Welcome, Guest! - or
Easy to remember!  »  VinNews.com

Jerusalem - After 4 Decades Steinsaltz Nears Completion

Published on:   November 11, 2009 01:10 PM
Change text size Text Size  
Bookmark and Share
After 4 Decades Rabbi Steinsaltz Nears CompletionAfter 4 Decades Rabbi Steinsaltz Nears Completion

Jerusalem - On November 7, 2010, after 45 years of hard work, Rav Adin Steinsaltz’s enormous undertaking – to render the entire Gemara into simple, modern Hebrew – will reach completion, reports Hebrew website Ynet. Upon finishing Maseches Niddoh and Maseches Chullin, what has been referred to as the largest Jewish project of our time will be complete and the event will be marked around the world with a Global Day of Jewish Learning.

When Rav Steinsaltz began his translation and commentary at the age of 28, he knew he was embarking on something big, but he had no idea how much time and effort he would expend. In an interview with Ynet  one year before the scheduled completion , Rav Steinsaltz, 73, says perhaps that was for the best.

Advertisement:

“Since I got started at a relatively young age of course I didn’t take into account the enormous effort this required. The work involves not just research and writing, but also numerous logistical problems,” he says. “But sometimes, if a person knows too much, he does nothing.”

FileFile

The Steinsaltz Edition of the Talmud is a one-man production, though he has received some help in recent years. But in addition to the major four-decade undertaking, the Israel Prize laureate who Time Magazine called “the scholar of the millennium” has published dozens of books, some of which have been translated into English and other languages, and heads Shefa , an umbrella organization for all of the educational programs and institutions he has set up over the years.

“Though the Talmud is not the foundation stone of Judaism it is the main conduit,” Rav Steinsaltz told Ynet. “The entire edifice of Jewish culture is bound up in the Talmud, and any place where the Talmud is lacking it is not only lacking knowledge, but also a central and vital component. In general, it could be said that every Jewish society, which for various reasons has lost Talmudic study, withered in terms of its Jewishness and assimilated socially. Therefore, part of the task of bringing the Talmud back to Am Yisroel was an attempt to solve this problem to a certain extent.”

But Rav Steinsaltz has no shortage of opponents to his approach. Many Litvish rabbonim have even banned the use of his books. Rav Shach zt”l said studying from an elucidated Talmud “has no trace of kedushoh and emunoh,” arguing it would cause the Gemara to be forgotten, chaliloh, and even called for his books to be put in sheimos. Other rabbonim, including Rav Chaim Kanievsky shlita, signed notices calling on the public to oppose the Steinsaltz Edition in “protest that would be heard from one end of the earth to the other.” Israel Sephardic Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar said these commentaries were meant for baalei tshuvoh who had never learned Gemara, warning bnei yeshiva to avoid easy commentaries and calling their use “mental laziness.”

The Steinsaltz Edition includes vowelization, punctuation and a translation from Aramaic to Hebrew, with the addition of easy explanations. Even the layout differs from the classic Vilna edition for technical reasons.

“Not only does my commentary not bring the Gemara down a level, but to a certain degree even provides an opportunity to delve and advance further,” says Rav Steinsaltz, in defense of his lifelong project. “In the final analysis, my commentary seeks primarily to solve technical problems: linguistic problems, problems of context, problems stemming from the fact that the Talmud is not an ordered book constructed step by step – all of these problems are really problems of entering the Talmud itself, and unfortunately sometimes the traditional approach to learning allocates so much time to overcoming the technical problems to the point where little time remains to study in depth and offer chiddushim.

“True, at a lot of yeshivas there was resistance to the elucidation, but not due to concerns it would prevent creative thinking – to the contrary. I tried to retain as many of the possibilities of the classical commentaries within the elucidation and within a whole set of additions and notes, but of course it’s easier to engage in study that is mostly technical work and does not open up the possibility of devoting more time to creative thinking.”

Some opponents expressed concern it would enable the uninitiated to concoct various unfounded interpretations. “A portion of Talmudic study is largely the freedom the student has to understand and interpret, yet the study itself is so closely tied to the Talmud that it does not allow room for unbounded interpretation. Of course people who have fixed opinions and beliefs of their own will continue to follow their chosen paths, whether they fit the Talmud or deviate from it. But this problem does not hinge on a certain commentary, but rather on differences among people, and there is no better way than through the Talmud to have them hold fast to Jewish beliefs and practices.

“At the time of the formation of the Enlightenment and secularism, the central figures were those who had studied the Talmud through the classical method. Many of the people who went in different and even strange directions had been yeshiva students. Personally, at no point along the way did I feel concerned that my commentary would displace the traditional Gemara. With people much greater than I, who did have such intentions, it turned out that the power of the tradition still remains and the many books that were written became aids to the traditional approach.

“In my case, the more heartwarming responses I receive are from people who came to fully embrace Judaism through this commentary. Oftentimes the other responses are from people who learned in different ways, and if not for my elucidation, they would have stopped learning.”

Now that Rav Steinsaltz has a deadline on the horizon he has begun turning his attention to new endeavors. “I have several other projects that I don’t know exactly how to prioritize. One of them is also a very big undertaking that has to do with the Yerushalmi, and another is publishing the ‘smaller masechtos,’ which have not yet been published with suitable commentary. In general these plans and projects, some of which I’m already engaged in, don’t leave much free time. According to my calculations they might entail another 100 years of work. Afterwards I’m thinking of going into retirement.”


More of today's headlines

New York, NY - Shudda. Coulda. Wudda. As the hustle and bustle of the mayoral race winds down, would've-been candidate Rep. Anthony Weiner is taking time to reflect on... New York - Today holds the promise of becoming the biggest Veterans Day celebration in many a New York year, and may it be so. Let cheers be full-throated, let salutes...

 

Total91

Read Comments (91)  —  Post Yours »

1

 Nov 11, 2009 at 12:34 PM Cynic Says:

Rav Shach zt”l said studying from an elucidated Talmud “has no trace of kedushoh and emunoh,” arguing it would cause the Gemara to be forgotten, chaliloh, What about artscroll? Oh I forgot Steinzalts had connections to Chabad artscroll does not.

2

 Nov 11, 2009 at 12:27 PM Anonymous Says:

Eilu V'eilu Divrei elokim Chaim.

There was a time when the RAMBAM's seforim were BURNED by the gedolim!

3

 Nov 11, 2009 at 12:37 PM Use Your Head Says:

With all due respect to the gedolim, opposition to this project seems misguided. Jewish history is replete with examples of visionaries whose wisdom and foresight was met with opposition in their own time, and only later recognized in retrospect. I believe this to be a similar situation. Consider that even the very fact that we have the Gemara in a written form was a revolution at the time it was done.

