Welcome, Guest! - or

Crown Heights, NY - Row Between Shomrim and Shmira Goes to Court

Published on:   Nov 03, 2009 at 07:47 AM
News Source: NY Post / NY Daily News
Change text size Text Size  

Crown Heights Shomrim Shmira
Crown Heights Shomrim Shmira
Crown Heights, NY - A long-standing rivalry between two Orthodox Jewish neighborhood patrols took center stage yesterday in the trial of a half-dozen men accused of assaulting yeshiva students in Crown Heights two years ago.

What began as a brawl in the Brooklyn yeshiva dorm over a revered rabbi has left six members of a Jewish patrol group facing gang assault charges in a state Supreme Court trial that started Monday.

Six members of the Shomrim patrol are charged with attacking four students after having been called to break up a melee at the school.

But one of the defense lawyers said in her opening statement that the defendants were charged as a result of efforts by Levi Huebner, a lawyer for a rival patrol called Shmira.

Advertisement:
Attorney Joyce David said Huebner called police the day after the violence and offered to translate for the Hebrew-speaking students. But he neglected to disclose that he represented Shmira, she said, and he later pressured detectives to arrest the Shomrim squad.

The two patrols' history of bad blood dates back to the late 1990s, when Shmira splintered from the original group.

The fight - over whether the late Rabbi Menachem Schneerson is an emissary of God - also led to broken bones, a $150 million lawsuit and a battle between two rival patrol groups.

"I'm going to call the Messiah as my first witness," defense lawyer Tedd Blecher quipped after the trial's first day.

With six defense lawyers objecting at once, a kibitzing crowd and the first witness having trouble telling six bearded defendants apart, the trial veered close to farce.

The defendants, members of the Shomrim watch group, face 15 years - and prosecutors were serious when they told Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Albert Tomei of possible witness tampering just before opening statements.

The six defendants were called to a Yeshiva dorm on Eastern Parkway to break up a fight between four members of the Messianic group and others on Dec. 29, 2007.

"It seems that the defendants had one goal and that was not to mediate," Assistant District Attorney David Weiss told jurors. "It was to beat up a bunch of yeshiva students."

Defense lawyers said the case was instigated by an attorney affiliated with Shomrim's rival guard group Shmira who also filed the lawsuit.

After yesterday's session, Huebner said, "I believe that the only place the case should be tried is in the court."

Prosecutor David Weiss, meanwhile, called Shomrim a "gang" whose intention that night was to attack helpless yeshiva students and "beat them indiscriminately."

But defense lawyer Tedd Blecher argued that the defendants were "like Boy Scouts" up against a hostile bunch.

"They're not yeshiva boys; they're full-grown adults, many of whom are much bigger than the defendants," said Blecher, who represents Benjamin Lifschitz, 23

The defendants, most of them in their 20s, could face up to 15 years in prison if found guilty.


More of today's headlines

Jerusalem - Many religious educators have grappled with the following issue. Internet connections have already been blocked and taken out of students' homes, but how can... Miami, FL - Federal authorities on Monday were conducting a criminal investigation into high-profile Fort Lauderdale attorney Scott Rothstein, who is suspected of...

 

Total76

Read Comments (76)  —  Post Yours »

1

 Nov 03, 2009 at 07:58 AM GG Jew Says:

This is another example of Shomrim behaving badly - I think we need to ask if they are really neccesary or if they are just an excuse for laydigayers to dress up in uniforms and play at being Cops, which would be bad enough, but it is made much worse in cases like this when they cause tremendous chillul Hashem. I don't believe they act under proper guidance from Rabbonim either.

2

 Nov 03, 2009 at 07:51 AM Anonymous Says:

So.....can you still cry anti-semitism or hate crime over this?

3

 Nov 03, 2009 at 07:59 AM Dag Says:

So...where do we send the Pidyom Shuvuyim money?

4

 Nov 03, 2009 at 08:21 AM Anonymous Says:

this has absolutely nothing to do with a ''revered rabbi'' it was a simple brawl and to make themselves look good they attached their fight ''in the rebbes name'' its bogus using the rebbe to justify battles

5

 Nov 03, 2009 at 08:27 AM funny Says:

I read this and laugh, they walked in to a dorm beat guy's up sent them to the hospital with a fractured skull broken bones?i guess it's shmira's fault i guess that night when they locked up to of the bocherim by claiming that they hit them with fire extinguishers is not moissering?, no wait once again its shmira's fault, who was it that brought inspecter vega to the hospital for a crime not committed in his pct? oh right it must have been shmira.

6

 Nov 03, 2009 at 09:06 AM CROWN HEIGHTS RESIDENT Says:

Reply to #3  
Dag Says:

So...where do we send the Pidyom Shuvuyim money?

I copied this from crownheights.info:

Contributions can be mailed to Shomrim office at:

537 East New York Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11225

Or you can call the Shomrim hotline at (718) 774-3333 after 6:00pm, and we will send a member to pick up your contribution.

And the most simple way is to donate by Credit Card through PayPal. A secure website for donations with all major Credit Cards: you can call the office for details, I don't know if I can post it here.

I am a supporter of both Shomrim or Shmira (we are friendly with members of both groups.) These young men put themselves out on the line to help us (& I have personally benefited from their help when I was attacked by a group of Blacks & another time, I was shot at.) This Huebner should be in Cherem. These guys are the good ones. Whatever anyone can donate to help pay for their defense will be greatly appreciated.

Thank you, Tizke L'mitzvos!

7

 Nov 03, 2009 at 09:06 AM Yosef Says:

They should go to Din Torah who is impartial.

8

 Nov 03, 2009 at 08:57 AM Anonymous Says:

Painful facts: both shomrim & shmira have amoung them ladigeyers who want to play policeman. Some rise to the occassion, others.... On the other hannd both have true mesiras nefesh yiden who want to protect others, as well. Shall we throw out the abby with the bathwater? Would we be better off without them? Or maybe we should try to fix what is broken....

9

 Nov 03, 2009 at 08:52 AM Anonymous Says:

After all this time, I am beginning to think that fighting must have some very holy roots. Everybody seems to be fighting in the name of G-d!

10

 Nov 03, 2009 at 08:50 AM AuthenticSatmar Says:

Putting all my feelings about Shomrim/Shmira aside, this case is bogus.
The fact is that they were called on their hotline about a fight and responded. They never came as a gang to assault anyone.
They walked into a chaotic situation that escalated.
The fact that Shmira is using this story and their connections to potentially lock up frum yidden is a shanda. That the Rabbonim aren't stopping this is even a bigger shanda. That the community is silent is even a bigger shanda. And this is from a community that preaches achdus/mashiach/ahavas yisroel.

