Florida - Rush Limbaugh: I'lll Leave U.S. To Costa Rica If Health Care Bill Passes |
|

Florida - Conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh said on his radio show that he will eventually leave the country if the health care bill passes and its provisions are implemented.
Liberal media watchdog Media Matters recorded Limbaugh’s comments, which you can hear below. At the 1:20 mark,
Limbaugh says the following: “I’ll just tell you this, if this passes and it’s five years from now and all that stuff gets implemented—I am leaving the country. I’ll go to Costa Rica.”
It is not clear if Limbaugh was making a joke, if he was saying he would leaving the country permanently, or if he was saying he would leave just for health care.
The radio host was responding to a caller who asked, “If the health care bill passes, where would you go for health care yourself?”
More of today's headlines
“Krakow, Poland - Three of the five suspects involved in the theft of the “Arbeit Macht Frei” sign have to reckon with prison sentences of up to 36...”
Krakow, Poland - Sentence Without Trial for Auschwitz Sign Thieves
Staten Island, NY - NYC's Oldest Dies at 111



Total97
Read Comments (97) — Post Yours »
1
Mar 09, 2010 at 01:56 PM Dave Says:Report as Inappropriate
I'm failing to see how this is supposed to encourage Democrats to oppose the legislation.
3
Mar 09, 2010 at 01:57 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
Good ridence
4
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:00 PM RTJ Says:Report as Inappropriate
Well, if the healthcare bill will rid us of this loudmouthed hatemonger and rabblerouser, I'm all for it!
5
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:01 PM out of context Says:Report as Inappropriate
Sorry, he didn't say that! Listen to that whole segment, where he spoke about insurance firms creating clinics out of the US with good doctors, if this bill passes. All Rush said was that he would "GO" down there for medical treatment, and explicitly said he would NOT move down there. So please don't post articles created by left wing nuts.
6
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:06 PM DR HEIMISH Says:Report as Inappropriate
Good! America will benefit from his move. His pills are also easier to buy over there.
7
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:10 PM me Says:Report as Inappropriate
he is a very smart man but he is only joking
8
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:12 PM Smokey Specs Says:Report as Inappropriate
Up until now, Costa Rica has been an environmentalist's paradise. Costa Rica needs him like a luchimkup.
9
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:13 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
As someone who actually listened to his clarification on his show today (3/9) he meant to say, "If this Monstrosity of Obamacare passes, I will GO to Costa Rica for my healthcare, not MOVE THERE, but purchase surgical services etc. from Costa Rican doctors/hospitals....." On his Monday show, he was not that clear.
10
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:13 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Well, if the healthcare bill will rid us of this loudmouthed hatemonger and rabblerouser, I'm all for it! ”
Hatemonger??
11
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:14 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
Zeischem L'shalom....
12
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:17 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
what! demagogic is not covered.
13
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:19 PM Obamanation Says:Report as Inappropriate
I like him alot, I know he is rush but is he the rush thats in the back of the gemorah that we need to think and talk about what is it that he said????
14
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:24 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
Who cares? Besides, like Art Bell who broadcast from Phillipines after he moved, I bet he will as well.
15
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:25 PM Anon1 Says:Report as Inappropriate
I heard Rush saying this on his program. BUT---Based on previous discussions on his show about US-based health plans making deals with doctors and hospitals in Costa Rica, I think he meant he'd get his medical care in Costa Rica, not that he'd move there altogether.
16
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:27 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
Finally, a really compelling reason to pass the health care bill...
17
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:29 PM omg Says:Report as Inappropriate
dont dare rush !!!!!! dont you dare. i mean comon please stay. you know forget about the health care thing. it was a joke justt!!!!! please stay.....ok?
18
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:33 PM Green Tea Says:Report as Inappropriate
Like him or hate him, I have been tracking him for years- he is usually right in his predicions.
19
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:39 PM 5T Resident Says:Report as Inappropriate
You have to understand Rush to know why he made this statement. As usual, Rush is baiting the liberals. He's saying exactly what the liberal Hollywood types like Sean Penn were saying before the 2004 election, i.e., that they would move to Canada if Bush were re-elected. He was re-elected but none of them moved a muscle. Rush wants to see what kind of play his statement would get in the liberal media while, hypocritically, they said nothing when the Hollywood libs didn't move.
20
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:40 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
some american... ready to bail when somthing isnt to his liking. good bye rush. take your radio program and leave. what are you worried abotu anyhow. youll have your medical care when you need it mr limbaugh. dont kid yourself.
21
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:51 PM Charlie Hall Says:Report as Inappropriate
Uh, Costa Rica has government sponsored universal health care. Like most sane countries, including Israel.
22
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:51 PM Liepa Says:Report as Inappropriate
Is that a threat or a promise............
23
Mar 09, 2010 at 02:55 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
CBS cut Rush Limbaugh's statement off in the middle. Limbaugh said he would go to Costa Rica for major medical treatment if private health care was outlawed by the Obama legislation. That is exactly what he said. CBS distorted his words because CBS despises Rush Limbaugh and will write anything to make Limbaugh look bad. CBS should lose its broadcasting license for intentionally distorting its news. They are shown to be liars once again. Remember Dan Rather and his fake reporting before the Bush/Gore Election? Fake news reports. Sheker rules at CBS. Disgusting.
24
Mar 09, 2010 at 03:03 PM BP Liberla Says:Report as Inappropriate
He may actually want to go elsewhere. Costa Rica has a fairly well-developed system of government-financed health care...
25
Mar 09, 2010 at 03:11 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
Costa Rica is too close! There are some beautiful places in Asia
26
Mar 09, 2010 at 03:17 PM yakov Says:Report as Inappropriate
All of you Rush-haters you never lived at a socialist country so you don't know what you are inviting upon yourselves. Great soviet writers Ilf and Petrov were calling that phenomenon "a country of un-scared idiots"
27
Mar 09, 2010 at 03:49 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
Rush Limbaugh is an ohev yisroel and his values are closer to torah than the krum oisvarfen commenting here. Shame on you.
28
Mar 09, 2010 at 03:52 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
He did leave NY after tax hikes so why wouldnt he leave the US? I would if I could find a minyan in CR and schools for my kids. In a heartbeat. The US is on a precipitous decline. Your grandchildren will never be able to pay off the debt Obama and the Democrats put on before we kick them out of office.
29
Mar 09, 2010 at 03:53 PM LeaveRush Says:Report as Inappropriate
Will anybody miss him? There are plenty others out there who can take his place on the radio waves. I dont know what makes Rush think he is the king of this country.
