Welcome, Guest! - or
Easy to remember!  »  VinNews.com

New York - Rabbi Horowitz: Well Intentioned, But Not Recommended - My Final Thoughts on Kol Yisroel Areivim

Published on:   May 27, 2010 04:05 PM
News Source:  Rabbi Yakov Horowitz
Change text size Text Size  
Bookmark and Share

New York - Areivim  has done an outstanding job of raising public consciousness about the matter of uninsured members of our community and the need to find a better way to do things other than the heartbreaking campaigns that regularly occur – and for this we all owe them a debt of gratitude.

As you can see from my correspondence  with Areivim, I proceeded with the utmost respect for their efforts, and merely wanted to conduct my diligence regarding their very well-intentioned project. The two members of Kol Yisrael Areivim ’s leadership with whom I met are polite, energetic people who are clearly motivated to help the klal – and are genuinely interested in receiving feedback. They have both invested enormous amounts of time and effort in this project and have been wildly successful in raising awareness about a critical subject.

Advertisement:

Unfortunately, the more I looked into the organization, the more issues presented themselves. All the while, I was contacted by numerous professionals and community leaders who felt that the model created is too problematic and they encouraged me to share that information with Areivim and with my readers. Therefore, with a heavy heart, I advise all my readers who are subscribed or contributors to Kol Yisroel Areivim to dissolve your relationship with them – and it would probably be wise to do so in writing and by certified mail with return receipt requested, so you can have proof of your disassociation.

The Brisker Rov zt’l famously stated that one of the main functions of a Rabbi is to advocate for and support the weakest members of his community – to give a voice to the voiceless. I hope that I have fulfilled that sacred responsibility by advocating for the widows and orphans who might fall through the cracks of a well-intentioned but poorly designed safety net at some point in the future.

The above is a shortened version of the article, to read the full article go to RabbiHorowitz.com 

Rabbi Yakov Horowitz is the founder and dean of Yeshiva Darchei Noam of Monsey, NY and founder and Director of Project Y.E.S. (Youth Enrichment Services).


More of today's headlines

New York - Assemblyman Dov Hikind (D-Brooklyn) is calling upon California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to take immediate action to address a seemingly growing... New York - U.S. Stocks had another turnaround Thursday and rocketed higher after China reassured investors it doesn't plan to sell the European debt it holds. The Dow...

 

Total132

Read Comments (132)  —  Post Yours »

1

 May 27, 2010 at 04:16 PM power up Says:

Who ever you are: your "usid liten es hadin". Who are you to decide on an organization that toils day and night for other people without making a profit.

Who are you to say your opinion on something that much bigger people said theirs.

Who gave you permission to abuse the platform you have.

Shame.

2

 May 27, 2010 at 04:18 PM Syracuse Maven Says:

I can understand that Rabbi Horowitz doesn't think that this Organization will have enough money down the road to cover all the donors for $100,000 per orphan, but why is it imperative to disassociate with them, after all it is a worthy Tzedakah that helps Almonas and Yesomim with your money.

3

 May 27, 2010 at 04:20 PM Anonymous Says:

Where does a single "yuchid" take the guts to say this is beyond me.

4

 May 27, 2010 at 04:22 PM Joel Rich Says:

Bshem omro-The Brisker Rov was quoting his father R' Chaim of Brisk (on whose gravestone was inscribed "Rav Chesed")
KT

5

 May 27, 2010 at 04:32 PM Askupeh Says:

I'm shocked, I know you well Rabbi Horowitz and know that you're a very responsible person, so how can you take it upon yourself such an Achreiyess with unforeseeable results? Some people are going to take your advice, but others won't therefore what happens then? Do we now become kiitois kitois? You had good questions and they had good answers and those questions you didn't ask, and those answers they didn't give, were supplied by many readers. Rabbi Horowitz, I respect you greatly, but cannot fathom how you, a one man team can take all this responsibility on you shoulders. Wouldn't it have been a better idea to call for an Asifa of Klal leaders to come to either conclusion? I personally have life insurance, but I joined anyhow and gladly paid the money when it was asked from me. I have a feeling that it has thousands of members like me; the main question remains, yes, you spoke up for the unfortunate God forbid future Almoness and Yesoimim, but did you speak correctly?

We can all be wrong, and maybe you’re right, but who can take such a responsibility?

6

 May 27, 2010 at 04:32 PM Anonymous Says:

Thank you for your well intentioned subtle character assassination of a fine institution.

7

 May 27, 2010 at 04:33 PM Joe Says:

From my experience it is run like a highschool project, total joke.

8

 May 27, 2010 at 04:36 PM BBB Says:

"The Brisker Rov zt’l famously stated that one of the main functions of a Rabbi is to advocate for and support the weakest members of his community"

I believe it was actually R' Chaim who said that.

9

 May 27, 2010 at 04:39 PM Anonymous Says:

The title says " Kol Yisroel Areivim" and in the article itself it says " Areivim". They are 2 separate organizations. Does Rabbi Horowitz hold the same about "Areivim"?

10

 May 27, 2010 at 04:40 PM Anonymous Says:

Is this recommendation only against being part of the organization "Kol Yisroel Areivim" and not the organization "Areivim" or it is against both organizations?

11

 May 27, 2010 at 05:35 PM jersey Yid Says:

Thank you Rabbi Horowitz. For those who doubt Rabbi Horowitz's conclusions you should read the correspondance yourself. It is full of evasive answers to the very straight forward questions posed. Make you own conclusion.

12

 May 27, 2010 at 05:34 PM Rabbi Horowitz Just Posted Says:

Rabbi Horowitz just posted this on his website:


To Clarify:

I met with the heads of Kol Yisroel Arevim which is supported by Vaad Harabbanim.

However, the problems are the same with any of the 3 programs because they are all well-intentioned attempts to "recreate the wheel" and make an insurance program.

There are huge legal issues with that, aside from the practical logistical nightmares it will create.

As I see it, there are two options:

1) Do what I suggest and help people buy commercial life insurance.

or

2) Continue the Arevim model as is -- but make it a pure tzedaka, meaning that you sign up to give money if there is c'v a tragedy. That way there are no legal issues and it is much simpler. (I suggested that to the Arevim people as well.)

As for the confusion between the 3 "Arevims", that is part of the problem that I didn't create. It IS confusing. And I am pretty sure that most people did not know that there were 3 Arevim programs in the first place.

And the issue with the endorsements needs a great deal of work.

I hope that clarifies matters -- at least my position.

13

 May 27, 2010 at 04:52 PM I agree Says:

The people running areivem DONT have a good business history.....

14

 May 27, 2010 at 04:56 PM yankel Says:

Reply to #1  
power up Says:

Who ever you are: your "usid liten es hadin". Who are you to decide on an organization that toils day and night for other people without making a profit.

Who are you to say your opinion on something that much bigger people said theirs.

Who gave you permission to abuse the platform you have.

Shame.

whats your question? you want to know who Rabbi Horowitz is? due some research like he did on Areivim & then you will know who he is.
I dont know Rabbi Horowitz, but I do know that he did a lot of research about this organiation, he spoke to the people who run it & asked them many different question and he based his dicision after weeks of going through all the detail.
My question is WHO ARE YOU? who has the chutzpah to be mevazeh so blatently a talmud chochom, a rov, a rabbi, a marbitz torah who has done more for klall yisroel then you will ever do in six lifetimes.
so i hope that now you know who Rabbi Horowitz is

15

 May 27, 2010 at 05:02 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #1  
power up Says:

Who ever you are: your "usid liten es hadin". Who are you to decide on an organization that toils day and night for other people without making a profit.

Who are you to say your opinion on something that much bigger people said theirs.

Who gave you permission to abuse the platform you have.

Shame.

this seems to be a comment of someone with an interest in the org. it looks, from their answers, that its another fund raising organziation, like Kupat Hair, spending big moneys on advertisement, displaying outragously gdoley Israel for their cheap advertisments.

16

 May 27, 2010 at 05:11 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #2  
Syracuse Maven Says:

I can understand that Rabbi Horowitz doesn't think that this Organization will have enough money down the road to cover all the donors for $100,000 per orphan, but why is it imperative to disassociate with them, after all it is a worthy Tzedakah that helps Almonas and Yesomim with your money.

Rabbi Horowitz is 100% Right, the Fact is that the vast majority of yungerleit in our community could afford to buy an adequate amount of Term Life Insurance, by signing up with Areivim they will Not buy Life Insurance and there is NO GUARANTEE that Areivim will be around in 10, 15 or 20 years

17

 May 27, 2010 at 05:12 PM Yossi Says:

We live in a internet world where a Rabbi can make conclusions and bury an organization like Areivim...I know of 2 almunes who benefit from them and b"h they received the $$$ what areivim stands for..How does Rabbi Horowitz take the achreies to condem such an org......I think he need Al Chyte with a hammer for this one......

18

 May 27, 2010 at 05:16 PM Anonymous Says:

I have a simple solution for areivim to come clean. A)the accounting firm you employ to come out with a letter of recommendation.(And it has to be a reputable firm) B)the board of directors / rabbis declare their stance(and these officers should be popular community leaders). After all playing with yesomim and almonos money is a huge aveiroh. And if this is ultimately legid , then hashem will bench you with kol tuv!!

19

 May 27, 2010 at 05:20 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #3  
Anonymous Says:

Where does a single "yuchid" take the guts to say this is beyond me.

He is Not a Yuchid anyone who knows a bit about finances agrees with him.

20

 May 27, 2010 at 05:23 PM Anonymous Says:

Areivim was founded here in the USA by about 20 chesed organizations and project coordinators. They have a well staffed office and are running it very professionally; people are getting signed up, getting their confirmations, members are getting notified by phone, email, etc before money is taken etc. They have a vaad of rabbonim, a vaad balei batim etc. and boruch hashem to date they helped a nice few almonos and yesomim, a family Lakewood, a family in Williamsburg, a family in Monsey etc,
Hashem should help that the organization should close down fast, we shouldn’t need their services anymore, but in the meantime I wish them great hatzloche

21

 May 27, 2010 at 05:27 PM torahis1 Says:

Thank you R' Horowitz. Showing us all once again what a true leader you are with true courage.

This is leadership we so desperately need nowadays, which is lacking.

22

 May 27, 2010 at 05:50 PM pupa rebbe Says:

You don't need to know rabbi horwitz to know this makes no sense and also illegal in america

Its a shame that our leaders are not educated financially and make such weird organizations based on no cheshbon

23

 May 27, 2010 at 06:03 PM power up Says:

Reply to #14  
yankel Says:

whats your question? you want to know who Rabbi Horowitz is? due some research like he did on Areivim & then you will know who he is.
I dont know Rabbi Horowitz, but I do know that he did a lot of research about this organiation, he spoke to the people who run it & asked them many different question and he based his dicision after weeks of going through all the detail.
My question is WHO ARE YOU? who has the chutzpah to be mevazeh so blatently a talmud chochom, a rov, a rabbi, a marbitz torah who has done more for klall yisroel then you will ever do in six lifetimes.
so i hope that now you know who Rabbi Horowitz is

Yes my dear "wise guy" I have been involved in a case where they paid money I have seen them up close, and I have personally spoken to several rabbi's who are behind this, I have no interest now in this org. But I have seen them at the wheel, he should be ashamed of him self, so should VIN news for runninng his quote on quote "advice".

Now the fact is, nothing is perfect , its possible that kol yisroel areivim is not perfect, its possible that areivim is not perfect, where can he make things better not destroy????!!!!!
This is what I need rabbi horowitz for????!!!

And this whole "reinventing the wheel " things is non sense, they are not reinventing any wheel, they do not need the life insurance companys statistics because they don't work for a profit, its a proven system in israel, and they are here to bring the system to the US.

Again, destroying is easy, let me see advice to build, to create, work hard to help, and make it better, then I will have respect for rabbi horowitz.