In fact, the headline is about a rift between shmira/shomrim. What does an assault charge have to do with a rift? What does shmira have to do with this case? Its because they setup the whole thing.

That's disgusting for a yid to do so to another yid.

"After yesterday's session, Huebner said, "I believe that the only place the case should be tried is in the court." Why not a din torah? Why a court? Where are the Rabbonim????

11

 Nov 03, 2009 at 09:19 AM KNOW THE TRUTH Says:

Only after the Shomrim members pleaded with Rabbis Avrohom Osdoba, Shlomo Yehuda Segal, and Yitzchok Raitport did they issue a summons for a Din Torah for all parties involved in the law suit against six Shomrim members accused of mercilessly beating bochurim residing in the dormitory at 749 Eastern Parkway, after being called to settle a dispute over a dormitory bed.

Upon receiving the summons to the Din Torah, the Bochurim involved arrived at Rabbi Osdoba's Beis Din exactly as the summons had stated, at nine in the evening. However, upon arrival the bochurim found the doors locked and lights shut, and after some quick phone calls they were informed that the Din Torah had been cancelled "after reexamining the situation, the Rabbonim decided there is no case for a Din Torah" someone close to the defence informed them.

Chabad.info has asked numerous individuals involved in this court case regarding their permission to approach the authorities, and the fact is that the Bochurim received explicit permission from both Rabbonim. And anyone who claims otherwise is simply spreading libelous slander.

12

 Nov 03, 2009 at 09:17 AM Anonymous Says:

whats the difference who is right or wrong! do these guys deserve to go to jail for what a little fight they had? some of these guys are married with kids do their children have to suffer b/c of a political fight that got physical

13

 Nov 03, 2009 at 09:54 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #12  
Anonymous Says:

whats the difference who is right or wrong! do these guys deserve to go to jail for what a little fight they had? some of these guys are married with kids do their children have to suffer b/c of a political fight that got physical

As a matter of fact, if individuals assault others they do deserve to go to jail. It's called the law.

14

 Nov 03, 2009 at 09:38 AM Anonymous Says:

shomrim that night came to fight with gloves laden with iron in them!!!! they used fire extinguishers, they broke one bochurs skull!!! they came that night to kill Jews. now they are crying? you pay the price when you act tough. it aint free to be have like that. that's all i have to say

15

 Nov 03, 2009 at 10:04 AM Anonymous Says:

The bochurim were sent to the hospital with broken arms, a fractured skull, a concussion, broken teeth and badly bruised and bloodied by the Shomrim thugs who were at the scene.

16

 Nov 03, 2009 at 08:40 AM willi boy Says:

He??!!! I thought the monroe guys are bad. Look at this yiden sending other yiden to jail for 15 years. That's unheard of in worlds history. And I think shomrim in all lacks some leadership. In williamsburgh when the satmer fight broke out they where very obvious one sided. If they serve the community they shouldn't be nowhere close to politics. If you go close to fire you get burned

17

 Nov 03, 2009 at 10:27 AM mendy to number 15 and 5 Says:

u make big accusations with nothing to back it up! nobody had a fractured skull etc.. one bochur had a fracture in his hand which they call a boxers fracture, let me guess why he had a boxers fracture? maybe its cuz he threw some punches! they claim they have a video that incriminates shomrim, well have u seen that video? i guess that u have not! cuz if u did u would see who was aggresive here and who wasnt! despite the video being edited! its still shows nothing! the reason why we are here at this stage is because shmira messira used this a s a perfect oppertunity to screw shomrim! something which they have been trying to do for upwards of 10 years! and since u guys "know what ur talkin about" maybe u can justify the 140 million dollar law suit filed by none other than those bochurim themselves with their lawyer who is none other than the mosser leve huebner! who happens to be a shmira member and a their lawyer! so these bochurim who are testifing against shomrim actually have a motive here! a 140 million dollar motive! and heubner as well hes the lawyer he takes his lawyers fee!

18

 Nov 03, 2009 at 10:25 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #7  
Yosef Says:

They should go to Din Torah who is impartial.

They tried to go to Beis din. And therefore they have heter from rabonim to go to court

19

 Nov 03, 2009 at 10:35 AM mendy to number 15 and 5 Says:

also shmira messira wasnt even there at the scene only later did they show up! and when they did they tryed to have shomrim arrested! they ferried the bochurim to the hospital back and forth and to the police station back and forth in their own shmira messira vehicle! also since the bochurim "dont speak any english" do u know who was their translator? well u guessed it, none other then their own lawyer levi huebner! he made the law suit and he translated for his own witnesses! are u aware of the fact that the officer from the 77th precinct when they came to arrest the shomrim members said: " that this is a political arrest" ! do u smell an agenda here? so instead of opening ur big mouthes and spewing lies, why dont u find out for your selves exactly what happened! like moshe rabainu told korach " boker vyoda Hasem" it will come a day very soon iyh here we will all see the blood libel that was made here! and i ask of u for one thing call up these 6 shomrim members and ask mechilla! cuz last i checked " hamalbin es pnai chavairo brabim... has no part in the world to come!

20

 Nov 03, 2009 at 10:38 AM to 18 Says:

they never tried to go to bais din! another propaganda! they have no hetter from a rov to go to court! and if u say there is a hetter than tell me which rov and shoe me the letter in which he says u can go to court! its all bs! tey dont have to listen to rabbonim , unless its in their favor! they say yechi and they can do whatever they want! they embarrass the chabad the REBBE etc.. and it came time to rid them from our midst! like it says " uvi-arta hara mikirbecha"!

21

 Nov 03, 2009 at 10:45 AM anonymous Says:

To #11

I am very happy that you know the facts, that the bochurim got permission to go to court. Do they have a letter from the Rabbonim giving them permission? or is that a bull story that you made up. I in fact did hear a tape where Rabbi Schwei explicitly states that no one is allowed to go to court about this Inyon.

Huebner and the bochurim did meet with the Rabbonim at 10:30 p.m. and they promised they would not show up in court. They actually sent someone else to court, {a witness} who brought papers from Huebner telling the court that they were intimidated by the Rabbonim to pull the case out of court.

The Chilul Hashem that this case has generated by being written about in the media and by being presented in front of a jury is just heartbreaking.

Enough with the lies and the Mesira.