30
Mar 09, 2010 at 03:53 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Good ridence ”
ha ha! and you think he will not continue given us strength thru the airways! he's here to stay, even if you don't like it!
31
Mar 09, 2010 at 04:11 PM LIBERALISM IS A DISEASE!!! Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ As someone who actually listened to his clarification on his show today (3/9) he meant to say, "If this Monstrosity of Obamacare passes, I will GO to Costa Rica for my healthcare, not MOVE THERE, but purchase surgical services etc. from Costa Rican doctors/hospitals....." On his Monday show, he was not that clear. ”
He has said this before in relation to callers from those 'evil profit hungry insurance companies.' I am surprised CBSOBAMA News hasn't picked this up before.
32
Mar 09, 2010 at 04:23 PM Charlie Hall Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ As someone who actually listened to his clarification on his show today (3/9) he meant to say, "If this Monstrosity of Obamacare passes, I will GO to Costa Rica for my healthcare, not MOVE THERE, but purchase surgical services etc. from Costa Rican doctors/hospitals....." On his Monday show, he was not that clear. ”
Costa Rica has government-sponsored universal healthcare. Just like President Obama proposes. So I guess the Obama plan isn't so bad after all!
33
Mar 09, 2010 at 04:26 PM Hurrah! Says:Report as Inappropriate
Another reason to pray for Health Care reform. The idea of Rush leaving the country, this hateful, vicious troublemaker, is too good to be true.
34
Mar 09, 2010 at 04:28 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
some people who comment here would rather follow the liberal media like lemmings than show hakoras hatov to one of the best friends Israel and Bnei Yisroel have amongst the goyim. Shame on you all.
35
Mar 09, 2010 at 04:35 PM Green Tea Says:Report as Inappropriate
Like him or hate him, I have been tracking him for years- he is usually right in his predicions.
36
Mar 09, 2010 at 04:42 PM Huh? Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ All of you Rush-haters you never lived at a socialist country so you don't know what you are inviting upon yourselves. Great soviet writers Ilf and Petrov were calling that phenomenon "a country of un-scared idiots" ”
I have friends and family members who did live in Socialist countries, and they detest Rush. You don't need to have grown up in America to have values, taste and common sense.
37
Mar 09, 2010 at 04:55 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
Last I checked, Costa Rica has universal health care, as does every industrialized country on earth. When left-wingers threaten to leave the country they have plenty of like-minded places to go. Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Great Britain, even Israel just to name a few. When right-wingers threaten to leave the country, they have nowhere to go except for maybe the Cayman Islands. Rush is getting desperate with his empty threats.
38
Mar 09, 2010 at 04:56 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ CBS cut Rush Limbaugh's statement off in the middle. Limbaugh said he would go to Costa Rica for major medical treatment if private health care was outlawed by the Obama legislation. That is exactly what he said. CBS distorted his words because CBS despises Rush Limbaugh and will write anything to make Limbaugh look bad. CBS should lose its broadcasting license for intentionally distorting its news. They are shown to be liars once again. Remember Dan Rather and his fake reporting before the Bush/Gore Election? Fake news reports. Sheker rules at CBS. Disgusting. ”
while i'm not justifying what CBS did, it is a common industry practice that just about everyone INCLUDING Rush Limbaugh does
as to why they did it...
while its possible that they did it because as you say they hate Rush and want to screw him its also very possible they did it because it generates traffic and listeners thus allowing them to charge higher rates for ads on their station/site
(stam as Rush is a public personality if he decided to go after (sue etc.) CBS he would have a hard time of it because he would have to prove that they did it maliciously)
39
Mar 09, 2010 at 05:01 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
Wow do any of the blogers here actuely listen to this man beside the tallent he got from
hashem which he points out at every turn not lke most balei gavah here he is one of the bigest ohev Yisrael around so stop talking out of ur ass and listen to the show or tell us what is wrong with what he says just to spew hate is a librale trade not a Jewish one
40
Mar 09, 2010 at 05:24 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Rush Limbaugh is an ohev yisroel and his values are closer to torah than the krum oisvarfen commenting here. Shame on you. ”
show me where it says in the torah that you are allowed to kill people who have different views then you, because that is what he said to do and one of his fanatic listeners actually followed through by killing dr. george tiller
41
Mar 09, 2010 at 05:26 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ He did leave NY after tax hikes so why wouldnt he leave the US? I would if I could find a minyan in CR and schools for my kids. In a heartbeat. The US is on a precipitous decline. Your grandchildren will never be able to pay off the debt Obama and the Democrats put on before we kick them out of office. ”
He left New York for the good life in Florida, not to a third-world country with a per-capita income of $6900 a year, in which the rich live behind gated walls with security guards in fear of the common folk. You might want to pay a visit to the slums of San Jose before you set sail for a Spanish-speaking tourist playland that has no serious industry other than growing bananas. You would really move there if they just had a good school for your children? Right. Uh huh.
US national debt on January 2001: 5.6 trillion
US national debt on January 2009: 12.3 trillon
Yes; it was "Obama and the Democrats" who put us in this mess.
42
Mar 09, 2010 at 05:27 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
Don't let the door...
43
Mar 09, 2010 at 05:29 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
If he wants to utilize Costa Rican healthcare, won't he need to be a resident? Or does CR insure its illegals like we do?
44
Mar 09, 2010 at 05:41 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ CBS cut Rush Limbaugh's statement off in the middle. Limbaugh said he would go to Costa Rica for major medical treatment if private health care was outlawed by the Obama legislation. That is exactly what he said. CBS distorted his words because CBS despises Rush Limbaugh and will write anything to make Limbaugh look bad. CBS should lose its broadcasting license for intentionally distorting its news. They are shown to be liars once again. Remember Dan Rather and his fake reporting before the Bush/Gore Election? Fake news reports. Sheker rules at CBS. Disgusting. ”
So what Rush really meant to say was that the next time he has a heart attack on a golf course in Hawaii, he is going to get on his private jet and fly ten hours to Costa Rica to get care at a foreign government-run emergency room. I see. Interesting interpretation.
45
Mar 09, 2010 at 05:51 PM Milhouse Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ show me where it says in the torah that you are allowed to kill people who have different views then you, because that is what he said to do and one of his fanatic listeners actually followed through by killing dr. george tiller ”
You are a liar. Limbaugh never said any such thing.
However, the man who killed Tiller was 100% justified. I have no idea whether he was a Limbaugh listener (and neither do you), but for this deed he will have the highest gan eden, for all the innocent lives he saved by killing this bloodthirsty murderer.