Seriously - we start boys learning Gemara in fifth grade and *most* bachurim emerge from high school or even several years of beis medrash with very, very little in terms of *real* Torah acquisition. So maybe worry more about solving this pressing problem, and then we can worry about a talmid chochom who is working to make the Gemara more accessible.

4

 Nov 11, 2009 at 01:01 PM formally Says:

I do not get the opposition the Gemara was originally written in Aramaic because that was the main language that people spoke and they wanted people to be able to read learn and understand the Gemara.

The natural conclusion would be, that they would want the Gemara to be translated to the language that more people would be able to understand.

But Dogma prevails, and it is very sad

6

 Nov 11, 2009 at 12:55 PM Midwesterner Says:

Reply to #1  
Cynic Says:

Rav Shach zt”l said studying from an elucidated Talmud “has no trace of kedushoh and emunoh,” arguing it would cause the Gemara to be forgotten, chaliloh, What about artscroll? Oh I forgot Steinzalts had connections to Chabad artscroll does not.

You probably also forgot that Rav Shach was very much anti the Artscroll gemaros as well.

7

 Nov 11, 2009 at 01:03 PM Anonymous Says:

The main opposition was expressed in th early '90 in a series of exchanges in the Jewish Obsersere; it had more to do with the haskafic views of the author expressed in "The Essential Talmud", as many considered the material published to border on heresy. And to #1, Rav Shach was very opposed to the usage of Artscroll as well, as noted in Michtovim U'Mamorim in several places.

8

 Nov 11, 2009 at 12:25 PM Anonymous Says:

Can anyone tell me when art scroll hebrew will be completed?

9

 Nov 11, 2009 at 01:07 PM Anonymous Says:

i remember my rebbe in torah vodaas telling me it was goyish to bring my schotenstein english gemorah into class and humiliated me in front of everyone

10

 Nov 11, 2009 at 01:13 PM Steven Says:

Instead of praising the Rav for undertaking such a task, there are people who just have to poke and belittle his efforts. What a chillul Hashem that yidden find it appropriate to act AND SPEAK this way.

11

 Nov 11, 2009 at 01:14 PM Garet Benson Says:

It's unfortunate when readers jump to conclusions about the cheshbonos that gedolei Yisroel make before they speak out on an issue. I really have no idea, but just guessing, I'm sure the rabbonim who opposed Steinsaltz recognized that it has something to offer for certain Jews, but after weighing the matter, held the price was too high to pay, since obviously it could be detrimental to other Jews who have a very promising future in Torah scholarship.

12

 Nov 11, 2009 at 01:35 PM ShatzMatz Says:

This entire argument is moot. Since the Mesivta shas has come out it has blown everything else out of the water. Any serious learner will choose the Mesivta over its competitors. For those masechahs that are not yet available, the Artscroll is a good second choice.

The Artscroll is also ideal for the layman who does not want to delve so deeply.

The Shteinzaltz is a beautiful piece of work for light informative reading. But I don't think you can consider 'reading' a Shteinzaltz as "learning".

13

 Nov 11, 2009 at 01:34 PM Anonymous Says:

Rabbi Steinzaltz was ahead of his time. You can make the argument that he paved the way for Artscroll and other modern translations and elucidations (hamesivta, shas lublin, etc.)

14

 Nov 11, 2009 at 01:40 PM serel chana maness Says:

whatever it takes to bring kal yisrael to teshuvoh so we can have the geula!

15

 Nov 11, 2009 at 01:39 PM Anonymous Says:

Learning Artscroll, I believe, is better than what kids are offered in yeshivos. With the Artscroll, you are opening up a sefer and learning inside the text. In a yeshiva, for the most part, you basically learn the shiurim of past roshei yeshiva and whatever other mareh mekomos the rebbe puts down on the source sheet.

16

 Nov 11, 2009 at 01:46 PM Anonymous Says:

I don't see what the big deal is. It is not like aramaic is a loshon kodesh. The gemara was only written in aramaic because that was the common language of the time.

17

 Nov 11, 2009 at 02:21 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #16  
Anonymous Says:

I don't see what the big deal is. It is not like aramaic is a loshon kodesh. The gemara was only written in aramaic because that was the common language of the time.

Your point is really the key issue. Learing germorah in aramaic is an arcane tradition that keeps most yidden from becoming more immersed in lamdus and has no real importance today other than nostalgia. We should make learning more accessible to ALL yidden and whether we use Artscroll or the new Steinsalz the key issue is to learn a yiddseh vert (not an aramaic vert). Within a generation or two, most yeshivot and kollels will be teaching in Hebrew rather than yiddish and the number of learners will have increased by an order of magnitude.

18

 Nov 11, 2009 at 02:53 PM shimon Says:

Does anyone really believe that without Steinsalz there would be any Artscroll or Mesivta today? He was the first one to do it on a global scale and he deserves the credit. Plus unlike Artscroll or Mesivta, this was almost a one-man project. Kol hakavod.

19

 Nov 11, 2009 at 02:50 PM Menachem Says:

The Artscroll Hebrew Shas is now being published with the Daf Yomi. The 3rd volume of Bava Basra should be out shortly. Some of the later Masechtos have already been published.

20

 Nov 11, 2009 at 02:50 PM Dr. E Says:

Kol hakavod to Rav Steinzaltz. 45 years is a long time for a project. It takes much mazel and perseverance.

I grew up using some of his earlier Masechtos that were given to me as a Bar Mitzvah gift by my uncle. I have used them primarily for reference, ever since.

Rav Steinzaltz is obviously on out-of-the box, free thinker without any party affiliations. His written works and his lectures are manifestations of that. That obviously makes many in the mainstream Chareidi leadership uncomfortable. His associations with Chabad has made both the Chareidi and Chabad establishments uncomfortable at the same time.

I would guess that one of the catalysts for the Artscroll Shas project was an effort to duplicate Rav Steinzaltz in a more “correct way”. “Kinas sofrim tarbeh chachma”, because whatever one has to criticize of the hagiographies, the Artscroll Talmud is an excellent work.

Rav Schach was against the Artscroll Shas which is the reason that they overloaded with everyone else’s Haskamos to divert attention from his refusal to endorse it. I guess Artscroll had to come to the realization that even in the Chareidi camp. “Eilu v’Eilu” needs to be employed, albeit conveniently.

21

 Nov 11, 2009 at 02:48 PM IKW Says:

The only problem with Artscroll is that people finish Shas twice using it and still are clueless when presented with a traditional gemara without annotation....language should not be barrier forever....problems associated with language should be addressed early on in one's learning

22

 Nov 11, 2009 at 02:44 PM Anonymous Says:

R. Elya Svei zt"l was against the Artscroll Gemara project, since he was concerned that the translation would become a crutch, stunting the growth of future gedolei yisrael (Reb Shmuel Kamenetsky, in contrast, gave his haskamah to the project). As it turns out, R. Elya had nothing to worry about: today's American yeshiva bochur, with his substandard eighth grade secular education, cannot read nor understand the English.