22

 Nov 03, 2009 at 11:04 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #17  
mendy to number 15 and 5 Says:

u make big accusations with nothing to back it up! nobody had a fractured skull etc.. one bochur had a fracture in his hand which they call a boxers fracture, let me guess why he had a boxers fracture? maybe its cuz he threw some punches! they claim they have a video that incriminates shomrim, well have u seen that video? i guess that u have not! cuz if u did u would see who was aggresive here and who wasnt! despite the video being edited! its still shows nothing! the reason why we are here at this stage is because shmira messira used this a s a perfect oppertunity to screw shomrim! something which they have been trying to do for upwards of 10 years! and since u guys "know what ur talkin about" maybe u can justify the 140 million dollar law suit filed by none other than those bochurim themselves with their lawyer who is none other than the mosser leve huebner! who happens to be a shmira member and a their lawyer! so these bochurim who are testifing against shomrim actually have a motive here! a 140 million dollar motive! and heubner as well hes the lawyer he takes his lawyers fee!

If the injuries were as minor as you say, then why are these people facing up to 20 years jail? Obvously the injuries were extremely seriously, otherwise this case would not have got to the courts.

23

 Nov 03, 2009 at 11:51 AM A Yid Says:

Reply to #22  
Anonymous Says:

If the injuries were as minor as you say, then why are these people facing up to 20 years jail? Obvously the injuries were extremely seriously, otherwise this case would not have got to the courts.

I think we are going to need Rudy juliani to make sholom here

24

 Nov 03, 2009 at 12:30 PM crown heights lubavitcher Says:

It takes to long to dispell every falsehood emenating from the ultra mishichist movement, so to make this short; the typical Lubavitcher no longer support their sick cause (even the lubabs in crown heights that used to bend towards yechi, 95 percent of them woke up and dropped the yechi maddness) so now they have to sue some 'non believer' lubavitchers for 140 million dollars, that all israeli mishichistin wackos can dance yechi all day long without having to get a real job. And as a bonus, they get to watch 'non believers' led to jail, just as some extra entertainment for when yechi gets boring. Sadly, the Rebbe has to get a ll this agmas nefesh from all these israeli hoodlooms, with their yellow yechi trash, which like calling themselves Lubavitch.

25

 Nov 03, 2009 at 12:27 PM What a disgrace Says:

Its hard to have jewish pride these days when you see how low we have sunk. People wake up and stop doing bad things to each other. We have enough enemies trying to hurt us lets not do their job for them!

26

 Nov 03, 2009 at 12:59 PM Anonymous Says:

This article reads like a Disney comic skit. The contradicting statements made here also makes it hard to really find out the truth behind the story. One thing I can say is that no D.A. will waste his time and money on opening a case if this was just a simple fight with minor injuries. There must have been a serious beating.

I personally have seen Shomrim act like the police, judge, and executioners against people. Even when they catch a thief they have no legal right to beat anyone up quickly before the cops arrive or search random people as if they have police powers which they never will. Shomrim have too much power and the NYPD knows this but can't do much because of the politics from community leaders.

27

 Nov 03, 2009 at 01:26 PM Joke of the day! Says:

Before the Mossrim take the stand to falsely Mosser fellow Jews, the judge is told that they cannot swear (to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth) due to their religious belief!

28

 Nov 03, 2009 at 01:26 PM antimesira Says:

“Every Jewish Child Learned in Chader/Elementary that Mesira on another Yid is the worse thing. We heard stories, we read stories of how Yidden gave their own life not to Mossier G-d forbid on a fellow Jew. Anybody who has to still be convinced, is not from זרע היהודי [from the seed of Israel]“

Don’t waist your time convincing the people whom are rejoicing over Mesira!

Don’t waist your time convincing people whom Justify and excuse Mesira!

Those [Mossrim] are not our people, they are not our friends, they couldn’t care less and lets not forget they put us in this position!

29

 Nov 03, 2009 at 01:23 PM Anonymous Says:

Well if the injuries were bogus then that fact will come out in trial and the shomrim will be vindicated... why is the prosecutor even pressing charges if there were no real injuries? I'm waiting to hear the facts that come out IN TRIAL, not the political propaganda being spewed. Frankly I don't care what the meshichists or antis believe in, let them believe whatever they want, if it comes to broken bones then the perpetrators should be punished. And if it turns out that there were no real injuries then they should be acquitted.

30

 Nov 03, 2009 at 03:02 PM facts of the case 2 Says:

6. A clear video obtained by the police clearly shows the bochurim asking the Shomrim to leave the building, but they refused and aggressively forcing their way into the apartment of question.
7. Gadi hershkoph with a lead laced gloves cracked the skull of one bochur with his fists, and beat others to a pulp. This is bono fide and clear to anyone that sees the video.
8. Over the course of the last two years or so that this incident had started, the Shomrim were given the opportunity to settle out of the courts. With the following request: 1. Apologize to the bochurim 2. Remove their hate filled site that bashmutzis the community. 3. Refrain from any further fighting, arguing, and antagonizing members of the community. By doing the above the Shomrim members are clearly showing they have no interest in fighting with the bochurim or dispensing any further vile and disgusting hate filled stories on the internet.
9. The above offer was delivered to the Shomrim coordinators through, the rabbanim, the heads of hatzalah, the vaad hakahol, and many other community leaders, even the police offered to settle this issue The Shomrim refused every person who presented their offer!

31

 Nov 03, 2009 at 02:57 PM Anonymous Says:

get rid of these people they only make a bad name for the jews. let the police do their work and let these guys volunteer in soup kitchens.

32

 Nov 03, 2009 at 02:56 PM facts of the case Says:

To all the readers, community members, and commentators on this site, I would like to clarify several facts to all of you:
1. The Shomrim members charged in this case were the aggressors, and caught on video beating bochurim to a bloody pulp.
2. The bochurim were sent to the hospital with broken arms, a fractured skull, a concussion, broken teeth and badly bruised and bloodied by the Shomrim thugs who were at the scene.
3. The Shomrim members at the scene after beating the bochurim were the ones who filed criminal charges and had two bochurim arrested that night. (bochurim were also thrown in jail and went thru lengthy and costly trials previously when Shomrim members pressed criminal charges against them)
4. The bochurim were advised initially not to talk to the police for fear of getting the Shomrim members locked up, and worse, for fear of a second beating by the Shomrim members.
5. Once Shomrim brought the police into this fight, the bochurim were forced to defend themselves again, and tell the police of the incident.

33

 Nov 03, 2009 at 03:34 PM Anonymous Says:

What is so hard to understand? The lawyer is using this bogus case just to make money. In Bais Din, it is not possible to sue for so much. What #21 says is true. I spoke to someone who was there and the Rabbonim did stop them from going to court. However the lawyer sent a witness to court and now the lawyer can entrapt the Rabonim for witness tampering.

34

 Nov 03, 2009 at 04:17 PM HUH? Says:

Reply to #11  
KNOW THE TRUTH Says:

Only after the Shomrim members pleaded with Rabbis Avrohom Osdoba, Shlomo Yehuda Segal, and Yitzchok Raitport did they issue a summons for a Din Torah for all parties involved in the law suit against six Shomrim members accused of mercilessly beating bochurim residing in the dormitory at 749 Eastern Parkway, after being called to settle a dispute over a dormitory bed.