46
Mar 09, 2010 at 05:52 PM Milhouse Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Well, if the healthcare bill will rid us of this loudmouthed hatemonger and rabblerouser, I'm all for it! ”
Hatemonger?! What possibly basis could you have for that statement? The only hatemonger I see is you, who are inciting people to hate Limbaugh.
47
Mar 09, 2010 at 06:22 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
"It is not clear if Limbaugh was making a joke,"
48
Mar 09, 2010 at 06:24 PM Liberalism is a Disease!!! Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Costa Rica has government-sponsored universal healthcare. Just like President Obama proposes. So I guess the Obama plan isn't so bad after all! ”
Actually Charles, you had to hear the whole thing but since you didnt I wont bother wasting my time on you.
49
Mar 09, 2010 at 06:25 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
Typical of the MSM. Rush did NOT say he would relocate to Costa Rica, that he would go there for health care -- just like Canadians (including a provincial premier -- the Canadian equivalent of state governor) come here or Brits go to Eastern Europe.
This has happened in EVERY nationalized system: the uber-rich can still afford to get the best health care and the rest get stuck in clinics left lying unattended in their own filth, relying on relatives to bring them food and water (see the recent reports out of Britain).
While America's system is imperfect, it affords the AVERAGE citizen access to the best treatment available. For example, twenty years ago my father -- a working class man -- needed SEXTUPLE bypass surgery. It was performed by the CHIEF cardiac surgeon at THE leading cardiac unit in Miami.
You don't get that in Britain; you get some "doctor" who went to medical school in Pakistan. You don't get that in Canada either: just ask the aforementioned Newfoundland Premier Danny Williams who went to the same hospital for HIS surgery.
In America, not all but MOST people have access to the best. Under socialized systems, only a few get the best and the rest... oh well
50
Mar 09, 2010 at 06:27 PM SOCIALISM IS A DISEASE!! Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ He left New York for the good life in Florida, not to a third-world country with a per-capita income of $6900 a year, in which the rich live behind gated walls with security guards in fear of the common folk. You might want to pay a visit to the slums of San Jose before you set sail for a Spanish-speaking tourist playland that has no serious industry other than growing bananas. You would really move there if they just had a good school for your children? Right. Uh huh.
US national debt on January 2001: 5.6 trillion
US national debt on January 2009: 12.3 trillon
Yes; it was "Obama and the Democrats" who put us in this mess. ”
Actually he moved from NY to a state without income taxes. He is constantly audited by NY to make sure he wasnt broadcasting from NY.
You were wrong on your numbers. You meant to say JAN 2010!!
51
Mar 09, 2010 at 06:30 PM SOCIALISM IS A DISEASE!! Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ I have friends and family members who did live in Socialist countries, and they detest Rush. You don't need to have grown up in America to have values, taste and common sense. ”
well enjoy your obama care and if god forbid you need treatment you better say vidduy now. the govt is the largest healthcare "insurer" now and they already deny coverage. you think when they get bigger they will approve everything? if you do, YOU ARE DRUNK!
52
Mar 09, 2010 at 06:41 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ All of you Rush-haters you never lived at a socialist country so you don't know what you are inviting upon yourselves. Great soviet writers Ilf and Petrov were calling that phenomenon "a country of un-scared idiots" ”
if the usa provides services for me that i can not afford to pay for, I am all for that. it wont ruin anyone and will help. health services, living services. counseling, and even if need be food services. thank GOODness we live in a nation that attends to the needs of its citizens.
53
Mar 09, 2010 at 06:56 PM Henry Frisch Says:Report as Inappropriate
Costa Rica has socialized medicine and stands ahead of the U.S. in overall quality of its health care.
Of course, this "news" about Limbaugh follows the news that his protege Palin has gone to Canada, also a "socialized medicine" country for care.
I would laugh if I were not crying about these troublesome people.
54
Mar 09, 2010 at 07:02 PM What? Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Uh, Costa Rica has government sponsored universal health care. Like most sane countries, including Israel. ”
How is Costa Rica Sane? Or for that Matter how is the rest of the world sane? We have the highest GDP of any country int he World with the most innovative economy...regardless of the current crisis, our currency is still the most stable and believe it or not is appreciating against most other western countries. Costa Rica's inflation rate is 13.4% vs the US' last 10 years never breaking above 3.85%. Costa Ricas taxes are only lower because of a service adjustment and the inflation arbitrage.
Additionally, because of their lack of a free medical market and rationing, they don't have access to our innovations (even if you had the money to buy it) let alone their own innovations. The only reason Israel, the UK, France, and Germany's systems continue to produce any medical innovations is because they have a consumer and private equity market to fund and than sell the innovations too, that market being the US. Remove the US from the equation by creating a Uni Health care system and even those advanced western countries will stop innovating and producing.
Before you make blanket idiotic statements, I suggest you learn basic economics and study the facts of the equation.
55
Mar 09, 2010 at 07:05 PM Hip hip hurray! Says:Report as Inappropriate
I'm inspired now to work harder for Health Care Reform. I'll give more $, make more calls.
56
Mar 09, 2010 at 07:27 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Actually he moved from NY to a state without income taxes. He is constantly audited by NY to make sure he wasnt broadcasting from NY.
You were wrong on your numbers. You meant to say JAN 2010!! ”
I am aware that Rush moved to Florida because it is a no-income-tax-state, but that doesn't change the point: Florida is a step up; Costa Rica is a a step down.
Thanks for telling me what I meant to say. I referenced 2001 and 2009 for they mark the beginning of the Bush and Obama presidencies. The figures are from the Wikipedia page titled "United States Public Debt," and they are perfectly accurate.
The 2010 national debt is estimated at 14.4 trillion which includes a 1.2 billion dollar deficit from the prior administration, and an 800 billion dollar stimulus package.
You can attempt to revise history all you'd like, but the numbers don't lie.
57
Mar 09, 2010 at 07:54 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Typical of the MSM. Rush did NOT say he would relocate to Costa Rica, that he would go there for health care -- just like Canadians (including a provincial premier -- the Canadian equivalent of state governor) come here or Brits go to Eastern Europe.
This has happened in EVERY nationalized system: the uber-rich can still afford to get the best health care and the rest get stuck in clinics left lying unattended in their own filth, relying on relatives to bring them food and water (see the recent reports out of Britain).
While America's system is imperfect, it affords the AVERAGE citizen access to the best treatment available. For example, twenty years ago my father -- a working class man -- needed SEXTUPLE bypass surgery. It was performed by the CHIEF cardiac surgeon at THE leading cardiac unit in Miami.
