Waterloo, IA – Wife Takes Stand at End of Rubashkin Slaughterhouse Trial

    29

    Leah Rubashkin testifies during her husband Sholom Rubashkin's child labor trial at the Black Hawk County Courthouse in Waterloo, Iowa, on Tuesday, June 1, 2010. Rubashkin faces 83 counts of child labor violations stemming from a May 2008 immigration raid at the Agriprocessors Inc. kosher meatpacking plant in Postville. (MATTHEW PUTNEY / Courier Photo Editor)Waterloo, IA – Sholom Rubashkin was busy in his job at the Agriprocessors meatpacking plant in Postville and traveled a lot for work, according to his wife.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Rubashkin, former Agriprocessors executive, is on trial for 83 counts of misdemeanor child labor violations, and his trial resumed Tuesday morning in Black Hawk County District Court with his wife, Leah Rubashkin, taking the stand.

    She recounted a list of business and family trips to California, Florida, New York, South Dakota, Canada and Israel her husband took in 2007 through 2008.

    Leah Rubashkin, who appears to be one of the defense’s last witnesses, also talked about sneaking in to bring her husband lunch at his office when he was at the Postville plant. She said there were usually three or four people waiting to have meetings with him, and although she could get in, it usually took him 15 to 20 minutes before he could acknowledge her.

    Earlier in the trial, former underage workers testifying for the prosecution said they occasionally saw Sholom Rubashkin on the plant floor.

    During Tuesday’s testimony, Leah Rubashkin said her husband was sometimes mistaken for his younger brother, Heshy, who also worked at the plant.

    Leah Rubashkin told jurors her husband came from a very observant Jewish family and described how her own family started the transition to become more observant when she was around 11 years old.

    Asked about her husband’s appearance, Leah Rubashkin said he wears the yarmulke cap to remind him that God is always above him. She said he dons his long black coat daily — an item some Jewish men only wear on the Sabbath — because of his dedication. She said the religion forbids him from shaving off his beard.

    She said Sholom Rubashkin finished the process of becoming a Rabbi about the time they were married 28 years ago. He worked in his father’s New York butcher shop after they were wed, and the couple did outreach work in Atlanta, Ga., for about year.

    They later moved to Minnesota, and for three years Sholom Rubashkin commuted to Postville when his father bought the meatpacking plant there. They then moved to Postville about 17 years ago, she said.

    Another defense witness called Tuesday, Rodney Heston, whose company redesigned the industrial refrigeration system at Agriprocessors, also said Sholom Rubashkin was “extremely busy” at his job.

    He said it usually took an appointment and an hour of waiting to see the executive when he went to the plant.

    Wayne Hecker, who had worked at Agriprocessors, said there was never a formal chain of command at the plant. He said Sholom Rubashkin was in charge of the business side of the operation, and Rubashkin’s brother oversaw sales and production.

    Hecker told jurors about an incident where a son or daughter of a supervisor was fired because he or she wasn’t old enough to work in meatpacking operations.

    After the lunch break, the defense indicated it didn’t have any more witnesses, and the state didn’t call any rebuttal witnesses.

    Judge Nathan Callahan excused the jury at 1:20 p.m., reminding them to not view or read any news accounts of the trial. He asked them to return Thursday at 10 a.m. for closing arguments.

    The court still has to finalize the jury instructions with the prosecution and defense.

    Callahan also said he will dismiss some of the charges against Rubashkin. The defense had asked the court to throw out charges that listed as victims minors who didn’t testify.

    Of the 31 minors named in the charges, five didn’t take the stand. That translated into 16 counts, according to a tally in the defense’s motion.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    29 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Yippee!
    Yippee!
    13 years ago

    Does this mean the days of all of those ridiculous blood libel claims and rants about imaginary anti-Semitism are finally coming to a close?

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    May we all wish them Hatlucha and Mazel

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    I dont understand why they keep on putting the blame on his brother sholem, is he safe? or or dosent he live in the US?

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    She is an excellent speaker and probably made a great witness. It sounds like the judge is being very liberal toward the defense as a lot of her testimony (i.e. why he wears a yamulke and has an untrimmed beard) would not be admissible in a lot of courts because it is not relevant to the charges of whether or not he knew of underaged workers at the plant.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    no not as long as you show signs of anti semitism…

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    What was the point of the Rebbetzin tesifying?

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    Do you really think the Jury cares that she became a BT at 11 years old?

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    The defense is probably trying to establish that he may have looked similar to other “Jews” at the plant and even a little like his brother and that he wasn’t there that often which makes it harder for someone to say that Sholom was aware that young workers where working in dangerous jobs. By establishing that he was away alot helps.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    It also sounds like this particular judge was willing to allow a certain amount of leeway to allow the defense to present info on the character of the defendant that was not allowed in the federal trial for the benefit of the jury as well as the public.

    It is very easy to see the vendetta both the federal and state prosecutors had and still have against SMR. It is also clear that this particular judge recognizes it.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    The judge wants to avoid a reversal because of some “procedural” error so has been consistently been giving SMR’s counsel the benefit of the doubt and lots of leeway (in contrast to the federal trial where some have questioned the fairness of some of the judge’s decisions). Thats the good news. The bad news, however, is that the defense case thusfar has veen very weak and I fear a conviction on at least some of the state charges is likely. Maybe they have some “smoking gun” or “Perry Mason moment” they will bring out at the very end of their case but absent a miracle, it does not look good.

    Pigs Meat
    Pigs Meat
    13 years ago

    …She said the religion forbids him from shaving off his beard…..

    What a crock and a LIE! It is a custom of some ‘jews’ not to shave a beard.. The actual prohibition is the 5 places on the face. POnce again ‘jews’ lie and expect others to believe me. This was the downfall of EVE (Chavah ) when she embellished what g-d said. History proves that she made an everlasting mistake. When will these silly ‘jews’ learn a lesson?