Upon receiving the summons to the Din Torah, the Bochurim involved arrived at Rabbi Osdoba's Beis Din exactly as the summons had stated, at nine in the evening. However, upon arrival the bochurim found the doors locked and lights shut, and after some quick phone calls they were informed that the Din Torah had been cancelled "after reexamining the situation, the Rabbonim decided there is no case for a Din Torah" someone close to the defence informed them.

Chabad.info has asked numerous individuals involved in this court case regarding their permission to approach the authorities, and the fact is that the Bochurim received explicit permission from both Rabbonim. And anyone who claims otherwise is simply spreading libelous slander.

something is very wrong in this case. What about all the money people are giving to Pidyun Shvuim. We are thinking this is a real innocent case against 6 members of the crownheights community. Meanwhile no beis din is taking place and the trial continues. Its not fair to everybody who is opening their wallets and not even a beis din is happening. I can understand if the bochurim did not show up but they did show up and nothing happened. I just hope Hashem will fix this mess before alot of people go to jail.
Unless this is a shmira member dictating the news above?
I feel like I am reliving the OJ Simpson Case but a chassidishe one.

35

 Nov 03, 2009 at 05:14 PM to 30 32 Says:

obviously the police saw that therewas no blood nobody half dead etcc like u describe, rather they did see two bochurim throwing punches so therefore they were arrested! all shomrim had to do was file reports that night against the bochurim and then the reports would off set! and we wuld never be here in this arguement! but shomrim doesnt masser thet dont rhyme and go hand in hand with messira like shmira does... the tzfatim are always fighting throughout the year, with the shluchim with baali batim who daven there on shabbos etcc and nebach some how they are always the victims everybody always picks on them etc... somehow anywhere there is a fight they are there, iyh this blood libel will come to an end and u should beg mechilla

36

 Nov 03, 2009 at 05:17 PM Please testify for the defense Says:

Reply to #24  
crown heights lubavitcher Says:

It takes to long to dispell every falsehood emenating from the ultra mishichist movement, so to make this short; the typical Lubavitcher no longer support their sick cause (even the lubabs in crown heights that used to bend towards yechi, 95 percent of them woke up and dropped the yechi maddness) so now they have to sue some 'non believer' lubavitchers for 140 million dollars, that all israeli mishichistin wackos can dance yechi all day long without having to get a real job. And as a bonus, they get to watch 'non believers' led to jail, just as some extra entertainment for when yechi gets boring. Sadly, the Rebbe has to get a ll this agmas nefesh from all these israeli hoodlooms, with their yellow yechi trash, which like calling themselves Lubavitch.

... please do testify on behalf of Shoimrim and by doing so completely ruin any chance they have to get out of this mess. Your comment essentially confirms what the yellow boogie men you appear to love so much were saying all along: this was a pogrom motivated exlusively by politics of "yechi" vs. "not quite" and they beat the living lights out of those bochrim as an act of political account-setting. It had nothing to do with enforcing law and order and "serving the community". According to you, Shoimrim are a gang hired to enforce one sheetah over all others and violently put down any discord... Very nice.

I hope and pray that bochrim drop the case;
I hope and pray that Shomrim do complete tshuva (including asking mechila from those they harmed, etc.);
I hope and pray that we all (Shoimrim, Shmira, Yechiniks, Schmechiniks, Tzfatis, Eilatis and Detroitis, and don't forget Lubavitchers as well as Chabadniks) sit and farbreng together mit alle Yiddn gam yachad at Beis Chayeinu b'koroiv. Omeyn

37

 Nov 03, 2009 at 05:16 PM resident Says:

Its clear form the hateful comments that the shmira have a big hand in this mesira.

You will find these same comments on Chabad.info and other shmira blogs.

Why did shmira take in upon itself to see this thing thorough?
Why is shmira being the "media" for this mesira?

By the way people, a question or assertion (like mine above), does not make something a fact.

38

 Nov 03, 2009 at 05:21 PM resident Says:

Reply to #29  
Anonymous Says:

Well if the injuries were bogus then that fact will come out in trial and the shomrim will be vindicated... why is the prosecutor even pressing charges if there were no real injuries? I'm waiting to hear the facts that come out IN TRIAL, not the political propaganda being spewed. Frankly I don't care what the meshichists or antis believe in, let them believe whatever they want, if it comes to broken bones then the perpetrators should be punished. And if it turns out that there were no real injuries then they should be acquitted.

"why is the prosecutor even pressing charges if there were no real injuries?"

Is this to say that every-time Jews were blamed for something it was true.
Does this mean that the mere fact that there was 6 arrest, that is already a guilty plea.

By Jury selection they tell you, NO!. Being arrested and accused means nothing, anybody can get arrested.

According to the statement above (and all like it), there is no need to Trial, for after all nobody gets arrested and charged falsely (its the first time such an event ever happened).

What happened here is not less then a BLOOD LIABLE!

39

 Nov 03, 2009 at 05:32 PM Crown Heights mother Says:

Reply to #34  
HUH? Says:

something is very wrong in this case. What about all the money people are giving to Pidyun Shvuim. We are thinking this is a real innocent case against 6 members of the crownheights community. Meanwhile no beis din is taking place and the trial continues. Its not fair to everybody who is opening their wallets and not even a beis din is happening. I can understand if the bochurim did not show up but they did show up and nothing happened. I just hope Hashem will fix this mess before alot of people go to jail.
Unless this is a shmira member dictating the news above?
I feel like I am reliving the OJ Simpson Case but a chassidishe one.

I think at this stage it's too late to stop the legal proceedings. A Bais Din could stop any civil suits, but the DA is prosecuting, not this insane Huebner. Huebner is a dangerous person & his picture should be posted on every lamp-post, wall, & bus stop in Brooklyn. No one should have anything to do with someone who dafka wants to do his bit to send Jews to jail, innocent or not. He doesn't care about truth or justice. He cares about Huebner & his personal, insane vendetta against a group of guys who look out for us. Why is he doing all this? No one has a clue.

BTW...did you know in his legal career he has never won a case? I pray he keeps his unbroken record.

40

 Nov 03, 2009 at 05:55 PM shomrim unit Says:

If the rabbonim couldnt help the situation why would they send them to court they should be mediated by a peace maker none other than Nobel peace prize winner President Obama he is the new moshiach maybe youll get a bail out~ a bail out of jail that is! shomrim was called to the scene for assistance not to beat up people . things got out of hand and shomrim reacted as any one would have. they dont belong in court or jail ! its the shmira organization thats causing all the trouble and should be expelled from the community how dare they make such a chillul Hashem ! politics will destroy us just as it did during the holocaust.
We must daven to Hashem so we may see the light and treat our fellows like brothers.