You don't get that in Britain; you get some "doctor" who went to medical school in Pakistan. You don't get that in Canada either: just ask the aforementioned Newfoundland Premier Danny Williams who went to the same hospital for HIS surgery.
In America, not all but MOST people have access to the best. Under socialized systems, only a few get the best and the rest... oh well ”
There has never been any reference made to a "nationalized system" in the current legislation.The proposal currently put forth by congress is to provide health insurance coverage to the uninsured. A nationalized system is one in which the government owns and operates the hospitals and hires doctors directly, but of course, you know that. If uninsured Americans were covered by a government program comparable to Medicare, Medicaid, or the VA, that wouldn't preclude rich citizens from accessing their own private health care services.
To compare a rich citizen in Canada to a rich citizen in the US is foolish.
Canada has a population that is 1/10th of the size of the US, so it is inevitable that the US is going to produce a greater number of top specialists. People from Oregon go to California all the time for specialized care; I hardly see how going from Canada to the US is any different. Of course you neglect to mention that US citizens travel abroad all the time for cheaper care. I know a friend who just went to Israel to get her dental work done.
British doctors are trained in Pakistan? Now you are just foaming at the mouth.
Oxford and Cambridge are not in the Middle East.
58
Mar 09, 2010 at 08:11 PM rush Says:Report as Inappropriate
who are you? who needs you here in the us, what do I gain from you? leave. don't leave do what do I care,
59
Mar 09, 2010 at 08:27 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ show me where it says in the torah that you are allowed to kill people who have different views then you, because that is what he said to do and one of his fanatic listeners actually followed through by killing dr. george tiller ”
You are commandd by torah to kill sodomites and murderers. What Tiller did fulfilled the torah's definitions of murder. The state analyzed the records and almost none were done to save the life of the mother. Unborn babies as old as 8-9 months were slaughtered by him. No halacha could have supported what Tiller did. You are a liberal and your hashkafos are not in line with torah. They are in line with the Communist Manifesto.
60
Mar 09, 2010 at 08:54 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ How is Costa Rica Sane? Or for that Matter how is the rest of the world sane? We have the highest GDP of any country int he World with the most innovative economy...regardless of the current crisis, our currency is still the most stable and believe it or not is appreciating against most other western countries. Costa Rica's inflation rate is 13.4% vs the US' last 10 years never breaking above 3.85%. Costa Ricas taxes are only lower because of a service adjustment and the inflation arbitrage.
Additionally, because of their lack of a free medical market and rationing, they don't have access to our innovations (even if you had the money to buy it) let alone their own innovations. The only reason Israel, the UK, France, and Germany's systems continue to produce any medical innovations is because they have a consumer and private equity market to fund and than sell the innovations too, that market being the US. Remove the US from the equation by creating a Uni Health care system and even those advanced western countries will stop innovating and producing.
Before you make blanket idiotic statements, I suggest you learn basic economics and study the facts of the equation. ”
1) When rated per-capita, the US does not have the highest GDP.
2) The sanity of the Costa Rican health care system is that it has both a public and private option, allowing access to all. I agree that a private equity market is essential to progress, but accessibility cannot be ignored at it's expense.
3) In spite of what you may believe, not all medical innovation comes from the US.
Places like Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, S Korea, and even China, have cutting-edge research and educational programs that rival and are often superior to the US, while also providing access to all.
I do not support "socialized medicine" such as that in Britain, but I do think it is essential that we find a way to provide greater accessibility as in Costa Rica or Israel.
61
Mar 09, 2010 at 09:07 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ All of you Rush-haters you never lived at a socialist country so you don't know what you are inviting upon yourselves. Great soviet writers Ilf and Petrov were calling that phenomenon "a country of un-scared idiots" ”
Hey genius, Costa Rica has a public option/universal healthcare.
62
Mar 09, 2010 at 09:29 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
No. 59. Yet, you were crying for Grossman.
63
Mar 09, 2010 at 09:38 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ You are commandd by torah to kill sodomites and murderers. What Tiller did fulfilled the torah's definitions of murder. The state analyzed the records and almost none were done to save the life of the mother. Unborn babies as old as 8-9 months were slaughtered by him. No halacha could have supported what Tiller did. You are a liberal and your hashkafos are not in line with torah. They are in line with the Communist Manifesto. ”
If that's what you are commanded to do, why don't you go to one of the many gay neighbors, bars, clubs etc and shoot the place up?
64
Mar 09, 2010 at 09:59 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
Re;to # 59. You condone murder ; You are bloodthirsty.
65
Mar 09, 2010 at 10:18 PM You missed the point! Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ 1) When rated per-capita, the US does not have the highest GDP.
2) The sanity of the Costa Rican health care system is that it has both a public and private option, allowing access to all. I agree that a private equity market is essential to progress, but accessibility cannot be ignored at it's expense.
3) In spite of what you may believe, not all medical innovation comes from the US.
Places like Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, S Korea, and even China, have cutting-edge research and educational programs that rival and are often superior to the US, while also providing access to all.
I do not support "socialized medicine" such as that in Britain, but I do think it is essential that we find a way to provide greater accessibility as in Costa Rica or Israel. ”
I never said all innovation comes from the US...go back and look again. I said all innovation is BECAUSE of the US. In fact most of the innovation is not from the US. Because we have tried over the past 40+ years to create a fairer, progressive public school system as well as our sense of priorities within our highly educated well designed private school system our economy is not geared toward the Sciences or Engineering, but rather towards seeking out how to create a revenue model from almost anything The private equity markets are dynamic and are primarily based in the US. Additionally because of our private consumer driven market we have huge demand for innovation, so the angel/private equity /IPO Markets seek to fulfill that demand; deriving huge profits (and of course taking huge risks, considering it takes roughly 9 years to get FDA approval, and you still aren't indemnified against future lawsuits) but satisfying a derivative need. Additionally you can't look at GDP on a per capita basis, because of the loss created by diminishing returns. (The law of diminishing returns applies to a human capital resource as well)
66
Mar 09, 2010 at 10:29 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ 1) When rated per-capita, the US does not have the highest GDP.
2) The sanity of the Costa Rican health care system is that it has both a public and private option, allowing access to all. I agree that a private equity market is essential to progress, but accessibility cannot be ignored at it's expense.
3) In spite of what you may believe, not all medical innovation comes from the US.
Places like Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, S Korea, and even China, have cutting-edge research and educational programs that rival and are often superior to the US, while also providing access to all.