23

 Nov 11, 2009 at 02:41 PM Just My Opinion Says:

I stopped learning Gemara after leaving Yeshiva. After my Father was nifter two years ago, I began learning again with the Schottenstein Gemara. Let me tell you I made a siyum on his Yahrtzeit and am one daf away from another siyom. Yes, I can listen to a daf yomi tape a gazillion times until I get the pshat. With the Schottenstein I enjoy learning. I wake up at night and I actually want to learn. I have litterally cried in awe when my learning Gemara reached such dveikus that I was afraid of what was happening to my neshama. Emes. I just hope HKBH is as happy with my learning as I am. I hope my Father A'H is benefiting along with my Zeide and Alter Zeides.

Also, the next step for Artscroll would be to prepare a volume on Tosaphos because I want to learn more on the daf. I live out of town now, but if I were in Brooklyn, I would want to seek a shiur based on my growth. Just my opinion.

24

 Nov 11, 2009 at 02:56 PM what about...? Says:

Reply to #12  
ShatzMatz Says:

This entire argument is moot. Since the Mesivta shas has come out it has blown everything else out of the water. Any serious learner will choose the Mesivta over its competitors. For those masechahs that are not yet available, the Artscroll is a good second choice.

The Artscroll is also ideal for the layman who does not want to delve so deeply.

The Shteinzaltz is a beautiful piece of work for light informative reading. But I don't think you can consider 'reading' a Shteinzaltz as "learning".

would you say that "reading" a kahati mishnayos is also not "learning?"

25

 Nov 11, 2009 at 02:56 PM SD Says:

Reply to #7  
Anonymous Says:

The main opposition was expressed in th early '90 in a series of exchanges in the Jewish Obsersere; it had more to do with the haskafic views of the author expressed in "The Essential Talmud", as many considered the material published to border on heresy. And to #1, Rav Shach was very opposed to the usage of Artscroll as well, as noted in Michtovim U'Mamorim in several places.

If you read the exchange in the Jewsih Observer, you would have seen just how embarrassing it was (or should have been) for the person who wrote the article justifying the ban.

After having written that the gemara was full of heresy, the author was challenged to show some examples.

Eight months later, after having recruited a couple of Lakewood chevreh to go through the work, massechta after massechta, they were unable to come up with anything and finally had to respond with one or two very weak examples.

26

 Nov 11, 2009 at 03:53 PM Anonymous Says:

It is quite obvious that those who "vehemently opposed" these transalations did not have a worldwide hashkafa. Rather they were concerend only with their own (similar to the chassida -a non kosher bird). Those who were actually concerend with ALL of Klall Yisroel and found it important that EVERYONE learn Torah backed translations etc.

Before the Baal Shem Tov came no one was concerned with the plain simple Jews. They were concerned only with talmidei chachomim.

Those opposed to translations are their sipirtual descendants.

The true gedolim who were/are concerend with ALL of Klall Yisroel were/are fully aware of the tremendous increase of limud haTorah due to these transaltions.

Rabbi Shteinsaltz who is a mufshat mai olam haze was simply ahead of his times.

27

 Nov 11, 2009 at 03:21 PM formally Says:

Regarding the access that his work provides, Steinsaltz says:

“I never thought that spreading ignorance has any advantage, except for those who are in a position of power and want to deprive others of their rights and spread ignorance in order to keep them underlings. My gemarot are surely used, if they are used anywhere, in Matan [a yeshiva for Orthodox women in Jerusalem], from beginning to end. Why? Because they help skip the elementary school level of training. That makes learning Talmud for them possible, and if it is possible then it is challenging and some of the men don’t want that challenge.”

28

 Nov 11, 2009 at 03:14 PM Aharon Says:

Of course he needs to be banned - he is an independednt thinker, a doer and is not under anyone's thumb. This is totally unacceptable!

29

 Nov 11, 2009 at 03:11 PM Anonymous Says:

from what i remember, one of the main problem that the opponrents had when this project stated is: that he had no "TZIRES HADAF" which we accepted from the vilna shas.

30

 Nov 11, 2009 at 03:08 PM this guys in cherem Says:

nobodys a daih here the gedolim have put him in cherem case dismissed

31

 Nov 11, 2009 at 03:07 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #1  
Cynic Says:

Rav Shach zt”l said studying from an elucidated Talmud “has no trace of kedushoh and emunoh,” arguing it would cause the Gemara to be forgotten, chaliloh, What about artscroll? Oh I forgot Steinzalts had connections to Chabad artscroll does not.

That's a good one! I never heard it before, but you are soooooooo correct.

32

 Nov 11, 2009 at 03:07 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #18  
shimon Says:

Does anyone really believe that without Steinsalz there would be any Artscroll or Mesivta today? He was the first one to do it on a global scale and he deserves the credit. Plus unlike Artscroll or Mesivta, this was almost a one-man project. Kol hakavod.

And, he was also the first to establish a yeshiva in Moscow.
All other yeshivos there were thanks to him..

33

 Nov 11, 2009 at 04:16 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #10  
Steven Says:

Instead of praising the Rav for undertaking such a task, there are people who just have to poke and belittle his efforts. What a chillul Hashem that yidden find it appropriate to act AND SPEAK this way.

you're 100% right!

34

 Nov 11, 2009 at 04:16 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #9  
Anonymous Says:

i remember my rebbe in torah vodaas telling me it was goyish to bring my schotenstein english gemorah into class and humiliated me in front of everyone

Yes, he obviously had true Torah values to do that, MUCH better than what you did. Maybe he should have worried less about who wrote the gemorras and more about what was written IN them.

It is pathetic that "rabbeim" like that molded us, and just read comments here to see the results.

35

 Nov 11, 2009 at 03:05 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #2  
Anonymous Says:

Eilu V'eilu Divrei elokim Chaim.

There was a time when the RAMBAM's seforim were BURNED by the gedolim!

if we learn the Rambam there is only one set of eilu

36

 Nov 11, 2009 at 03:04 PM chosid Says:

I wonder if the chochomim who oppose this would also have opposed Rashi's pirush in his time. No, it's better to spend hours looking up basic vocabulary than to have bochurim actually learn how to learn and let the vocabulary come bderech mimaila.