41

 Nov 03, 2009 at 07:32 PM A CH Mother Says:

This is one of the Defendants in this case, one of the Shomrim Six....
Meet him, get to know him and judge for yourselves.

http://www.vimeo.com/7068117

This man has a family, wife and kids. This man has a responsible job in the community and may I add hes doing a great job, going above and beyond.

I give over my most precious possession to Chaim every single day.

I can't believe this is happening to him and his friend, whom we all know from our interactions in the community.

I hope and pray that this ends soon, my little girl refuses to go on a bus without her Chaim.

42

 Nov 03, 2009 at 07:29 PM dahhl h Says:

...a bloody pulp?? do me a favor ! U guys are all full of it. Hatzolo verified no one was beaten that bad at all - so I stopped reading after I read #1 ...bloody pulp my foot..whatever!

That said its a boosha to the rebbe, and thank goodness I also hear most of chabad is dropping them all and the yechi schtick like hot potatoes! Its about time.

43

 Nov 03, 2009 at 07:37 PM Anonymous Says:

If the Shomrim did nothing wrong they have nothing to fear.
but growing up in crown heights i really doubt that...

44

 Nov 03, 2009 at 09:05 PM Anonymous Says:

Why vis this mesirah. If you don't fight these shomrim they might do it again. It's pikuach nefesh. If someone beat up your child and unless you prosecute him, he can do it again to your child that's mesirah?

45

 Nov 03, 2009 at 09:18 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #13  
Anonymous Says:

As a matter of fact, if individuals assault others they do deserve to go to jail. It's called the law.

what law? definitely not jewish law!

46

 Nov 03, 2009 at 09:23 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #28  
antimesira Says:

“Every Jewish Child Learned in Chader/Elementary that Mesira on another Yid is the worse thing. We heard stories, we read stories of how Yidden gave their own life not to Mossier G-d forbid on a fellow Jew. Anybody who has to still be convinced, is not from זרע היהודי [from the seed of Israel]“

Don’t waist your time convincing the people whom are rejoicing over Mesira!

Don’t waist your time convincing people whom Justify and excuse Mesira!

Those [Mossrim] are not our people, they are not our friends, they couldn’t care less and lets not forget they put us in this position!

i hope you understand you are referring to both groups. if you want to be truthful and fair that is.

47

 Nov 03, 2009 at 09:43 PM Anonymous Says:

Shomrim was involved in many mesiras, and this is the only too stop them. The community faced the other cheek, now every body wakes-up. It should of been taken care of from the get-go, instead, many CHs were locked-up through out the past decade.

48

 Nov 03, 2009 at 09:54 PM gavi Says:

i do not know the facts in this case nor am i in a position to judge the claimants, but for those of you who are claiming that this is clear cut mesirah, i was wondering if you could explain to me the psak of the tzitz eliezer zt''l19:52 that in a just nation, and he used europe as an example, there is no concept of mesirah, or that of rabbi elyashiv shlita quoted in the davar sinai 45-46 based on the panim meorot where he says their is no concept of mesirah nowadays, although he states that depending on the indivisual case their may still be chillul hashem, or that of harav wosner shlita Shevet Halevi, Yoreh Deah 58, with support from a maharam alshich, where he states that if the law in question would be covered by the nations rights under dina dimalchuta dina, their is no mesirah, with the only prohibition being hashavas aveidah lagoy, which doesnt apply togovernments, although he frowns on the practice of actually bringing jews to court as not being the practice of the righteous, while their are others who disagree with this and i may reference them in a later post, mesirah is not quite so clear cut as some think (much thanks to jlaw for the sources) tms''a- gavi

49

 Nov 03, 2009 at 10:37 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #14  
Anonymous Says:

shomrim that night came to fight with gloves laden with iron in them!!!! they used fire extinguishers, they broke one bochurs skull!!! they came that night to kill Jews. now they are crying? you pay the price when you act tough. it aint free to be have like that. that's all i have to say

complete lie!!!!! shmrim are upstanding, volunteers while these bochurim are violent, extreme in their nission and out to destroy shomrim.

50

 Nov 03, 2009 at 10:53 PM Anti Says:

Reply to #24  
crown heights lubavitcher Says:

It takes to long to dispell every falsehood emenating from the ultra mishichist movement, so to make this short; the typical Lubavitcher no longer support their sick cause (even the lubabs in crown heights that used to bend towards yechi, 95 percent of them woke up and dropped the yechi maddness) so now they have to sue some 'non believer' lubavitchers for 140 million dollars, that all israeli mishichistin wackos can dance yechi all day long without having to get a real job. And as a bonus, they get to watch 'non believers' led to jail, just as some extra entertainment for when yechi gets boring. Sadly, the Rebbe has to get a ll this agmas nefesh from all these israeli hoodlooms, with their yellow yechi trash, which like calling themselves Lubavitch.

I hate to break it to you, but its has always been 95% anti.
just because they are wackos, that does not mean that you can beat them, have them arrested, and then cry foul when they do it back to you.

51

 Nov 03, 2009 at 11:32 PM crown highter Says:

What does Shmira have to do with it? They where not there that night, they were told to stay away .

52

 Nov 03, 2009 at 11:32 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #10  
AuthenticSatmar Says:

Putting all my feelings about Shomrim/Shmira aside, this case is bogus.
The fact is that they were called on their hotline about a fight and responded. They never came as a gang to assault anyone.
They walked into a chaotic situation that escalated.
The fact that Shmira is using this story and their connections to potentially lock up frum yidden is a shanda. That the Rabbonim aren't stopping this is even a bigger shanda. That the community is silent is even a bigger shanda. And this is from a community that preaches achdus/mashiach/ahavas yisroel.

In fact, the headline is about a rift between shmira/shomrim. What does an assault charge have to do with a rift? What does shmira have to do with this case? Its because they setup the whole thing.

That's disgusting for a yid to do so to another yid.

"After yesterday's session, Huebner said, "I believe that the only place the case should be tried is in the court." Why not a din torah? Why a court? Where are the Rabbonim????

they were called yo a din torah. the rabbis told them not to go to secular court. then huebner took the psak of thre beis dinand brought it to the judge claiming it was witness tampering.

53

 Nov 03, 2009 at 11:24 PM attorney Says:

Reply to #22  
Anonymous Says:

If the injuries were as minor as you say, then why are these people facing up to 20 years jail? Obvously the injuries were extremely seriously, otherwise this case would not have got to the courts.

Not really the way it works.