I do not support "socialized medicine" such as that in Britain, but I do think it is essential that we find a way to provide greater accessibility as in Costa Rica or Israel. ”
I neglected to address your public/private bullet. This system already exists in this country it is called Medicaid. I think the problem you think should be addressed is for those who are too rich to be enrolled in medicaid and too poor to buy private insurance. The thing you are missing and what most of the world misses, is that we don't have a health care problem; we have a health care financing problem. The issue so eloquently addressed by David Goldhill in his article in The Atlantic http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/09/how-american-health-care-killed-my-father/7617/.
Discusses a more rational way of paying for health care that will neither bankrupt the country (see France/Belgium) nor raise taxes to Onerous/Usurious levels (See France/Belgium again), and will inevitably lower costs. The problem with the US' health care finance system isn't that it is a free market, its that it isn't. We don't pay doctors! we pay insurance! (Better known today as managed care) utterly distorted price systems with incentives in place to over spend...why not its free is the rationale. We need to move to a rational pay system which would involve a dynamic HSA/Catastrophic Insurance
67
Mar 09, 2010 at 10:48 PM Charlie Hall Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ 1) When rated per-capita, the US does not have the highest GDP.
2) The sanity of the Costa Rican health care system is that it has both a public and private option, allowing access to all. I agree that a private equity market is essential to progress, but accessibility cannot be ignored at it's expense.
3) In spite of what you may believe, not all medical innovation comes from the US.
Places like Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, S Korea, and even China, have cutting-edge research and educational programs that rival and are often superior to the US, while also providing access to all.
I do not support "socialized medicine" such as that in Britain, but I do think it is essential that we find a way to provide greater accessibility as in Costa Rica or Israel. ”
Add much of Europe to your list of innovative countries; some of the most important medical research comes from there.
68
Mar 09, 2010 at 10:47 PM Ron Paul Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ As someone who actually listened to his clarification on his show today (3/9) he meant to say, "If this Monstrosity of Obamacare passes, I will GO to Costa Rica for my healthcare, not MOVE THERE, but purchase surgical services etc. from Costa Rican doctors/hospitals....." On his Monday show, he was not that clear. ”
I would move there if i could, ! Why stay here? your still are going to have to pay for medical services you are not use! every year .... it will be a monstrosity , and new federal bureaucracy with a new tax that supposed to pay for it.
any time government gets bigger our freedoms get become less.
69
Mar 09, 2010 at 10:46 PM Charlie Hall Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ well enjoy your obama care and if god forbid you need treatment you better say vidduy now. the govt is the largest healthcare "insurer" now and they already deny coverage. you think when they get bigger they will approve everything? if you do, YOU ARE DRUNK! ”
My wife is a physician and all of her patients have government insurance, mainly New York State Medicaid. I asked her how often it denied coverage. In the 4 1/2 years she has practices in NY, the only thing they have ever asked her to do was to prescribe a different drug of the same class, one that was on their formulary. She has NEVER had Medicaid deny coverage for a procedure or treatment she had reccommended. When she treated patients with private insurance she got denials of coverage all the time and was constantly on the phone arguing with them.
70
Mar 09, 2010 at 10:42 PM It doesn't matter if it is nationalized Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ There has never been any reference made to a "nationalized system" in the current legislation.The proposal currently put forth by congress is to provide health insurance coverage to the uninsured. A nationalized system is one in which the government owns and operates the hospitals and hires doctors directly, but of course, you know that. If uninsured Americans were covered by a government program comparable to Medicare, Medicaid, or the VA, that wouldn't preclude rich citizens from accessing their own private health care services.
To compare a rich citizen in Canada to a rich citizen in the US is foolish.
Canada has a population that is 1/10th of the size of the US, so it is inevitable that the US is going to produce a greater number of top specialists. People from Oregon go to California all the time for specialized care; I hardly see how going from Canada to the US is any different. Of course you neglect to mention that US citizens travel abroad all the time for cheaper care. I know a friend who just went to Israel to get her dental work done.
British doctors are trained in Pakistan? Now you are just foaming at the mouth.
Oxford and Cambridge are not in the Middle East. ”
Its irrelevant, the government can nationalize healthcare without creating a public option...In a way they already do, every state has insurance regulations that require minimum services and care in order to gain a license to operate in that state. In this they become a de facto partner. By requiring the companies to offer any service or minimum care coverage they distort pricing and underwriting. Which will logically raise premiums and force policy holders to lose coverage through natural selection. The US is not producing more specialists simply because of population density, that is an idiotic thing to say. China, India have more people in higher population density (generally a factor for increasing collaboration and education) and they dont produce as many or as high quality as the US. Besides Canadians don't come here because of superior service (which is probably a factor but not the sole factor). They come here because of rationed care. Because there is 4.5 MRI machines per million population in Canada and 16 in the US (and in a much bigger population as you pointed out yourself.
71
Mar 09, 2010 at 10:49 PM Charlie Hall Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ You are commandd by torah to kill sodomites and murderers. What Tiller did fulfilled the torah's definitions of murder. The state analyzed the records and almost none were done to save the life of the mother. Unborn babies as old as 8-9 months were slaughtered by him. No halacha could have supported what Tiller did. You are a liberal and your hashkafos are not in line with torah. They are in line with the Communist Manifesto. ”
What Tiller did is not sanctioned by the Torah; Noachides are obligated to have a court system rather than vigilate justice. Tiller is the murderer here.
72
Mar 09, 2010 at 10:50 PM Charlie Hall Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ You are commandd by torah to kill sodomites and murderers. What Tiller did fulfilled the torah's definitions of murder. The state analyzed the records and almost none were done to save the life of the mother. Unborn babies as old as 8-9 months were slaughtered by him. No halacha could have supported what Tiller did. You are a liberal and your hashkafos are not in line with torah. They are in line with the Communist Manifesto. ”
What I meant to say was the the person who killed Tiller is the murderer. And since there were eyewitnesses he would receive a death sentence at the hands of a Noachide court.
73
Mar 09, 2010 at 10:56 PM Charlie Hall Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ How is Costa Rica Sane? Or for that Matter how is the rest of the world sane? We have the highest GDP of any country int he World with the most innovative economy...regardless of the current crisis, our currency is still the most stable and believe it or not is appreciating against most other western countries. Costa Rica's inflation rate is 13.4% vs the US' last 10 years never breaking above 3.85%. Costa Ricas taxes are only lower because of a service adjustment and the inflation arbitrage.
Additionally, because of their lack of a free medical market and rationing, they don't have access to our innovations (even if you had the money to buy it) let alone their own innovations. The only reason Israel, the UK, France, and Germany's systems continue to produce any medical innovations is because they have a consumer and private equity market to fund and than sell the innovations too, that market being the US. Remove the US from the equation by creating a Uni Health care system and even those advanced western countries will stop innovating and producing.