37

 Nov 11, 2009 at 03:04 PM Rippin Pinchas Says:

Reply to #1  
Cynic Says:

Rav Shach zt”l said studying from an elucidated Talmud “has no trace of kedushoh and emunoh,” arguing it would cause the Gemara to be forgotten, chaliloh, What about artscroll? Oh I forgot Steinzalts had connections to Chabad artscroll does not.

R' Schach also made the point that when he was a child, his rebbi did not write rashi script on the board; instead, he used his fingers. The idea was amaylos, which does not exist with artscroll. R' Mordechai Gifter's intervention caused R' Schach not to publicly assur it.

Any gadlus of most of the people who finished shas at the daf yomi was that attended everyday. Being spoon fed information through the artscroll in of itself is not particularly impressive. I understand some people gain a lot from it, but it is not amailos.

If you use artscroll to propel yourself to the real thing, kol hakavod. Most people are unfortunately stuck in the artscroll.

38

 Nov 11, 2009 at 03:04 PM michal Says:

A big Yasher Koach to Rabbi Steinsaltz. May he live to 120.

39

 Nov 11, 2009 at 03:04 PM MW Says:

Reply to #7  
Anonymous Says:

The main opposition was expressed in th early '90 in a series of exchanges in the Jewish Obsersere; it had more to do with the haskafic views of the author expressed in "The Essential Talmud", as many considered the material published to border on heresy. And to #1, Rav Shach was very opposed to the usage of Artscroll as well, as noted in Michtovim U'Mamorim in several places.

Rabbi Steinsaltz is an incredible visionary.
Until it was banned, his gemara had changed th face of gemara stidy in EY.
Thousands of ba'alei battim who had gone to yeshivos and given up on learning suddenly found encouragement to try once again, It was not only being used by the paricipants, but by the Rabbonim who were leading the shourim, as it showed them how to explain the gemara in a simple and easily understood way. I recall that it was used widely even in Ger.

Rabbi Steinsalz also founded the very first yeshiva in Moscow.

40

 Nov 11, 2009 at 02:57 PM Truth Stands Says:

Reply to #9  
Anonymous Says:

i remember my rebbe in torah vodaas telling me it was goyish to bring my schotenstein english gemorah into class and humiliated me in front of everyone

The Truth stands the test of time... That was the Truth then and it is the Truth today!

41

 Nov 11, 2009 at 04:19 PM torahyid Says:

A few points: 1.One should read the haskomoh of R'Elyashiv on Artscroll, he writes that the only reason to make it is "eis la'asos laHashem heifeiru torosecho" that people who are looking for elucidated gemoro should not "wander in foreign fields" referring to Steinsaltz. 2. I personally believe that for many people it does open the gates of learning that would otherwise be closed for them, but many people I observe that could totally learn regular gemoro with a bit of yegiah, but out of laziness use Artscroll, and one can not seriously shteig from having it all laid out for you without independent thought and analysis, it should therefore be no more than a gateway to eventually learning without it. 3. On Shteinsaltz, he is quoted as saying “My grandfather used to say being an apikorus, a heretic, was better than being an am ha’aretz, an ignoramus”, and his father is quoted as saying “I do not care if my son is an apikores (heretic), but no son of mine will be an am-haaretz (ignoramus)". afrei lepumei. I think that says it all.

42

 Nov 11, 2009 at 04:19 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #8  
Anonymous Says:

Can anyone tell me when art scroll hebrew will be completed?

Did you not read the article before commenting on it?

43

 Nov 11, 2009 at 02:27 PM stamford hilly billy Says:

I don`t see what the big deal is. Surely it is better to sit and learn using or with the help of a steinzaltz or artscroll gemara than not learn or be bittul torah.

The gemara was written in the aramic language of the time, the Rambam wrote in simple hebrew so the average joe could understand, I don`t see how any of these modern projects are different.

The only rebuttal to these new versions that I can think of is that it could be some of the original meanings and intentions are lost when we don`t learn using the original texts, therefore I use the likes of artscroll and steinzaltz to help me understand the gemara but not in place of it. I always try and make sure that I understand the gemara inside using my `normal standard gemara`

44

 Nov 11, 2009 at 01:56 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #16  
Anonymous Says:

I don't see what the big deal is. It is not like aramaic is a loshon kodesh. The gemara was only written in aramaic because that was the common language of the time.

no you are worng do some research

45

 Nov 11, 2009 at 01:54 PM Chaim Braun Says:

This is huge. i never heard of this.
Kol Hakavod.

Tere always will be misnagdim against any kind of innovation.
They are just affraid. Hashem should bless him with hatzlocho rabo.

46

 Nov 11, 2009 at 01:52 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #1  
Cynic Says:

Rav Shach zt”l said studying from an elucidated Talmud “has no trace of kedushoh and emunoh,” arguing it would cause the Gemara to be forgotten, chaliloh, What about artscroll? Oh I forgot Steinzalts had connections to Chabad artscroll does not.

the way i see it is that artscroll only explains it. this seems to be replacing it thats totally diffrent

47

 Nov 11, 2009 at 04:22 PM Anonymous Says:

At the end it is the banned and the ridiculed that succeed. The Rambam, Ramchal, The Baal Shem Tov, R Nachman, and more recently Chabad, and Steinzaltz plus many more, have and will always continue to ultimatly succeed.

48

 Nov 11, 2009 at 04:22 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #11  
Garet Benson Says:

It's unfortunate when readers jump to conclusions about the cheshbonos that gedolei Yisroel make before they speak out on an issue. I really have no idea, but just guessing, I'm sure the rabbonim who opposed Steinsaltz recognized that it has something to offer for certain Jews, but after weighing the matter, held the price was too high to pay, since obviously it could be detrimental to other Jews who have a very promising future in Torah scholarship.

If making learning easier for any other Jews was "detrimental" to them, then their "very promising future in Torah scholarship" was worthless.

This post by garet benson is the very definition of irony, and you gedolei hador who think you are better than everyone else and that your learning and way of learning are so important are simply jokes whose "learning" is almost certainly worthless.

49

 Nov 11, 2009 at 04:58 PM SD Says:

Reply to #41  
torahyid Says:

A few points: 1.One should read the haskomoh of R'Elyashiv on Artscroll, he writes that the only reason to make it is "eis la'asos laHashem heifeiru torosecho" that people who are looking for elucidated gemoro should not "wander in foreign fields" referring to Steinsaltz. 2. I personally believe that for many people it does open the gates of learning that would otherwise be closed for them, but many people I observe that could totally learn regular gemoro with a bit of yegiah, but out of laziness use Artscroll, and one can not seriously shteig from having it all laid out for you without independent thought and analysis, it should therefore be no more than a gateway to eventually learning without it. 3. On Shteinsaltz, he is quoted as saying “My grandfather used to say being an apikorus, a heretic, was better than being an am ha’aretz, an ignoramus”, and his father is quoted as saying “I do not care if my son is an apikores (heretic), but no son of mine will be an am-haaretz (ignoramus)". afrei lepumei. I think that says it all.

Allow me to try to follow your logic.

You have helpfully pointed out that Rav Shteinsalz is a Ba'al Teshuva who was sent to learn gemara because his non-religious father did not want him to be an Am Ha'aretz.
You are telling us that Rav Shteinsaltz, the ba'al teshuva who went from nothing to writing a peirush on all of Shas, is therefore worthy of being cursed with "Afra l'Pumei."

You sound like a really lovely person.

50

 Nov 11, 2009 at 04:37 PM Everybody has an opinion Says:

Reply to #22  
Anonymous Says:

R. Elya Svei zt"l was against the Artscroll Gemara project, since he was concerned that the translation would become a crutch, stunting the growth of future gedolei yisrael (Reb Shmuel Kamenetsky, in contrast, gave his haskamah to the project). As it turns out, R. Elya had nothing to worry about: today's American yeshiva bochur, with his substandard eighth grade secular education, cannot read nor understand the English.

Excellent point, unfortunately! Ah bittereh gelechter.

51

 Nov 11, 2009 at 04:34 PM I mean, seriously? Says:

Reply to #12  
ShatzMatz Says:

This entire argument is moot. Since the Mesivta shas has come out it has blown everything else out of the water. Any serious learner will choose the Mesivta over its competitors. For those masechahs that are not yet available, the Artscroll is a good second choice.

The Artscroll is also ideal for the layman who does not want to delve so deeply.

The Shteinzaltz is a beautiful piece of work for light informative reading. But I don't think you can consider 'reading' a Shteinzaltz as "learning".

Thank you for clearing up what is considered learning and what is not.

I'm sure the Aibishter is grateful to you for doing his job for him.

Your arrogance and ignorance make you about the LAST person who should be giving advice on what is or isn't learning. It is self-righteous hypocrites like you who make me realize that learning doesn't make you a talmid chochom, it can just as easily turn you into a condescending jerk.

You should pray to Gd to one day become one-thousandth of what R' Steinsaltz is, or one ten-thousandth. And in the meantime, why not have at least a drop of derech eretz and learn to at least spell his name correctly when you insult him.

52

 Nov 11, 2009 at 04:44 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #30  
this guys in cherem Says:

nobodys a daih here the gedolim have put him in cherem case dismissed

He's at least as great a godol as anybody who put him in cherem. And one who declares a cherem against someone, especially a talmid chochom, without giving him due process, deserves to be put in cherem himself. See Rambam Hil' Talmud Torah at the very end of chapter 6: המנדה מי שאינו חייב נידוי.

53

 Nov 11, 2009 at 04:56 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #44  
Anonymous Says:

no you are worng do some research

Research into what? You have another reason why the gemara was written in Aramaic?

54

 Nov 11, 2009 at 04:57 PM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #32  
Anonymous Says:

And, he was also the first to establish a yeshiva in Moscow.
All other yeshivos there were thanks to him..

Excuse me? Lubavitch had yeshivos there throughout the communist era.

55

 Nov 11, 2009 at 05:35 PM Anonymous Says:

If not for Artscroll and Steinzalts, there would be exponentally less Daf Yomi or any learning.

56

 Nov 11, 2009 at 06:13 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #37  
Rippin Pinchas Says:

R' Schach also made the point that when he was a child, his rebbi did not write rashi script on the board; instead, he used his fingers. The idea was amaylos, which does not exist with artscroll. R' Mordechai Gifter's intervention caused R' Schach not to publicly assur it.

Any gadlus of most of the people who finished shas at the daf yomi was that attended everyday. Being spoon fed information through the artscroll in of itself is not particularly impressive. I understand some people gain a lot from it, but it is not amailos.

If you use artscroll to propel yourself to the real thing, kol hakavod. Most people are unfortunately stuck in the artscroll.

Rippin Pinchas... If you want Amaylus , then learn Talmud ,Chumash , etc. without Rashi , Targum Onkeles , Sifsei Chachomim, Bal Haturim. Do NOT delve into other meforshim but figure out everything in your head. Now THAT would be Amaylus....
Do you really believe that even when one learns with tapes or a tranlated Gemorrah it is automatically so easily understood???? Do you know how much amaylus is sometimes requires just to understand it with translation? Can poeple stop worrying about amaylus and just learn something?? Thanks.

57

 Nov 11, 2009 at 06:12 PM torahyid Says:

Reply to #49  
SD Says:

Allow me to try to follow your logic.

You have helpfully pointed out that Rav Shteinsalz is a Ba'al Teshuva who was sent to learn gemara because his non-religious father did not want him to be an Am Ha'aretz.
You are telling us that Rav Shteinsaltz, the ba'al teshuva who went from nothing to writing a peirush on all of Shas, is therefore worthy of being cursed with "Afra l'Pumei."

You sound like a really lovely person.

"You are telling us that Rav Shteinsaltz, the ba'al teshuva who went from nothing to writing a peirush on all of Shas, is therefore worthy of being cursed with "Afra l'Pumei.""do you enjoy making up words and putting them in other peoples mouth?

58

 Nov 11, 2009 at 06:03 PM Nachum Says:

When did the Vilna layout become so holy?

Not that it should matter, but the Vilna edition was produced by Maskilim; the Bomburg edition (which first established the dafim we use today) was made by a non-Jew.

And, in any event, R' Steinsaltz's edition is now available in a Vilna version. I suppose it helps people follow along...

59

 Nov 11, 2009 at 05:28 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #54  
Milhouse Says:

Excuse me? Lubavitch had yeshivos there throughout the communist era.

Do a Google Book Search on
"Envoy to Moscow: memoirs of an Israeli ambassador, 1988-92"
By Aryeh Levin

60

 Nov 11, 2009 at 06:32 PM formally Says:

Reply to #40  
Truth Stands Says:

The Truth stands the test of time... That was the Truth then and it is the Truth today!

it is still Torah in any language Hebrew Yiddish English.

I was in Italy and went to shul and the rov gave the shuir in Italian, it that a no no for you.
According to your logic the Gemorath is blasphemy since it was written in a YES goyish language

61

 Nov 11, 2009 at 06:47 PM Anonymous Says:

try learning gemara and trust me this is the best thing since butter bread! why should only the learned person need allowed to understand gemara? i am a ffb!