24

 May 27, 2010 at 06:08 PM Simcha Says:

In theory this is a great idea, but it does not stand a chance of succeeding.

25

 May 27, 2010 at 06:11 PM Anonymous Says:

the fact that people complain shows there doing something good

26

 May 27, 2010 at 06:12 PM Simcha Says:

Reply to #14  
yankel Says:

whats your question? you want to know who Rabbi Horowitz is? due some research like he did on Areivim & then you will know who he is.
I dont know Rabbi Horowitz, but I do know that he did a lot of research about this organiation, he spoke to the people who run it & asked them many different question and he based his dicision after weeks of going through all the detail.
My question is WHO ARE YOU? who has the chutzpah to be mevazeh so blatently a talmud chochom, a rov, a rabbi, a marbitz torah who has done more for klall yisroel then you will ever do in six lifetimes.
so i hope that now you know who Rabbi Horowitz is

amen, brother!

27

 May 27, 2010 at 06:23 PM Simcha Says:

Reply to #17  
Yossi Says:

We live in a internet world where a Rabbi can make conclusions and bury an organization like Areivim...I know of 2 almunes who benefit from them and b"h they received the $$$ what areivim stands for..How does Rabbi Horowitz take the achreies to condem such an org......I think he need Al Chyte with a hammer for this one......

al chyte with a hammer, huh? well aren't you the funny guy? did you ever run a business? why don't you find out how many people are behind in their payments?
i assure you this kind of plan would be very well funded....in the beginning.
Eventually over time, it unintentionally assumes the Pyramid effect (not scheme).
go hammer out some common sense.

28

 May 27, 2010 at 06:27 PM Mendel Zilberberg Says:

Reply to #20  
Anonymous Says:

Areivim was founded here in the USA by about 20 chesed organizations and project coordinators. They have a well staffed office and are running it very professionally; people are getting signed up, getting their confirmations, members are getting notified by phone, email, etc before money is taken etc. They have a vaad of rabbonim, a vaad balei batim etc. and boruch hashem to date they helped a nice few almonos and yesomim, a family Lakewood, a family in Williamsburg, a family in Monsey etc,
Hashem should help that the organization should close down fast, we shouldn’t need their services anymore, but in the meantime I wish them great hatzloche

I have one question for you. If an organization says they have certain board members and the reported board members say it is not so, should the organization be trusted. Especially, an organization that will be entrusted with huge sums anf there is a long time horizon, where trust is vital.

We can put this issue to rest very quickly, contact Yatty Wienreb, Abe Roth or Abe Biderman and ask them if they are directors of the organization. If they are Rabbi Horowitz (a dear friend of mine) is in the dog house. If they aren't, lets all thank Rabbi Horowitz.

This way we do not have to speculate if a few askonim can create a life insurance model that is more efficient and reliable than New York Life, if this model is legal based on prevailing insurance law, and if this is a proper activity for a charity based on IRS code as opposed to our understanding of tzedakah

As an aside, if you were purchasing life insurance to potentially protect your wife and children would you choose Prudential, John Hancock, New York Life or Arievim.

Rabbi Horowitz took the time to deal with this in a proper and dignified manner. If any readers take exception fell free to put him to the test.

29

 May 27, 2010 at 06:29 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #17  
Yossi Says:

We live in a internet world where a Rabbi can make conclusions and bury an organization like Areivim...I know of 2 almunes who benefit from them and b"h they received the $$$ what areivim stands for..How does Rabbi Horowitz take the achreies to condem such an org......I think he need Al Chyte with a hammer for this one......

Rabbi Horowitz is talking only from Kol Yisroel Areivim not from Areivim

30

 May 27, 2010 at 06:38 PM Anonymous Says:

Before you badmouth Rabbi Horowitz,Just imagine the following scenario, Yankel is 35 yers and healthy he could without any problem afford to buy plenty of Life Insurance but he just signs up with Areivim thinking he will have free Life Insurance, in 10 years from now Areivim for whatever reason is no longer around, Yankel is now 45 with 10 children but has Medical Condition and can't buy Life Insurance or ch"v Yankel passed away and his almonah and yesomim are pennyless, why, since Yankel could have bought a Life Insurance and did not since he was made to believe that Areivim is Free Life Insurance and now his family will nebech suffer

31

 May 27, 2010 at 06:56 PM Anonymous Says:

Being Motzti Shem Ra on an organization that has already helped L.A. several
Almonos and Yesomin, is a VERY SINFUL act.
I am a member, whose children are B.H. married. When I receive the calls
from Areivim I am more than happy to be part of such a great mitzva, that cost so little..
Areivim is Mezake the Rabbim, by making thousands of people contribute to
each cause.
Nothing is garuanteed, and down the road, I hate to tell you that insurance
companies can also go bankrupt. Everybody has his own mazel, and so
does the beneficiary.
I hate to tell you, but we invested in insurance companies in Europe and
got back pennies on the dollars when the policies matured!
We are not supposed to play G-d, we must do Hishtadlus, and the outcome
does not depend on us. In the meantime, thousands of people gave
Tzedaka (by not making too big a dent in anybody's pocket), quite a number
of needy people were helped B'derech Kovod, WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO
SAY, "IF YOU CAN'T FIX IT BREAK IT?"
Causing people to refrain from giving Tzedaka is a big Aveira,
This news blog did not sound like constructive criticism, this should never
have gone public, its a big shame (good intentions is not an excuse

32

 May 27, 2010 at 07:02 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #24  
Simcha Says:

In theory this is a great idea, but it does not stand a chance of succeeding.

It already suceeded, ask the yesoimim who benefitted.

33

 May 27, 2010 at 07:03 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #27  
Simcha Says:

al chyte with a hammer, huh? well aren't you the funny guy? did you ever run a business? why don't you find out how many people are behind in their payments?
i assure you this kind of plan would be very well funded....in the beginning.
Eventually over time, it unintentionally assumes the Pyramid effect (not scheme).
go hammer out some common sense.

A pyramid means that some are on top and some are on the bottom, who is here on top and who on bottom?

34

 May 27, 2010 at 07:08 PM Actuary Vayb Says:

My wife is an actuary, and she like almost all actuaries she knows are shocked by this program and very upset that people are participating rather than purchasing basic term life. There is numerous problems with this program including the lack of real underwriting, lack of any real transparency and oversight, lack of any financial soundness assessment, and much more. Folks are asking for trouble here.

This organization needs to get a frum actuary to run a full analysis and then present it publicly. They also need to have an enforceable legal structure where it isnt just a "board" who decides who get what instead of the flimsy benefit structure there is now. Also, they need to have a very public list of administration and staff so people know who they are giving their money to.

Until this is done, people are asking for serious trouble.

35

 May 27, 2010 at 07:09 PM Anonymous Says:

I don't understand rabbi Horowitz how he takes his numbers that they won't have money to pay $100000 for each yosem this is not N investmet to get money back this is only if unfortch

This is not a investment to get back money it's only if Ch"I sombody needs it they ask money from the members thanks god I have a life insurance also some other investmen and I am a member I also had my married children becomeing members
"this is not a investment"

36

 May 27, 2010 at 07:13 PM A former 8th Grader Says:

Reply to #5  
Askupeh Says:

I'm shocked, I know you well Rabbi Horowitz and know that you're a very responsible person, so how can you take it upon yourself such an Achreiyess with unforeseeable results? Some people are going to take your advice, but others won't therefore what happens then? Do we now become kiitois kitois? You had good questions and they had good answers and those questions you didn't ask, and those answers they didn't give, were supplied by many readers. Rabbi Horowitz, I respect you greatly, but cannot fathom how you, a one man team can take all this responsibility on you shoulders. Wouldn't it have been a better idea to call for an Asifa of Klal leaders to come to either conclusion? I personally have life insurance, but I joined anyhow and gladly paid the money when it was asked from me. I have a feeling that it has thousands of members like me; the main question remains, yes, you spoke up for the unfortunate God forbid future Almoness and Yesoimim, but did you speak correctly?

We can all be wrong, and maybe you’re right, but who can take such a responsibility?

Who can take such responsibility? Funny you should ask. Why, clearly, Rabbi Horowitz can. The only thing shocking is how sad it is that Rabboim with real guts and broad shoulders are in such short supply.

37

 May 27, 2010 at 07:50 PM Anonymous Says:

Rabbi Horowitz gives good advice in his article. and that is for anyone interested in insuring that people buy life insurance and not be in a situation where it is possible that they may leave almonois r"l with a burden on the community to support etc. this is the direction that they should go.

That is: make a campaign to encourage people to purchase term life which is much cheaper than whole life and covers you for your working years at least. Then raise funds and help people pay the premiums for term life.

38

 May 27, 2010 at 07:52 PM Anonymous Says:

Whats the different between the 3 Areivim programs thats out there??

39

 May 27, 2010 at 07:54 PM Anonymous Says:

Is this a Ponzi game all over again .

40

 May 27, 2010 at 07:58 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #31  
Anonymous Says:

Being Motzti Shem Ra on an organization that has already helped L.A. several
Almonos and Yesomin, is a VERY SINFUL act.
I am a member, whose children are B.H. married. When I receive the calls
from Areivim I am more than happy to be part of such a great mitzva, that cost so little..
Areivim is Mezake the Rabbim, by making thousands of people contribute to
each cause.
Nothing is garuanteed, and down the road, I hate to tell you that insurance
companies can also go bankrupt. Everybody has his own mazel, and so
does the beneficiary.
I hate to tell you, but we invested in insurance companies in Europe and
got back pennies on the dollars when the policies matured!
We are not supposed to play G-d, we must do Hishtadlus, and the outcome
does not depend on us. In the meantime, thousands of people gave
Tzedaka (by not making too big a dent in anybody's pocket), quite a number
of needy people were helped B'derech Kovod, WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO
SAY, "IF YOU CAN'T FIX IT BREAK IT?"
Causing people to refrain from giving Tzedaka is a big Aveira,
This news blog did not sound like constructive criticism, this should never
have gone public, its a big shame (good intentions is not an excuse

500,000- 1million dollars per insurance company is backed by the state. Anyhow the cost of a 500,000 term policy could run you as little as 15 dollars a month*

41

 May 27, 2010 at 08:04 PM yossel Says:

Reply to #35  
Anonymous Says:

I don't understand rabbi Horowitz how he takes his numbers that they won't have money to pay $100000 for each yosem this is not N investmet to get money back this is only if unfortch

This is not a investment to get back money it's only if Ch"I sombody needs it they ask money from the members thanks god I have a life insurance also some other investmen and I am a member I also had my married children becomeing members
"this is not a investment"

hey if you have life insurance, you (your heirs) are in for a surprise. they won't get paid a cent. areivim specifically says that if the person has assets or insurance they will not cover

42

 May 27, 2010 at 08:10 PM ah nechtiger tug Says:

There is a very informative letter from an actuary in this weeks "Readers Write" section of the Yated. In it, the writer explains in great detail (with mathematical equations to support his hypothesis) why Arevim structures are not, in any way, viable. Definitely worth the read...

43

 May 27, 2010 at 08:10 PM DovBear Says:

Anyone who wants to see why Rabbi Horowitz is advising all of you to drop areivim can go to his website where its all spelled out nice and clear. For starters they wouldn't answer his basic questions . For ex

They won't say who their posek is
They won't name any of the "hundreds" of Rabbis who supposedly not only endorse the program but are "investing time, energy and heart in this project, one which has become a priority to them."
They won't provide a full list of board members, and 3 of the 16 people who were named contacted Rabbi Horowitz after their names were linked to the organization to deny any involvement.(In other words, they lied)
hey won't name the people who run the office.
They won't name the actuaries, lawyers and accountants who allegedly signed of on the program
They sidestepped questions about payments, fees and commissions.
They wouldn't explain how investment or disbursement decisions will be made
They wouldn't explain how grievances are addressed, or what is done if someone feels they've been mistreated

I have more on my blog dovbear.blogspot.com (I'm running out of characters here)

44

 May 27, 2010 at 08:10 PM Anonymous Says:

I've met with Kol Yisrael Areyvim on numerous occasions and while the heads of the organization are very well mannered people, many questions I posed were left either unanswered or answered in a very round about way. There was no transparancy as to who was responsible in the organization as well as where the "money" is held and how it was distributed. Additionally, their presentation was more focused on getting more people into a group and obtaining there credit card information, which in my mind was a red flag. While the people who i met with were polite, respectful and wanted to help yesomim I did not see it being a fit in promoting there work to the Klal.