54

 Nov 03, 2009 at 11:19 PM t s Says:

like the truth could ever be clarified here.

if you really want to know what happened.... you can't

both sides either subject themselves to a din torah.... they won't, or local law governs, which it will. fair or not.

such is life.

55

 Nov 03, 2009 at 11:18 PM CrownHeighters Says:

Reply to #10  
AuthenticSatmar Says:

Putting all my feelings about Shomrim/Shmira aside, this case is bogus.
The fact is that they were called on their hotline about a fight and responded. They never came as a gang to assault anyone.
They walked into a chaotic situation that escalated.
The fact that Shmira is using this story and their connections to potentially lock up frum yidden is a shanda. That the Rabbonim aren't stopping this is even a bigger shanda. That the community is silent is even a bigger shanda. And this is from a community that preaches achdus/mashiach/ahavas yisroel.

In fact, the headline is about a rift between shmira/shomrim. What does an assault charge have to do with a rift? What does shmira have to do with this case? Its because they setup the whole thing.

That's disgusting for a yid to do so to another yid.

"After yesterday's session, Huebner said, "I believe that the only place the case should be tried is in the court." Why not a din torah? Why a court? Where are the Rabbonim????

The community has not been silent... whatsoever.

56

 Nov 03, 2009 at 10:07 PM gavi Says:

i ran out fof charachters in my last post, i will gladly admit that according to reb moshe and rabbi breisch, mesirah is the same today as it has always been, according to rabbi ezra batzri it would still apply because we cant trust the current judicial system no matter how fair it may seem, according to rabbi yaakov yishayahu blau, whenever their is a prison sentance at risk their is not mesirah and that according to rabbi yitzchak shmelkes whle mesirah doesnt exist today, reporting a jew to the government is still a tort, but my point was that mesirah is not as clear cut as some might say, with rabbis wosner and elyashiv, as well as the tzitz eliezer and the maharam alshich, and rabbi shmelkes to a lesser extant, stating, please correct me if im wrong, that their is no mesirah nowadays, stating that their is not mesirah nowadays, please, i understand that some of you will not accept my arguments, and by all means critique them, but please dont insult, thanks to jlaw for all sources, i have not quoted close to all of the rabbis dealign with this topic but i quoted enough prominent ones to make the point i was trying to make (ztzal and shlita where appropriate)

57

 Nov 04, 2009 at 02:54 AM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #48  
gavi Says:

i do not know the facts in this case nor am i in a position to judge the claimants, but for those of you who are claiming that this is clear cut mesirah, i was wondering if you could explain to me the psak of the tzitz eliezer zt''l19:52 that in a just nation, and he used europe as an example, there is no concept of mesirah, or that of rabbi elyashiv shlita quoted in the davar sinai 45-46 based on the panim meorot where he says their is no concept of mesirah nowadays, although he states that depending on the indivisual case their may still be chillul hashem, or that of harav wosner shlita Shevet Halevi, Yoreh Deah 58, with support from a maharam alshich, where he states that if the law in question would be covered by the nations rights under dina dimalchuta dina, their is no mesirah, with the only prohibition being hashavas aveidah lagoy, which doesnt apply togovernments, although he frowns on the practice of actually bringing jews to court as not being the practice of the righteous, while their are others who disagree with this and i may reference them in a later post, mesirah is not quite so clear cut as some think (much thanks to jlaw for the sources) tms''a- gavi

This is all nonsense. There is nothing in the Shulchon Oruch about what kind of government it is. The law is the same now as it ever was, and all these sources you give are worthless. Lo mipihem onu chayim.

58

 Nov 04, 2009 at 02:49 AM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #36  
Please testify for the defense Says:

... please do testify on behalf of Shoimrim and by doing so completely ruin any chance they have to get out of this mess. Your comment essentially confirms what the yellow boogie men you appear to love so much were saying all along: this was a pogrom motivated exlusively by politics of "yechi" vs. "not quite" and they beat the living lights out of those bochrim as an act of political account-setting. It had nothing to do with enforcing law and order and "serving the community". According to you, Shoimrim are a gang hired to enforce one sheetah over all others and violently put down any discord... Very nice.

I hope and pray that bochrim drop the case;
I hope and pray that Shomrim do complete tshuva (including asking mechila from those they harmed, etc.);
I hope and pray that we all (Shoimrim, Shmira, Yechiniks, Schmechiniks, Tzfatis, Eilatis and Detroitis, and don't forget Lubavitchers as well as Chabadniks) sit and farbreng together mit alle Yiddn gam yachad at Beis Chayeinu b'koroiv. Omeyn

It's got nothing to do with "yechi". It's got everything to do with the Tzfatim violently taking over Crown Heights. This is all about a bochur who was being thrown out of his room by the Tzfatim. What right did they have to do that? The dorm belongs to the yeshivah, not to them. It was paid for by donors who gave money to build a yeshivah dorm, not a propaganda center for a violent cult. This bochur called for help; whom should he have called? The police?! He called Shomrim, and Shomrim came to his rescue, and had to beat off the gang of criminals that were throwing him out.

As a result of this case, they no longer respond to such calls; now bochurim who are being bullied and beaten and harassed by the Tzfatim have no recourse. Me'ayin yovo ezrom? Who will help them, beside Hashem? They have no choice but to go along with whatever the Tzfatim tell them, or else.

59

 Nov 04, 2009 at 02:52 AM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #43  
Anonymous Says:

If the Shomrim did nothing wrong they have nothing to fear.
but growing up in crown heights i really doubt that...

What nonsense are you talking now? Do you expect anyone to believe that innocent people are never convicted?!

60

 Nov 04, 2009 at 02:53 AM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #47  
Anonymous Says:

Shomrim was involved in many mesiras, and this is the only too stop them. The community faced the other cheek, now every body wakes-up. It should of been taken care of from the get-go, instead, many CHs were locked-up through out the past decade.

Really? Name someone Shomrim massered.

61

 Nov 04, 2009 at 02:37 AM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #30  
facts of the case 2 Says:

6. A clear video obtained by the police clearly shows the bochurim asking the Shomrim to leave the building, but they refused and aggressively forcing their way into the apartment of question.
7. Gadi hershkoph with a lead laced gloves cracked the skull of one bochur with his fists, and beat others to a pulp. This is bono fide and clear to anyone that sees the video.
8. Over the course of the last two years or so that this incident had started, the Shomrim were given the opportunity to settle out of the courts. With the following request: 1. Apologize to the bochurim 2. Remove their hate filled site that bashmutzis the community. 3. Refrain from any further fighting, arguing, and antagonizing members of the community. By doing the above the Shomrim members are clearly showing they have no interest in fighting with the bochurim or dispensing any further vile and disgusting hate filled stories on the internet.
9. The above offer was delivered to the Shomrim coordinators through, the rabbanim, the heads of hatzalah, the vaad hakahol, and many other community leaders, even the police offered to settle this issue The Shomrim refused every person who presented their offer!