62

 Nov 11, 2009 at 07:42 PM Yankel from BP Says:

I tell my son only half jokingly that Artscroll and Steinsaltz is a crutch, and he needs to learn how to learn without it. But I took him to Rav Steinsaltz shiur recently in EY and we were zoche to speak with him a little afterwards... How often do you get to meet a talmid chacham like him who wrote a peirush on all of shas ? I think it is wrong for the israeli rabbonim and their followers in america to put in cherem and attack everything that everyone else in the frum world does if they dont toe their line... Even if the gedolim dont mean it to happen, their ignorant followers reject everyone who doesn't fit their mold. I remember how I felt after I read Rav Schach's anti lubavitch letter for the first time when I was in Bais Medrash, it felt wrong to me..attacking them for learning Rambam?.... I feel like each cherem, each kol koreh against other yidden destroys our souls and our children see this fighting and rejection and it can push them off the derech Rachmana Litzlan.

63

 Nov 11, 2009 at 07:39 PM Hakaras HaTov Says:

I also want to acknowledge hakaras hatov to Rav Haim Perlmutter for his "Grow with Gamara" and "Tosofos" seforim. They really helped me master the daf, which is what everyone above is really debating.

In order to really get the most out of a translation of the daf, you really do need the mechanics of the loshon and the key words that everyone usually just picked up in shiur and never really understood by themselves according to their own significance which turns out is substantial. Yeshiva education is really filled with holes. Maybe this is why there are so many learning issues with the troubled bochurim today. It is not ADHD it may only be a lack of clarity in learning the daf.

This is the biggest problem for my Chabad friends. Their background is very weak in Gamara and need a lot of help in order to learn a daf.

64

 Nov 11, 2009 at 07:53 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #41  
torahyid Says:

A few points: 1.One should read the haskomoh of R'Elyashiv on Artscroll, he writes that the only reason to make it is "eis la'asos laHashem heifeiru torosecho" that people who are looking for elucidated gemoro should not "wander in foreign fields" referring to Steinsaltz. 2. I personally believe that for many people it does open the gates of learning that would otherwise be closed for them, but many people I observe that could totally learn regular gemoro with a bit of yegiah, but out of laziness use Artscroll, and one can not seriously shteig from having it all laid out for you without independent thought and analysis, it should therefore be no more than a gateway to eventually learning without it. 3. On Shteinsaltz, he is quoted as saying “My grandfather used to say being an apikorus, a heretic, was better than being an am ha’aretz, an ignoramus”, and his father is quoted as saying “I do not care if my son is an apikores (heretic), but no son of mine will be an am-haaretz (ignoramus)". afrei lepumei. I think that says it all.

Your comment about his parents' statements are patently false. He is a baal teshuva and his parents weren't frum so your ra'aya is garbage. Rav Moshe had a set of Steinzaltz in his study.

65

 Nov 11, 2009 at 07:30 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #57  
torahyid Says:

"You are telling us that Rav Shteinsaltz, the ba'al teshuva who went from nothing to writing a peirush on all of Shas, is therefore worthy of being cursed with "Afra l'Pumei.""do you enjoy making up words and putting them in other peoples mouth?

I made it up?

Here's the quote form the love-filled Yid I was responding to:
On Shteinsaltz, he is quoted as saying “My grandfather used to say being an apikorus, a heretic, was better than being an am ha’aretz, an ignoramus”, and his father is quoted as saying “I do not care if my son is an apikores (heretic), but no son of mine will be an am-haaretz (ignoramus)". afrei lepumei. I think that says it all. ”

Which part did I misquote him on?
Do you now agree with me?

66

 Nov 11, 2009 at 08:09 PM Anonymous Says:

The issue is not just that the talmud is written in Aramaic rather than hebrew which is the real loshon hakodesh, but that it is taught too frequently in yiddish rather than hebrew or english. Does anyone think that teaching an Aramaic text in yiddish is somehow a good idea for bringing more yiddin closer to torah learning.

67

 Nov 11, 2009 at 07:16 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #47  
Anonymous Says:

At the end it is the banned and the ridiculed that succeed. The Rambam, Ramchal, The Baal Shem Tov, R Nachman, and more recently Chabad, and Steinzaltz plus many more, have and will always continue to ultimatly succeed.

Rabbi Slifkin, too.

68

 Nov 11, 2009 at 09:15 PM Rippin Pinchas Says:

Reply to #56  
Anonymous Says:

Rippin Pinchas... If you want Amaylus , then learn Talmud ,Chumash , etc. without Rashi , Targum Onkeles , Sifsei Chachomim, Bal Haturim. Do NOT delve into other meforshim but figure out everything in your head. Now THAT would be Amaylus....
Do you really believe that even when one learns with tapes or a tranlated Gemorrah it is automatically so easily understood???? Do you know how much amaylus is sometimes requires just to understand it with translation? Can poeple stop worrying about amaylus and just learn something?? Thanks.

"If you want Amaylus , then learn Talmud ,Chumash , etc. without Rashi , Targum Onkeles , Sifsei Chachomim, Bal Haturim. Do NOT delve into other meforshim but figure out everything in your head. Now THAT would be Amaylus"

What you wrote is misguided and foolish. R' Shlomo Zalman ZT"L commented that the biggest Mechadesh is Rashi. That only applies if you know how to learn Rashi. The same for the other Meforshim. You can be amal in the meforshim too. The same is not applicable for the artscroll

"Can poeple stop worrying about amaylus and just learn something??"

No, see Rashi in the beginning of parshas Bechukosei.

69

 Nov 11, 2009 at 09:14 PM Richard Nixon Says:

Reply to #62  
Yankel from BP Says:

I tell my son only half jokingly that Artscroll and Steinsaltz is a crutch, and he needs to learn how to learn without it. But I took him to Rav Steinsaltz shiur recently in EY and we were zoche to speak with him a little afterwards... How often do you get to meet a talmid chacham like him who wrote a peirush on all of shas ? I think it is wrong for the israeli rabbonim and their followers in america to put in cherem and attack everything that everyone else in the frum world does if they dont toe their line... Even if the gedolim dont mean it to happen, their ignorant followers reject everyone who doesn't fit their mold. I remember how I felt after I read Rav Schach's anti lubavitch letter for the first time when I was in Bais Medrash, it felt wrong to me..attacking them for learning Rambam?.... I feel like each cherem, each kol koreh against other yidden destroys our souls and our children see this fighting and rejection and it can push them off the derech Rachmana Litzlan.

In some generations we are zocheh to a manhig recognized by all bnai torah as above and beyond the run of the mill talmid chachom. Our inability to understand every action or decision of the manhig of klal yisroel is not an indication that he has acted or decided incorrectly. Rather, our failure to understand the reasoning of the manhig of the generation, should be a catalyst to greater efforts in learning and mussar, so that we may be zocheh to understand his words. Until then, when the manhig of the generation speaks, we should humbly accept his opinion. We were zocheh to have such a manhig in Morainu ZTZ"L. What a pity some people couldn't appreciate the zechus and continue to think they can speak about Morainu ZTZ"L in any which way they choose.

70

 Nov 11, 2009 at 09:27 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #20  
Dr. E Says:

Kol hakavod to Rav Steinzaltz. 45 years is a long time for a project. It takes much mazel and perseverance.

I grew up using some of his earlier Masechtos that were given to me as a Bar Mitzvah gift by my uncle. I have used them primarily for reference, ever since.

Rav Steinzaltz is obviously on out-of-the box, free thinker without any party affiliations. His written works and his lectures are manifestations of that. That obviously makes many in the mainstream Chareidi leadership uncomfortable. His associations with Chabad has made both the Chareidi and Chabad establishments uncomfortable at the same time.

I would guess that one of the catalysts for the Artscroll Shas project was an effort to duplicate Rav Steinzaltz in a more “correct way”. “Kinas sofrim tarbeh chachma”, because whatever one has to criticize of the hagiographies, the Artscroll Talmud is an excellent work.

Rav Schach was against the Artscroll Shas which is the reason that they overloaded with everyone else’s Haskamos to divert attention from his refusal to endorse it. I guess Artscroll had to come to the realization that even in the Chareidi camp. “Eilu v’Eilu” needs to be employed, albeit conveniently.

How can you say that "Chabad is uncomfortable" with his association with Chabad? Chabad is very proud of him and he lectures at many Chabad mosdos frequently. Please be careful with what you state as fact.

71

 Nov 11, 2009 at 08:52 PM esther Says:

Reply to #11  
Garet Benson Says:

It's unfortunate when readers jump to conclusions about the cheshbonos that gedolei Yisroel make before they speak out on an issue. I really have no idea, but just guessing, I'm sure the rabbonim who opposed Steinsaltz recognized that it has something to offer for certain Jews, but after weighing the matter, held the price was too high to pay, since obviously it could be detrimental to other Jews who have a very promising future in Torah scholarship.

so we should sacrifice those "certain" yidden because some potential great scholar might get lazy with his learning? that is twisted and self centered thinking.there's a whole world of yidden out there besides bnai brak,bp and lakewood.

72

 Nov 11, 2009 at 09:32 PM Richard Nixon Says:

Reply to #64  
Anonymous Says:

Your comment about his parents' statements are patently false. He is a baal teshuva and his parents weren't frum so your ra'aya is garbage. Rav Moshe had a set of Steinzaltz in his study.

Really? Can you tell me where in his study you saw it?

73

 Nov 11, 2009 at 08:35 PM Open mind Says:

The issue with this Rabbi Steinsaltz, is his lack of mesorah [as prevalent in his "interesting" thoughts on the Talmud].

Although the Talmud is in print, it continues to be Torah Sh"bAL Peh. The essence of Torah Sh"bAL Peh is the Giving over from teacher to Student.

The affore mentioned Rabbi steinsaltz Pirush, lacks the basic premise of the oral code. It is more like a proprietary- new age Masterpiece.

74

 Nov 11, 2009 at 08:28 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #53  
Milhouse Says:

Research into what? You have another reason why the gemara was written in Aramaic?

"Do ou have another reason why the gemara was written in Aramaic?”

Yes. The authors of the gemorah were elitist and did not want poishete yiddin to be learning halacha so they instead wrote the talmud in an arcane language that was only understood by the educated rather than yiddish or more widely spoken languages.

75

 Nov 11, 2009 at 07:06 PM Woodridge Says:

Harav Yitzchok Lebovitch, Woodridger Rov Shlit"a, is very pro learning from sefarim with translations.

In his exact words: "nem Artscroll un endig masechtas - take artscroll and finish masechtas!!"

76

 Nov 11, 2009 at 07:03 PM glatekup Says:

Reply to #1  
Cynic Says:

Rav Shach zt”l said studying from an elucidated Talmud “has no trace of kedushoh and emunoh,” arguing it would cause the Gemara to be forgotten, chaliloh, What about artscroll? Oh I forgot Steinzalts had connections to Chabad artscroll does not.

I believe that rav schach had more issues with shteinzaltz. There were questionable things written and there was a chashash of apikorsus.

77

 Nov 11, 2009 at 06:39 PM formally Says:

to all the naysayers is there a problem is someone davens in English? maybe it is better since the person can understand what they are saying, and maybe have more kavana

78

 Nov 11, 2009 at 06:36 PM formally Says:

this whole issue is about power,
as long as less people can read and understand the Gemorath in Aramaic, the more power and importance the ones that do understand have.

By making the Gemorath readable to all, takes away some of their power and the are afraid to loss it.

History is full of the elite not wanting the the regular people to understand the holy books they are no diffrentGemorath

79

 Nov 12, 2009 at 12:15 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #8  
Anonymous Says:

Can anyone tell me when art scroll hebrew will be completed?

Yes,sure. Sometime after Shabbos- not sure exactly when.

80

 Nov 12, 2009 at 08:33 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #72  
Richard Nixon Says:

Really? Can you tell me where in his study you saw it?

If one were sitting on Rav Moshe's chair it would be on the second bookshelf on the left on the bottom shelf. Additionally, members of the mishpacha are mei'id he had them. I think it's unfair to Rav Shach to take his words out of the decidedly Israeli context in which he was speaking.
My Rebbe Rav Yaakov zatzal was not a big fan of the Gemaras (ayen Bimchitzas Rabbeinu pg 31) but he would never degrade such a work. Unfortunately there is a major disconnect between people who think they are right (self-made kannoim like you) and those that are right (the holy tzaddikim like Rav Yaakov zatzal, who stay away from such nivel peh to begin with).

81

 Nov 12, 2009 at 08:55 AM torahyid Says:

Reply to #64  
Anonymous Says:

Your comment about his parents' statements are patently false. He is a baal teshuva and his parents weren't frum so your ra'aya is garbage. Rav Moshe had a set of Steinzaltz in his study.

the fact that he has no problem repeating this heretical statement doesn't reflect very well on him, to say the least.

82

 Nov 12, 2009 at 08:50 AM Anonymous Says:

not making any judgment but the oilum should know that the translation was not a mostly one man effort as mentioned by some comments and the article. Rabbi Steinsaltz after the first few volumes had a team of scholars in a Eretz Yisroel doing the majority of the work. He is the General Editor http://www.steinsaltz.org.il/show.asp?id=16256
המכון הישראלי לפרסומים תלמודיי
המכון הישראלי לפרסומים תלמודיים הוקם בשנת 1965, כדי לסייע לרב עדין אבן ישראל שטיינזלץ בכתיבתו והוצאתו לאור של "התלמוד המבואר".