Before you make blanket idiotic statements, I suggest you learn basic economics and study the facts of the equation. ”
The CIA World Factbook lists the US as #10 or #12 in per capita GDP, depending on how you adjust for currency values.
France in particular has a fabulous health system.
74
Mar 09, 2010 at 11:00 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Last I checked, Costa Rica has universal health care, as does every industrialized country on earth. When left-wingers threaten to leave the country they have plenty of like-minded places to go. Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Great Britain, even Israel just to name a few. When right-wingers threaten to leave the country, they have nowhere to go except for maybe the Cayman Islands. Rush is getting desperate with his empty threats. ”
very good observation. well said.
75
Mar 09, 2010 at 11:04 PM Which is why it costs are so high Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ My wife is a physician and all of her patients have government insurance, mainly New York State Medicaid. I asked her how often it denied coverage. In the 4 1/2 years she has practices in NY, the only thing they have ever asked her to do was to prescribe a different drug of the same class, one that was on their formulary. She has NEVER had Medicaid deny coverage for a procedure or treatment she had reccommended. When she treated patients with private insurance she got denials of coverage all the time and was constantly on the phone arguing with them. ”
As a percentage of the Federal Budget Medicaid alone was 7% (7% of $3 Trillion or $210 Billion) in 2009. This doesn't include what New York State Contributes. Everyone is so concerned as you have proven with how much they will lose through rationing and your response is that nothing will be lost...look at my anecdotal evidence, The New York State Budget has a projected $9 billion shortfall in the next 13 months. Primarily this is caused by entitlement programs and bloated pension and retirees health benefits. The fact that up until now Medicaid was great because New York (and of course the Federal Government) was able to borrow cheaply is not proof that these services wont be cut or rationed when you double the number of people enrolling.
76
Mar 09, 2010 at 11:07 PM Charlie Hall Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Typical of the MSM. Rush did NOT say he would relocate to Costa Rica, that he would go there for health care -- just like Canadians (including a provincial premier -- the Canadian equivalent of state governor) come here or Brits go to Eastern Europe.
This has happened in EVERY nationalized system: the uber-rich can still afford to get the best health care and the rest get stuck in clinics left lying unattended in their own filth, relying on relatives to bring them food and water (see the recent reports out of Britain).
While America's system is imperfect, it affords the AVERAGE citizen access to the best treatment available. For example, twenty years ago my father -- a working class man -- needed SEXTUPLE bypass surgery. It was performed by the CHIEF cardiac surgeon at THE leading cardiac unit in Miami.
You don't get that in Britain; you get some "doctor" who went to medical school in Pakistan. You don't get that in Canada either: just ask the aforementioned Newfoundland Premier Danny Williams who went to the same hospital for HIS surgery.
In America, not all but MOST people have access to the best. Under socialized systems, only a few get the best and the rest... oh well ”
The late Sen. Spark Matsunaga went to Canada for his cancer treatments even though as a US Senator he was entitled to free medical care anywhere in the US.
And a lot of US doctors went to medical school in Pakistan or other third world countries. The last statistics I saw were that 40% of primary care internal medicine and family medicine physicians in training earned their medical degrees outside the US.
And as others have said, Costa Rica has a government sponsored universal health care system, with more of a government role than the plan now before congress. I guess Rush thinks government sponsored health care isn't so bad as long as President Obama doesn't get credit for it.
77
Mar 09, 2010 at 11:07 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Add much of Europe to your list of innovative countries; some of the most important medical research comes from there. ”
True but almost no new drugs come from Europe. ALmost all new drugs and miracle cures come from the US.
78
Mar 09, 2010 at 11:09 PM Charlie Hall Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Its irrelevant, the government can nationalize healthcare without creating a public option...In a way they already do, every state has insurance regulations that require minimum services and care in order to gain a license to operate in that state. In this they become a de facto partner. By requiring the companies to offer any service or minimum care coverage they distort pricing and underwriting. Which will logically raise premiums and force policy holders to lose coverage through natural selection. The US is not producing more specialists simply because of population density, that is an idiotic thing to say. China, India have more people in higher population density (generally a factor for increasing collaboration and education) and they dont produce as many or as high quality as the US. Besides Canadians don't come here because of superior service (which is probably a factor but not the sole factor). They come here because of rationed care. Because there is 4.5 MRI machines per million population in Canada and 16 in the US (and in a much bigger population as you pointed out yourself. ”
Canada may have fewer MRI machines but they are healthier and live longer.
79
Mar 09, 2010 at 11:15 PM Charlie Hall Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ I would move there if i could, ! Why stay here? your still are going to have to pay for medical services you are not use! every year .... it will be a monstrosity , and new federal bureaucracy with a new tax that supposed to pay for it.
any time government gets bigger our freedoms get become less. ”
Thank you, Congressman Paul. Will you now endorse giving US citizens the same medical care as those of Costa Rica? Costa Ricans live longer than Americans even though the GDP of Costa Rica is about 1/4 that of the US.
80
Mar 09, 2010 at 11:25 PM Simple Statistics Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ The CIA World Factbook lists the US as #10 or #12 in per capita GDP, depending on how you adjust for currency values.
France in particular has a fabulous health system. ”
The CIA is using Arithmetic calculations for Per Capita GDP, but Economists use other factors, such as productivity efficiency. In basic economics you learn about the law of diminishing returns. As an example if 1 person tills a field and is able to produce x units of produce; than it is common sense that 2 persons should equal 2x, 3 people 3x etc. However at some point in the Yield Curve you will find that the returns on productivity will diminish and 45 people will not equal 45x (it could be more/less, this is a hypothetical) therefore if the richest people in the country live in NYC but you have many losers wasting their life in Troy New York. those people are that diminished return on the yield curve. The entire population of the UK is 61 million people the US is about 310 million, we being a younger more ambitious country have created more wealth through innovation as opposed to capital appreciation. Wealth tends to consolidate among the producers, so when spread over a larger poorer population it looks like less GDP per capita. However a better measure would be which country has the most billionaires and the largest middle and upper middle class.