45

 May 27, 2010 at 08:12 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #1  
power up Says:

Who ever you are: your "usid liten es hadin". Who are you to decide on an organization that toils day and night for other people without making a profit.

Who are you to say your opinion on something that much bigger people said theirs.

Who gave you permission to abuse the platform you have.

Shame.

You have the chutzpah to question Rabbi Horowitz. You know how I know Rabbi Horowtz is right is the fact that people like you are screaming and getting all meshugah. When someone is wrong on an issue there is maybe 2 posts and no commotion. But look what is going on in the community and 99% of the people agree with Rabbi Horowitz just by looking at the forum on the jewish blogs.

Secondly, Rabbi Eli Teitelbaum Zt"l used to scream bout these issue all the time and he also was mocked, made fun of and only when it was popular to "agree" with Reb Eli did everyone take credit for things that he screamed about over and over again. There are not too many people that have the guts like Reb Eli did or like Rabbi Horowitz does and this , in my opinion is really what the root of the problem is. We don't like hearing anything about the truth in our communities and we don't like the word CHANGE.

When Rabbi Horowitz screamed about kids at risk when that was not the popular thing to even talk about , everyone including this blog said feh with Rabbi Horowitz and mocked him. Would anyone have the chutzpha today not to recognize and give credit to Rabbi Horowitz today for changing the status quo?

46

 May 27, 2010 at 08:19 PM Flatbush Yid Says:

Reply to #28  
Mendel Zilberberg Says:

I have one question for you. If an organization says they have certain board members and the reported board members say it is not so, should the organization be trusted. Especially, an organization that will be entrusted with huge sums anf there is a long time horizon, where trust is vital.

We can put this issue to rest very quickly, contact Yatty Wienreb, Abe Roth or Abe Biderman and ask them if they are directors of the organization. If they are Rabbi Horowitz (a dear friend of mine) is in the dog house. If they aren't, lets all thank Rabbi Horowitz.

This way we do not have to speculate if a few askonim can create a life insurance model that is more efficient and reliable than New York Life, if this model is legal based on prevailing insurance law, and if this is a proper activity for a charity based on IRS code as opposed to our understanding of tzedakah

As an aside, if you were purchasing life insurance to potentially protect your wife and children would you choose Prudential, John Hancock, New York Life or Arievim.

Rabbi Horowitz took the time to deal with this in a proper and dignified manner. If any readers take exception fell free to put him to the test.

Why is everyone associating KYA with life insurance? All members are just pledging to help each other financially if the need should c"v arise.

I'm one of 8 brothers, and we all agree that if one of us should c"v be niftar at a young age, we'll all do whatever we can to help out his family, financially and in every way. Do you think we competing with an insurance company? Aren't all Jews brothers?

I personally have adequate life insurance, buy I'm still signed up for KYA. I want to help yesomim even though if I die young my children won't be on the receiving end.

I'm a client of one of the professionals you mention in your comment (I won't mention which one), and he told me about KYA and that he loves the idea. He said he devoted alot of time to help work out many details. I also reviewed the math and actuarial mortality tables and I don't see anything wrong with the numbers. As far as Rabbi Horowitz's financial advice - I'm sure it's "Well Intentioned, But Not Recommended". I'd anytime take the financial advice of a business professional over a rabbi's. Questions regarding Torah and Mitzvos should be forwarded to a rabbi.

47

 May 27, 2010 at 08:20 PM mendy Says:

In know way am i agreeing or disagreeing with RH I just want clarification

Why is pyramid or the classic chain letter a scheme.

The answer is that in chain letter you give me the first $5 for no LOGICAL reason, since I am not obligated to return you anything.

Looking at another angle: Why do I have to give $5 to your chain letter, I can start one myself and you give me $5,

The same is with areivim the first people paying out have no commitment in recpricate, since any member can decide to drop out. Getting new members is equivalent to getting new succers to bail out the old ones.

Furthermore, as pointed out at any given moment the progaram is not self sufficient should there be ch"v greater needs than their optimistic model.

But my main point is again since in theory all members can stop paying without penalty and leave the program the members have noting in hand.

48

 May 27, 2010 at 08:31 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #1  
power up Says:

Who ever you are: your "usid liten es hadin". Who are you to decide on an organization that toils day and night for other people without making a profit.

Who are you to say your opinion on something that much bigger people said theirs.

Who gave you permission to abuse the platform you have.

Shame.

Who are the "bigger people"? That one of the major problems - the refusal to provide names of the people who are supposedly involved with this endeavor.

49

 May 27, 2010 at 08:38 PM actual member Says:

I am a proud Member of Areivim. I understood that this is not adequate insurance, but unfortunately, there are many people who don't afford even minimal life insurance. For them, this program is mamesh hatzolas nefoshos. I feel that this is tzedakah money well spent. Does anyone have a better idea of how to save a drowning penniless family? Cooling people off from sharing in this mitzvah is arrogant and plain rishus.

50

 May 27, 2010 at 08:41 PM Anonymous Says:

Our biggest problem is when you have Gedolei Yisroel that are put in the forefront of an organization and know very little if anything about it.
1. Go to any godol and say you want to open a tzedokah fund, he will clearly give you brochos and say its great
2. go to any godol and say you are advocating learning 5 mishnas a day for every child, wow thats great. Who will say don't learn
3. Go to a godol and say we should observe an extra 5 minutes shabbos every week before candle lighting l'tovas that kinderlich should have a refuah, who will say no.
4. I want to open a yeshiva for baal tshuva, Avadeh, sure mit asach mazal etc etc

I have been there and know that this is the situation. Therefore when someone says that these organizations are backed by gedolim, they mean less than nothing.

Instaed of writing maasis about Rav Horowitz, discuss facts how he is wrong. Do not speak around the issue. Hit it directly if you can

51

 May 27, 2010 at 08:44 PM Anonymous Says:

Rabbi Horowitz spent much time and investigated this thoroughly before he would put his name on paper advising other avenues for life insurance. He would never do this without thought and restraint. There are not too many Rabbis (He is really not a "Rav") who speak out and are not afraid to buck the system. He is a good man and does a tremendous amount of good for Klal Yisrael.

52

 May 27, 2010 at 08:49 PM Flatbush Yid Says:

Reply to #34  
Actuary Vayb Says:

My wife is an actuary, and she like almost all actuaries she knows are shocked by this program and very upset that people are participating rather than purchasing basic term life. There is numerous problems with this program including the lack of real underwriting, lack of any real transparency and oversight, lack of any financial soundness assessment, and much more. Folks are asking for trouble here.

This organization needs to get a frum actuary to run a full analysis and then present it publicly. They also need to have an enforceable legal structure where it isnt just a "board" who decides who get what instead of the flimsy benefit structure there is now. Also, they need to have a very public list of administration and staff so people know who they are giving their money to.

Until this is done, people are asking for serious trouble.

With all due respect to your Vayb, no one is suggesting you forgo basic term life insurance for Kol Yisrael Areivim. All they are saying that in addition to being responsible and buying life insurance, you join a program and pledge to help the yesomim of others who didn't have the financial means to be as responsible as you are.

The problems your wife cites:
lack of real underwriting - the mortality tables are readily available and include smoker and non-smokers and people with all different medical rating. An insurance company needs underwriting because they price the policy to each individual, so that a person in poor health pays more than someone in better health. Here everyone pays the same and therefore there is no need for individual underwriting.

cont.

53

 May 27, 2010 at 08:57 PM Flatbush Yid Says:

Reply to #34  
Actuary Vayb Says:

My wife is an actuary, and she like almost all actuaries she knows are shocked by this program and very upset that people are participating rather than purchasing basic term life. There is numerous problems with this program including the lack of real underwriting, lack of any real transparency and oversight, lack of any financial soundness assessment, and much more. Folks are asking for trouble here.

This organization needs to get a frum actuary to run a full analysis and then present it publicly. They also need to have an enforceable legal structure where it isnt just a "board" who decides who get what instead of the flimsy benefit structure there is now. Also, they need to have a very public list of administration and staff so people know who they are giving their money to.

Until this is done, people are asking for serious trouble.

lack of any real transparency and oversight - I didn't see much transparency and oversight with any almona and yesomim drives (don't even get me started with the Japan bachurim tzedakos). Do you advocate not giving tzedakah do unless you get to hand it to an almona in her hand and check her bank statements if she truly needs it? the bottom line is, if you die and your family needs financial assistance, they contact your Rav and Kol Yisrael Areivim and they will collect the funds for them.

lack of any financial soundness assessment - No investments are ever made without "your" Rav. Kol Yisrael Areivim only collects the money.

and much more - care to elaborate?

This organization needs to get a frum actuary - they had many professionals working on this , and I'm assuming this would include frum actuaries (I'm not sure - but can be confirmed with the organization)

They also need to have an enforceable legal structure - does any other tzedakah drive have an enforceable legal structure?

need to have a very public list of administration and staff - it seems that professionals with a list of clients in their private practice don't like to be associated with controversy.
cont.

54

 May 27, 2010 at 09:01 PM Flatbush Yid Says:

Reply to #34  
Actuary Vayb Says:

My wife is an actuary, and she like almost all actuaries she knows are shocked by this program and very upset that people are participating rather than purchasing basic term life. There is numerous problems with this program including the lack of real underwriting, lack of any real transparency and oversight, lack of any financial soundness assessment, and much more. Folks are asking for trouble here.

This organization needs to get a frum actuary to run a full analysis and then present it publicly. They also need to have an enforceable legal structure where it isnt just a "board" who decides who get what instead of the flimsy benefit structure there is now. Also, they need to have a very public list of administration and staff so people know who they are giving their money to.

Until this is done, people are asking for serious trouble.

look at how many people and organizations who worked on it and endorsed it, are chickening out and not agreeing to publicly vouch for this organization's legitimacy.

Until this is done, people are asking for serious trouble - I would just say, that if this is undone c"v, we're all asking for serious trouble.

I think you're wife either didn't take the time to do her due diligence on KYA, or might not be an actuary at all.

56

 May 27, 2010 at 09:28 PM Anonymous Says:

Areivim, never told anyone to cancel their life insurance policy, or not to
buy one.
But I know several people that fell into hard times and were forced to
let their policies lapse.
So, don't put your faith in the Life Insurance, I have a good friend who did
fabulously at being a broker, and he dropped it, because he felt it was a
Huge Ponzi scheme, and he didn't want to victimize his brethern.
People struggle to pay the premiums, only to receive the death benefit
which so many years later is worth almost nothing.
Forty years ago, my husband bought a $25,000.00 life policy. At that time
it seemed like a fortune. We rationed our meager income to pay the
premium, now what was 25,000 worth 20-25 years later when we were
marrying children? B.H. we married our children, but Och un Vei
if we would have had to redeem the worthless policy!
We have to put our faith in Hashem, and Hashem surely gets Naches
Ruach from thousands of Yidden who in joint effort were able to help
the widows and orphans, in this great zchus, everybody should be zoche
to marry of their children and grandchildren gezunterheit ad biyas goal
tzedek.

57

 May 27, 2010 at 09:39 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #45  
Anonymous Says:

You have the chutzpah to question Rabbi Horowitz. You know how I know Rabbi Horowtz is right is the fact that people like you are screaming and getting all meshugah. When someone is wrong on an issue there is maybe 2 posts and no commotion. But look what is going on in the community and 99% of the people agree with Rabbi Horowitz just by looking at the forum on the jewish blogs.

Secondly, Rabbi Eli Teitelbaum Zt"l used to scream bout these issue all the time and he also was mocked, made fun of and only when it was popular to "agree" with Reb Eli did everyone take credit for things that he screamed about over and over again. There are not too many people that have the guts like Reb Eli did or like Rabbi Horowitz does and this , in my opinion is really what the root of the problem is. We don't like hearing anything about the truth in our communities and we don't like the word CHANGE.

When Rabbi Horowitz screamed about kids at risk when that was not the popular thing to even talk about , everyone including this blog said feh with Rabbi Horowitz and mocked him. Would anyone have the chutzpha today not to recognize and give credit to Rabbi Horowitz today for changing the status quo?

Just because he does a fabulous job with Kids at Risk, doesn't mean that
he is now an authority on every issue of Chessed.
He is a wonderful Mechanech (his articles are fabulous), but please
leave Almonos and Yesomim alone.
Fargin them the money that is raised by Areivim, and as long as it lasts,
it will last.
We have to do Hishtadlus, Hashem makes it happen.
Mir darfen tun, nisht auftun!

58

 May 27, 2010 at 09:45 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #32  
Anonymous Says:

It already suceeded, ask the yesoimim who benefitted.

They don't want to publish the board members, actuarys accountants , the yesiomim who benefited. Gut in himel why is there always another scam by yissidshe kinder?!

59

 May 27, 2010 at 09:50 PM Flatbush Yid Says:

Reply to #43  
DovBear Says:

Anyone who wants to see why Rabbi Horowitz is advising all of you to drop areivim can go to his website where its all spelled out nice and clear. For starters they wouldn't answer his basic questions . For ex

They won't say who their posek is
They won't name any of the "hundreds" of Rabbis who supposedly not only endorse the program but are "investing time, energy and heart in this project, one which has become a priority to them."
They won't provide a full list of board members, and 3 of the 16 people who were named contacted Rabbi Horowitz after their names were linked to the organization to deny any involvement.(In other words, they lied)
hey won't name the people who run the office.
They won't name the actuaries, lawyers and accountants who allegedly signed of on the program
They sidestepped questions about payments, fees and commissions.
They wouldn't explain how investment or disbursement decisions will be made
They wouldn't explain how grievances are addressed, or what is done if someone feels they've been mistreated

I have more on my blog dovbear.blogspot.com (I'm running out of characters here)

They won't say who their posek is-
is there any question that we need to collect money for poor yesomim? Why do you need a posek? and they did mention names of two very prominent Rabbanim in Boro Park.

They won't name any of the "hundreds" of Rabbis...
They won't provide a full list of board members...-
To be honest , I'm very disappointed with many board members and rabbanim that are afraid and will not give public support when controversy arises. Do you really think that an organization would give names and lie when it's so easy to verify if they are really on board. I'm a client of one professional, and I assume he doesn't want to have his name publicly linked to KYA for fear that controversy will drive away clients, or perhaps professionally he isn't allowed to vouch for it only if he personally audits all documents (such as forming the non-profit filings etc.) Whatever the case may be, he told me personally that he thinks it's great and helped with forming KYA. (He only worked with KYA - he was not very happy with the others - not sure why - I don't know why they don't just all join KYA b'achdus)

cont.

60

 May 27, 2010 at 09:52 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #54  
Flatbush Yid Says:

look at how many people and organizations who worked on it and endorsed it, are chickening out and not agreeing to publicly vouch for this organization's legitimacy.

Until this is done, people are asking for serious trouble - I would just say, that if this is undone c"v, we're all asking for serious trouble.

I think you're wife either didn't take the time to do her due diligence on KYA, or might not be an actuary at all.

Check the credentials before you talk.
The Chorbon Bais Hamikdash came about because they spoke with their mouth,
that which they did not hear with their ears.
You are taking a wonderful thing; a joint effort of thousands of people helping
bereived families and bad mouthing it.
Nobody is "investing" money, people are donating money...a couple of dollars
per orphan! Whats this huge outcry about??
My father zl. used to say that we have to give a lot of money for tzedaka to
assure that we get the real zechus of mitzvas tzedaka, this way we can hope that some of it goes to real needy and worthy causes.
If we want Hashem to bestow parnosa without scrutinizing whether we are
deserving, we should not scrutinize our Tzedaka with a magnifying glass.
Let us not be like Amalek who was Bekorcho Baderech, he cooled off
a good thing.
I'm not insinuating in any way that Rabbi Horowitz isn't a wonderful man,
he has tons of zechusim and helped many ,many people, but great people
have also made mistakes!

61

 May 27, 2010 at 09:55 PM Baal Habos Says:

Reply to #17  
Yossi Says:

We live in a internet world where a Rabbi can make conclusions and bury an organization like Areivim...I know of 2 almunes who benefit from them and b"h they received the $$$ what areivim stands for..How does Rabbi Horowitz take the achreies to condem such an org......I think he need Al Chyte with a hammer for this one......

Some organizations deserve to be buried.

62

 May 27, 2010 at 09:56 PM Baal Habos Says:

Reply to #57  
Anonymous Says:

Just because he does a fabulous job with Kids at Risk, doesn't mean that
he is now an authority on every issue of Chessed.
He is a wonderful Mechanech (his articles are fabulous), but please
leave Almonos and Yesomim alone.
Fargin them the money that is raised by Areivim, and as long as it lasts,
it will last.
We have to do Hishtadlus, Hashem makes it happen.
Mir darfen tun, nisht auftun!

Mir darfen tun, mit seichel.

63

 May 27, 2010 at 09:57 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #58  
Anonymous Says:

They don't want to publish the board members, actuarys accountants , the yesiomim who benefited. Gut in himel why is there always another scam by yissidshe kinder?!

As far a the board members and actuary's accountans, call them and they
WILL reassure you of all your doubts.
The list of Yesomim? that is supposed to be confidential, but I'm sure they
will give you a list of people who will vouch for the money that it was
distributed.
I did all that, just for the record, and all my questions (not doubts) were
removed.

64

 May 27, 2010 at 09:57 PM areivim member Says:

what they havent mentioned is if a spouse passes and they have children over the age of 28 said child will not receive any money because they are condired adults. of course each case is looked at individually but thats the general rule. so when he does his numbers they are a little off. also not everyone gets 100k a like for parents who are members and they only have 2 children when a parent passes only the kids get money not the spouse so there another 100k not shelled out. also if someone from the group passes and they have a substantial amount of life insurance the payout is less. so again theres more money in the pot. personally speaking.... I do not have that extra money each month to buy life insurance so we joined areiivim, i know its no substitute but at least i know my kids will have something if c"v....

65

 May 27, 2010 at 09:59 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #7  
Joe Says:

From my experience it is run like a highschool project, total joke.

People are involved in this project day and night and kill for klall
Yisroel and you mock it by saying "highschool project".
We learnt in high school that Laitzonim don't have a Chelek in Olom
Habo, it seems you went to a "different" kind of school.

66

 May 27, 2010 at 10:00 PM Baal Habos Says:

Reply to #1  
power up Says:

Who ever you are: your "usid liten es hadin". Who are you to decide on an organization that toils day and night for other people without making a profit.

Who are you to say your opinion on something that much bigger people said theirs.

Who gave you permission to abuse the platform you have.

Shame.

Define "without making a profit". Are there salaries being paid? Because of all the questions involved, I would not trust this organization unless they open their books.

67

 May 27, 2010 at 10:05 PM Flatbush Yid Says:

Reply to #43  
DovBear Says:

Anyone who wants to see why Rabbi Horowitz is advising all of you to drop areivim can go to his website where its all spelled out nice and clear. For starters they wouldn't answer his basic questions . For ex

They won't say who their posek is
They won't name any of the "hundreds" of Rabbis who supposedly not only endorse the program but are "investing time, energy and heart in this project, one which has become a priority to them."
They won't provide a full list of board members, and 3 of the 16 people who were named contacted Rabbi Horowitz after their names were linked to the organization to deny any involvement.(In other words, they lied)
hey won't name the people who run the office.
They won't name the actuaries, lawyers and accountants who allegedly signed of on the program
They sidestepped questions about payments, fees and commissions.
They wouldn't explain how investment or disbursement decisions will be made
They wouldn't explain how grievances are addressed, or what is done if someone feels they've been mistreated

I have more on my blog dovbear.blogspot.com (I'm running out of characters here)

won't name the people who run the office -
If Rabbi Horowitz found the people who run the office, I called and was able to reach someone who runs the office, I'm sure you can too.

They won't name the actuaries, lawyers and accountants who allegedly signed of on the program -
Same answer as before - people don't like to be associated with controversy... If you know any of the 16 professionals they mentioned personally, ask them and I'm sure they'll tell you their thoughts on it.

sidestepped questions about payments, fees and commissions -
When I asked they told me that no payments, fees and commissions are paid. There are obviously office and marketing expenses, which are paid by private donors. There was no sidestepping when I called politely and asked.

wouldn't explain how investment or disbursement decisions will be made -
They said that they make no investments or disbursements. They collect and give the money to the family's Rav to create a trust for each child.

wouldn't explain how grievances are addressed...-
I'm told these are usually settled by the Rabbanim (which they did mention) and the family's Rav. I'm sure if a family is eligible, money will be collected for them.

68

 May 27, 2010 at 10:09 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #51  
Anonymous Says:

Rabbi Horowitz spent much time and investigated this thoroughly before he would put his name on paper advising other avenues for life insurance. He would never do this without thought and restraint. There are not too many Rabbis (He is really not a "Rav") who speak out and are not afraid to buck the system. He is a good man and does a tremendous amount of good for Klal Yisrael.

He does well to advise people to buy life insurance, but that shouldn't stop
people from contributing to those who can't.
I've heard that he suggested to open a Gmach to pay for Life insurance,
does he realize how much money that would entail? How many people will
he be able to cover?.
This is not a new idea, a very successful insurance broker tried to implement
such a program a long time ago, and wasn't too successful.
A Yeshiva in Flatbush, also raised a huge sum of money to set aside for
retirement benefits for their Mechanchim, and the money was lost to a
bad investment.
We have no guarantees in life, what do you think Life Insurance Co;s do
with the money? they make investments, we've seen huge banks go
"under" and we've seen huge investments go sour.
Can Rabbi Horowitz guarantee the future of Klall Yisroel?

69

 May 27, 2010 at 10:22 PM Anonymous Says:

Thanks for giving this Worthy Organization such publicity, it was an eye opener
(I never heard about this organization before) I have since done my homework
and was overwhelmed with their wonderful work. B.H. I am zoche to not only
become a member, but I also donated a generous part of my Maaser money
to this worthy cause.
In the zechus of this great mitzva, may we all be zoche to Aruchas yomim
veshonim .

70

 May 27, 2010 at 10:25 PM Anonymous Says:

Once again, it has been proven that every great organization will have opponents
who will to dampen the spirit of those who with much mesiras nefesh try to
accomplish.
Doson Veavirom also doubted the credibility of Moshe Rabeinu!

71

 May 27, 2010 at 10:29 PM Anonymous Says:

come on. how many people writing and trashing rabbi horowitz here WORK for areivim???
sorry to say, but its pashut to me that something stinks there.. its plain and simple - show us your board members, your exec. directors and managers - why the hiding and double talk ?? come clean or cloee up this operation..

72

 May 27, 2010 at 10:47 PM Anonymous Says:

People who don't want to contribute, find that accusing the organizations of
being distrustful, a good way out.
If you don't want to contribute, don't....you don't have to excuse yourself,
Why must you be a Chote Umachtee?.

73

 May 27, 2010 at 10:50 PM shmiel glassman Says:

can anyone verify if people think this is instead of life insurance??? i think its safe to say most people look at this as an efficient tzedaka org.

74

 May 27, 2010 at 10:51 PM Anonymous Says:

Do any of the people running Areivim have an MBA? CFA? CPA? Any credentials at all?

75

 May 27, 2010 at 10:58 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #38  
Anonymous Says:

Whats the different between the 3 Areivim programs thats out there??

There are two organizations one Kol Yisroel Areivim and the other is Areivim

76

 May 27, 2010 at 11:05 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #63  
Anonymous Says:

As far a the board members and actuary's accountans, call them and they
WILL reassure you of all your doubts.
The list of Yesomim? that is supposed to be confidential, but I'm sure they
will give you a list of people who will vouch for the money that it was
distributed.
I did all that, just for the record, and all my questions (not doubts) were
removed.

Can you please post the info you got from them on THIS board (I don't need the yesiomims names) the accountants, board, rabbis etc. If its not a secret and its legid ,why not post it?. Please , can you do us all the favor?.

77

 May 27, 2010 at 11:06 PM WolfishMusings Says:

I'm not an actuary. Nonetheless, I was able to take the numbers provided by the program, the mortality rates published by the CDC and run the numbers to see if the program works.

The way the program is set up, it can accommodate 48 orphans per year. That's based on the fact that the 16,500 members are charged a maximum of $288 a year. However, when I ran the numbers against the mortality rates, I found that there is almost no way a group can have less than 48 orphans.

I ran three scenarios and in the best of them there were 96 orphans -- twice as many as the program could accommodate.

You're free to check out my blog post (http://wolfishmusings.blogspot.com/2010/05/areivim-my-opinion-on-matter-and-some.html) about it where I describe my methodology and the assumptions I made regarding the population of the group. In the post is a link to a spreadsheet where you can see how I ran the numbers.

If you think my methodology is flawed in a way that will significantly alter the numbers, let me know and I'll run them again.

Aside from the fact that the numbers don't work, I also had numerous other concerns regarding how payouts are to be handled and who is eligible.

The Wolf

78

 May 27, 2010 at 11:06 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #41  
yossel Says:

hey if you have life insurance, you (your heirs) are in for a surprise. they won't get paid a cent. areivim specifically says that if the person has assets or insurance they will not cover

I'm not in for any supprise I know that so what! this is tzducka I gave allready when dhey asked for some people can't affored insurance and some people can't get INS. So this is a responsable way thT the yasomim shudnt be the world racmnues and going to collect pennies and if it won't work in 10-15 years from now so what

80

 May 27, 2010 at 11:45 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #17  
Yossi Says:

We live in a internet world where a Rabbi can make conclusions and bury an organization like Areivim...I know of 2 almunes who benefit from them and b"h they received the $$$ what areivim stands for..How does Rabbi Horowitz take the achreies to condem such an org......I think he need Al Chyte with a hammer for this one......

Shame on you!! Besides for being "mevaze" a talmud chochem, a rav, a posek who "most probably" has a better understanding then you in both torah and business issues, you are also a huge idiot!!!

He never said that araivim will not make the payouts if they are able to. We all understood that 5,10, maybe 15 almonos and yesoimim will be able to get their share. His problem was beyond that (plus a few more issues).

Not a single person, not from araivim, nor any comments posted on any of the articles regarding this issue, have posted a response to this issue that R' horowitz brought up. So fool what your are, before you comment, read the facts, the questions posted and responses, then judge for yourself. And if you still feel your right, then go get your head examined.

81

 May 27, 2010 at 11:51 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #20  
Anonymous Says:

Areivim was founded here in the USA by about 20 chesed organizations and project coordinators. They have a well staffed office and are running it very professionally; people are getting signed up, getting their confirmations, members are getting notified by phone, email, etc before money is taken etc. They have a vaad of rabbonim, a vaad balei batim etc. and boruch hashem to date they helped a nice few almonos and yesomim, a family Lakewood, a family in Williamsburg, a family in Monsey etc,
Hashem should help that the organization should close down fast, we shouldn’t need their services anymore, but in the meantime I wish them great hatzloche

Wish what you want, but why for crying out loud, don't you fools understand.????

Are you trying to show what a great job they are doing? Did you not read what R' Horowitz wrote? Did he not agree that these people have good intentions? Did you skip the part that he said that this will not work "long term"? Is your comment even worth posting?

82

 May 27, 2010 at 11:56 PM metlife agent Says:

Reply to #28  
Mendel Zilberberg Says:

I have one question for you. If an organization says they have certain board members and the reported board members say it is not so, should the organization be trusted. Especially, an organization that will be entrusted with huge sums anf there is a long time horizon, where trust is vital.

We can put this issue to rest very quickly, contact Yatty Wienreb, Abe Roth or Abe Biderman and ask them if they are directors of the organization. If they are Rabbi Horowitz (a dear friend of mine) is in the dog house. If they aren't, lets all thank Rabbi Horowitz.

This way we do not have to speculate if a few askonim can create a life insurance model that is more efficient and reliable than New York Life, if this model is legal based on prevailing insurance law, and if this is a proper activity for a charity based on IRS code as opposed to our understanding of tzedakah

As an aside, if you were purchasing life insurance to potentially protect your wife and children would you choose Prudential, John Hancock, New York Life or Arievim.

Rabbi Horowitz took the time to deal with this in a proper and dignified manner. If any readers take exception fell free to put him to the test.

Hey???

What about Metlife? They are the "biggest" life insurer in the country...are the not worth to mention?

Yeah yeah yeah, I know AIG was the biggest insurer (not life) and they had issues, but it was the investments they maid, not the life insurance portfolio .

83

 May 28, 2010 at 12:01 AM It's the deception stupid Says:

In its best light, the program masquerades as life insurance to efficiently collect tzedaka for yesomim and almonos by credit card debits. People don't expect a subjective determination of their "needs" after the death of a parent by a shadowy board. Being straight forward.and removing the insurance mask would help this group a great deal.

84

 May 28, 2010 at 12:04 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #31  
Anonymous Says:

Being Motzti Shem Ra on an organization that has already helped L.A. several
Almonos and Yesomin, is a VERY SINFUL act.
I am a member, whose children are B.H. married. When I receive the calls
from Areivim I am more than happy to be part of such a great mitzva, that cost so little..
Areivim is Mezake the Rabbim, by making thousands of people contribute to
each cause.
Nothing is garuanteed, and down the road, I hate to tell you that insurance
companies can also go bankrupt. Everybody has his own mazel, and so
does the beneficiary.
I hate to tell you, but we invested in insurance companies in Europe and
got back pennies on the dollars when the policies matured!
We are not supposed to play G-d, we must do Hishtadlus, and the outcome
does not depend on us. In the meantime, thousands of people gave
Tzedaka (by not making too big a dent in anybody's pocket), quite a number
of needy people were helped B'derech Kovod, WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO
SAY, "IF YOU CAN'T FIX IT BREAK IT?"
Causing people to refrain from giving Tzedaka is a big Aveira,
This news blog did not sound like constructive criticism, this should never
have gone public, its a big shame (good intentions is not an excuse

The money you lost was obviously not yours. You either stole it, committed tax fraud, tax evasion or some other not ehrliche deed. Because if it were yours, it would stay yours. Therefore, your entire comment is "oopgefraigt"..

85

 May 28, 2010 at 12:15 AM Anonymous Says:

Raboisai, I read all the comments until I reached about the 50th one. Eech hub shoin nisht kan koach!!!. With stupid people, that for some reason cannot respond or comment on the issues that were brought up, there is no sense in even "reading" you comment, forget about me responding to them.

One point I wanna make, look at all the comments, on all the blogs, and see how many agree with the rabbi and how many disagree. You will see the the "mee'ut" that disagree, are out voted, by far!!!

86

 May 28, 2010 at 12:25 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #68  
Anonymous Says:

He does well to advise people to buy life insurance, but that shouldn't stop
people from contributing to those who can't.
I've heard that he suggested to open a Gmach to pay for Life insurance,
does he realize how much money that would entail? How many people will
he be able to cover?.
This is not a new idea, a very successful insurance broker tried to implement
such a program a long time ago, and wasn't too successful.
A Yeshiva in Flatbush, also raised a huge sum of money to set aside for
retirement benefits for their Mechanchim, and the money was lost to a
bad investment.
We have no guarantees in life, what do you think Life Insurance Co;s do
with the money? they make investments, we've seen huge banks go
"under" and we've seen huge investments go sour.
Can Rabbi Horowitz guarantee the future of Klall Yisroel?

Can Rabbi Horowitz guarantee the future of Klall Yisroel?

No he can't. But he "can" gaurantee that "this" program will not work, not long term.

87

 May 28, 2010 at 12:28 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #77  
WolfishMusings Says:

I'm not an actuary. Nonetheless, I was able to take the numbers provided by the program, the mortality rates published by the CDC and run the numbers to see if the program works.

The way the program is set up, it can accommodate 48 orphans per year. That's based on the fact that the 16,500 members are charged a maximum of $288 a year. However, when I ran the numbers against the mortality rates, I found that there is almost no way a group can have less than 48 orphans.

I ran three scenarios and in the best of them there were 96 orphans -- twice as many as the program could accommodate.

You're free to check out my blog post (http://wolfishmusings.blogspot.com/2010/05/areivim-my-opinion-on-matter-and-some.html) about it where I describe my methodology and the assumptions I made regarding the population of the group. In the post is a link to a spreadsheet where you can see how I ran the numbers.

If you think my methodology is flawed in a way that will significantly alter the numbers, let me know and I'll run them again.

Aside from the fact that the numbers don't work, I also had numerous other concerns regarding how payouts are to be handled and who is eligible.

The Wolf

we are not statistics, we should all daven to Hashem that there should
not be any new orphans, and prove your statistics wrongs.
Yidden are above the Mazel and above Teva.

88

 May 28, 2010 at 12:58 AM Flatbush Yid Says:

Reply to #77  
WolfishMusings Says:

I'm not an actuary. Nonetheless, I was able to take the numbers provided by the program, the mortality rates published by the CDC and run the numbers to see if the program works.

The way the program is set up, it can accommodate 48 orphans per year. That's based on the fact that the 16,500 members are charged a maximum of $288 a year. However, when I ran the numbers against the mortality rates, I found that there is almost no way a group can have less than 48 orphans.

I ran three scenarios and in the best of them there were 96 orphans -- twice as many as the program could accommodate.

You're free to check out my blog post (http://wolfishmusings.blogspot.com/2010/05/areivim-my-opinion-on-matter-and-some.html) about it where I describe my methodology and the assumptions I made regarding the population of the group. In the post is a link to a spreadsheet where you can see how I ran the numbers.

If you think my methodology is flawed in a way that will significantly alter the numbers, let me know and I'll run them again.

Aside from the fact that the numbers don't work, I also had numerous other concerns regarding how payouts are to be handled and who is eligible.

The Wolf

Wolf,

Your calculations are flawed. You assume that all participants are eligible to be recipients. I have adequate life insurance and am a member with KYA. I know many other people who definitely wouldn't be eligible but signed up as a gesture of achdus in klal yisrael.

I would also assume that most people eligible to receive are younger than 30. By the time people reach 30 they usually are working and could afford term life insurance, or might have accumulated significant assets, own an established business, etc. If you were to calculate that the older members are much less likely to receive a payout, and that there are many young members who are also ineligible, you would come up with very different numbers.

As to your other points, I believe they have been addressed by others in previous comments.

In Israel I have doubts if it can work, due to much more members being eligible for a payout, and larger family sizes.

I really enjoyed your thought out analysis, although I think you miscalculated. Nice plug for your blog though!

89

 May 28, 2010 at 01:11 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #73  
shmiel glassman Says:

can anyone verify if people think this is instead of life insurance??? i think its safe to say most people look at this as an efficient tzedaka org.

If its tsedaka why do poor people have to pay in in order to get a pay out if they die. This is an illegal insurance scheme, with no numbers or professionals backing it up.

90

 May 28, 2010 at 01:33 AM Anonymous Says:

You know what Rabbi Horowitz and all Sonei Yisroel, we should not ask a Shailoh from anybody because nobody is perfect, No Shul is perfect No Husband No wife is perfect and No Business or Investment is perfect

91

 May 28, 2010 at 01:58 AM shaul Says:

im glad this is coming to the public
i am a member of kol yisrael areivim
but now is the time for the community leaders to see how they can improve things
not bash and critisize ,nothing is perfect
even the best insurance companies can go broke, nothing is secure
lets improve nobel orgonizations

92

 May 28, 2010 at 02:28 AM PonziVelt Says:

I live in a part of the world where there have been many Ponzi schemes, and the earliest ones were actually run by people who are much like the Arevim chevra - they were not out to cheat anyone but really thought their business model of paying earlier participants with money from later ones was a valid one that could go on forever.

Yes, some people have (LA) gotten payouts. But Rav Horowitz is warning us that according to his careful research, the system is one set up by well meaning people with no business understanding and no viable model. Therefore at some point the system will collapse and leave disaster in its wake. He does so in a menschlich way and is not profiting himself from any alternative to Arevim.

93

 May 28, 2010 at 07:17 AM Anonymous Says:

What is the problem here? No one is laying out any money until Chas Vesholem someone passes away. And then it is a minimal amount.
DO you not send tzeduka to organizations that you NEVER know where the money goes, i.e. administrative fees, administrative SALARIES, fancy offices, OVERZEALOUS and OVERDONE Advertisements that plague your mailboxes???
I think this is a great idea.
I just worry if Kol Yisroel can get 16,000 members together>>
And also where Kol Yisroel's expenses are getting paid from>>>
Bu to badmouth a great idea like this I never heard anybody do on this farnem. Especially by a reputable Rabbi Horowitz..
Can he please also be fair and check out ALLLLLL tzeduka entities that send letters out DAY IN DAY OUT.
Some are government funded , make huge fund raising affairs (again with the most extravagent advertisements) bombard our mailboxes and voicemails with hulabaloo and i really wonder how much money is left for the intended recipients..........

94

 May 28, 2010 at 08:29 AM KAS Says:

The only people who will get harmed by this are the people who are running this scam. Rabbi Horowitz asked them clear questions. They gave unclear answers. The people running this scam have every reason to keep the facts, supporters and haskamos quiet - Its because they don't exist. I for one am sick of being told that behind the scenes there are askonin and rabonim - Why are the behind the scenes. Because they don't exist.

95

 May 28, 2010 at 08:59 AM Anonymous Says:

I read the 90+ comments above, and I am shocked by the extremism of the comments in either direction as well as the departure from the Caution sign that was the conclusion of Rabbi Horowitz after much research. KYA has failed to be transparent, and every tzedokoh needs to be. Not because of a business model, though that needs to be the case, but because it takes someone else's money with a goal in mind. If I want to contribute to support yesomim, and the result is not achieved, I have not succeeded in performing a mitzvah, despite my intentions. I monitored the dialogue on rabbihorowitz.com, and the evasiveness that KYA displayed was alarming and disconcerting. Rabbi Horowitz did thorough research, asked direct questions, and KYA sidestepped almost every single issue. If someone approached you for "Hachnosas Kallah", and used the money to go on vacation to Bermuda, would you think it proper? Perhaps we should not check up every "collector", but organizations have a public duty to be transparent. KYA failed that test. We need to be sure that tzedokoh reaches its target or it ceases to be a mitzvah. What's so hard to understand?

96

 May 28, 2010 at 09:06 AM Simple Simon Says:

It is my humbleopinion that both, Areivim and Kol Yisroel Areivim, are well intentioned concepts but woefully defective and deficient. For starters, both are definitely NOT tzedakas. You are paying specifically for protection (insurance) regardless of how the payments are structured. Further, not one penny will go to any family that is not a paying member. Where exactly is the tzedaka? Secondly, these organizations will have to be licensed as private-mutual life insurance companies (groups, unions, societys, etc.). If not, they will be ILLEGAL. Considering the above absolutely relevant aspects, there is no question that for the exact same money, families can purchase legitimate, regulated, bonded, certified insurance policies WITHOUT any of the considerable drawbacks and limitation of the Areivim organizatios. It's black or white. It's that simple. Rabbi Horowitz is rigt on the money.

97

 May 28, 2010 at 09:25 AM dan Says:

read r' horowitz's blog and you'll understand why no one should associate themselves with kol yisrael areivim.

98

 May 28, 2010 at 09:46 AM jewinjerusalem Says:

Rabosai, I have a question for you. Let's say I'm collecting for hachnasas kalla. It's for my daughter. I don't have very much money as i learn full time, and we all know the high cost of living in Eretz Yisrael. Not to mention the dira that a father must provide [at least half] to marry off his daughter. Ok.Thank you for your donation. Will you be upset if you find out my daughter is only five years old? You are angry with me? Well, I'm starting to collect early as it's not easy to raise $100,000 when she'll be 18. Plus, her sister is right behind her. After all a mentch has to make a plan. What's wrong? You don't accept my explanation? You feel i should wait to collect until she's at least 16? Somehow everyone I know is upset and they all think that I'm engaging in geneivas da'as by asking for hachnassas kalla for my five-year old.

Guess what? The money for areivim is for chassunas. It is NOT for the family at the present time. It is to have enough to provide for a dira, dowry, and chassuna. Is that called tzaddaka? I don't think so. What do you think?

99

 May 28, 2010 at 09:51 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #32  
Anonymous Says:

It already suceeded, ask the yesoimim who benefitted.

the top of the pyramid always gets paid

100

 May 28, 2010 at 10:04 AM yoel Says:

Reply to #28  
Mendel Zilberberg Says:

I have one question for you. If an organization says they have certain board members and the reported board members say it is not so, should the organization be trusted. Especially, an organization that will be entrusted with huge sums anf there is a long time horizon, where trust is vital.

We can put this issue to rest very quickly, contact Yatty Wienreb, Abe Roth or Abe Biderman and ask them if they are directors of the organization. If they are Rabbi Horowitz (a dear friend of mine) is in the dog house. If they aren't, lets all thank Rabbi Horowitz.

This way we do not have to speculate if a few askonim can create a life insurance model that is more efficient and reliable than New York Life, if this model is legal based on prevailing insurance law, and if this is a proper activity for a charity based on IRS code as opposed to our understanding of tzedakah

As an aside, if you were purchasing life insurance to potentially protect your wife and children would you choose Prudential, John Hancock, New York Life or Arievim.

Rabbi Horowitz took the time to deal with this in a proper and dignified manner. If any readers take exception fell free to put him to the test.

My dear freind mendel, I understand you are very good friends with r' yanky horowitz and you have to stick up for him, but no matter how a big tzadik he is we stil have our hoily rabbis saying you have to be dan lekaf zechus" and people have their minds on their one and let them decide, there is pleanty garbage out there, (vehamavin yovin) this Is life you could think in your heart what ever you want, or speak about it at home to this and publicly say such a think, I don't know what to say, my wife knows who he is and used to work with him, I used to respect him a lot now I'm confused!

101

 May 28, 2010 at 10:13 AM WolfishMusings Says:

Reply to #88  
Flatbush Yid Says:

Wolf,

Your calculations are flawed. You assume that all participants are eligible to be recipients. I have adequate life insurance and am a member with KYA. I know many other people who definitely wouldn't be eligible but signed up as a gesture of achdus in klal yisrael.

I would also assume that most people eligible to receive are younger than 30. By the time people reach 30 they usually are working and could afford term life insurance, or might have accumulated significant assets, own an established business, etc. If you were to calculate that the older members are much less likely to receive a payout, and that there are many young members who are also ineligible, you would come up with very different numbers.

As to your other points, I believe they have been addressed by others in previous comments.

In Israel I have doubts if it can work, due to much more members being eligible for a payout, and larger family sizes.

I really enjoyed your thought out analysis, although I think you miscalculated. Nice plug for your blog though!

Flatbush Yid,

Thanks for the reasoned response.

I *do* believe that the vast majority of people who sign for Areivim *are* doing it for the potential payout. The number of people who do it solely as a tzedaka, as you do (and tizku l'mitzvos to you!) are, in my estimation, a very small percentage. I believe that as people become ineligible to receive benefits (as you describe) they will pull out of the program, not remain with it. In any event, one of the scenarios that I published *did* account for the membership being skewed younger -- and there were still too many orphans.

My other points (regarding who is eligible and who is not -- does someone who uses the Flatbush eruv count as "Torah observant?" What if the mother wants to send her kid to a school the family rav doesn't approve of? What if the family rav doesn't approve of the shidduch -- can he withhold funds for the wedding?) were not addressed.

The Wolf

102

 May 28, 2010 at 10:16 AM WolfishMusings Says:

Reply to #87  
Anonymous Says:

we are not statistics, we should all daven to Hashem that there should
not be any new orphans, and prove your statistics wrongs.
Yidden are above the Mazel and above Teva.

I don't know how to respond to your remark!

Of course we should all daven to HaShem. But we know that people do die, and people do (unfortunately) die young.

I would LOVE for a year to go by with no new orpahns and for you to say "Wolf, you really blew it this time!" But that's not going to happen. We may be above mazel, but (despite your silly assertion) we aren't above statistics. You can't just throw up an organization and say "the heck with the stats -- it'll work anyway." That's like Hatzoloh proposing to cover all of New York City with one ambulance and saying "the heck with accident rates" -- we shouldn't need the service, but to put up the organization in a state that is completely unable to face reality is irresponsible.

The Wolf

103

 May 28, 2010 at 10:33 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #84  
Anonymous Says:

The money you lost was obviously not yours. You either stole it, committed tax fraud, tax evasion or some other not ehrliche deed. Because if it were yours, it would stay yours. Therefore, your entire comment is "oopgefraigt"..

"because if it were yours, it would stay yours"..wow! How you judge people
without knowing the entire story! We are honest tax paying people who worked
hard all our life. We have relatives abroad, who told us that it was a good
way to invest a few dollars for the children's future, as the returns were
supposed to be great..
We didn't invest a "king's randsom" as we were never wealthy,
I'm not obliged to tell you how much, but I assure you it sure
was a lot less than you think.and the money was 100% kosher.
You're obviously of the few lucky ones that never lost money in their life,
you you can't put yourself in the shoes of others.
Hashem is the one who makes people make money and lose money,
and everything has its Cheshbon.
I tell you again, Life Insurance is not 100% garuanteed (read the fine
lines) banks aren't secure, nor is the gov't secure. Who would have
believed a few years ago, what the economy in the mighty USA
would look like in 2010. One attack on the Twin Towers sent the
economy off balance.
Its nice to know that somebody like you, knows Hashem's Chashbonos,
and never suffered a loss in his life.
Be Dan Lkaf Zchus and have faith in Hashem.

104

 May 28, 2010 at 10:47 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #102  
WolfishMusings Says:

I don't know how to respond to your remark!

Of course we should all daven to HaShem. But we know that people do die, and people do (unfortunately) die young.

I would LOVE for a year to go by with no new orpahns and for you to say "Wolf, you really blew it this time!" But that's not going to happen. We may be above mazel, but (despite your silly assertion) we aren't above statistics. You can't just throw up an organization and say "the heck with the stats -- it'll work anyway." That's like Hatzoloh proposing to cover all of New York City with one ambulance and saying "the heck with accident rates" -- we shouldn't need the service, but to put up the organization in a state that is completely unable to face reality is irresponsible.

The Wolf

Mr. Wolfish do you think that this vast majority that enrolled for the payout would have otherwise been LI policy holders? open your eyes and look at the STATISTICS of the percentage of humanity holding life insurance policies!

i relly do think that even if Horowitz thinks he has a better solution and that tha aareivim solution does not seem the right one in his eyes, there is no logic to undermining it before presenting the alternative in all its details ready for the klal to enroll.

105

 May 28, 2010 at 10:49 AM Actuary Says:

Reply to #6  
Anonymous Says:

Thank you for your well intentioned subtle character assassination of a fine institution.

A well intentioned Ponzi scheme is still a ponzi scheme

106

 May 28, 2010 at 10:59 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #102  
WolfishMusings Says:

I don't know how to respond to your remark!

Of course we should all daven to HaShem. But we know that people do die, and people do (unfortunately) die young.

I would LOVE for a year to go by with no new orpahns and for you to say "Wolf, you really blew it this time!" But that's not going to happen. We may be above mazel, but (despite your silly assertion) we aren't above statistics. You can't just throw up an organization and say "the heck with the stats -- it'll work anyway." That's like Hatzoloh proposing to cover all of New York City with one ambulance and saying "the heck with accident rates" -- we shouldn't need the service, but to put up the organization in a state that is completely unable to face reality is irresponsible.

The Wolf

The Wolf, its about time Hashem takes us out of Galus, we have unfortunately
become "fargoyisht". You feel we aren't above statistics, well we are above
statistics.
You gave a very poor example, becasue if Hatzolah had only one ambulance to
his disposal, would you say that they should close shop, or would you say
that they should try to save whomever they can? If the ambulance was
parked in Crown Heights, and he got a call that somebody was severely
injured in Boro Park, wouldn't you say that he should run and try to save this
life, or would you say, that we must wait until somebody in Crown Heights
needs us?
Don't try to run the world, Olom Chessed Yiboneh, if we stop making
Chashbonos, Hashem will deal with us without Chashbonos and give
us Matnas Chinom, more than we deserve.
Hashem tells us, "if you're so smart, I'll let you run the world.." and then
we suffer from Hester Panim.
Let's show Hashem that we depend on him, pischu li pesach kpischo shel
machat ....and I shall open a hole as large as an Ulam. We must only
show Hashem, that we want to help our brethern, Hashem is the one
who will make it happen.

107

 May 28, 2010 at 11:17 AM Anonymous Says:

Life Insurance is a ponzi scheme and so are banks. If an unpredicted amount of people died in one year, Life Insurance would not be able to meet their
obligations, same with the banks, if every person would decide to withdraw
their money in one week, the banks would declare bankrupcy.
Anybody that becomes a member in Areivim, is aware that the logistics
may change, NOBODY can garuantee you anything.
BUT... we do have a garuantee from Hashem "Eilu Devorim She ein lohem
Shir...Eilu devarim sheodom ochel peiroseihem Bo olom haze VEHKERE
LE OLOM HABO..amongst others, .one of them is Gemilas Chassodim,
and another is Hachnosas Kallo, HASHEM is our "garuantor".

Therefore, lets face it...Areivim is a good and solid investment, and
nobody can beat that.

108

 May 28, 2010 at 11:32 AM WolfishMusings Says:

Reply to #104  
Anonymous Says:

Mr. Wolfish do you think that this vast majority that enrolled for the payout would have otherwise been LI policy holders? open your eyes and look at the STATISTICS of the percentage of humanity holding life insurance policies!

i relly do think that even if Horowitz thinks he has a better solution and that tha aareivim solution does not seem the right one in his eyes, there is no logic to undermining it before presenting the alternative in all its details ready for the klal to enroll.

No, I don't think they would have been policy holders. But I feel that people are going to view this as an insurance substitute. They will enroll and then decide that they don't need life insurance -- when, in fact, the proper thing for them to do is to get life insurance in the first place.

The Wolf

109

 May 28, 2010 at 11:37 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #106  
Anonymous Says:

The Wolf, its about time Hashem takes us out of Galus, we have unfortunately
become "fargoyisht". You feel we aren't above statistics, well we are above
statistics.
You gave a very poor example, becasue if Hatzolah had only one ambulance to
his disposal, would you say that they should close shop, or would you say
that they should try to save whomever they can? If the ambulance was
parked in Crown Heights, and he got a call that somebody was severely
injured in Boro Park, wouldn't you say that he should run and try to save this
life, or would you say, that we must wait until somebody in Crown Heights
needs us?
Don't try to run the world, Olom Chessed Yiboneh, if we stop making
Chashbonos, Hashem will deal with us without Chashbonos and give
us Matnas Chinom, more than we deserve.
Hashem tells us, "if you're so smart, I'll let you run the world.." and then
we suffer from Hester Panim.
Let's show Hashem that we depend on him, pischu li pesach kpischo shel
machat ....and I shall open a hole as large as an Ulam. We must only
show Hashem, that we want to help our brethern, Hashem is the one
who will make it happen.

If Hatzoloh had only one ambulance, I would NOT say that they close up shop -- I would say that they should scale back their operation to something more realistic. Instead of trying to service all of New York with one ambulance, they should service one neighborhood (or whatever geographic region can be supported by that one ambulance). However, to propose a solution that is impossible for the resources at hand (which is what Areivim is attempting to do) is completely irresponsible -- ESPECIALLY when you are charging people for the privilege of being covered.

"If the ambulance was parked in Crown Heights, and he got a call that somebody was severely injured in Boro Park, wouldn't you say that he should run and try to save this life, or would you say, that we must wait until somebody in Crown Heights
needs us?"

That's a poor example, because there are alternatives for the person in Boro Park -- like calling 911 -- until Hatzoloh is able to grow as an organization and cover other areas.

"if we stop making Chashbonos,"

Utter nonsense. HKBH tells us that we must do hishtadlus. He does not tell us "throw up any plan and the heck with whether or not it actually works."

The Wolf

110

 May 28, 2010 at 11:51 AM Flatbush Yid Says:

Reply to #105  
Actuary Says:

A well intentioned Ponzi scheme is still a ponzi scheme

I'm surprised an actuary doesn't know the definition a ponzi scheme. There are no investors here, just people who pledge to donate should the need arise. Even if you think the math doesn't add up, and you might give tzedakah, and your family might not receive the same amount of tzedakah should you l"a die at a young age, that still doesn't make it a ponzi.

If someone breaks into my car, am I also a victim of a ponzi scheme?

111

 May 28, 2010 at 11:54 AM WolfishMusings Says:

Reply to #107  
Anonymous Says:

Life Insurance is a ponzi scheme and so are banks. If an unpredicted amount of people died in one year, Life Insurance would not be able to meet their
obligations, same with the banks, if every person would decide to withdraw
their money in one week, the banks would declare bankrupcy.
Anybody that becomes a member in Areivim, is aware that the logistics
may change, NOBODY can garuantee you anything.
BUT... we do have a garuantee from Hashem "Eilu Devorim She ein lohem
Shir...Eilu devarim sheodom ochel peiroseihem Bo olom haze VEHKERE
LE OLOM HABO..amongst others, .one of them is Gemilas Chassodim,
and another is Hachnosas Kallo, HASHEM is our "garuantor".

Therefore, lets face it...Areivim is a good and solid investment, and
nobody can beat that.

"If an unpredicted amount of people died in one year, Life Insurance would not be able to meet their obligations"

Maybe -- but the odds of so many people dying at once are extremely remote. That's why the system is considered sound.

"same with the banks, if every person would decide to withdraw their money in one week, the banks would declare bankrupcy"

Again true, but again, the same rule applies -- the odds against it are very remote -- that's WHY the banking system is set up the way it is. And if it comes to pass that there are runs on banks, then we have much bigger problems then whether Arievim is viable or not.

"Areivim is a good and solid investment, and nobody can beat that. ”

Not if it can't deliver the funds it promises.

Also, I'm left to question how much it qualifies as gemilus chasadim if you have to pay in to get benefits. NO OTHER CHARITY that I can think of requires you to pay in to get benefits. Tomchei Shabbos, Bikur Cholilm, Hatzoloh, Misaskim, et al -- all pay or provide services REGARDLESS of whether you've paid in in the past. THAT'S true tzedaka and gemilas chasadim.

The Wolf

112

 May 28, 2010 at 12:31 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #107  
Anonymous Says:

Life Insurance is a ponzi scheme and so are banks. If an unpredicted amount of people died in one year, Life Insurance would not be able to meet their
obligations, same with the banks, if every person would decide to withdraw
their money in one week, the banks would declare bankrupcy.
Anybody that becomes a member in Areivim, is aware that the logistics
may change, NOBODY can garuantee you anything.
BUT... we do have a garuantee from Hashem "Eilu Devorim She ein lohem
Shir...Eilu devarim sheodom ochel peiroseihem Bo olom haze VEHKERE
LE OLOM HABO..amongst others, .one of them is Gemilas Chassodim,
and another is Hachnosas Kallo, HASHEM is our "garuantor".

Therefore, lets face it...Areivim is a good and solid investment, and
nobody can beat that.

Insurance companies are themselves insured with reinsurance companies in the unlikely event of an unlikely amount of people dying in a year. They are also examined and rated by 3rd parties to determine their stability. Why is areivim above examination?

Banks are required to have a certain amount of capital. They are also insured by the FDIC against runs on the bank.

112

 May 28, 2010 at 12:31 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #108  
WolfishMusings Says:

No, I don't think they would have been policy holders. But I feel that people are going to view this as an insurance substitute. They will enroll and then decide that they don't need life insurance -- when, in fact, the proper thing for them to do is to get life insurance in the first place.

The Wolf

Regarding my opinion of undermining before constructing an alternative what do you think? is this the way someone considering himself a "Rabbi ", feeling that he is in the category of people that Brisker rav's words were directed to, should act?

113

 May 28, 2010 at 12:56 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #83  
It's the deception stupid Says:

In its best light, the program masquerades as life insurance to efficiently collect tzedaka for yesomim and almonos by credit card debits. People don't expect a subjective determination of their "needs" after the death of a parent by a shadowy board. Being straight forward.and removing the insurance mask would help this group a great deal.

It's not masquerading and it's not a deception. All its members know that this is not life insurance but a mutual agreement to help each other if any one should c"v die. No one is upset that his credit card was charged instead of the niftar's credit card. Believe me, no one.

114

 May 28, 2010 at 12:58 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #84  
Anonymous Says:

The money you lost was obviously not yours. You either stole it, committed tax fraud, tax evasion or some other not ehrliche deed. Because if it were yours, it would stay yours. Therefore, your entire comment is "oopgefraigt"..

If you have supernatural ability to know what only God knows, then maybe you can tell us, when Moshiach will come?

115

 May 28, 2010 at 01:06 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #92  
PonziVelt Says:

I live in a part of the world where there have been many Ponzi schemes, and the earliest ones were actually run by people who are much like the Arevim chevra - they were not out to cheat anyone but really thought their business model of paying earlier participants with money from later ones was a valid one that could go on forever.

Yes, some people have (LA) gotten payouts. But Rav Horowitz is warning us that according to his careful research, the system is one set up by well meaning people with no business understanding and no viable model. Therefore at some point the system will collapse and leave disaster in its wake. He does so in a menschlich way and is not profiting himself from any alternative to Arevim.

The way this works the earlier participants don't get paid with money from later ones. The earlier here is the one who dies first, and then only if he has no other life insurance, didn't leave an inheritance, children are younger then 28 years old, etc.

And who pays it, members who are more then glad too. It's no buisiness and no model, but a good Jewish organization that works and hopefully will work until Moshiach comes.

116

 May 28, 2010 at 01:10 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #95  
Anonymous Says:

I read the 90+ comments above, and I am shocked by the extremism of the comments in either direction as well as the departure from the Caution sign that was the conclusion of Rabbi Horowitz after much research. KYA has failed to be transparent, and every tzedokoh needs to be. Not because of a business model, though that needs to be the case, but because it takes someone else's money with a goal in mind. If I want to contribute to support yesomim, and the result is not achieved, I have not succeeded in performing a mitzvah, despite my intentions. I monitored the dialogue on rabbihorowitz.com, and the evasiveness that KYA displayed was alarming and disconcerting. Rabbi Horowitz did thorough research, asked direct questions, and KYA sidestepped almost every single issue. If someone approached you for "Hachnosas Kallah", and used the money to go on vacation to Bermuda, would you think it proper? Perhaps we should not check up every "collector", but organizations have a public duty to be transparent. KYA failed that test. We need to be sure that tzedokoh reaches its target or it ceases to be a mitzvah. What's so hard to understand?

No money is taken unless someone dies and only then if it meets all the conditions is money taken. No one holds a gun to your head to make that payment, if you don't fell like it, you just don't pay and cancel your membership. All who pay, do it out of a deep responsibility, and gladly pay.

117

 May 28, 2010 at 01:13 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #96  
Simple Simon Says:

It is my humbleopinion that both, Areivim and Kol Yisroel Areivim, are well intentioned concepts but woefully defective and deficient. For starters, both are definitely NOT tzedakas. You are paying specifically for protection (insurance) regardless of how the payments are structured. Further, not one penny will go to any family that is not a paying member. Where exactly is the tzedaka? Secondly, these organizations will have to be licensed as private-mutual life insurance companies (groups, unions, societys, etc.). If not, they will be ILLEGAL. Considering the above absolutely relevant aspects, there is no question that for the exact same money, families can purchase legitimate, regulated, bonded, certified insurance policies WITHOUT any of the considerable drawbacks and limitation of the Areivim organizatios. It's black or white. It's that simple. Rabbi Horowitz is rigt on the money.

This has been ansered a million times. This is not a life insurance company, but a mutual agreement betweeen participants to come to the aid of each other should the need c"v arise.

118

 May 28, 2010 at 01:15 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #99  
Anonymous Says:

the top of the pyramid always gets paid

But this is not a pyrmid, the one who dies first gets paid, and no one is hoping to be the one.

119

 May 28, 2010 at 01:20 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #105  
Actuary Says:

A well intentioned Ponzi scheme is still a ponzi scheme

But this is not a ponzi scheme. Lookup the definition of ponzi.

120

 May 28, 2010 at 01:22 PM Anonymous Says:

Insurance companies hold RBC (Risk Based Capital) to cover potential adverse results
Insurance companies pay into a guarantee fund to ensure that policyholders get paid even if the company fails
Insurance companies are built to last

Areivim is completely unprepared to manage risk

121

 May 28, 2010 at 01:26 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #109  
Anonymous Says:

If Hatzoloh had only one ambulance, I would NOT say that they close up shop -- I would say that they should scale back their operation to something more realistic. Instead of trying to service all of New York with one ambulance, they should service one neighborhood (or whatever geographic region can be supported by that one ambulance). However, to propose a solution that is impossible for the resources at hand (which is what Areivim is attempting to do) is completely irresponsible -- ESPECIALLY when you are charging people for the privilege of being covered.

"If the ambulance was parked in Crown Heights, and he got a call that somebody was severely injured in Boro Park, wouldn't you say that he should run and try to save this life, or would you say, that we must wait until somebody in Crown Heights
needs us?"

That's a poor example, because there are alternatives for the person in Boro Park -- like calling 911 -- until Hatzoloh is able to grow as an organization and cover other areas.

"if we stop making Chashbonos,"

Utter nonsense. HKBH tells us that we must do hishtadlus. He does not tell us "throw up any plan and the heck with whether or not it actually works."

The Wolf

No one is being charged for the privilege of being covered. When someone dies (and meets all conditions), only then is a member called to donate. If he decides not to, he can terminate his membership right then and there. It is all by free and goodwill, which klal Yisroel is blessed with.

122

 May 28, 2010 at 01:28 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #103  
Anonymous Says:

"because if it were yours, it would stay yours"..wow! How you judge people
without knowing the entire story! We are honest tax paying people who worked
hard all our life. We have relatives abroad, who told us that it was a good
way to invest a few dollars for the children's future, as the returns were
supposed to be great..
We didn't invest a "king's randsom" as we were never wealthy,
I'm not obliged to tell you how much, but I assure you it sure
was a lot less than you think.and the money was 100% kosher.
You're obviously of the few lucky ones that never lost money in their life,
you you can't put yourself in the shoes of others.
Hashem is the one who makes people make money and lose money,
and everything has its Cheshbon.
I tell you again, Life Insurance is not 100% garuanteed (read the fine
lines) banks aren't secure, nor is the gov't secure. Who would have
believed a few years ago, what the economy in the mighty USA
would look like in 2010. One attack on the Twin Towers sent the
economy off balance.
Its nice to know that somebody like you, knows Hashem's Chashbonos,
and never suffered a loss in his life.
Be Dan Lkaf Zchus and have faith in Hashem.

I'm sorry to hear that you lost money. Now try to understand that there is a difference between investing in a public insurance company and owning a policy issued by one. As an investor you are an owner, and participate in the company's profits or losses. As a policyholder you are a customer, and have purchased a guarantee from the company. The guarantee is as sound as regulators can make it.

Bank stocks went down to almost nothing and NO ONE lost a cent of deposited money. The same is true if insurance company stock drops; no policyholder loses the guarantee.

123

 May 28, 2010 at 01:32 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #111  
WolfishMusings Says:

"If an unpredicted amount of people died in one year, Life Insurance would not be able to meet their obligations"

Maybe -- but the odds of so many people dying at once are extremely remote. That's why the system is considered sound.

"same with the banks, if every person would decide to withdraw their money in one week, the banks would declare bankrupcy"

Again true, but again, the same rule applies -- the odds against it are very remote -- that's WHY the banking system is set up the way it is. And if it comes to pass that there are runs on banks, then we have much bigger problems then whether Arievim is viable or not.

"Areivim is a good and solid investment, and nobody can beat that. ”

Not if it can't deliver the funds it promises.

Also, I'm left to question how much it qualifies as gemilus chasadim if you have to pay in to get benefits. NO OTHER CHARITY that I can think of requires you to pay in to get benefits. Tomchei Shabbos, Bikur Cholilm, Hatzoloh, Misaskim, et al -- all pay or provide services REGARDLESS of whether you've paid in in the past. THAT'S true tzedaka and gemilas chasadim.

The Wolf

No one pays in. Whenever the need arises thats when money is asked for. If they don't feel like it then the yosem gets a small amount less and the mutual agreement (caled membership) is terminated. It's a pure honor system.

124

 May 28, 2010 at 02:03 PM Askupeh Says:

Flatbush Yid, you're a very smart man, and thank you for saying everything I wanted to say. Rabbi Horowitz is not on trial here, nor should the various Areivim organizations be. Everyone on both sides of the issue are well intentioned, and believe passionately, either for or against it. People like you and the Wolf have contributed greatly to this discussion and kept it on a higher plane.

In short, this is not a business, not a life insurance Company, not a ponzi scheme nor a pyramid. This are straight shooting organization coordinating between a large group of like minded individuals, who will be more then glad to honor their commitment shall another member of the group C”V die. I believe that all the fears of those against it can be allayed, and both sides should work at making these organizations more sound, and maybe even get them to unite, which had it been united in the first place, then maybe it would have already been sound. Either way I will remain with them and just encourage them to make it even better. Beser Hut Nisht Kein Shiyur.

125

 May 28, 2010 at 02:22 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #120  
Anonymous Says:

Insurance companies hold RBC (Risk Based Capital) to cover potential adverse results
Insurance companies pay into a guarantee fund to ensure that policyholders get paid even if the company fails
Insurance companies are built to last

Areivim is completely unprepared to manage risk

There is no risk to manage.

126

 May 28, 2010 at 03:42 PM Joel Says:

And-

It's not like as if Rabbi Horowitz DOES name names of who he spoke with or which rabbis commissioned him to go out and try to bring this organization down. But Areivim MUST name names. Am I missing something?

So basically, Rabbi Horowitz had some questions about Areivim. Instead of calling Areivim, he decided to blog about it and raise concerns.

When the organization couldn't answer Rabbi Horowitz questions to his satisfaction he decided to use his political capital to make demands and/or try to destroy what somebody else worked so hard to build. To declare that it can only work according to Rabbi Horowitz's - and his nameless advisers- system.

Rabbi Horowitz's ego has to win here.

127

 May 28, 2010 at 03:45 PM Lawrence M. Reisman Says:

Reply to #125  
Anonymous Says:

There is no risk to manage.

When talking about risk in this context, risk means the possibility, or probability, that large payments will become necessary. And that is a risk to be managed, either with large reserves, or stop loss insurance.

Areivim has shown itself very capable of being sophisticated when it comes to fundraising. If they showed the same sophisitication in other areas, they would have an audited financial statement that would be available to anyone who asked, they would be filing annual reports with IRS and the NYS attorney general that they could post on their web site, and those statements would reference some sort of actuarial evaluation of their operation.

Apart from a valid concern about the organization's representatives refusing to give straight answers to Rabbi Horowitz's questions, I would be very concernced with any organization who's fundraising is as sophisticated as Areivim's, but cannot point to any othe part of its operation that matches that level.

128

 May 28, 2010 at 04:59 PM Yehuda` Says:

Reply to #125  
Anonymous Says:

There is no risk to manage.

There is the clear risk that the number of claimants (yesomim) asking for $100K will exceed the required member contributions. If / when that happens, there is no "Plan B", other than reducing the average payout, or disqualifying some of the yesomim that might be relying upon this program.

129

 May 30, 2010 at 04:00 AM doesn't make sence Says:

My problem with Rabbi Horowitz is that in his 1st letter to Areivim as he is asking all the questions he writes " I cannot in good conscience recommend this program," so he already made up his mind way before he gave them a chance to answer. The whole thing was a shpiel to sound honest

130

 May 30, 2010 at 10:15 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #125  
Anonymous Says:

There is no risk to manage.

This statement demonstrates exactly the type of ignorance we are afraid of here.

131

 May 30, 2010 at 12:34 PM Purple Says:

someone advertised that if you send him $1 in the mail, he will send you ten (train/bus) tokens (when the cost of one token was one dollar). Some brave people responded by sending a dollar, and indeed received ten tokens in the mail. Word spread and more people sent in $1 and again received 10 tokens in the mail. Of course much more people thought it's worth it, and the guy picked up several large sacks full of envelopes from the post office each envelope containing a $1 bill. This time he took those sacks and disappeared without sending anyone the tokens. Great scam, huh? He did this scheme in several small towns.

Just because Areivim paid out to a few almonos $$$ doesn't make this legitimate. I'm not at all saying it's a scam, but there are too many unanswered questions.

I know one of the almonos was told she can only get 50,000 per child, because there isn't enough members in the group. Well, how do we know this is true? Of course, it could very well be true, however, they are not forthcoming with info for us to be certain.

132

 May 30, 2010 at 10:04 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #128  
Yehuda` Says:

There is the clear risk that the number of claimants (yesomim) asking for $100K will exceed the required member contributions. If / when that happens, there is no "Plan B", other than reducing the average payout, or disqualifying some of the yesomim that might be relying upon this program.

I believe that makes this a classic Ponzi Scheme

133

 May 30, 2010 at 11:54 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #36  
A former 8th Grader Says:

Who can take such responsibility? Funny you should ask. Why, clearly, Rabbi Horowitz can. The only thing shocking is how sad it is that Rabboim with real guts and broad shoulders are in such short supply.

The people here are unbelievable. When there are a few deaths and no money to give each and every beneficiary, what will everybody say??

"WHERE WERE THE GEDOLIM TO STOP THIS SCAM?"

Well, the GADOL (singular) IS HERE, trying to warn you all, and he is being shouted down.

You can't have it both ways.

The model only works when you have many contributors and few deaths.

If there are too many deaths to handle, they will get nothing.

A classic ponzi scheme.

And you have a TRUE GADOL trying to save everybody,

If you think that when a husband dies without insurance, AND there is no money left in the fund, the Yesomim will say: "Oh, well, we knew there was no guarentee", you have another thing coming.

The numbers done make sense, and Rabbi Horowits is the only person with the guts to point it out.

134

Sign-in to post a comment

Scroll Up
Advertisements:

Sell your scrap gold and broken jewelry and earn hard cash sell gold today!