Welcome, Guest! - or
Easy to remember!  »  VinNews.com

New York, NY - Living Expenses Rising Far Faster than Wages, Study Finds

Published on:   July 5, 2010 08:52 PM
Change text size Text Size  
Bookmark and Share

New York, NY - For New York City families, increases in the cost of living have far outpaced wages, according to a report to be released by a national organization working to advance economic equality for women and their families.

The report, known as the Self-Sufficiency Standard for New York City, which is released every five years by the Women’s Center for Education and Career Advancement, compares the amount of money a family needs to make ends meet with the federal poverty level, commonly used to determine whether families receive subsidized housing, food stamps and other supports.

The report echoes conclusions reached by the city in a study released in March. The city came up with its own poverty yardstick that took into account expenses like housing, medical costs and child care, and concluded that the number of New Yorkers in poverty rose by about 7 percent from 2005 to 2008, even though by the federal standard fell by 8 percent during that time.

Advertisement:

The Women’s Center report, aimed at establishing a more accurate assessment of need, calculated the income that families in each of the five boroughs would need to cover the costs of housing, food, child care, health care, transportation and taxes.

It found that while median earnings for a family consisting of a single parent, a preschooler and a school-aged child rose by 16 percent since 2000, the amount needed to cover basic costs has risen between 20 and 42 percent, depending on the borough.

For example, such a family living in Brooklyn now needs a $29.91 hourly wage to make ends meet, the report found — a 42-percent increase since 2000, driven primarily by housing costs.

The problem, the report’s authors say, is that only one out of the 10 most common jobs in the city (registered nursing) provide Brooklyn families with adequate income, leaving many to scrape by.

“There is a very high level of frustration,” said Merble Reagon, executive director of the Women’s Center for Education and Career Advancement, of the women she counsels, many of whom have hourly jobs that do not have benefits and leave them regularly sacrificing one basic need for another.

Advocates for the poor have long argued that the federal formula, established decades ago and adjusted annually for inflation, is sorely outdated because it continues to assume that an average family spends far more on food than on other basic necessities, like clothing, shelter and utilities.

Ms. Reagon said the 2010 data should be used to “streamline” access to the services people need to survive in addition “to education, job training and jobs that provide a career ladder.”


More of today's headlines

Jerusalem - Some Israeli soldiers may have to face the music for a viral video of them dancing on duty. A video of the soldiers stopping a patrol in the West Bank to... Manhattan, NY - Andrew Cuomo and his GOP challengers are splitting sharply on the hotly contested question of building a mosque near Ground Zero, even as they're in...

 

Total5

Read Comments (5)  —  Post Yours »

1

 Jul 05, 2010 at 09:34 PM Anonymous Says:

I needed a study to tell me this garbage? And how much did this study cost? Ever notice that dumb people are always doing studies on things we all know already? How about a study with a chidush where we can all say wow and ooh?

2

 Jul 05, 2010 at 10:31 PM Anonymous Says:

perhaps we could use the money from bike lanes to help people make ends meet.
today i was driving my car on a block with 2 bike lanes yet the biker rode up the middle of the block.
got to the end of the block , did NOT wait for the light, just went with no regard for anyone or anything.
they dont follow rules, why make them lanes?
at least if they dont follow the rules they should be ticketed.

3

 Jul 06, 2010 at 07:53 AM Gefilte Fish Says:

People stop and think!
Is there a tiny chance that this mayhem was caused my our social services? Section 8 hired the cost of housing and so did the other services. If the government is handing out money for free, money has less value. As simple as that!

So instead of asking for more programs to cover the hole, eliminating them all in all would do a far much better job. People would get off their unemployment and go to work, people wouldn't be scared of getting a promotion at work in fear of losing their section 8.

Just think about this for one minute, is all I ask.

4

 Jul 06, 2010 at 08:13 AM pedestrian Says:

Reply to #2  
Anonymous Says:

perhaps we could use the money from bike lanes to help people make ends meet.
today i was driving my car on a block with 2 bike lanes yet the biker rode up the middle of the block.
got to the end of the block , did NOT wait for the light, just went with no regard for anyone or anything.
they dont follow rules, why make them lanes?
at least if they dont follow the rules they should be ticketed.

A week of enforcement aimed at bikers who blow red lights, ride wrong way, ride on sidewalks, fail to yield to pedestrians would generale many million dollars in revenue for the city. Yes, bike riders have to obey traffic law. Have you ever seen a law abiding bike rider?

5

 Jul 06, 2010 at 10:34 AM Anonymous Says:

no, really?.... This is nothing new. The whole income to expenses ratio just doest make sense for a regular person to survive in any city.

6

Sign-in to post a comment

Scroll Up
Advertisements:

Sell your scrap gold and broken jewelry and earn hard cash sell gold today!