81
Mar 09, 2010 at 11:45 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Its irrelevant, the government can nationalize healthcare without creating a public option...In a way they already do, every state has insurance regulations that require minimum services and care in order to gain a license to operate in that state. In this they become a de facto partner. By requiring the companies to offer any service or minimum care coverage they distort pricing and underwriting. Which will logically raise premiums and force policy holders to lose coverage through natural selection. The US is not producing more specialists simply because of population density, that is an idiotic thing to say. China, India have more people in higher population density (generally a factor for increasing collaboration and education) and they dont produce as many or as high quality as the US. Besides Canadians don't come here because of superior service (which is probably a factor but not the sole factor). They come here because of rationed care. Because there is 4.5 MRI machines per million population in Canada and 16 in the US (and in a much bigger population as you pointed out yourself. ”
Can and will are two separate things. You aren't addressing my claim that rich people can access their own private health care system regardless of government insurance policy.
China and India are dishonest examples. Both countries are poor, undereducated, and mostly third-world, although China is slowly catching up. Canada on the other hand is a first-world educated society, so the comparison is apt.
As far as Canadians coming to the US is concerned, I was responded to the claim that a Canadian political came here, and it was more than likely because of the quality of the particular care he needed, not because he couldn't receive care in his home country. Of course for people without health insurance, rationed care is better than no care at all, which is precisely why you choose to ignore the reality that people migrate out of this country all the time to receive more affordable care, and instead focus on the people migrating in.
Its really quite simple: for people who can afford it, the US has the best health care system bar none. For those who cannot afford it, it is the worst.
82
Mar 09, 2010 at 11:51 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ As a percentage of the Federal Budget Medicaid alone was 7% (7% of $3 Trillion or $210 Billion) in 2009. This doesn't include what New York State Contributes. Everyone is so concerned as you have proven with how much they will lose through rationing and your response is that nothing will be lost...look at my anecdotal evidence, The New York State Budget has a projected $9 billion shortfall in the next 13 months. Primarily this is caused by entitlement programs and bloated pension and retirees health benefits. The fact that up until now Medicaid was great because New York (and of course the Federal Government) was able to borrow cheaply is not proof that these services wont be cut or rationed when you double the number of people enrolling. ”
The US government spends that much money in Iraq alone per year, and I don't hear anyone on the Right complaining. If you eliminated or even reduced the immense fraud in these programs, they would be perfectly feasible. It's all a matter of priorities.
83
Mar 10, 2010 at 12:25 AM You are right it is simple. Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Can and will are two separate things. You aren't addressing my claim that rich people can access their own private health care system regardless of government insurance policy.
China and India are dishonest examples. Both countries are poor, undereducated, and mostly third-world, although China is slowly catching up. Canada on the other hand is a first-world educated society, so the comparison is apt.
As far as Canadians coming to the US is concerned, I was responded to the claim that a Canadian political came here, and it was more than likely because of the quality of the particular care he needed, not because he couldn't receive care in his home country. Of course for people without health insurance, rationed care is better than no care at all, which is precisely why you choose to ignore the reality that people migrate out of this country all the time to receive more affordable care, and instead focus on the people migrating in.
Its really quite simple: for people who can afford it, the US has the best health care system bar none. For those who cannot afford it, it is the worst. ”
It is simple but you are coming to the wrong conclusion...See my post above addressing Financing Health Care being badged as Health Care. The bottom line is reducing cost through a truly competitive market place moving away from managed care will inevitably reduce over all cost. Ergo people in lower income brackets will be able to afford the care without the need for an intermediary (I.E. Managed Care Provider). Read the whole article by David Goldhill, but prepare yourself it is extremely in depth and is very long.
In the current system this statement "for people who can afford it, the US has the best health care system bar none. For those who cannot afford it, it is the worst." But that is due to government related price distortions and incentives remove those from the equation and the market should correct itself and become more affordable.
84
Mar 10, 2010 at 12:36 AM I don't where you get your figures Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ The US government spends that much money in Iraq alone per year, and I don't hear anyone on the Right complaining. If you eliminated or even reduced the immense fraud in these programs, they would be perfectly feasible. It's all a matter of priorities. ”
Having looked up the statistics... we invaded Iraq in 2003 we have spent roughly $704 billion there (divide by 7 equals around 100 billion per year, not $210) regardless the war may feel interminable, and I agree that it should probably come to an end. But there is no direct correlation between Foreign War spending and domestic long term deficit creating wealth redistributing entitlement programs, that actually is interminable and doesn't just feel that way. As has been proven in almost any government program, when the program is created it is for the best intentions but in reality it just ends up being an expensive quagmire that generally mutate out of its stated purpose (See: Social Security). If the program didn't exist there couldn't be any fraud. The bigger problem is that more often than not it is not fraud but rather bloated and unchecked profit margins that ultimately increase costs. The government usually responds with price fixing (See: Medicare) translating into the service or goods provider getting creative about how to increase the bottom line. Such as increasing the churn rate (See: Medicare)
Bottom line: Price distortions are bad for everyone (See: Rent Control)
85
Mar 10, 2010 at 12:45 AM Milhouse Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ What Tiller did is not sanctioned by the Torah; Noachides are obligated to have a court system rather than vigilate justice. Tiller is the murderer here. ”
As usual, Charles Hall is being deliberately dishonest here. A rodef is not taken to court; he is cut down where he stands, before he has a chance to kill his next victim. There can be NO QUESTION whatsoever that Tiller was a rodef, and Mr Hall knows that very well, and therefore the hero who killed him will be welcomed Above by all of Tiller's victims, and all the babies whom Tiller would have murdered had he been allowed to live. Mr Hall can quote conflicting authorities when it comes to a yid who kills unborn babies, but Tiller was not a yid, and Mr Hall knows that the halacha about a goy who kills fetuses in the womb is clear and incapable of any reinterpretation: the abortionist is a murderer, subject to the death penalty if convicted in a court of law, and therefore his victims must be saved even at the cost of his life.
86
Mar 10, 2010 at 02:04 AM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ I am aware that Rush moved to Florida because it is a no-income-tax-state, but that doesn't change the point: Florida is a step up; Costa Rica is a a step down.
Thanks for telling me what I meant to say. I referenced 2001 and 2009 for they mark the beginning of the Bush and Obama presidencies. The figures are from the Wikipedia page titled "United States Public Debt," and they are perfectly accurate.
The 2010 national debt is estimated at 14.4 trillion which includes a 1.2 billion dollar deficit from the prior administration, and an 800 billion dollar stimulus package.
You can attempt to revise history all you'd like, but the numbers don't lie. ”
Boy do you have some serious problems with your numbers. Although, I can see how one could be confused by the wikipedia article. Debt and Deficit are 2 completely different things, and are barely related. Deficit is based on what was spent vs. what was projected. It does not necessarily mean that "debt" was or was not incurred. Apples and oranges. For example, Bush had plenty of deficits early on, but paid for them with the surplus money from the Clinton years. While he wasted billions of dollars, he did not actually incur that much debt.