What kind of nonsense is this? "A clear video obtained by the police clearly shows the bochurim asking the Shomrim to leave the building, but they refused and aggressively forcing their way into the apartment of question." Of course they refused! They got a call for help from inside the apartment; why would they not answer it just because the gang who were throwing the caller out of his room told them to go away? Suppose you got a call for help, say from a woman who says her husband is hitting her, and when you got there the husband told you to go away; would you listen to him?

62

 Nov 04, 2009 at 02:33 AM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #31  
Anonymous Says:

get rid of these people they only make a bad name for the jews. let the police do their work and let these guys volunteer in soup kitchens.

Are you nuts? Who will protect the Jews then? The police?! If Crown Heights Jews had to rely on the police for protection from crime they'd be in serious trouble.

63

 Nov 04, 2009 at 08:13 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #60  
Milhouse Says:

Really? Name someone Shomrim massered.

Can I have readers come forward with more names other than Shuchat, Prager Stern, Rogatsky,??? If you want to make it an issue on who Shomrim massered.

64

 Nov 04, 2009 at 08:43 AM Allan Says:

I am not part of the Crown Heights community although I did grow up very close to there, but that was in th 50's and 60's when the community was just forming into what it is now. The actions of both groups are an embarrassment to Jews everywhere and beyond my understanding of what I thought the movement there was all about. Totally mind blowing to read about how these men are making fools of themselves and their community. Shame on such disgraceful behavior. Why is this matter not in the hands of a neutral Bet Din?

65

 Nov 04, 2009 at 11:08 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #64  
Allan Says:

I am not part of the Crown Heights community although I did grow up very close to there, but that was in th 50's and 60's when the community was just forming into what it is now. The actions of both groups are an embarrassment to Jews everywhere and beyond my understanding of what I thought the movement there was all about. Totally mind blowing to read about how these men are making fools of themselves and their community. Shame on such disgraceful behavior. Why is this matter not in the hands of a neutral Bet Din?

That's why the community is very upset about. The community never wanted that it should come to this. Apparently, they have outside backing (williamsburg, Borough Park). Mostly because, they carried the name Shomrim. You see, a person with a shtreimel looks very chushiv from the out-side, but there's the occasional molester that makes all shtreimelach look bad. So too, in the case of Shomrim; in the overall they are an amazing group, but in CH they don’t act like the professional Shomrim organization, the community doesn't know how to handle them; so people won’t ignore them and therefore use their services which causes a chain reaction leaving them to believe that they are useful and wanted. unfortunally, they are not the biggest chachoomim, always running to the machlokes, and this is one of many results.

66

 Nov 04, 2009 at 12:03 PM Anonymous Says:

It all started in 96' when they lost a summer camp due to greediness (they wanted all for them). A Din Torah back then was not in their favour, so they (the Hershkops) Went to the courts. Their motto since "If we suffer, all must suffer" this is the reason why CH is a bitter place, because certain people chose to be bitter for the rest of their life.

67

 Nov 04, 2009 at 10:40 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #58  
Milhouse Says:

It's got nothing to do with "yechi". It's got everything to do with the Tzfatim violently taking over Crown Heights. This is all about a bochur who was being thrown out of his room by the Tzfatim. What right did they have to do that? The dorm belongs to the yeshivah, not to them. It was paid for by donors who gave money to build a yeshivah dorm, not a propaganda center for a violent cult. This bochur called for help; whom should he have called? The police?! He called Shomrim, and Shomrim came to his rescue, and had to beat off the gang of criminals that were throwing him out.

As a result of this case, they no longer respond to such calls; now bochurim who are being bullied and beaten and harassed by the Tzfatim have no recourse. Me'ayin yovo ezrom? Who will help them, beside Hashem? They have no choice but to go along with whatever the Tzfatim tell them, or else.

Glad we agree that this had nothing to do with "yechi" and all attempts to make it sound otherwise will only be detrimental to the accused. Now, I wasn't there nor am I in CH most of the time - I only go by the info from the too diametrically opposing views. But what you are saying left me more confused then before. If the bochur was indeed thrown out of his room, was there no other people of authority he could have complained to? Hanholo maybe?Why call the shomrim who are supposed to be busy keeping the sh'chunah safe from real criminals? Do you not think that shomrim may have overstepped their authority (slightly) by beating people up?
Re."Tzfatim" , I'm sure you know better but my experience with Israeli bochrim on kvutza is entirely different. I only met some of the most eidel chassidishe boys (who are proud to call themselves "Tzfatim"). If there is a bad apple here or there, this has to be dealt with but you are not helping the situation at all by drawing paranoia-inspired war lines through Lubavitch.
This is a sad sad situation and I hope nobody is dumb enough to scream didan notzach when it's all over.

68

 Nov 04, 2009 at 10:31 AM Anonymous Says:

The Maschiach will not come as long as Yidden fight Yidden.

69

 Nov 04, 2009 at 09:18 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #67  
Anonymous Says:

Glad we agree that this had nothing to do with "yechi" and all attempts to make it sound otherwise will only be detrimental to the accused. Now, I wasn't there nor am I in CH most of the time - I only go by the info from the too diametrically opposing views. But what you are saying left me more confused then before. If the bochur was indeed thrown out of his room, was there no other people of authority he could have complained to? Hanholo maybe?Why call the shomrim who are supposed to be busy keeping the sh'chunah safe from real criminals? Do you not think that shomrim may have overstepped their authority (slightly) by beating people up?
Re."Tzfatim" , I'm sure you know better but my experience with Israeli bochrim on kvutza is entirely different. I only met some of the most eidel chassidishe boys (who are proud to call themselves "Tzfatim"). If there is a bad apple here or there, this has to be dealt with but you are not helping the situation at all by drawing paranoia-inspired war lines through Lubavitch.
This is a sad sad situation and I hope nobody is dumb enough to scream didan notzach when it's all over.

No, there is nobody he could have complained to. 749 is run entirely by the Tzfatim and the hanholo has no control over it whatsoever. It is a jungle.