עיקר עיסוקו של המכון, מאז ועד היום, הוא בהפקתו של התלמוד המבואר. המדובר במפעל מונומטלי של: תרגום התלמוד ופיסוקו, כתיבה של ביאור קצר חדש, עיונים מעמיקים בשיטות ביאור נוספות, מסקנות ההלכה בכל סוגיה, מסורת הש"ס שינויי גרסות, והוספות רבות בתחומים של לשון היסטוריה ומדעי הטבע המתייחסים לדברי התלמוד. לצורך זה מעסיק המכון צוות גדול של תלמידי חכמים חוקרים עורכים ומגיהים, אנשי סדר-דפוס וגרפיקה, המסייעים לרב אבן ישראל שטיינזלץ בתחומים השונים. במשך השנים עסק המכון רבות גם בתרגום התלמוד המבואר לשפות שונות - אנגלית, צרפתית, רוסית וספרדית.

המכון עוסק גם בעריכה והוצאה לאור של ספרים נוספים. בראש וראשונה ספרי הרב אבן ישראל שטייזלץ הנוספים. בתחומים של חסידות, מחשבה, מצבו של עם ישראל ועוד. וכמו כן ספרים ומחק

83

 Nov 12, 2009 at 10:07 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #80  
Anonymous Says:

If one were sitting on Rav Moshe's chair it would be on the second bookshelf on the left on the bottom shelf. Additionally, members of the mishpacha are mei'id he had them. I think it's unfair to Rav Shach to take his words out of the decidedly Israeli context in which he was speaking.
My Rebbe Rav Yaakov zatzal was not a big fan of the Gemaras (ayen Bimchitzas Rabbeinu pg 31) but he would never degrade such a work. Unfortunately there is a major disconnect between people who think they are right (self-made kannoim like you) and those that are right (the holy tzaddikim like Rav Yaakov zatzal, who stay away from such nivel peh to begin with).

Why do you need to mention the eidus of mishpachah if you claim to have seen them yourself?

84

 Nov 12, 2009 at 09:00 AM torahyid Says:

Reply to #78  
formally Says:

this whole issue is about power,
as long as less people can read and understand the Gemorath in Aramaic, the more power and importance the ones that do understand have.

By making the Gemorath readable to all, takes away some of their power and the are afraid to loss it.

History is full of the elite not wanting the the regular people to understand the holy books they are no diffrentGemorath

you are obsessed with power, I don't think you realise how ridiculous you sound.

85

 Nov 12, 2009 at 08:58 AM torahyid Says:

Reply to #65  
Anonymous Says:

I made it up?

Here's the quote form the love-filled Yid I was responding to:
On Shteinsaltz, he is quoted as saying “My grandfather used to say being an apikorus, a heretic, was better than being an am ha’aretz, an ignoramus”, and his father is quoted as saying “I do not care if my son is an apikores (heretic), but no son of mine will be an am-haaretz (ignoramus)". afrei lepumei. I think that says it all. ”

Which part did I misquote him on?
Do you now agree with me?

good, now you've quoted me properly, so now tell me which part of that statement does not deserve to be said on it "afrei lepumei".

86

 Nov 12, 2009 at 11:17 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #83  
Anonymous Says:

Why do you need to mention the eidus of mishpachah if you claim to have seen them yourself?

Just a s'mach. it is a well known fact that he had them.

87

 Nov 12, 2009 at 01:03 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #69  
Richard Nixon Says:

In some generations we are zocheh to a manhig recognized by all bnai torah as above and beyond the run of the mill talmid chachom. Our inability to understand every action or decision of the manhig of klal yisroel is not an indication that he has acted or decided incorrectly. Rather, our failure to understand the reasoning of the manhig of the generation, should be a catalyst to greater efforts in learning and mussar, so that we may be zocheh to understand his words. Until then, when the manhig of the generation speaks, we should humbly accept his opinion. We were zocheh to have such a manhig in Morainu ZTZ"L. What a pity some people couldn't appreciate the zechus and continue to think they can speak about Morainu ZTZ"L in any which way they choose.

You may accept anybody you want to be your manhig. Don't assume your rebbe is the manhig of all klal yisroel. There are many, many other equally great lamdanim and tzaddikim who manage to avoid machlokes, in keeping with the cardinal principle of Torah Judaism which is Shalom. Those who were able to master the principle of darchei noam are the true manhigim.

88

 Nov 12, 2009 at 01:37 PM MIESQ. Says:

There is alot to be said about runing commontary-translation of the Talmudic text being ill advised for yeshiva students during their formative years. However, with the advent of the Artscroll Talmud, Shas Lublin ,Mesivtha and Chavrusah editions of Talmud produced for Daf Yomi bare wittness to how right the Rabbi's project isPersonally. I learned to make a lainen based on what I saw in Steinsaltz
& B'H I am on my way for my third syium on Shas YASHAR KOACH RABBI

89

 Nov 12, 2009 at 02:31 PM torahyid Says:

Reply to #87  
Anonymous Says:

You may accept anybody you want to be your manhig. Don't assume your rebbe is the manhig of all klal yisroel. There are many, many other equally great lamdanim and tzaddikim who manage to avoid machlokes, in keeping with the cardinal principle of Torah Judaism which is Shalom. Those who were able to master the principle of darchei noam are the true manhigim.

so who was the manhig hador by yetzias mitzrayim, moshe rabbeinu o"h who rebuked klal yisroel and not everybody cried when he was niftar bec of the enemies he made, or ahron hakohen o"h who made peace and all klal yisroel cried. both are needed, the manhig to speak out without fear and another tzadik who makes peace.

90

 Nov 12, 2009 at 03:10 PM Boruch N. Hoffinger BS"D Says:

Reply to #10  
Steven Says:

Instead of praising the Rav for undertaking such a task, there are people who just have to poke and belittle his efforts. What a chillul Hashem that yidden find it appropriate to act AND SPEAK this way.

#10 Steven,
Never fear, if they belittle a great man and his works, G-d (Eloquim) will also
judge them accordingly.

91

 Nov 13, 2009 at 12:00 AM a torah yid of Monsey Says:

stenzalts said (its printed) 'Halacho Moshe mesinai means a very old minhag'. If tha'ts not enough to label him as an apikores then what is?

92

 Nov 13, 2009 at 12:39 AM Milhouse Says:

Reply to #91  
a torah yid of Monsey Says:

stenzalts said (its printed) 'Halacho Moshe mesinai means a very old minhag'. If tha'ts not enough to label him as an apikores then what is?

See Yodayim 4:3 for an example of a law that is claimed to be from Moshe Misinai, but is obviously not.

93

Sign-in to post a comment

Scroll Up
Advertisements:

Sell your scrap gold and broken jewelry and earn hard cash sell gold today!