That being said, the reason why the 2009 number is somewhat misleading is because Obama did not create or sign the 2009 budget. Bush did. The $1.4 TRILLION net deficit that so many liars like to quote for 2009 when they blame Obama is actually from Bush.
On average, we're not doing THAT badly on increases in the national debt (esp. considering we're in 2 wars). 1971-1980 was 131% increase. 1981-1990 was 252% increase. 1991-2000 was 76% increase. 2001-2010 (2010 est. at $14.45 trillion) will be 150%.
The phony outrage is just that.. phony.
87
Mar 10, 2010 at 03:38 AM Milhouse Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ If that's what you are commanded to do, why don't you go to one of the many gay neighbors, bars, clubs etc and shoot the place up? ”
For one thing, why should he? Even if he thinks it would be a good thing, why does that mean that he must do it himself? Do you think Mother Theresa was a heroine? If so, why don't you move to India and spend your life helping the sick? Oh, suddenly you discover that not everyone must do something just because it's good. So what's your tayna on #59?
88
Mar 10, 2010 at 03:40 AM Milhouse Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ If that's what you are commanded to do, why don't you go to one of the many gay neighbors, bars, clubs etc and shoot the place up? ”
In any case, crimes that are bein odom lachavero are up to a court, or to Hashem Himself to take care of. But when a person is routinely committing murder, and the law won't stop him, someone has to do something. Every possible legal means to stop Tiller had been tried, and it had failed. So he had to be stopped permanently.
89
Mar 10, 2010 at 03:47 AM Milhouse Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ The US government spends that much money in Iraq alone per year, and I don't hear anyone on the Right complaining. If you eliminated or even reduced the immense fraud in these programs, they would be perfectly feasible. It's all a matter of priorities. ”
Of course not. Go learn Bosi Legani -- when a country is at war it spends whatever is necessary to win. Defense is what government is FOR, so why should we complain that it's spending at least some of our money properly? The problem is that it also spends much more than that on all sorts of things that it has no business doing. Such as paying people's medical bills.
90
Mar 10, 2010 at 08:26 AM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Boy do you have some serious problems with your numbers. Although, I can see how one could be confused by the wikipedia article. Debt and Deficit are 2 completely different things, and are barely related. Deficit is based on what was spent vs. what was projected. It does not necessarily mean that "debt" was or was not incurred. Apples and oranges. For example, Bush had plenty of deficits early on, but paid for them with the surplus money from the Clinton years. While he wasted billions of dollars, he did not actually incur that much debt.
That being said, the reason why the 2009 number is somewhat misleading is because Obama did not create or sign the 2009 budget. Bush did. The $1.4 TRILLION net deficit that so many liars like to quote for 2009 when they blame Obama is actually from Bush.
On average, we're not doing THAT badly on increases in the national debt (esp. considering we're in 2 wars). 1971-1980 was 131% increase. 1981-1990 was 252% increase. 1991-2000 was 76% increase. 2001-2010 (2010 est. at $14.45 trillion) will be 150%.
The phony outrage is just that.. phony. ”
I am perfectly aware of the difference between deficit and debt, and the numbers I have quoted are indisputable. I fail to see what you are responding to. We agree. If you take a look at the back and forth, you will see that i was originally responding to the idea that Obama has created the enormous debt we have today, which is patently false.
I do take issue however, with the idea that "we're not doing that badly," regarding national debt. Any increase is a bad thing, be it the result of reckless wars or stimulus bills. Indebtedness ultimately destroys you.
91
Mar 10, 2010 at 08:32 AM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ In any case, crimes that are bein odom lachavero are up to a court, or to Hashem Himself to take care of. But when a person is routinely committing murder, and the law won't stop him, someone has to do something. Every possible legal means to stop Tiller had been tried, and it had failed. So he had to be stopped permanently. ”
You haven't answered the question. If you are under the impression that you are commanded to kill "sodomites and murderers" as the commenter suggested, and we assume you have no legal recourse with which to pursue this measure, do you condone the extrajudicial killing of sodomites?
92
Mar 10, 2010 at 09:46 AM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ He left New York for the good life in Florida, not to a third-world country with a per-capita income of $6900 a year, in which the rich live behind gated walls with security guards in fear of the common folk. You might want to pay a visit to the slums of San Jose before you set sail for a Spanish-speaking tourist playland that has no serious industry other than growing bananas. You would really move there if they just had a good school for your children? Right. Uh huh.
US national debt on January 2001: 5.6 trillion
US national debt on January 2009: 12.3 trillon
Yes; it was "Obama and the Democrats" who put us in this mess. ”
The budget deficit is projected to add another 9 TRILLION of debt over the next 10 years. From the OMB report last month:The White House Office of Management and Budget’s Mid-Session Review, an annual update between budgets, put the 10-year deficit estimate at $9.051 trillion, up from the previously projected $7 trillion. The administration had leaked the figure over the weekend. And thats being optimistic!
93
Mar 10, 2010 at 10:08 AM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ I'm failing to see how this is supposed to encourage Democrats to oppose the legislation. ”
it will raise consciousness with the People who can put pressure and, when empowered, have a voice.
94
Mar 10, 2010 at 01:16 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ The budget deficit is projected to add another 9 TRILLION of debt over the next 10 years. From the OMB report last month:The White House Office of Management and Budget’s Mid-Session Review, an annual update between budgets, put the 10-year deficit estimate at $9.051 trillion, up from the previously projected $7 trillion. The administration had leaked the figure over the weekend. And thats being optimistic! ”
The key word there is "projected." In other words, 9 trillion hasn't been added to the national debt as a result of budget shortfalls, it is projected that it will, assuming the status quo. What i was discussing was the current debt, which has more than doubled under the watch of the "fiscal conservatives" who controlled spending for 6 years and owned the veto pen between 2001-2009. That's an indisputable fact.
95
Mar 10, 2010 at 01:25 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
Idiots don't attack rush limbaugh he is very pro jewish
96
Mar 10, 2010 at 02:10 PM bobw Says:Report as Inappropriate
Good Bye Rush
97
Mar 10, 2010 at 02:59 PM Huh? Says:Report as Inappropriate
“ Idiots don't attack rush limbaugh he is very pro jewish ”
Please don't describe anybody so hateful and despicable as pro-Jewish. No good Jew I know would espouse the garbage spewed by this blight on humanity.
98
Mar 10, 2010 at 03:54 PM Anonymous Says:Report as Inappropriate
No. 88. Just curious,since you are so compassionate about the murder of Dr Tiller.Would you have done it yourself ?