70

 Nov 04, 2009 at 08:50 PM gavi Says:

you are right per say about the shulchan aruch, although the shulchan aruch would obligate someone to inform on a person who is a risk to the public or in a case where the government would get a hint that they werent informing, and i never denied that their is a strong argument that mesirah is still as strong now as it ever was, which is accepted by many rebeim including reb moshe , but when rabbi wosner rabbi elyashiv the tzitz eliezer the maharam alschich and the aruch hashulchan (who dispite claims that his comment as to that regard could have been influenced by the censor, probabely meant it do to the fact that such "censorized" comments usually came in the footnotes and not the main text) say something is not mesirah, you should be melamei zechut on those who choose to pasken by them, additionally, their is a concept, look at shmuel hanagids introduction to toshba, that when a later authority states something in opposition to an earlier authority, we tend to lean towards the later authority because we assume he was fully aware of what the earlier authority said and determined his opinion accordingly, tmtsa- gavi (please fill in shlitas and zatzals where appropriate)

71

 Nov 04, 2009 at 10:36 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #70  
gavi Says:

you are right per say about the shulchan aruch, although the shulchan aruch would obligate someone to inform on a person who is a risk to the public or in a case where the government would get a hint that they werent informing, and i never denied that their is a strong argument that mesirah is still as strong now as it ever was, which is accepted by many rebeim including reb moshe , but when rabbi wosner rabbi elyashiv the tzitz eliezer the maharam alschich and the aruch hashulchan (who dispite claims that his comment as to that regard could have been influenced by the censor, probabely meant it do to the fact that such "censorized" comments usually came in the footnotes and not the main text) say something is not mesirah, you should be melamei zechut on those who choose to pasken by them, additionally, their is a concept, look at shmuel hanagids introduction to toshba, that when a later authority states something in opposition to an earlier authority, we tend to lean towards the later authority because we assume he was fully aware of what the earlier authority said and determined his opinion accordingly, tmtsa- gavi (please fill in shlitas and zatzals where appropriate)

The heter to inform in a case where the government will otherwise find out that they're not informing only applies if there is a danger that the government will then kill the entire community, or banish them, or something like that. The fact that modern governments won't do that, and lack the power to do that, makes mesirah WORSE, not better, because this exception no longer applies. No Jewish community is endangered by the mere existence among it of criminals who might be caught by the government.

72

 Nov 04, 2009 at 10:33 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #70  
gavi Says:

you are right per say about the shulchan aruch, although the shulchan aruch would obligate someone to inform on a person who is a risk to the public or in a case where the government would get a hint that they werent informing, and i never denied that their is a strong argument that mesirah is still as strong now as it ever was, which is accepted by many rebeim including reb moshe , but when rabbi wosner rabbi elyashiv the tzitz eliezer the maharam alschich and the aruch hashulchan (who dispite claims that his comment as to that regard could have been influenced by the censor, probabely meant it do to the fact that such "censorized" comments usually came in the footnotes and not the main text) say something is not mesirah, you should be melamei zechut on those who choose to pasken by them, additionally, their is a concept, look at shmuel hanagids introduction to toshba, that when a later authority states something in opposition to an earlier authority, we tend to lean towards the later authority because we assume he was fully aware of what the earlier authority said and determined his opinion accordingly, tmtsa- gavi (please fill in shlitas and zatzals where appropriate)

Your claim (or rather the claim of the web site from which you are copying this) that when the Oruch Hashulchon writes nonsense to appease the censor he does it in footnotes, is completely false. A brief look at some of the relevant simonim in OHS will show such pieces in the body of the text. Generally one can tell that he's not serious because he goes over the top, so that anyone familiar with the normal style of such writing can tell that he's giving the reader a big wink.

73

 Nov 05, 2009 at 08:52 PM gavi Says:

im curious to see an example of where the oruch hashulchan gives a intext censored comment in CS (which is the section this seemst to apply to) regardless, it appears that he was not writing for the censor because he made a reference to the british system of democracy in his description of a just government, which would be a strange thing to do for a censor in a antibrittish country, and your description of a censored comment doesnt seem to fit, with the probable exception of him including russia as a just country, regradless, i am sure that Rabbi Elyashiv Rabbi Wosner The Maharam Alschich The tzitz eliezer and, to a much lesser degree, Rabbi Yitzchak Shmelkes (he still bans it but only as tort, not as mesirah) know much more about hilchos mesirah than i do, and if they all say that mesirah doesnt exist in countries like ours than im sure they have something to be somech on, as to your point on the shulchan aruch, ill conceed it to you based on the fact that i am not that familiar with the relevant seifim, although the reason that ive seen given is chillul hashem not persecution tmts''a- gavi

74

 Nov 05, 2009 at 09:52 PM pollplace Says:

Shomrim Video show in court.. oh no!
November 5, 2009

I opened the court room door quietly almost afraid to be seen, to my present surprise it was full of lubavichers who had come to support shomrim. honestly i didn't go for that i went for the video i heard was going to be played.

see over the past 2 years and more often now i have seen on many of the hate sites that there is this “Video” that proves the aggression and hate that shomrim have to the tzfatim and proves that they went into 749 with the intent to hurt the bocherim.

now if only i could show you this video.. its something that you must see for yourself (it may be show again and again in court its worth going to watch) it doesn't show not one of the allegations is shows only the opposite, its shows shomrim getting pushed and pulled and glasses being torn off their faces.

75

 Nov 06, 2009 at 05:48 AM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #73  
gavi Says:

im curious to see an example of where the oruch hashulchan gives a intext censored comment in CS (which is the section this seemst to apply to) regardless, it appears that he was not writing for the censor because he made a reference to the british system of democracy in his description of a just government, which would be a strange thing to do for a censor in a antibrittish country, and your description of a censored comment doesnt seem to fit, with the probable exception of him including russia as a just country, regradless, i am sure that Rabbi Elyashiv Rabbi Wosner The Maharam Alschich The tzitz eliezer and, to a much lesser degree, Rabbi Yitzchak Shmelkes (he still bans it but only as tort, not as mesirah) know much more about hilchos mesirah than i do, and if they all say that mesirah doesnt exist in countries like ours than im sure they have something to be somech on, as to your point on the shulchan aruch, ill conceed it to you based on the fact that i am not that familiar with the relevant seifim, although the reason that ive seen given is chillul hashem not persecution tmts''a- gavi

Look at the TITLE of the simon on hilchos gerim.

And who told you that Russia was hostile to Britain at that time?!

76

 Nov 06, 2009 at 10:14 AM gavi Says:

thank you for responding, first off, if you look at the historical landscape of that time, russia and brittain were at the very least not allies, which means that their would be no reason for him to explicitely mention the government of england had he been writing for the censor, still, thank your for your responce and im curious to see what you have to say about the other rebbeim i sited, rabbi elyashiv is much much more explicit than the aruch hashulchan and the tzitz eliezer quotes the aruch hashulchans comment as the normative halacha, which would be weird if it was obvious he was writing for the censor (shlitas and zatzals where appropriate) tmts"a-gavi

77

If you wish to post anonymously do not fill out this field.
Says:

Your email address will not be published.

Reply to #  
Says:

Important: Please read the rules before submitting your opinion.
Scroll Up
Advertisements: