is legitimate. It's not just the Neturei Karta. Many Gedolim have and do reject zionism, including the Chazon Ish, Rav Schach, Rav Miller, Rav Kotler, Rav Gifter, Rav Miller, Rav Hutner, the Satmer Rebbe, the Toshe Rebbe, the PREVIOUS Lubavitcher Rebbe and R' Kolakowski's rebbe, the Biala Rebbe (that's right, contrary to claims above he is NOT NK, he is a chossid of the Biala Rebbe).

Someone above asked "What kind of Jew is anti-israel?" if you mean that being anti-zionism is "anti-Israel" the please see the list above. There are many others. And I can assure you that each and every name listed was/is a FAR BETTER Jew than you (or I) will ever hope to be.

Someone else said "Its time we rid ourselves of these people." Then rid yourself of Torah because these men I listed above are/were living embodiments of Torah and you would have to throw them out as well. Who are you going to replace them with? The athiest leaders of zionism? Kach terrorists? How about Olmert, Lapid, Livni... they are the real face of the zionism you so ardently defend while condemning Gedolim. That's right: when you condemn a pios man like r' Kolakowski, you condemn all of them as well

I never ceased to be amazed by the pro-zionist crowd when they decry the lack of Ahavas Yisroel of those that oppose zionism and then turn right around and spew sinas chinam at them. And then we wonder why haShem does not then answer our prayers and send Moshiach. I think the answer is obvious.

Your comment was right on target and said what I was trying to say, until you called them “Kach terrorists”; there you lost me. Are you comparing them C”V to Hamas? You need to know that your “Torah view” is very far from the Emes. Would the Tosher Rebbe call them “terrorists”? Shame on you.

64

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:03 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #44  
Milhouse Says:

Not so fast. There's a question of chazakah. I wonder whether he will take them to a din torah.

This rav served "at will" and does not have tenure or contract protections against discharge by the synagogue. He could have walked out the door anytime he wanted and the shul could not have sued him. Why would "chazakah" of any sort be applicable here.

65

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:17 PM Who Says:

Reply to #27  
Kogan Says:

“ Chabad wouldn't throw him out, even if he is a non-Zionist. Does he have a problem going to Chabad?”

Chabad would not welcome a naturei karta type of a guy. While Chabad is not pro-Zionist it is not anti-Zionist either. So any kind of anti-... goes against chabad philosophy.

"While Chabad is not pro-Zionist it is not anti-Zionist either". What is that supposed to mean? Are we black or what? Are we left or right? are we vegetarians or do we eat meat? Thats always been Chabads problem. They don't want-not can't-to state that they are anti the zionist regime. The Frerdika Rebbe stated that the state of Israel has set back Moshiachs arrival at LEAST 50 years. So what does that say about what they believe?

66

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:11 PM Anonymous Says:

this guy must be an idiot and they are correct for removing him. how can he preach to a crowd when he speaks against their religion?
to them he would be no different than a neturei karta

67

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:11 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #42  
Obliko_Morale Says:

Seems good to everyone. With his and his wife's limited exposure to Yiddishe lifestyle (through no fault of their own) he is better off in a Jewish neighborhood, not in the middle of a desert. It's understandable that most BT's want to do kiruv, but this is rarely good for their ruchnius. And it's not good to get a salary from MO heretics, in physical sense of being dependent on them as well as spiritually. As far as his former congregates go, it's their loss. The new MO priest will quickly teach them how to properly love Zionist government, maybe he'll even organize a delegation to a "pride" parade in Israel.

The day after Yom Kippur you call MOs heretics and a MO Rabbi a priest. Your slate was clean but you just dirtied it up with your hatred for other yidden and your name calling.

68

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:39 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #64  
Anonymous Says:

This rav served "at will" and does not have tenure or contract protections against discharge by the synagogue. He could have walked out the door anytime he wanted and the shul could not have sued him. Why would "chazakah" of any sort be applicable here.

Because there is a halacha of chazakah, and the shul can't just ignore it.

69

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:38 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #65  
Who Says:

"While Chabad is not pro-Zionist it is not anti-Zionist either". What is that supposed to mean? Are we black or what? Are we left or right? are we vegetarians or do we eat meat? Thats always been Chabads problem. They don't want-not can't-to state that they are anti the zionist regime. The Frerdika Rebbe stated that the state of Israel has set back Moshiachs arrival at LEAST 50 years. So what does that say about what they believe?

Who is the "Frerdika Rebbe" and why would anyone care what he had to say about EY and zman moishiach??

70

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:38 PM Not simle to fire a Rabbi Says:

It is not so simple to fire a rabbi according to the Shulchan Aruch.
If the 2 congregations merged and this Rabbi was still a Rabbi, who gave anyone permission to fire him ? it seems that Young Yisrael found a good excuse, but if his views were not a problem in the past, basically at the time of merging, the new congregation inherited a Rabbi with tenure with his own opinions, thus they were not really allowed to fire him.
While I understand that Young Yisrael would not aprecciate his opinions, they should have dealt with the situation in a different way, and most certainly the outcome should have been for a quiet and honorable and amicable way of him leaving, accompanied with a large ammount of money and helping him find another position.
Now they opened the door for a justifyed Din Torah from the rabbi.

71

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:38 PM Who Says:

Reply to #41  
OMG Says:

Why despicable were you there do you know all the facts relating to his hiring and firing? Maybe he did not tell them upfront his views about Zionist or better yet he let them to believe that he is a supporter of the state when in reality he is a strong anti-Zionist, I did not expect from you such harsh condemnation.

They DID know know about his "anti Zionist" beliefs BEFORE they hired him. I have a friend who lives there and he told me that there were other reasons why he was let go. I will not mention them here on this board.

72

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:37 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #57  
Anonymous Says:

What kind of "chazakah would there be...thats lunacy. If this guy were to have authorized eating chazer fleish at a simcha at the shul, they would have fired him on the spot. Opposing the existence of EY is an even greater shanda since it puts yiddin at risk and empowers oyaveh yisroel.

Opposing zionism puts him squarely in line with the MAJORITY of gedolei yisroel, past and present. It is not at all similar to permitting chazzer.

73

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:35 PM Askupeh Says:

Reply to #67  
Anonymous Says:

The day after Yom Kippur you call MOs heretics and a MO Rabbi a priest. Your slate was clean but you just dirtied it up with your hatred for other yidden and your name calling.

I agree with you that #42 has no morals calling MOs heretics and a MO Rabbi a priest who maybe will even organize a delegation to a "pride" parade in Israel. The hatred from the extremists from both sides (Chareidi to MO, and MO to Chareidi) has got to stop.

74

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:34 PM Anonymous Says:

I really wonder what the MO would say if the chareidim would fire a rav for leaning to zionism,i can just imagine the outrage about the closeminded chareidim.

75

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:30 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #39  
Anonymous Says:

excellent news. #16 - what is "Zoinsest" - chabad is not anti zionist, you are quite the fool. Maybe a long time ago they were. Get with the times! Look at the settlements, at the people living there, chabad is all over as well as all over the army. They are true lovers of the land and the people.

They are lovers of the land and the people, not of the medinah. Chabad remains every bit as anti-zionist as it was 60 years ago, and 70 years ago, and 100 years ago.

76

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:46 PM Charlie Hall Says:

I went to the Young Israel web site and found their Constitution there. The word "Zionist" does not appear anywhere, nor any implication that any of their rabbis must be Zionist. I don't understand the issue.

Now, the National Council of Young Israel recently decided that it wanted to have a veto power over the appointment of any rabbi to any synagogue, so maybe they've decided to enforce some kind of hashkafic requirement that isn't in their Constitution. I know someone, a wonderful young rabbi who trained at YU, who was given the grilling of his life over non-halachic matters. Fortunately they approved him, but why would any rabbi submit himself to such humiliation when he can get a job at an OU shul?

77

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:30 PM We are - Chabad! Says:

Reply to #65  
Who Says:

"While Chabad is not pro-Zionist it is not anti-Zionist either". What is that supposed to mean? Are we black or what? Are we left or right? are we vegetarians or do we eat meat? Thats always been Chabads problem. They don't want-not can't-to state that they are anti the zionist regime. The Frerdika Rebbe stated that the state of Israel has set back Moshiachs arrival at LEAST 50 years. So what does that say about what they believe?

We are Chabad. Plain and simple. Not vehemently anti-Zionist to the point of stirring up machloikes, on the forefront of protecting the safety of Jews in EY, but not seeing any kedusha in the state, and most importantly there for every Jew no matter who and where he is. We may look black, and our standards are charedi, but we are the rainbow and cannot be "boxed in" to any definition except - Chabad.

78

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:27 PM Who Says:

Reply to #35  
jax Says:

But not in a YI shul. he should stay with his own.

"His own" Aren't they YI part of "his own"? Or is YI another religion?

79

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:27 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #5  
Anonymous Says:

That pic is very confusing! A chareidishe girl named Faith?! A chassidishe rabbi in Young Israel? I would love an explanation and more info on this family...

He probably registered the name Faith on the birth certificate as is the custom in some kehillos. Her name is Alte Fayge Emunah.

80

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:52 PM Charlie Hall Says:

Reply to #46  
Toras Moshe Emess Says:

I don't know which is more repulsive: the statements of the shul or the commnets posted here. Obviously, some have already forgotten what day it was just yesterday.

This pious young man was hired by a DYING shul because no one else wanted to take the job. He came in and infused it with LIFE, rebuilding it, reinvigorating it. The day after they fire him, they announce a new Rabbi has been hired, meaning they had been planning all this all along behind his back. They should be ASHAMED of themsleves. The business about his views on zionism is just an excuse to cover their own misdeeds. They knew what he was when they hired him. They knew his views all along. They used him to fill a slot until they could get somebody "better."

Their comment that he "has in fact been barred from membership because of his anti state of Israel views" is a true chillul HaShem. Is it no longer possible for Yidden to have legitimate Torah differences without hating one another? Their is NO EXCUSE for this behavior.

Yes, I said LEGITIMATE Torah differences. The Torah opposition to zionism is legitimate. It's not just the Neturei Karta. Many Gedolim have and do reject zionism, including the Chazon Ish, Rav Schach, Rav Miller, Rav Kotler, Rav Gifter, Rav Miller, Rav Hutner, the Satmer Rebbe, the Toshe Rebbe, the PREVIOUS Lubavitcher Rebbe and R' Kolakowski's rebbe, the Biala Rebbe (that's right, contrary to claims above he is NOT NK, he is a chossid of the Biala Rebbe).

Someone above asked "What kind of Jew is anti-israel?" if you mean that being anti-zionism is "anti-Israel" the please see the list above. There are many others. And I can assure you that each and every name listed was/is a FAR BETTER Jew than you (or I) will ever hope to be.

Someone else said "Its time we rid ourselves of these people." Then rid yourself of Torah because these men I listed above are/were living embodiments of Torah and you would have to throw them out as well. Who are you going to replace them with? The athiest leaders of zionism? Kach terrorists? How about Olmert, Lapid, Livni... they are the real face of the zionism you so ardently defend while condemning Gedolim. That's right: when you condemn a pios man like r' Kolakowski, you condemn all of them as well

I never ceased to be amazed by the pro-zionist crowd when they decry the lack of Ahavas Yisroel of those that oppose zionism and then turn right around and spew sinas chinam at them. And then we wonder why haShem does not then answer our prayers and send Moshiach. I think the answer is obvious.

While there have indeed been some great anti-Zionist rabbis, there have also been some great rabbis who embraced Zionism. Among them were Rabbi Reines z'tz'l, Rav Kook z'tz'l, Rav Soloveitchik z'tz'l, Rav Herzog z'tz'l, Rav Goren z'tz'l, Rabbi Shapira z'tz'l, Rabbi Aharon Lichtenstein, Rabbi Mordecai Eliyahu, Rabbi Hershel Schachter, and Rabbi Moshe Tendler. The names mentioned represent several different strains of Religious Zionism, all of which are legitimate Torah positions. Rav Kook and Rav Soloveitchik will likely be seen as the two greatest Jewish thinkers of the 20th century.



81

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:34 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #46  
Toras Moshe Emess Says:

I don't know which is more repulsive: the statements of the shul or the commnets posted here. Obviously, some have already forgotten what day it was just yesterday.

This pious young man was hired by a DYING shul because no one else wanted to take the job. He came in and infused it with LIFE, rebuilding it, reinvigorating it. The day after they fire him, they announce a new Rabbi has been hired, meaning they had been planning all this all along behind his back. They should be ASHAMED of themsleves. The business about his views on zionism is just an excuse to cover their own misdeeds. They knew what he was when they hired him. They knew his views all along. They used him to fill a slot until they could get somebody "better."

Their comment that he "has in fact been barred from membership because of his anti state of Israel views" is a true chillul HaShem. Is it no longer possible for Yidden to have legitimate Torah differences without hating one another? Their is NO EXCUSE for this behavior.

Yes, I said LEGITIMATE Torah differences. The Torah opposition to zionism is legitimate. It's not just the Neturei Karta. Many Gedolim have and do reject zionism, including the Chazon Ish, Rav Schach, Rav Miller, Rav Kotler, Rav Gifter, Rav Miller, Rav Hutner, the Satmer Rebbe, the Toshe Rebbe, the PREVIOUS Lubavitcher Rebbe and R' Kolakowski's rebbe, the Biala Rebbe (that's right, contrary to claims above he is NOT NK, he is a chossid of the Biala Rebbe).

Someone above asked "What kind of Jew is anti-israel?" if you mean that being anti-zionism is "anti-Israel" the please see the list above. There are many others. And I can assure you that each and every name listed was/is a FAR BETTER Jew than you (or I) will ever hope to be.

Someone else said "Its time we rid ourselves of these people." Then rid yourself of Torah because these men I listed above are/were living embodiments of Torah and you would have to throw them out as well. Who are you going to replace them with? The athiest leaders of zionism? Kach terrorists? How about Olmert, Lapid, Livni... they are the real face of the zionism you so ardently defend while condemning Gedolim. That's right: when you condemn a pios man like r' Kolakowski, you condemn all of them as well

I never ceased to be amazed by the pro-zionist crowd when they decry the lack of Ahavas Yisroel of those that oppose zionism and then turn right around and spew sinas chinam at them. And then we wonder why haShem does not then answer our prayers and send Moshiach. I think the answer is obvious.

Why do you emphasise the PREVIOUS Lubavitcher Rebbe? The most recent Lubavitcher Rebbe did not change anything; he was more anti-zionist than half the others on your list. When everyone else was falling over themselves rejoicing at "reishis tzmichas ge'uloseinu", he was calling it a "choshech koful umchupol", and he continued to call it that throughout his life.

82

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:24 PM Who Says:

Reply to #32  
Anonymous Says:

biala is zionist so he cant be a biala chusid he is a satmar chusid

NO rebbe anywhere is a Zionist other than his belief in the posuk. Vesechzenu aynaynu bishuvcha L'Tzeeyon birachamim". In that kind of Zionism the Satmer Rebbe Zt'l had more love of the land of Israel and the Jewish people in the tip of his pinky then all the so called "zionists" put together.

83

 Sep 29, 2009 at 05:22 PM Pashuteh Yid Says:

While one can see why his views were repulsive to his congregants, my heart goes out to a young yiddishe family with a small child to support. Hopefully he'll get a new position soon.

BTW Chabad was not anti-Zionist. Do you think all the heads of state of Israel would have made it a point to visit the Rebbe for eitzahs and long discussions, if he hated Israel? They didn't exactly go to the Satmar Rav for eitzahs.

84

 Sep 29, 2009 at 06:01 PM Just Curious Says:

Since when is Zionism a required tenet of Judaism? Given, an MO rabbi would likely have trouble keeping a job as a Rav in a Satmar shul in Williamsburg, but how is that grounds for termination? What does that have to do with his ability to teach Torah and make weddings in Virginia?

85

 Sep 29, 2009 at 06:09 PM OMG Says:

Reply to #71  
Who Says:

They DID know know about his "anti Zionist" beliefs BEFORE they hired him. I have a friend who lives there and he told me that there were other reasons why he was let go. I will not mention them here on this board.

The way you make it sound is worst you leave it to the reader’s imagination not good.

86

 Sep 29, 2009 at 06:11 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #54  
Milhouse Says:

You are mistaken; Chabad is definitely anti-zionist. But of course Chabad has no shortage of rabbonim, and would have no reason to take a Bialer. If Chabad took over a shul with a Bialer rov, though, they would not fire him.

they wouldn't fire him? of course they would. maybe not overnight - but in short order.

87

 Sep 29, 2009 at 06:32 PM Anonymous Says:

I don't see in the whole article in Style that he is anti zionist also in the letter to fire him it that that the article implies that it it a Chassidic shul I don't see any where in the article that impied.

88

 Sep 29, 2009 at 06:52 PM ShatzMatz Says:

I have been following this guy for some time. He posts videos of many chassidishe wedding on Youtube. He is a serious bal tshuva and his wife is an ex-mormon giyorus. Both of them have more mesiras nefesh for yiddishkeit than any of the posters here.

He was just recently interviewed on Kol Mevaser 212-444-1100. Press 3 for interviews.

Because of their different background, many Rabbi Kolakowski's behaviors can seem eccentric to say the least. He acts like and admo"r and feered tisch for his congregants. He officiated at bar-mitzvahs in a white bekeshe and big shreimel. He certainly meant well, and he enjoyed limited success there.

The people there enjoyed it to a point. But in the end it got a little too much.

His daugther's name is Alte Faige, after the Satmar rebbetzin.

The fact is that precious yiddishe family is now suddenly left without parnassah right before yom tov. Instead of focusing on the politics let's focus on the practical. If you have the ability to provide some support please consider doing so. At the very least you should be mispallel for them.

You can try to contact him through his website www.kolemes.org

They both have compelling life stories that should evoke the rachmunes of all their yiddishe bretheren wherever they may be.

89

 Sep 29, 2009 at 07:02 PM moshe Says:

Reply to #80  
Charlie Hall Says:

While there have indeed been some great anti-Zionist rabbis, there have also been some great rabbis who embraced Zionism. Among them were Rabbi Reines z'tz'l, Rav Kook z'tz'l, Rav Soloveitchik z'tz'l, Rav Herzog z'tz'l, Rav Goren z'tz'l, Rabbi Shapira z'tz'l, Rabbi Aharon Lichtenstein, Rabbi Mordecai Eliyahu, Rabbi Hershel Schachter, and Rabbi Moshe Tendler. The names mentioned represent several different strains of Religious Zionism, all of which are legitimate Torah positions. Rav Kook and Rav Soloveitchik will likely be seen as the two greatest Jewish thinkers of the 20th century.



satmar rebe ztl was considered by the greatest godoley hador chasidish litvish or Sephardic to be true das torah none of these mentioned were in his league

90

 Sep 29, 2009 at 06:56 PM Anti Zionist not Anti Israel Says:

Most Chareidim are anti Zionism, if it refers to the Zionist state of Israel - the anti Jewish government of Israel. They are not anti Zion, the holy land of Israel. I am Chareidi, I love Eretz Yisroel. I hate the Israeli government. I do not like The Iranian dictator, or the PLO or Hamas etc. I do not want them attacking Israel because I love the Yidden in the land of Israel. But, the gov't is anti Chareidi, it has to go. Moshiach has to come!

91

 Sep 29, 2009 at 06:49 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #84  
Just Curious Says:

Since when is Zionism a required tenet of Judaism? Given, an MO rabbi would likely have trouble keeping a job as a Rav in a Satmar shul in Williamsburg, but how is that grounds for termination? What does that have to do with his ability to teach Torah and make weddings in Virginia?

You just said it it yourself! A zionist rabbi wouldn't be able to keep his job in a Satmer shul.So to them, anti- zionism is a required tenet of Judaism. There is more to being a rabbi than performing weddings and teaching , obviously hashkofos count.

92

 Sep 29, 2009 at 07:22 PM torahyid Says:

Welcome back Milhouse, I can enjoy reading VIN again knowing most of the anti torah comments will be dealt with, they've been dominating the site in your absence having a field day.

93

 Sep 29, 2009 at 07:27 PM Ani Mamin Says:

Judiasim dictates 3 components for redemption
1) Gules is a stage where you don't have your own Jewish government if you participate in a Jewish government you deny Hashems decree that you shall be in Gules til :
2) Goel , Hashem has told us trough his Neviem that the redemption will by a GOEL (Meshiach )and the fulfillment of the activities and guidance of the Goel Tzedek
will result in the:
3) Geula
so the Lubavitcher version of the Goel is in conflict with the Jewsh version of Goel, the Zionists don't believe in a Goel altogether and the Hatikva is MMS and the flag Is yellow

so if you ask are lubavitch Zionist the answer yes 2 out of 1
if you ask is lubavitch Jewish the answer no 2 out of 1

94

 Sep 29, 2009 at 06:39 PM berel Says:

Reply to #83  
Pashuteh Yid Says:

While one can see why his views were repulsive to his congregants, my heart goes out to a young yiddishe family with a small child to support. Hopefully he'll get a new position soon.

BTW Chabad was not anti-Zionist. Do you think all the heads of state of Israel would have made it a point to visit the Rebbe for eitzahs and long discussions, if he hated Israel? They didn't exactly go to the Satmar Rav for eitzahs.

#83 so you are of the opinion that satmar hated israel?

95

 Sep 29, 2009 at 06:25 PM AMG Says:

In principal a rabbi has to be independent and objective in his opinions about all issues including the state of Israel in order to guide his congregation and the fact that a recognized Orthodox organization encouraged a congregation to dismiss their rabbi because his views is great tragedy and is a blatant violation of halachah.

96

 Sep 29, 2009 at 08:12 PM Anonymous Says:

is this for real? They found a Rabbi Ethan Allen for Williamsburg? Does he make furniture too?

97

 Sep 29, 2009 at 08:13 PM Anonymous Says:

ה' עמך גיבור החיל

98

 Sep 29, 2009 at 07:53 PM who Says:

Reply to #69  
Anonymous Says:

Who is the "Frerdika Rebbe" and why would anyone care what he had to say about EY and zman moishiach??

What I should have said was the privious Lubavitcher Rebbe Rabbi Yosef Yitzchok Shneerson Z"TL. And Lubavichers care what he says.

99

 Sep 29, 2009 at 08:15 PM Toras Moshe Emess Says:

Reply to #63  
Askupeh Says:

Your comment was right on target and said what I was trying to say, until you called them “Kach terrorists”; there you lost me. Are you comparing them C”V to Hamas? You need to know that your “Torah view” is very far from the Emes. Would the Tosher Rebbe call them “terrorists”? Shame on you.

How else would you categorize Kach? These people gather every year at the grave of Baruch Goldstein on his yartzeit. There is a plaque that reads: "To the holy Baruch Goldstein, who gave his life for the Jewish people, the Torah and the nation of Israel." A JDL member in the US and Kach member in Israel, he went on a shooting spree that killed 29 and wounded 150. Is that NOT terrorism just because the victims were unarmed Arabs instead of unarmed Jews??? Terror is terror, no matter who employs it. C"v we should EVER legitimize this kind of massacre as anything else other than what is was. Now you can argue "well he was just crazy" but that doesn't change the fact that Kach REVERES this man! They call him "holy!!!" So yes, while maybe not in terms of scale but that is no different that Hamas.

100

 Sep 29, 2009 at 08:15 PM young israel Says:

Young Israel shuls thruout the world are pro Eretz Yisroel, this was a mismatch from the beginning.

101

 Sep 29, 2009 at 07:46 PM Toras Moshe Emess Says:

Reply to #81  
Milhouse Says:

Why do you emphasise the PREVIOUS Lubavitcher Rebbe? The most recent Lubavitcher Rebbe did not change anything; he was more anti-zionist than half the others on your list. When everyone else was falling over themselves rejoicing at "reishis tzmichas ge'uloseinu", he was calling it a "choshech koful umchupol", and he continued to call it that throughout his life.

There has been much written that leaves the impression he was much more moderate in his position re:zionism (I'm not saying that this is legitimate, just the general perception that has been created). The same cannot be said of the previous rebbe.

102

 Sep 29, 2009 at 07:43 PM Toras Moshe Emess Says:

Reply to #80  
Charlie Hall Says:

While there have indeed been some great anti-Zionist rabbis, there have also been some great rabbis who embraced Zionism. Among them were Rabbi Reines z'tz'l, Rav Kook z'tz'l, Rav Soloveitchik z'tz'l, Rav Herzog z'tz'l, Rav Goren z'tz'l, Rabbi Shapira z'tz'l, Rabbi Aharon Lichtenstein, Rabbi Mordecai Eliyahu, Rabbi Hershel Schachter, and Rabbi Moshe Tendler. The names mentioned represent several different strains of Religious Zionism, all of which are legitimate Torah positions. Rav Kook and Rav Soloveitchik will likely be seen as the two greatest Jewish thinkers of the 20th century.



While I disagree with your last statement, you make precisely my point. You can argue a legitimate Torah view supporting zionism and I can make a legitimate Torah argument opposing zionism... and we can do so without calling one another names, etc. I have no problem with that. What dismays me are statements like "what kind of Jew..." or "it's time to be rid of (them)..." This pure sinas chinam and should not be tolerated, regardless of which "side" says them. I am equally dismayed that a frum site like vosizneias permits this kind of incindiary language.

104

 Sep 29, 2009 at 09:19 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #60  
Anonymous Says:

"Faith" means "Tikvah."

Actually Tikvah means hope nothing less or more! Emuna/bitachon mean faith

105

 Sep 29, 2009 at 08:36 PM who Says:

Reply to #102  
Toras Moshe Emess Says:

While I disagree with your last statement, you make precisely my point. You can argue a legitimate Torah view supporting zionism and I can make a legitimate Torah argument opposing zionism... and we can do so without calling one another names, etc. I have no problem with that. What dismays me are statements like "what kind of Jew..." or "it's time to be rid of (them)..." This pure sinas chinam and should not be tolerated, regardless of which "side" says them. I am equally dismayed that a frum site like vosizneias permits this kind of incindiary language.

I agree with everything in your last post except for the part in which you said "You can argue a legitimate Torah view supporting zionism etc Where can I find this Torah view? I have yet to see anyone write a Sefer in which he shlugs uup the Satmerer Rebbe's Ahl Hagula V'aal Hatmara. .

106

 Sep 29, 2009 at 09:22 PM Anonymous Says:

he is not Neturei Karta or Biala. He is very close with the Biala Rebbes, but takes a lot more from Satmar and Kalov. He is not such a big kanoi. He always was teaching that both sides were kosher, but he personally agreed with the anti-zionists, but respected all of the sides. What made YI say they had to kick him out was because he had a few yungerleit that he was mekarev there who became anti-zionists from his hashpaah which YI didn't like. Those yungerleit made a new Mosdos for him in Richmond and they already rented space for a new beis medrash for them, which has been open for a month already now. Natrina only picked it up because it was now in the Reflector. The shul is Young Israel in name only. The president is an Agudist. They are only trying to make themselves look zionist to attract money from the rest of the community. Instead they have alienated themselves and even the strongest Zionists in the main frum community in Richmond have taken Rabbi K's side in this, and find it hilarious that the YI shul thinks they can stay open.

107

 Sep 29, 2009 at 09:20 PM Anonymous Says:

if it was up these people to decide who is fit to be their rabbi they would have for sure fired the chofeits chaim as well being the one who cursed zionist and zionism accordind to his talmid r' elchonon wasserman hy"d

108

 Sep 29, 2009 at 09:41 PM Anonymous Says:

Members of a shul should be allowed to decide who is their rebbe based on any factors that are important to them. The rebbe is an "employee" of the shul and absent a contract, he can be discharged at any time. The large percentage of synagoguges in the U.S. and eretz yisroel are supportive of the medinah but there are some extremists (including the Satmar and a few others) who despise the tzionist philosophy. In a democracy, we should tolerate their views however offensive the majority of views may find them. However, we certainly have no obligation to support or emply them.

110

 Sep 29, 2009 at 09:49 PM bigwheeel Says:

Reply to #5  
Anonymous Says:

That pic is very confusing! A chareidishe girl named Faith?! A chassidishe rabbi in Young Israel? I would love an explanation and more info on this family...

If you would have read his and his wife's (Rebbetzin) Biography, you wouldn't ask such questions. They are both Baalei Tshuva, who built up this congregation from scratch.

111

 Sep 29, 2009 at 09:59 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #108  
Anonymous Says:

Members of a shul should be allowed to decide who is their rebbe based on any factors that are important to them. The rebbe is an "employee" of the shul and absent a contract, he can be discharged at any time. The large percentage of synagoguges in the U.S. and eretz yisroel are supportive of the medinah but there are some extremists (including the Satmar and a few others) who despise the tzionist philosophy. In a democracy, we should tolerate their views however offensive the majority of views may find them. However, we certainly have no obligation to support or emply them.

you are off base . The large percentage of Orthodox Shuls are supportive , of Eretz Yisroel and Jews who live there ,a lot more than the Reform or Conservative or secular Jews . Yet these same Shuls are definitely against Secular Zionism or the philosophy of the Medinah .

112

 Sep 29, 2009 at 10:47 PM cranberry stuffer Says:

Reply to #80  
Charlie Hall Says:

While there have indeed been some great anti-Zionist rabbis, there have also been some great rabbis who embraced Zionism. Among them were Rabbi Reines z'tz'l, Rav Kook z'tz'l, Rav Soloveitchik z'tz'l, Rav Herzog z'tz'l, Rav Goren z'tz'l, Rabbi Shapira z'tz'l, Rabbi Aharon Lichtenstein, Rabbi Mordecai Eliyahu, Rabbi Hershel Schachter, and Rabbi Moshe Tendler. The names mentioned represent several different strains of Religious Zionism, all of which are legitimate Torah positions. Rav Kook and Rav Soloveitchik will likely be seen as the two greatest Jewish thinkers of the 20th century.



you are a funny man! Thanks for the laugh, I had a hard day today.

113

 Sep 29, 2009 at 10:46 PM Charlie Hall Says:

Reply to #108  
Anonymous Says:

Members of a shul should be allowed to decide who is their rebbe based on any factors that are important to them. The rebbe is an "employee" of the shul and absent a contract, he can be discharged at any time. The large percentage of synagoguges in the U.S. and eretz yisroel are supportive of the medinah but there are some extremists (including the Satmar and a few others) who despise the tzionist philosophy. In a democracy, we should tolerate their views however offensive the majority of views may find them. However, we certainly have no obligation to support or emply them.

I have difficulty with the idea that a legitimate Torah viewpoint is "offensive".

114

 Sep 29, 2009 at 10:44 PM Charlie Hall Says:

Reply to #105  
who Says:

I agree with everything in your last post except for the part in which you said "You can argue a legitimate Torah view supporting zionism etc Where can I find this Torah view? I have yet to see anyone write a Sefer in which he shlugs uup the Satmerer Rebbe's Ahl Hagula V'aal Hatmara. .

Read *Eim Habonim Semichah* by Yisachar Shlomo Teichtal zt"l , Rov Soloveitchik's *Kol Dodi Dofek*, or any of the many writings of Rav Kook. Rov Soloveitchik's work is particularly important because it was written in the diaspora after the establishment of the Jewish state.

115

 Sep 29, 2009 at 10:44 PM Toras Moshe Emess Says:

Reply to #105  
who Says:

I agree with everything in your last post except for the part in which you said "You can argue a legitimate Torah view supporting zionism etc Where can I find this Torah view? I have yet to see anyone write a Sefer in which he shlugs uup the Satmerer Rebbe's Ahl Hagula V'aal Hatmara. .

My point was that we can disagree without being hateful to one another. If I were to have said or implied, for example, "even though there is no legitimate Torah argument supporting zionism" or "even though opposition to zionism is anti-Torah" (or some such) it would have defeated the purpose of my post and merely stirred the pot even further. Please realize that BOTH sides of this debate believe that THEIRS is the legitimate Torah view and that the other's is NOT. For the sake of civility (which has been desperately lacking here) I preferred to present them in "neutral" form, regardless of my personal position (which, if you must, I think you can figure out if you reread my post). I hope you understand.

116

 Sep 29, 2009 at 10:50 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #56  
Anonymous Says:

What a shame. The fired Rabbi, who was affectionately called 'My Hasidic Friend' by many of Richmond's secular Jews, now has no pulpit. I just don't understand. Who will be their Hasidic Friend now? I do not think that Richmond will be able to attract another Rebbe of Rabbi Joseph Kolakowski's caliber - he was certainly one of a kind. Although, Richmond did just open up a post-high school yeshiva. They brought in a Mashgiach from Lakewood, Reb Chaim Moskowitz. I do not think that the Mashgiach had anything to do with the Rebbe's termination.

The truth is, Rabbi Kolakowski is very eccentric. He walked with a silver cane (even though he is in his 20s) and I think he only wore red-tinted glasses, like Hacham Ovadia Yosef. I think the community was just very confused by his strange hanhagos.

I know Rav Moskowitz and he had nothing to do with the firing, he just likes to learn and go jogging from time to time.

117

 Sep 29, 2009 at 10:42 PM cranberry stuffer Says:

Reply to #65  
Who Says:

"While Chabad is not pro-Zionist it is not anti-Zionist either". What is that supposed to mean? Are we black or what? Are we left or right? are we vegetarians or do we eat meat? Thats always been Chabads problem. They don't want-not can't-to state that they are anti the zionist regime. The Frerdika Rebbe stated that the state of Israel has set back Moshiachs arrival at LEAST 50 years. So what does that say about what they believe?

actually, the Rebbe himself has said it privately as well. The Rebbe was a realist. There is a medina.Its a fact. Now we have the choice to utilize every posible avenue to undo all the bad it has caused, and is constantly causing, and be mikarev hashems children.

118

 Sep 29, 2009 at 10:33 PM Charlie Hall Says:

Reply to #102  
Toras Moshe Emess Says:

While I disagree with your last statement, you make precisely my point. You can argue a legitimate Torah view supporting zionism and I can make a legitimate Torah argument opposing zionism... and we can do so without calling one another names, etc. I have no problem with that. What dismays me are statements like "what kind of Jew..." or "it's time to be rid of (them)..." This pure sinas chinam and should not be tolerated, regardless of which "side" says them. I am equally dismayed that a frum site like vosizneias permits this kind of incindiary language.

I agree with this statement. I personally identify with the religious Zionism of Rabbi Reines and Rov Soloveitchik, but I accept as legitimate pov's both the very different religious Zionism of Rav Kook and the various anti-Zionist pov's of (to name some approaches) the Brisker Rav z'tz'l (who was Rov Soloveitchik's uncle!), the Satmar Rebbe Yoel Teitlebaum z'tz'l, and Rabbi Ovadiah Yosef.

May all our disputes be for the sake of heaven.

120

 Sep 29, 2009 at 11:56 PM och in vey Says:

Reply to #68  
Milhouse Says:

Because there is a halacha of chazakah, and the shul can't just ignore it.

if someone has a chazakah for stupid comments,i guess all his comments are stupid ,if a rav has a contract which must be renewed,or has other clauses there's no chazka

121

 Sep 29, 2009 at 11:26 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #51  
Babishka Says:

I seem to recall an anti-Zionist Satmar one of the Kedoshe Mumbai HY"D who was murdered at the Nariman Chabad House.

Your comment should remind us that we are in fact one - One People...
It has nothing to do with zionism vs. non zionism we are Yidden and all part of the same Hakadosh Baruch Hu............
Everyone has an opinion .. does it really matter??? In the end all that matters is that we are ONE .... Please let us not need something awful to remind us of that.
We are human and we err does that mean we need to be wiped off the face of the earth? Zionism is not the issue here .. I do not think that most of us visiting this site are concerned with Zionism as a state - what we are concerned with is the Holy Land and the people inhabiting the Land of Israel. When Moshiach comes (may it be very very soon) all these issues will be resolved. What we need to do is be more forgiving which will bring the Geula much closer.

122

 Sep 30, 2009 at 12:04 AM joel Says:

Reply to #17  
Anonymous Says:

Neturi Karta should take him in. I feel bad fior the kid to be born to such ppl. What kind of Jew is anti-israel?

go to williamsburg brooklyn and ask the 10's of thousands of yidden living there your stupid question.

123

 Sep 30, 2009 at 03:12 AM Another Richmonder speaks up Says:

I am also a long time Richmond, VA resident. Let me clarify a few things. Kenesset Beth Israel is a vibrant shul and has been for many years. It enjoyed a few extraordinary rabbis since we have lived here, including Rabbi Ron. The two shuls did not merge. They attempted to merge, but there was ONE lone family who held out. It was this family who orchestrated the hiring of Rabbi Kolakowski. He was hired even before he was married, and arrived here soon after his wedding. The synagogue from the get-go imposed all kinds of rules and restrictions on him. They didn't like it when he said a certain meat couldn't be brought in because of the hechsher. He had signed a two year contract with them, that they played around with time and time again. Faced with the needs of a growing family, Rabbi Kolakowski agreed not one time, but many times to a pay cut in order to keep providing parnasah for his family. Before he was fired he was only earning a quarter of his promised salary. He was working several other jobs in order to make ends meet. Time after time, the "powers that be" would produce yet another rule that he had to follow. Rabbi Kolakowski is an earlicher mentch who only thinks the best of everyone. Even after he was fired, he has gone back repeatedly to help them with the mikveh. (The mikveh is the main reason no one wants to let go of the shul. There is a Chabad mikveh, but it is only open to women.) Rabbi Kolakowski has an incredible amount of Torah knowledge. What I don't understand is how only one comment out of 122 comment about the lack of kavod haTorah. Only comment 46 picked up on this. That comment alone is well worth a re-reading of every single person here. He did not deserved to be humiliated in public and talked about incessantly. Although, as I said, he is a very kind man and he is not at all upset for the reason he was fired. If anything, he is actually proud of it.

124

 Sep 30, 2009 at 02:23 AM elya Says:

The way he and his wife look I think whoever hired them should have assumed that they weren't exactly going to say Hallel with a brocho on yom atzmaut, so seems quite unfair now to throw them out. It would be like a Satmar shul in WB hiring someone with a shaven beard, long hair and shorts as their Rov and then throwing him out because his views were too modern or something. Another thing is you don't have to be neturei karta for such a place to dislike your views, I think even most moderate Haredi viewpoints on Zionism would be considered far out in such a place.

125

 Sep 30, 2009 at 02:06 AM Brisker talmid Says:

My Rebbe Reb Dovid Soloveitchik told us that he remembers in 1935 in Poland
in Brisk when someone was a Lubavitcher chosid that was understood exactly like calling one a Neturei Karta in today's times!
And the reason for that was the holy RaShab.. REB SHOLOM BER ..was a fiery anti Zionist and even anti Agudah! ...That is Agudah of the Chofetz Chaim's time !..

126

 Sep 30, 2009 at 01:52 AM Anonymous Says:

So many posts with outrage that the shul fired a"tzadik" who agrees with many "gedolim on antizionism", but are people forgetting that not a single chasidish shul would EVER hire a Zionist Rabbi with a knitted kippa even if his child was dying of hunger and had no job. If this guy is so zealous about his antizionist ideology,he should stick to being a rabbi in his community or join neturei karta maybe they will find him a job as a leas-ion to Ahmidinijad on anti Israel education.

I have zero remorse for any person who is an anti-Zionist zealot and thinks he speaks for the entire Jewish people and that his interpretation of the Torah is correct on Zionism. There are MANY gedolim who supported Zionist movement and The Satmar Rabbi is not the sole voice for ALL Jews. Chasidim forget that there are 16 million Jews around the world and we don't revolve around their little world.

127

 Sep 30, 2009 at 01:22 AM starwolf Says:

Reply to #26  
Yonason Herschlag Says:

The term "Anti Zionist" means different things for different people. A few people are against Jews living in Israel. Some people are against Jews ruling the land of Israel before mashiach comes. Many people (myself included) are against this particular group of (anit-Torah) murderous hoods who took control of the land by force, and disguise their governing as though it would be a democracy.

The point is, that there may not really have been such a great difference of opinion between YI and this local rabbi. It could be that he merely placed the emphasis on being against this particular government, and that via misunderstandings, people construed his words to be against YI's positions.

Sounds like a loss for the community. He accomplished a lot there. But I'm sure that Hashem has another community for him, that will benefit even more.

It is difficult to know the source of this quote: "Many people (myself included) are against this particular group of (anit-Torah) murderous hoods who took control of the land by force, and disguise their governing as though it would be a democracy."

Is it Yonason Herschlag or Yasser Arafat? The clothes are the clothes of Yonasan, but the voice is the voice of Ishmael.

It is difficult to imagine anyone more "anti-Zionist" that the author of that post.

I wonder what kind of a democracy we would have in Israel if Yonasan were in charge. .I wonder if people would be allowed to vote. I wonder if women would be allowed to vote.

As far as the topic of this thread, a Rav should fit his congregation. I don't see too many Hareidi shuls hiring people from Hesder Yeshivot..

128

 Sep 30, 2009 at 01:15 AM Miss Williamsburg Says:

Reply to #122  
joel Says:

go to williamsburg brooklyn and ask the 10's of thousands of yidden living there your stupid question.

No, actually it's you who are wrong. Williamsburg has a Satmar majority and not a Neturei Karta one.
First of all, like many others you are confusing Neturei Karta with Satmar. They are two totally different sects. While their philosophy starts out similar it comes to a fork and go in different directions.
Please read post #90 who said it very well.
You and many others are confusing anti-Zionist with Anti-Israel. They are two different things. Who could boast more Ahavas Yisroel than the Satmar Rebbe zt"l.
Anti Zionists (my version, in accordance to previous posters who rightfully explained that this term can have different meanings to different people) are people who are against the government of Medinas Yisroel. Against the idea of establishing a Jewish Medina before the coming of Moshiach. But Ch"v should this be confused to think that they are anti Eretz Hakodesh.
Those anti Zionist Gedolei Yisroel mentioned in a previous post loved Eretz Yisroel and the Yidden living there more than any Pro-Israel young Israel affiliate can boast.

129

 Sep 30, 2009 at 01:14 AM Lives in VA and used to attend Kol Emes Says:

Kol Emes of Richmond is dying. The shul has been dying for years and years. I believe the shul only has 3 or 4 members left.

Rabbi Kolakowski built up the shul again, and the few older members rejected the newer members. They didn't like the college kids he brought; they wanted him to bring in doctors and lawyers. They went from having no minyan to having one every single week by day, and most weeks by night. You have to understand, NO ONE frum lives in that area of town except for two families, not counting the rabbi. They hired him knowing full well who he is and what he represented.

I have lived in Richmond for 20 years, and in the whole time I have lived here, no rabbi lasts more than 2, maybe 3 years. Some only as long as a year. They had some exceptional rabbis over the year, but after a while, they stopped liking this one because he wears a black hat. They don't like that one because he is into kiruv. One rabbi asked to move half way between the two shuls, and the board said no, he has to stay on "their side of town", even though there were no children for his kids to play with. He left the city, and moved back a year later. He lives on our side of town, and has held the same position in the day school for 6 years now.

So who do you think is the problem? Rabbi Kolakowski or the so called shul? They are the laughing stock of Richmond, and now they have aired the dirty laundry for the whole world to see. I made it very clear to one of the guys, do not call my house asking for my son to come help make their minyan.

If anyone is ever passing through, KBI is a wonderful place to stop by and visit, and Chabad runs an hotel during the summer. Sadly, we have no kosher restaurants or bakeries. Does anyone want to move down here and start one?

130

 Sep 30, 2009 at 07:24 AM Elya Says:

One thing I know is that in all places iv'e lived all the Israeli schnorrers (Sefardim included) seem to gravitate to Satmar, and it is there that they seem to make a large amount of money and find somewhere to eat and sleep, wonder why they don't go to young Israel shuls?? This Rosh Hashonoh I davvened in Satmar and two very modern people with shaved beards and small kippot came in and someone immediately went to find them a place and make them feel welcome, don't know what would have happened in the opposite case. I challenge anyone reading this to go into Satmar in Wmsburg in a knitted kippah with an Israeli flag on it, then go into a young Israel shul wearing a shtreimel and bekitsche and tell me where they felt more unwelcome.

131

 Sep 30, 2009 at 07:20 AM Anonymous Says:

To 127,

No they would not nor should they hire such a Rabbi, especially if his only qualification is that he is starving. What the chassidim would do and do often is give the person the food, money and other help that he needs without regard to his knitted yarmula and without requiring him to work.

And the rabbi in this case was ready employed and built up the shul. And it seems they threw him out even if him, his and child will go hungry. Your rants are wildly misdirected

132

 Sep 30, 2009 at 06:53 AM Disgusted Says:

If this quote is true:

Rabbi Pesach Lerner, Executive Director of the National Council of Young Israel, which is comprised of over 150 synagogues around the country and in Israel, informed us that in light of Rabbi Kolakowski’s positions on the State of Israel he would not be able to remain in the position of rabbi of the shul.

... then I no longer support Young Israel due to its disgusting hypocracy. There are many Yeshivishe Rabbeim at YI all over the USA.

They picked on this one Rav due to politics. Shameful and Disgusting. The day after Yom Kippur. Disgusting. Disgusting. Disgusting. No more contributions from me. Go fly a kite Lerner. Welcome to the new Politically Correct OU. This is the new OU leadership talking. An Obama-like Socialist Modern Orthodoxy. Mark my words, the OU is metamorphising into a Neo-Orthodox.movement.

133

 Sep 30, 2009 at 08:10 AM Lubavitcher woman Says:

Reply to #51  
Babishka Says:

I seem to recall an anti-Zionist Satmar one of the Kedoshe Mumbai HY"D who was murdered at the Nariman Chabad House.

You "seem to recall"...what is your problem? You are making numerous short & sarcastic posts on different threads. Care to explain what you mean HERE? Please tell me, what does Mumbai & the Kedoshim have to do with in-fighting in a small community? DO NOT deface their memory with snide comments. Instead, do something positive to honor them, such as joining in the Shabbos Mevorchim Challah Baking group (worldwide!!) started in their memory, where we distribute challah to those who wouldn't otherwise have. If you're interested, post here!

FYI, & for everyone else who is mis-informed due to bias & ignorance, Chabad objects to a Jewish State NOT based on Torah values. But Chabadniks will (and obviously DO!) lay down our lives to help ALL Jews, Zionist or not.

This has nothing to do with the thread, but it needs addressing. Thank you.

134

 Sep 30, 2009 at 08:00 AM matzahlocal101 Says:

Reply to #126  
Anonymous Says:

So many posts with outrage that the shul fired a"tzadik" who agrees with many "gedolim on antizionism", but are people forgetting that not a single chasidish shul would EVER hire a Zionist Rabbi with a knitted kippa even if his child was dying of hunger and had no job. If this guy is so zealous about his antizionist ideology,he should stick to being a rabbi in his community or join neturei karta maybe they will find him a job as a leas-ion to Ahmidinijad on anti Israel education.

I have zero remorse for any person who is an anti-Zionist zealot and thinks he speaks for the entire Jewish people and that his interpretation of the Torah is correct on Zionism. There are MANY gedolim who supported Zionist movement and The Satmar Rabbi is not the sole voice for ALL Jews. Chasidim forget that there are 16 million Jews around the world and we don't revolve around their little world.

Yes there are 16 Million Jews in the world. Some are Chassidim, some are communist, some are Zionist, some are Neturai Karta, some are Republicans, some are Democrats. We Torah committed Jews don't have answer to 16 million Jews. We don't have to answer to Communists, Democrats, Rebublicans, or Zionists. We have to answer to G-d. What does G-d want from us? Some things are stated explicitly in the Torah like eating kosher and keeping Shabbos. Other areas are not so clear, so we go to our gedolim like the Torah tells us (Devarim 17:11) people that were disconnected from political, finiancial, and egotistical interests, that lived and breathed Torah, and we follow their directions. While people may have an emotional tie or an egotistical tie to the secular state of Israel, one must ask, is the land of Israel, promised to us by G-d in the Torah, and nowhere else, supposed to be a national homeland for Jewish prostitutes and drug addicts? Is that what G-d intended when he promised Abraham the land of Canaan for his descendants? A land where Jewish girls can marry Arab men? A place where the Government supports hosting a gay pride parade through the streets of Holy Jerusalem? A place where Arab parliment members vote on the question of "who is Jew"? The secular Zionist are in a quandry. They don't believe in G-d or the Torah and realize they have no claim to a country they were exiled from 2000 years ago. So they hide behind the religious Zionist and tell him "tell that G-d promised us the land in the bible. Tell them that we have prayed 3 times a day for 2000 years for the return to Zion. Tell them that we have sat on the floor with ash and sackcloth and every Tisha b'av we mourn the exile for almost 2000 years. And the religious Zionist foolishly goes ahead and does the bidding of the secular anti-religious government. The government that begged him to make Aliyah, the government that encouraged the "mitzvah of Yishuv ha'aretz", the government that sent to Gush Katif to make whole towns and industry blossom out of the desert for 38 years, and we they were done with him, they bulldozed his house, they closed his business, and kicked him out without compensation. This, in the name of peace while thousands of kassams, katyushas, and mortars were, and continue to be, fired at Jews. Those the are the people that you proudly support? Not me and not most other Jews committed to Torah values. For those who continually ask on these boards, which "gaon", which "alter rebbe" who was Reb Shraga Faivel, who was Reb itzikel, which Reb Michoel Ber? In the Torah world there is no question who these people were. For those that have to ask, but can likely name all the players and stats of their favorite sports team or all the names of the actors in their favorite movie or soap opera, you are obviously too busy to have G-d and his Torah on your front burner. Zionism was an Anathema to all gedolai yisroel from it's inception for many reasons. Among them the battle cry that "the IDF can protect us around the world" , Kochi vi'otzem yadi at it's best (or worst). Jews used to rely on G-d, now we proudly proclaim that we don't need him anymore because Israel has an air force. Sorry, but Zionism is not anything to proud of.

135

 Sep 30, 2009 at 10:27 AM Glatt some questions Says:

NCYI has a rabbinic placement office...were they the ones who originally recommended this rabbi in the first place? That would be quite ironic, and speak very poorly of their ability to vet rabbis who are appropriate for their chapter shuls.

136

 Sep 30, 2009 at 10:25 AM Another Richmonder wants to add Says:

The shul knew exactly what and who they were hiring when they hired him. (Although now they are lying and claiming they had no idea.) From the get go, he asked that the Israeli flags be moved OUT of the shul and put into the front hall way. (He did NOT insist that they completely remove them from shul premises.)

This past summer, one donor whom this rabbi had brought in insisted the flags be moved out. He based his five thousand dollar donation on this. They got upset, and said no. They also were upset with another member Rabbi Kolakowski had brought in, who shares his views. This member was also barred from being a member, and threatened that if he showed to daven, THEY WOULD CALL THE POLICE ON HIM. They called Pesach Lerner, who said he can't be rabbi. He was demoted to ba'al koreh, which again, HE HUMBLY ACCEPTED to keep providing parnasah for his family.

Please know that this shul you are so strongly supporting cut off his medical insurance just after they had their first baby, because his wife couldn't meet her expectations as their rebbitzen. It didn't faze them that she had been in the hospital for two months suffering from kidney problems. Within a week of giving birth, they expected her to be back at shul.

They were constantly nitpicking at him. They threatened him with dismissal because his desk wasn't neat. Do you want me to go on?

BTW, this article appeared in the local Richmond paper on Friday, right before Shabbos Shuvah. You have to bear in mind we are talking about three individuals.

137

 Sep 30, 2009 at 10:34 AM Saddened in Richmond Says:

From some of the other local contributors, it's possible to get the picture of what happened. Kol Emes hangs on due to the natural tenacity of a few yidden who can't bear to see something they love go down. The KBI (the larger frum shul) people think the Kol Emes backers should just go ahead and the let it die a natural death--they love KBI, shouldn't everyone? This is also a natural tendency--everything thinks everyone else should also like what they like. As for Rabbi K--I really love the man, and agree with the praises said on his behalf by #123. If I were in his shoes, I would have kept the anti-Zionist opinions to myself, in the interests of keeping the parnossa for my wife and now two daughters. But I'm also not on Rabbi K's madrega--he is me'ein Nachshon ben Aminadav--walking by faith, and letting the Eibishter's hashgacha settle matters ba-olam hazeh. And all will be well, with G-d's help, for him and his family. He is a very special person, mamash an erlicher yid, and bears no ill will toward anyone, because his eyes are and heart are in the right place. Trying to give l'chaf z'chus to all involved, and I know all the principals--they all have good intentions--I wish we could all be oivdim on Rabbi K's level, really working on ourselves and recognizing that we don't and can't understand the other guy's parsha. Ad mosai?!!

138

 Sep 30, 2009 at 10:45 AM mikvah yid Says:

Reply to #123  
Another Richmonder speaks up Says:

I am also a long time Richmond, VA resident. Let me clarify a few things. Kenesset Beth Israel is a vibrant shul and has been for many years. It enjoyed a few extraordinary rabbis since we have lived here, including Rabbi Ron. The two shuls did not merge. They attempted to merge, but there was ONE lone family who held out. It was this family who orchestrated the hiring of Rabbi Kolakowski. He was hired even before he was married, and arrived here soon after his wedding. The synagogue from the get-go imposed all kinds of rules and restrictions on him. They didn't like it when he said a certain meat couldn't be brought in because of the hechsher. He had signed a two year contract with them, that they played around with time and time again. Faced with the needs of a growing family, Rabbi Kolakowski agreed not one time, but many times to a pay cut in order to keep providing parnasah for his family. Before he was fired he was only earning a quarter of his promised salary. He was working several other jobs in order to make ends meet. Time after time, the "powers that be" would produce yet another rule that he had to follow. Rabbi Kolakowski is an earlicher mentch who only thinks the best of everyone. Even after he was fired, he has gone back repeatedly to help them with the mikveh. (The mikveh is the main reason no one wants to let go of the shul. There is a Chabad mikveh, but it is only open to women.) Rabbi Kolakowski has an incredible amount of Torah knowledge. What I don't understand is how only one comment out of 122 comment about the lack of kavod haTorah. Only comment 46 picked up on this. That comment alone is well worth a re-reading of every single person here. He did not deserved to be humiliated in public and talked about incessantly. Although, as I said, he is a very kind man and he is not at all upset for the reason he was fired. If anything, he is actually proud of it.

also, the Chabad Mikveh is outside of the eiruv, so they need it for the women on Shabbos, but so many of the women stopped going on shabbos because they don't like this shul. We are trying to build a new mikveh here in Richmond where everyone can feel comfortable.

139

 Sep 30, 2009 at 10:51 AM richmond Says:

Reply to #136  
Another Richmonder wants to add Says:

The shul knew exactly what and who they were hiring when they hired him. (Although now they are lying and claiming they had no idea.) From the get go, he asked that the Israeli flags be moved OUT of the shul and put into the front hall way. (He did NOT insist that they completely remove them from shul premises.)

This past summer, one donor whom this rabbi had brought in insisted the flags be moved out. He based his five thousand dollar donation on this. They got upset, and said no. They also were upset with another member Rabbi Kolakowski had brought in, who shares his views. This member was also barred from being a member, and threatened that if he showed to daven, THEY WOULD CALL THE POLICE ON HIM. They called Pesach Lerner, who said he can't be rabbi. He was demoted to ba'al koreh, which again, HE HUMBLY ACCEPTED to keep providing parnasah for his family.

Please know that this shul you are so strongly supporting cut off his medical insurance just after they had their first baby, because his wife couldn't meet her expectations as their rebbitzen. It didn't faze them that she had been in the hospital for two months suffering from kidney problems. Within a week of giving birth, they expected her to be back at shul.

They were constantly nitpicking at him. They threatened him with dismissal because his desk wasn't neat. Do you want me to go on?

BTW, this article appeared in the local Richmond paper on Friday, right before Shabbos Shuvah. You have to bear in mind we are talking about three individuals.

furthermore, the president of the shul is a non-Zionist Agudist, and he said the flags should be totally removed (as they were for a few months two years ago). Some donors said it should be put back, but then another donor made this offer (as mentioned here), which caused Rabbi Lerner to say the Rabbi should be fired (even though the Rabbi said the flags could stay if they didn't want this guy's money).

140

 Sep 30, 2009 at 11:09 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #135  
Glatt some questions Says:

NCYI has a rabbinic placement office...were they the ones who originally recommended this rabbi in the first place? That would be quite ironic, and speak very poorly of their ability to vet rabbis who are appropriate for their chapter shuls.

NCYI has a rule that they can seize the assets of a shul if they don't like what it is doing. Rabbi Kolakowski was certified by NCYI and was placed there. I can only imagine that they were planning this all along because they knew that it would take 100 years of dues payment to get the amount of money they can get just by seizing the assets. They sent him there to fail. When they saw he was being too successful and giving a future to the shul they started making their threats to seize the assets because of the influence he had on people he brought to the shul. The shul was never a strongly Zionist shul. They did not say hallel on Yom HaAtzmaut even when they had their own daily minyan there (later when they had a shared minyan with KBI there were often fights about it). This is all about NCYI's imperialism over their branches. NCYI takes much from their branches but gives back very little.

141

 Sep 30, 2009 at 10:57 AM who Says:

Reply to #115  
Toras Moshe Emess Says:

My point was that we can disagree without being hateful to one another. If I were to have said or implied, for example, "even though there is no legitimate Torah argument supporting zionism" or "even though opposition to zionism is anti-Torah" (or some such) it would have defeated the purpose of my post and merely stirred the pot even further. Please realize that BOTH sides of this debate believe that THEIRS is the legitimate Torah view and that the other's is NOT. For the sake of civility (which has been desperately lacking here) I preferred to present them in "neutral" form, regardless of my personal position (which, if you must, I think you can figure out if you reread my post). I hope you understand.

Sorry I did not mean it as a criticism. I was just curious about what sources in Gemorah etc. might say it's ok to establish a state before Moshiach arrival.

142

 Sep 30, 2009 at 10:53 AM who Says:

Reply to #114  
Charlie Hall Says:

Read *Eim Habonim Semichah* by Yisachar Shlomo Teichtal zt"l , Rov Soloveitchik's *Kol Dodi Dofek*, or any of the many writings of Rav Kook. Rov Soloveitchik's work is particularly important because it was written in the diaspora after the establishment of the Jewish state.

They do not refute his Sefer. They motly talk about the mitzvah "yishuv Eretz Yisroel" There is no way to refute the "Sholosh Shvuos". It's Gemorah. There is no other Gemorah that states otherwise. Also see Sanhedrin 98.

143

 Sep 30, 2009 at 11:39 AM Chavah Kolakowski Says:

Hi, now you're going to hear it from the source. When my husband was interviewed for the position at YI of Richmond, he got off the plane looking like a Satmar chasid. At the initial interview, he mentioned moving the flags (American as well as Israeli) from the front of the shul. He never never hid who he was or what he believed. YI of Richmond was in a nearly-dead state at that point, and I believe they were desperate for any young Rabbi to re-invigorate the shul and bring people in to make minyonim. My husband worked diligently to this end, and at the end of two years, there was a regular, reliable Shabbos morning minyan, along with Shabbatonim every other week and regular shiurim taught by himself and two other yingerman. There was even talk of starting a kollel. After a new member offered a sizable donation on the condition that the flags be moved (without my husband's direction or knowledge), the board members (all three of them) consulted with Rabbi Pesach Lerner of NCYI and he said the shul's assets would be seized if my husband continued to be Rabbi there. My husband acquiesced and stepped down, hoping to continue on as baal koreh and/or Kollel yingerman. After this point, things between my husband and a few board members got ugly. Both sides (including my husband) did and said things that were not right. Lashon Hara was spoken. It was a sad state of affairs. This was all a week before my daughter was born and it was a very stressful time.

Neither my husband nor I belong to or have any association with Neturi Karta (or however it's spelled). I have strong ties to Satmar, as I was mekarev by Satmar chasidim, and I also have ties to Chabad. The posek for National Council of Young Israel actually was av beis din for my gerus, and I consider him to be like a father to me. My husband has worked for Biala and Shidlovsa, but doesn't align himself with any particular Rebbe. He is a chosid of the Baal Shem Tov. It is easy to be confused by our mixed backgrounds. We definitely come from "anti-Zionist" shitas, but strive to do our best to love ALL Jews, including and especially those living in Israel. We make mistakes just like everyone, but baruch Hashem, there is tshuvah in Judaism. I just daven that Hashem will accept mine.

We loved our time with Kol Emes, and we still maintain strong ties and friendships with some of the members there. We wish Rabbi Allen and his wife hatzlacha and hope they succeed in unifying and strengthening the congregation. Richmond is an amazing community with two mikvaos, a day school, a Yeshiva katana, a brand-new Yeshivah gedolah (hooray!), and three very different but very wonderful orthodox shuls. I love living here, even as a Satmar chassidiste, and hope to continue to do so for many years iy"H.

144

 Sep 30, 2009 at 11:48 AM Authentic Londoner Says:

You seem to be confusing the illness with the symptoms. For Young Israel shul members the problem with the rabbi is that he is 'farfrumpt' and that in their eyes makes him irrational and not someone who one would wish to have teach ones children. They see his dress and antizionism as evidence of his irrationality.
Matzahlocal101, how do you imagine that MO Jews, let alone Conservative, Reform Jews, agnostic or atheist Jews view the Chassidic community and their leadership. How do you think non Jews view you? Do you think they do so with respect? Why do you think that they choose to deliberately ignore the views of the Gedolim whether past or present? Do you imagine that a 19th century modernist 'German of the Mosaic faith' would view you in a favorable light because you may for different reasons be antizionist?

145

 Sep 30, 2009 at 11:45 AM who Says:

Reply to #126  
Anonymous Says:

So many posts with outrage that the shul fired a"tzadik" who agrees with many "gedolim on antizionism", but are people forgetting that not a single chasidish shul would EVER hire a Zionist Rabbi with a knitted kippa even if his child was dying of hunger and had no job. If this guy is so zealous about his antizionist ideology,he should stick to being a rabbi in his community or join neturei karta maybe they will find him a job as a leas-ion to Ahmidinijad on anti Israel education.

I have zero remorse for any person who is an anti-Zionist zealot and thinks he speaks for the entire Jewish people and that his interpretation of the Torah is correct on Zionism. There are MANY gedolim who supported Zionist movement and The Satmar Rabbi is not the sole voice for ALL Jews. Chasidim forget that there are 16 million Jews around the world and we don't revolve around their little world.

A few things here my fool of a friend. A) Satmar would not hire him in the first place. Which is not the case here.
b)Even if he was a NON WEARING yarmulka person and Not their rabbi they-Satmar- would collect as much money as possible to help him and his child.
C) you are an anti Semite even though you may be Jewish (thru your father)
D)YOU certainly do NOT speak for entire Jewish people.
E)There are NOT many but a handfull of so-called Gedolim who support Zionism
F)The Satmer Rov along with 1000 other Gedolim are opposed to the "state"

Nope we sure don't evolve around the "little World" of Satmar. After all there are "only" about 150,000 Satmar Chasidim and how may YI typess are there? Of the 16,000,000 you claim which part are you with? The 90% non-religious?

146

 Sep 30, 2009 at 11:44 AM Anonymous Says:

I'd like to hear from Rabbi Pesach Lerner. A lot has been said in his name but unless I missed it, what EXACTLY did he say? Rabbi Lerner, step forward & answer your critics & clarify your instructions.

147

 Sep 30, 2009 at 11:41 AM Chavah Kolakowski Says:

Reply to #138  
mikvah yid Says:

also, the Chabad Mikveh is outside of the eiruv, so they need it for the women on Shabbos, but so many of the women stopped going on shabbos because they don't like this shul. We are trying to build a new mikveh here in Richmond where everyone can feel comfortable.

Please PLEASE let me know if I can help in any way with the building of the mikvah. I love the Chabad mikvah, but it is important that we have a mikvah inside the eiruv for Shabbos and Yom Tov. In my opinion, the more mikvas, the better!
You should be matzliach!!!

148

 Sep 30, 2009 at 11:32 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #142  
who Says:

They do not refute his Sefer. They motly talk about the mitzvah "yishuv Eretz Yisroel" There is no way to refute the "Sholosh Shvuos". It's Gemorah. There is no other Gemorah that states otherwise. Also see Sanhedrin 98.

There is a big sugya on the mitzvah of yishuv Eretz Yisroel. It is not a pashuter zach. These gedolim talking mostly about the lamdus on this issue. The second maamar in VaYoel Moshe is all about the machlokes between the Rambam and the Ramban on this issue. Nothing about politics, just real Torah. But people should note if it is about loving Eretz Yisroel, Rav Soloveitchik never even visited Medinat Israel (he only visited Eretz Yisroel once before the founding of the Medinah), whereas the Satmar Rov lived there for a few years and visited several times, and was officially the Rov of Yerushalayim under the BaDaTz. (also the Satmar Rebbes since then visit Eretz Yisroel often, and both of the present Rebbes lived there in their younger days).

149

 Sep 30, 2009 at 11:22 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #104  
Anonymous Says:

Actually Tikvah means hope nothing less or more! Emuna/bitachon mean faith

Emunah is faith. Bitachon takes it to a new level. It means absolute trust.
Try it. It works.

150

 Sep 30, 2009 at 11:14 AM chardal Says:

Reply to #5  
Anonymous Says:

That pic is very confusing! A chareidishe girl named Faith?! A chassidishe rabbi in Young Israel? I would love an explanation and more info on this family...

The pic looks familiar - I think there was an article about them recently - I think she may be a giyores... there was a story about how they got to Richmond....

151

 Sep 30, 2009 at 11:25 AM who Says:

Reply to #117  
cranberry stuffer Says:

actually, the Rebbe himself has said it privately as well. The Rebbe was a realist. There is a medina.Its a fact. Now we have the choice to utilize every posible avenue to undo all the bad it has caused, and is constantly causing, and be mikarev hashems children.

The Eibeshter is the greatest Baal Harachamim. "Ok so you went against my decree and you did establish a state before I sent Moshiach. So now my sons what will you do with it? Will you repent because you are so thank-full you now have your own country, government etc. or will you be m'chalel Shabbos, eat trafe, practice abominable deeds, have legal prostitution areas (as in Amsterdam), have pornography stores and worse, be the highest abortion per ca-pita country IN THE WORLD (and this a people who lost over 6000000) allow every perverted avodah zorah imaginable etc, etc. and yet I let you still be here. I arouse other countries against you, I allow them to build weapons against you, yet I still let you win and protect you and carefully plan who nebech must leave this world. So when will you and I mean ALL of you thank ME and return to ME, not just the 10% of you who study Torah and keep mitzvos. What about you other 90%???"" This is what is bothering Hashem. (if I could dare speak for Him Kaveeyochol. And please don't tell me about all those sitting and learning Torah in Israel. That's ONLY about 500,000 out of 6,500,000 about 1/10th as I said. What about the rest. Hashem gave the Torah to ALL Yidden when they proclaimed "Naaseh V'nishma" Ok off my soap box.

152

 Sep 30, 2009 at 11:21 AM Anonymous Says:

This is a very sad story, no matter which way you look at it. I hope he finds a new source of parnassah immediately.

153

 Sep 30, 2009 at 12:27 PM zalman Says:

Reply to #80  
Charlie Hall Says:

While there have indeed been some great anti-Zionist rabbis, there have also been some great rabbis who embraced Zionism. Among them were Rabbi Reines z'tz'l, Rav Kook z'tz'l, Rav Soloveitchik z'tz'l, Rav Herzog z'tz'l, Rav Goren z'tz'l, Rabbi Shapira z'tz'l, Rabbi Aharon Lichtenstein, Rabbi Mordecai Eliyahu, Rabbi Hershel Schachter, and Rabbi Moshe Tendler. The names mentioned represent several different strains of Religious Zionism, all of which are legitimate Torah positions. Rav Kook and Rav Soloveitchik will likely be seen as the two greatest Jewish thinkers of the 20th century.



"Rabbi Moshe Tendler" being the best quote !!
we all remember the " rabbi" who wanted to uproot the mitzva of bris milah and the minhag of kapporos among others ......
am actually surprised youi didnt mention Tendler's predecessors the hon. estemmed "Rabbis" - Rabbi Moses Mendelsohn, Rabbi Aaron Choriner, Rabbi Yaakov Frank, Rabbi Shabssai Tzvi etc.

154

 Sep 30, 2009 at 12:20 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #152  
Anonymous Says:

This is a very sad story, no matter which way you look at it. I hope he finds a new source of parnassah immediately.

he wasn't making a lot of money there at the shul for the last year (he took a 75% paycut last year because they ran out of money). He is also a prison chaplain and he started his own Beis Medrash now down the block. (the Rebbetzin also works). He has had minyan already with only local people, but at Kol Emes they only had minyan even on RH and YK by paying guys to come from Baltimore. Rabbi Kolakowski's new mosdos definitely needs support, though.

155

 Sep 30, 2009 at 01:32 PM New Yorker Says:

Rebbetzin Kolakowski is a classy lady. I wish them much success & a year of Brachas.

156

 Sep 30, 2009 at 04:05 PM Jew Says:

People shouldn't bash him when they don't know the situation. He came to that shul when it was dead, and only because of him were they able to get minyanim. The board of Kol Emes isn't even shomer shabbos, and they are the laughing stock of the whole community of Richmond. If they didn't like his views, they never should have hired him. They claim that they did not know he was anti-zionist. That just proves how idiotic they really are. From his first shabbos there, when he wouldn't put up an Israeli flag that knew that he wasn't a zionist. I personally witnessed the kindness that Rabbi Kolakowski treated the person who wrote the article with, and I think the person who wrote it is a Rasha Merusha.

157

 Sep 30, 2009 at 04:55 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #5  
Anonymous Says:

That pic is very confusing! A chareidishe girl named Faith?! A chassidishe rabbi in Young Israel? I would love an explanation and more info on this family...

Her name is Alta Fayga Emuna. She's called Faygie. Faith was used for the article.

158

 Sep 30, 2009 at 05:17 PM Askupeh Says:

Reply to #52  
Anonymous Says:

Before moving to Ocean Parkway- Rav Miller was Rabbi in the YI of Rugby which was in East Flatbush-

So if Rabbi Avigdor Miller was able to be a YI Rabbi even though he was a Kanohi, then why can't he?

159

 Sep 30, 2009 at 05:15 PM Askupeh Says:

Reply to #156  
Jew Says:

People shouldn't bash him when they don't know the situation. He came to that shul when it was dead, and only because of him were they able to get minyanim. The board of Kol Emes isn't even shomer shabbos, and they are the laughing stock of the whole community of Richmond. If they didn't like his views, they never should have hired him. They claim that they did not know he was anti-zionist. That just proves how idiotic they really are. From his first shabbos there, when he wouldn't put up an Israeli flag that knew that he wasn't a zionist. I personally witnessed the kindness that Rabbi Kolakowski treated the person who wrote the article with, and I think the person who wrote it is a Rasha Merusha.

That the board of Kol Emes isn't shomer shabbos doesn't matter; at least they are Zionists.

160

 Sep 30, 2009 at 06:10 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #120  
och in vey Says:

if someone has a chazakah for stupid comments,i guess all his comments are stupid ,if a rav has a contract which must be renewed,or has other clauses there's no chazka

Go learn the halachos on this, and you will find that it is not nearly so simple.

161

 Sep 30, 2009 at 06:04 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #99  
Toras Moshe Emess Says:

How else would you categorize Kach? These people gather every year at the grave of Baruch Goldstein on his yartzeit. There is a plaque that reads: "To the holy Baruch Goldstein, who gave his life for the Jewish people, the Torah and the nation of Israel." A JDL member in the US and Kach member in Israel, he went on a shooting spree that killed 29 and wounded 150. Is that NOT terrorism just because the victims were unarmed Arabs instead of unarmed Jews??? Terror is terror, no matter who employs it. C"v we should EVER legitimize this kind of massacre as anything else other than what is was. Now you can argue "well he was just crazy" but that doesn't change the fact that Kach REVERES this man! They call him "holy!!!" So yes, while maybe not in terms of scale but that is no different that Hamas.

Unarmed? What were the hatchets with which they hacked him to pieces? And what were they doing with them if they were just praying? Boruch Goldstein saved the Jews of Chevron from a pogrom, and you have no right to impugn his memory. Hashem Yikom Domo, including from those who continue to spill it.

162

 Sep 30, 2009 at 06:03 PM mel Says:

I Am # 160 Wow what a storm he created. He means well ,ober ehr hodt nisht kayn sechel. In a Y I shule/? ,a baby called faith? they hired him ? Zey oich hoben nisht kayn sechel.

163

 Sep 30, 2009 at 06:44 PM yid Says:

Rabbi and Rebtzen Kolakowski Chask vamotz some cant tolerate the truth if it is not to their taste they will attack you relentlessly to bury their guilt.

I heard from a grand son of rabbi Moshe Feinstein z,tl he was once giving his weekly shiur and the topic was every Jew has a good mido and we should learn from every Jew
a lady asked what could you learn from a satmar Chasid to hate jews. Reb Moshe z,tl face paled he was visibly very upset by the comment and he said I am not going to go in detail to every good mido of the satmars, but you used the word "to hate other Jews" I will tell you a story a yid from eretz yisroel came to the US to collect money for a wedding and he complained to Reb Moshe z"tl that he was still very far from his goal and the wedding date approaching Reb Moshe advised him to try his luck in Williamsburg being afraid as he didn’t exactly fit in to the satmar community he stopped a satmar on the street and started crying telling him his story the guy had pity on him he took him to the shul and some address rasing all the mony in less than a week he came back to thank Reb Moshe. With a sigh Reb Moshe said this is true ahvas yisroel that satmars excel in and we should learn from them

From what I have read you are true satmars and we are proud of you i'yh you will be matzlich with your new shtebel Hash am should send you brucha vhatzlcha until moishch speedy arrival

164

 Sep 30, 2009 at 07:47 PM Emes Says:

It is interesting to note what people are writing and ends up like a mixed chulent.
Satmar and Zionism are two different things. Many of the Satmar sect have followed the sefer Shlosha Divarim written by the Rav Joel of Satmar Z"L. It is in a high language and only very brilliant people can understand what is written. However, the problem is that many people, whose learning is on a low level, think they understand what is written and think they know what they are reading and are the ones distorting the whole philsophy. Not all Satmar are anti Zionist, they are anti State of Israel. At this point many of us are not for the State of Israel but for Eretz Yisroel. Yeshivos in Eretz Yisroel who are not for the State do not avail themselves of the benefits. So before people start bashing , especially so close after Yom Kippur and before Hoshanna Rabba, when our fate was not sealed, take a deep breath, keep quiet, don't call or text just anyone you have ever met in you life... just be dan l'chaf zechus and hope for the best. Obviously, there may have been something we don't really know about this Young Israel why they were forced to do this. Let's hope the Rabbi and family will settle in a place where they will fit into more properly. That is not to say that the people in Young Israel are not fine, i am sure they are and do feel sorry for the move they had to take.

165

 Sep 30, 2009 at 08:30 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #47  
Anonymous Says:

They would. Why are you so shocked ?

The Chofetz Chaim was niftar in 1933, we don't know what he would have said about Israel had he been alive to see the Holocaust.

166

 Sep 30, 2009 at 08:22 PM Anti Zionist NOT Anti Israel Says:

Emes said it very well. This is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Down with the anti Jewish Zionist government of Israel, Up with Eretz Yisroel, the land and it's people. We need MOSHIACH now.

167

 Sep 30, 2009 at 08:11 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #164  
Emes Says:

It is interesting to note what people are writing and ends up like a mixed chulent.
Satmar and Zionism are two different things. Many of the Satmar sect have followed the sefer Shlosha Divarim written by the Rav Joel of Satmar Z"L. It is in a high language and only very brilliant people can understand what is written. However, the problem is that many people, whose learning is on a low level, think they understand what is written and think they know what they are reading and are the ones distorting the whole philsophy. Not all Satmar are anti Zionist, they are anti State of Israel. At this point many of us are not for the State of Israel but for Eretz Yisroel. Yeshivos in Eretz Yisroel who are not for the State do not avail themselves of the benefits. So before people start bashing , especially so close after Yom Kippur and before Hoshanna Rabba, when our fate was not sealed, take a deep breath, keep quiet, don't call or text just anyone you have ever met in you life... just be dan l'chaf zechus and hope for the best. Obviously, there may have been something we don't really know about this Young Israel why they were forced to do this. Let's hope the Rabbi and family will settle in a place where they will fit into more properly. That is not to say that the people in Young Israel are not fine, i am sure they are and do feel sorry for the move they had to take.

you are the one who has made a chulent satmar is anti zionst period

168

 Sep 30, 2009 at 08:00 PM Askupeh Says:

Reply to #161  
Milhouse Says:

Unarmed? What were the hatchets with which they hacked him to pieces? And what were they doing with them if they were just praying? Boruch Goldstein saved the Jews of Chevron from a pogrom, and you have no right to impugn his memory. Hashem Yikom Domo, including from those who continue to spill it.

I’m with you Milhouse. Boruch Goldstein was a Tzaddik, and was wrongly vilified by EVERYONE for no good reason. There is a sick innate need for people to prove their anti-bigotry which makes them buy into this “Goldstein-a-terrorist” mantra. He was a good doctor who treated the Arabs and was very nice to them. In addition to trying to prevent a pogrom, two people murdered in Chevron/Kiryas Arbah died in his hands. If a murdered Jew would to die in my hands I would snap too. Would you also call me a terrorist? If I would have been there, I would have said: Boruchel it is not worth it; you are worth to me more then all the Arabs in Chevron. I vehemently disagree with Kach in Hashkofah although I love them, and to me Boruch is a big Tzaddik.

To throw out food for thought, let me tell you what very few know. When Rabbi Meir Kahana HY”D was murdered (BTW in my opinion the CIA and Mossad at the least knew about it beforehand, if not orchestrated by them), the Leveiya took place on Ocean Parkway in front of Young Israel of Rabbi Bomzer. Rabbi Avigdor Miller ZT”L who lived a half a block away, came out on the street to pay his respect. Rabbi Kahana had learned in Mir in Flatbush for 14 tears and Rabbi Miller was the Mashgiach. That Thursday night in Rabbi Millers famous Hashkofah Shiyur, Rabbi Miller was asked what he has to say about Rabbi Kahane. Look what this Tzaddik, the Kanohi said; he praised Rabbi Kahana to the hilt for his tenacious fighting of the Reform. All the knuckleheads out there; learn how a Tzaddik thinks of a Yid regardless of his diametrically opposed views!

169

 Sep 30, 2009 at 07:14 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #159  
Askupeh Says:

That the board of Kol Emes isn't shomer shabbos doesn't matter; at least they are Zionists.

this is the irony - the bylaws of NCYI say that if you are mechallel shabbos you cannot be an officer on the board, but NCYI ignores their own rules when it suits them and makes up their own rules when it suits them.

170

 Sep 30, 2009 at 08:37 PM och in vey Says:

Reply to #160  
Milhouse Says:

Go learn the halachos on this, and you will find that it is not nearly so simple.

i have and you have not thats why you made your silly comments,you have smicha in abi greatee,im sure you were yorah yorah

171

 Sep 30, 2009 at 08:36 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #90  
Anti Zionist not Anti Israel Says:

Most Chareidim are anti Zionism, if it refers to the Zionist state of Israel - the anti Jewish government of Israel. They are not anti Zion, the holy land of Israel. I am Chareidi, I love Eretz Yisroel. I hate the Israeli government. I do not like The Iranian dictator, or the PLO or Hamas etc. I do not want them attacking Israel because I love the Yidden in the land of Israel. But, the gov't is anti Chareidi, it has to go. Moshiach has to come!

Achmadinizad would also say he is anti zionist but not antisemitic ( remember the photo of him embracing the NK fools?) what's the difference between your views and his?

172

 Sep 30, 2009 at 11:36 PM Anonymous Says:

The fact is that some of the leaders in Kol Emes are pious Jews who do believe in Hashem and His Word, but for vain hopes of financial support they pretend to be Zionists. They did not hire a Zionist Rabbi from YU, they hired a regular haredi yeshivishe Rabbi from Ner Israel. It's not like they are going to say Hallel on Hei Iyar there all of a sudden. There is already a strong Zionist shul here, Keneseth Beth Israel. They are the stronghold of Yiddishkeit in the city and they deserve every kavod and chashivus. Kol Emes should just be honest and join Agudath Israel, and stop pretending to be a Young Israel shul. However they gave into Rabbi Lerner's bullying. Orginally they were tricked by NCYI to join against the will of many of the members. The guy who wrote this article is intermarried and not Shomer Shabbos, yet Rabi Lerner lets him stay an officer whole he bars Rabbi Kolakowski from membership. Nebech,

173

 Sep 30, 2009 at 11:46 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #168  
Askupeh Says:

I’m with you Milhouse. Boruch Goldstein was a Tzaddik, and was wrongly vilified by EVERYONE for no good reason. There is a sick innate need for people to prove their anti-bigotry which makes them buy into this “Goldstein-a-terrorist” mantra. He was a good doctor who treated the Arabs and was very nice to them. In addition to trying to prevent a pogrom, two people murdered in Chevron/Kiryas Arbah died in his hands. If a murdered Jew would to die in my hands I would snap too. Would you also call me a terrorist? If I would have been there, I would have said: Boruchel it is not worth it; you are worth to me more then all the Arabs in Chevron. I vehemently disagree with Kach in Hashkofah although I love them, and to me Boruch is a big Tzaddik.

To throw out food for thought, let me tell you what very few know. When Rabbi Meir Kahana HY”D was murdered (BTW in my opinion the CIA and Mossad at the least knew about it beforehand, if not orchestrated by them), the Leveiya took place on Ocean Parkway in front of Young Israel of Rabbi Bomzer. Rabbi Avigdor Miller ZT”L who lived a half a block away, came out on the street to pay his respect. Rabbi Kahana had learned in Mir in Flatbush for 14 tears and Rabbi Miller was the Mashgiach. That Thursday night in Rabbi Millers famous Hashkofah Shiyur, Rabbi Miller was asked what he has to say about Rabbi Kahane. Look what this Tzaddik, the Kanohi said; he praised Rabbi Kahana to the hilt for his tenacious fighting of the Reform. All the knuckleheads out there; learn how a Tzaddik thinks of a Yid regardless of his diametrically opposed views!

he is a rodef

174

 Oct 01, 2009 at 11:13 AM Askupeh Says:

Reply to #173  
Anonymous Says:

he is a rodef

Was Shimshon Hagibor a Rodef too? Was Rabbi Meir Kahana a Rodef too? If so then why did Rabbi Miller pay him his last respect? Halachacally speaking (maybe you) and the Neturei Karta are the ones who have a Din Rodef? Giving aid and comfort to the enemy!

175

 Oct 01, 2009 at 12:10 PM eitza geber Says:

I know Rabbi Kolakowski somewhat. he used to sit and learn in the Bialer Bais Medrash in Boro Park. He is a very brilliant man and very knowledgeable. Any congregation that hire s him will be getting a wonderful deal

176

 Oct 01, 2009 at 12:16 PM eitza geber Says:

Reply to #32  
Anonymous Says:

biala is zionist so he cant be a biala chusid he is a satmar chusid

answer to no. 32. Mori V'Rabbi Harav Hatzadik of Biala (Yerushalaim)(the Grandfather of the one in Boro Park) differed philosophically from Satmar. He was a member of the moetzes Gedolei Hatorah and did send people to vote in the Israeli elections. Howevwer, by no means would he be considered a Zionist.

177

 Oct 01, 2009 at 05:00 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #173  
Anonymous Says:

he is a rodef

Who is a rodef? R Kahane HYD? Dr Goldstein HYD? R Miller ZL? Why would you say something like that? What makes or made any of them rodfim?

178

 Oct 02, 2009 at 07:50 AM matzahlocal101 Says:

Reply to #144  
Authentic Londoner Says:

You seem to be confusing the illness with the symptoms. For Young Israel shul members the problem with the rabbi is that he is 'farfrumpt' and that in their eyes makes him irrational and not someone who one would wish to have teach ones children. They see his dress and antizionism as evidence of his irrationality.
Matzahlocal101, how do you imagine that MO Jews, let alone Conservative, Reform Jews, agnostic or atheist Jews view the Chassidic community and their leadership. How do you think non Jews view you? Do you think they do so with respect? Why do you think that they choose to deliberately ignore the views of the Gedolim whether past or present? Do you imagine that a 19th century modernist 'German of the Mosaic faith' would view you in a favorable light because you may for different reasons be antizionist?

It is actually you that are confusing the illness and symptom. We have two thousand years of experience in galus. When we keep to ourselves and keep torah and mitzvos and walk down the street proudly identifying ourselves as Jews with our beard and payos and long jacket we do alot better than the German Jews that cut their beard and payos, wore short jackets and had the Germans tell them to wear a yellow star to identify them as Jews. When we keep to ourselves and marry Jews like the Torah tells we do better than the Germans Jews when the German government passed the first Nuremberg laws, the law for the protection of German blood and honor which says a Jew cannot marry Goy. If you were married in a different country we do not recognize it and if you live together without marriage you will be fined, imprisoned and sentenced to hard labor. If you are married for 60 years with 10 kids we don't care, your marriage will be annulled, because a Jew cannot be married to a Goy. When we live among ourselves in our own self imposed ghettoes we did much better than in germany where the Jews got mingle with their gentile neighbors (Thanks to Mendelsohn, the father of modern assimilation) who forced into ghettoes by the Goyim who did not appreciate our mingling. The maginitude of this is greatly increased by the fact that these things never happened to anyone else, in any country ever, except for the Jew. Adolph Hitler was merely a stick. he was the manifestation of the tocha'chah in it's minutest detail because Yidden did not follow the Torah. We need to look at who his wielding the stick, not the stick. I will not engage in further discussion on schar vionesh, or becheerah chofshis because these are the absolute basics of Judaism. If you believe that anti-semitism is caused by a Jew following torah and wearing a beard and payos like Hashem commanded him to, You simply don't believe in the same G-d, and Torah as I do. Hashem said he will protect us if we follow Torah and he has done so such as in the time of Chezkiyahu hamelech, and he will punish us if we don't as we have seen many times. The suggestion that following the Torah will lead to anti-semitism is denial of hashgocha protis and kefira and Hashem and his Torah. Hashem is really big and gets his way even if you disagree with him. We tried "Yehudi bi'ohelecha uben adom betzaitecha" it doesn't work. Hashem didn't give us all the laws requiring us seperate ourselves from the goyim in dress, speech, hairstyle, action, etc, (Rambam Hil. Avodah Zorah chap 11) so we could outsmart him and shave with a saam (most elec razors are a ta'ar mamash, verify this by removing the outer most guard [screen or head] and clean it and slide it over the back of your forearm. If it removes hair you are shaving with a razor and violate 5 di'oireisas everytime you shave.) or cut our payos off completely with scissors. There some modern orthodox Jews that are so hellenized they think payos is a new chumrah made up by chassidic Jews not realizing that it is normative halachah for 3000 years.

179

 Oct 02, 2009 at 09:17 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #177  
Milhouse Says:

Who is a rodef? R Kahane HYD? Dr Goldstein HYD? R Miller ZL? Why would you say something like that? What makes or made any of them rodfim?

A rodef is somebody whose actions endangers other yiden's life, make your own conclusion which of the three fall in to that category

180

 Oct 02, 2009 at 12:38 PM Askupeh Says:

Reply to #179  
Anonymous Says:

A rodef is somebody whose actions endangers other yiden's life, make your own conclusion which of the three fall in to that category

My Rebbe in Cheder Teitched "Rodef", a pursuer. Who among the three was a “pursuer”? The answer is “none”. Neiya Pshotim in “Din Rodef”.

181

 Oct 02, 2009 at 02:23 PM amazed Says:

Reply to #180  
Askupeh Says:

My Rebbe in Cheder Teitched "Rodef", a pursuer. Who among the three was a “pursuer”? The answer is “none”. Neiya Pshotim in “Din Rodef”.

I can see that I have to pick up where your rebee in cheddar left you at”

If you purse someone and the person is running to save his life and in the course of fleeing from you he trips on a stone or falls off a cliff and is injured or killed you are chayev even you didn’t acutely hit him the same if a terrorist commits an act out of revenge that injures or kills chas voshulm a yid you are rodef

182

 Oct 02, 2009 at 02:50 PM Askupeh Says:

Reply to #181  
amazed Says:

I can see that I have to pick up where your rebee in cheddar left you at”

If you purse someone and the person is running to save his life and in the course of fleeing from you he trips on a stone or falls off a cliff and is injured or killed you are chayev even you didn’t acutely hit him the same if a terrorist commits an act out of revenge that injures or kills chas voshulm a yid you are rodef

So then my question is again: Was Shimshon Hagibor a Rodef too? Why did he say Tomis Nafshi Im Pelishtim and brought the whole house with everyone in it down? According to you he should have accepted his fate, lest a terrorist (in his case a Pelishti) commit an act out of revenge that injures or kills chas voshulm a yid. Was he a Rodef, yes or no?

Was Rabbi Meir Kahana a Rodef? If yes then why did the great Tzadik and Kanohi Rabbi Avigdor Miller pay him his last respect?

According to your logic the Neturei Karta might have a Din Rodef? Because even our enemies are concerned with their image, as the Gemorah in Pesochim tells the story of a Roman Senator admitting that they would annihilate the Jewish people if not for their public image. So if these Reshoyim see that Yiden in Shmoneh Begodim are with them, doesn’t that give them courage and “justification” to kill more Jews? Based on your definition of a Rodef, the Neturei Karta are the Rodfim by aiding and Abetting the Enemy. What better aid is there then giving them a good public image?

183

 Oct 04, 2009 at 08:31 PM Richmond congregant Says:

Rabbi Kolakowski had a minyan for Yom Tov in his office shtibel, morning and night - two people came over from the Young Israel who were visiting because they were fed up because there was no minyan at the Young Israel, and there was already a minyan without them.

184

 Oct 09, 2009 at 10:17 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #24  
Moshe knowitall Says:

Just FYI he started out as the rabbi of Cong. Kol Emes he built up the minyan and community then they merged with YI against his wishes and the rest is history......

Its a shame he worked so hard, to get booted its sad ....

You, my friend, are misinformed---Kol Emes was founded in 1964 by hard line religious zionists. In 1985 we affiliated with Young Israel of Richmond for the past 24-25 years. We believe the State, land, and people of Israel deserve our support.
Many of our children study, live and serve in the Israeli armed forces, and make aliah.
Rabbi K. did not get fired. He decided to resign because he did not want to modify his beliefs and teachings.
We were instructed ny NCYI, that Rabbi K. could not remain in the Shul as Rabbi.
Don't feel sorry for him as he has established his own outreach center in Richmond.
-------Current President of Young Israel of Richmond

186

 Mar 15, 2010 at 10:11 PM Anonymous Says:

I am pretty sure that NCYI rules state that every Jew must be welcome to be a member in a YI branch shul - how can they ban the Rabbi from membership?

187

 Mar 15, 2010 at 10:13 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #184  
Anonymous Says:

You, my friend, are misinformed---Kol Emes was founded in 1964 by hard line religious zionists. In 1985 we affiliated with Young Israel of Richmond for the past 24-25 years. We believe the State, land, and people of Israel deserve our support.
Many of our children study, live and serve in the Israeli armed forces, and make aliah.
Rabbi K. did not get fired. He decided to resign because he did not want to modify his beliefs and teachings.
We were instructed ny NCYI, that Rabbi K. could not remain in the Shul as Rabbi.
Don't feel sorry for him as he has established his own outreach center in Richmond.
-------Current President of Young Israel of Richmond

it was founded by zionists, but you are a card-carrying Agudist (i.e. non-Zionist), Mr. President - and so is your new rabbi who dropped out of YU to join NIRC - Kol Sheker is just pretending to be Zionist to attract people, but it still won't work

188

 Mar 23, 2010 at 05:33 PM LashonTov Says:

The following is from the statement issued by the Young Israel of Richmond, VA:
"The only Hassidic member of our Synagogue was the ex-Rabbi, Joseph Kolakowski, who has in fact been barred from membership because of his anti state of Israel views. Rabbi Pesach Lerner, Executive Director of the National Council of Young Israel, which is comprised of over 150 synagogues around the country and in Israel, informed us that in light of Rabbi Kolakowski’s positions on the State of Israel he would not be able to remain in the position of rabbi of the shul."
First of all let's be clear on something. Rabbi Kolakowski never imposed his views (which do have basis from Tzadikim such as the late Satmar Rav, zt'l) on the membership of the Young Israel. Second, NOWHERE IN THE Young Israel Constitution IS THE STATE OF ISRAEL or even ZION MENTIONED!!!!
What is mentioned is the following:
ARTICLE TWO
Aims and Purposes
Sec. 2.1. The aims and purposes of the Organization shall be to foster and maintain a program
of spiritual, cultural, social and communal activity towards the advancement and perpetuation of
traditional, Torah-true Judaism; and to instill into Jewish youth an understanding and appreciation
of high ethical and spiritual values of Judaism and demonstrate the compatibility of the ancient
faith of Israel with good citizenship.
So will someone please explain to me why the Executive Vice President of National Council apparently approves the views of the rabbi of YI of Las Vegas to "get the girl of your dreams ... KNOCK HER UP" since he has not moved to seize the assets of that branch when their rabbi made that statement on radio station KDWN last month but following the teachings of Gedolim B'Torah who happen to have a differing opinion on the State of Israel is grounds to be chased out of the Young Israel rabbinate?

189

 Jun 29, 2010 at 11:48 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #143  
Chavah Kolakowski Says:

Hi, now you're going to hear it from the source. When my husband was interviewed for the position at YI of Richmond, he got off the plane looking like a Satmar chasid. At the initial interview, he mentioned moving the flags (American as well as Israeli) from the front of the shul. He never never hid who he was or what he believed. YI of Richmond was in a nearly-dead state at that point, and I believe they were desperate for any young Rabbi to re-invigorate the shul and bring people in to make minyonim. My husband worked diligently to this end, and at the end of two years, there was a regular, reliable Shabbos morning minyan, along with Shabbatonim every other week and regular shiurim taught by himself and two other yingerman. There was even talk of starting a kollel. After a new member offered a sizable donation on the condition that the flags be moved (without my husband's direction or knowledge), the board members (all three of them) consulted with Rabbi Pesach Lerner of NCYI and he said the shul's assets would be seized if my husband continued to be Rabbi there. My husband acquiesced and stepped down, hoping to continue on as baal koreh and/or Kollel yingerman. After this point, things between my husband and a few board members got ugly. Both sides (including my husband) did and said things that were not right. Lashon Hara was spoken. It was a sad state of affairs. This was all a week before my daughter was born and it was a very stressful time.

Neither my husband nor I belong to or have any association with Neturi Karta (or however it's spelled). I have strong ties to Satmar, as I was mekarev by Satmar chasidim, and I also have ties to Chabad. The posek for National Council of Young Israel actually was av beis din for my gerus, and I consider him to be like a father to me. My husband has worked for Biala and Shidlovsa, but doesn't align himself with any particular Rebbe. He is a chosid of the Baal Shem Tov. It is easy to be confused by our mixed backgrounds. We definitely come from "anti-Zionist" shitas, but strive to do our best to love ALL Jews, including and especially those living in Israel. We make mistakes just like everyone, but baruch Hashem, there is tshuvah in Judaism. I just daven that Hashem will accept mine.

We loved our time with Kol Emes, and we still maintain strong ties and friendships with some of the members there. We wish Rabbi Allen and his wife hatzlacha and hope they succeed in unifying and strengthening the congregation. Richmond is an amazing community with two mikvaos, a day school, a Yeshiva katana, a brand-new Yeshivah gedolah (hooray!), and three very different but very wonderful orthodox shuls. I love living here, even as a Satmar chassidiste, and hope to continue to do so for many years iy"H.

B"H - Dear Rebbetzin Kolakowski - kol kavod to you!! - what a beautiful post and thank you for sharing details of what must have been a terribly difficult and trying time for you and your family. May you and your husband be blessed b'revach with hatzlachah in all to which you put your hands. May HaKadosh Baruch Hu shower your family with abundant berachot - for parnassah, nachat, simcha, chaim tovim! May the Rabbi's outreach efforts bear fruit - and may you and he have only goodness as you work hard to bring Jews to the Derech. I am moved by your honestly, candor, kindness, emunah and positiveness - no question you and your husband are assets that any frum community would be blessed to have. Hatzlachah rabbah!

190

Sign-in to post a comment

Scroll Up
Advertisements: