Welcome, Guest! - or
Easy to remember!  »  VinNews.com

Ramapo, NY - Villages to Evict Israeli Families from Yeshiva Housing

Published on:   July 14, 2010 04:29 PM
News Source:  The Journal News
Change text size Text Size  
Bookmark and Share

Ramapo, NY - Four villages today mailed eviction notices to 16 Israeli families living in yeshiva-owned housing on Grandview Avenue based on a state judge’s decision after yeshiva failed to follow his orders, officials said.

A lawyer representing the Ramapo villages in the ongoing lawsuit said eviction letters were sent after Modos Chofetz Chaim refused to follow the judge’s order to put up a $75,000 surety bond.

Modos Chofetz Chaim moved the families in last year despite a court injunction freezing activity and occupation of the units pending the result of ongoing legal action with the four villages.

Advertisement:

Attorney Michael D. Zarin said the families were being given 30 days to leave, unless the yeshiva operators put up the bond and paid the villages’ legal fees ordered the judge.

The villages won the opening round of the court case when Justice Francis Nicholai ruled the yeshiva and Ramapo failed to conduct a proper environmental review before construction of 60 units within 12 multiple-family buildings.

Read the full story at The Journal News 

 


More of today's headlines

New York - The state has finally passed an alternative no-fault divorce law. Like most states, New York requires grounds (reasons) for divorce and resolution of... Tel Aviv - Two people were killed on Wednesday in a shooting incident in southern Tel Aviv. The police believe one of the victims shot the other and then committed...

 

Total66

Read Comments (66)  —  Post Yours »

1

 Jul 14, 2010 at 05:49 PM Anonymous Says:

These people are not capable of living in peace with their neighbors according to the rules of law. Everything has to be SHTICK.

2

 Jul 14, 2010 at 06:18 PM Anonymous Says:

The anti semitism of the villages is beyond belief. They stop at nothing to get the yeshivas in trouble in any manner that they can.

3

 Jul 14, 2010 at 06:27 PM monseyite Says:

That's because you people are not capable of living in peace with their neighbors according to the rules of mankind. Everything has to be a lawsuit!
And when they vote then are all parasite's.

4

 Jul 14, 2010 at 06:28 PM Tzi Bar David Says:

This is another outrageous example of the antisemitism of the Rockland county officials. These Israeli families are not burdening the town; why should the families be made to suffer when the builder is the one the towns should go after?

5

 Jul 14, 2010 at 06:38 PM Anonymous Says:

What Israeli families? I live near this place. They are American Kollel families.

6

 Jul 14, 2010 at 06:43 PM Anonymous Says:

I believe the land in question is not in any of the Villages. I believe it is either in unincorporated Ramapo or in its own Village. I am wondering how "4 Villages" could all have the authority to issue eviction notices? Could some (real) lawyer please explain that concept? Thanks.

7

 Jul 14, 2010 at 06:52 PM Anonymous Says:

its just threats they can still put up money

8

 Jul 14, 2010 at 06:57 PM Anonymous Says:

Please stop using the word anti semitism, you can say they're wrong, bad vicious whatever to support your side. Using this word just doesn't do anything good to anyone.

9

 Jul 14, 2010 at 07:04 PM Anonymous Says:

Oh please, everyone knows that the "representative" of the four villages practically owns the journal news, this is the most biased and warped view of the whole situation. Everything should be taken with a grain of salt.

10

 Jul 14, 2010 at 07:11 PM Anonymous Says:

The housing is a scam to avoid paying taxes. This has nothing to do with antisemitism and everything to do with following the law. If the people living the cjas v'sholom get sick because the environmental study wasn't done properly would you call Rabbi Zachs an antisemite for endangering yidden?

11

 Jul 14, 2010 at 07:15 PM to#8 Says:

Reply to #8  
Anonymous Says:

Please stop using the word anti semitism, you can say they're wrong, bad vicious whatever to support your side. Using this word just doesn't do anything good to anyone.

o yes it does!!! all that the people who are saying all these comments just don't want a place thats filled with kidusha and with such gidolim b'torah--SHAME ON ALL OF YOU!!!

12

 Jul 14, 2010 at 07:23 PM Shaul in Monsey Says:

The biggest joke of this entire story is that if C'V a fire broke out and the town couldn't respond in time because zoning laws were broken, and someone died, these same frummocks would be crying antisemitism over the town abandoning them.

These apartments are illegal. The judge allowed them to live there for over a year. That was a chesed on his part, he didn't have to do that.

Newsflash: It ain't antisemitism if a yid gets shot in the back as he's leaving the bank he just robbed at gunpoint.

The villages have every right to demand that Ramapo follow the law. The streets and the infrastructure are overburdened, and Monsey is looking more and more like Lodz every day. We all know whose ainikel is involved here and he's a crook shebecrook. Let him pay to relocate whatever idiots moved in there to begin with.

13

 Jul 14, 2010 at 07:24 PM Anonymous Says:

Come on, everyone is Monsey knows that the villages just keep threatening, Iyh it will all work out, as its all about money, noone can evict anyone at this point.

14

 Jul 14, 2010 at 07:35 PM Anonymous Says:

As a frum yid myself I can't understand why they can't follow the judges ruling. Evrything isn't always anti semitism, and if in this case it is, Hashem will take care of them. YOU need to do things in a civilized manner. Listen to the judge!

15

 Jul 14, 2010 at 07:49 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #5  
Anonymous Says:

What Israeli families? I live near this place. They are American Kollel families.

Israeli is code for Jewish.

So here's the thing: Ramapo etc. IS teeming with antisemites (comments section: "Go back to Israel. Let the Palestinians show you justice."). OTOH, these yeshivas DO act like they don't care whether they follow the law or not. Who knows if the yeshivas could undo the damage, even if they wanted to. Antisemites aren't known to be forgiving.

16

 Jul 14, 2010 at 07:53 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #10  
Anonymous Says:

The housing is a scam to avoid paying taxes. This has nothing to do with antisemitism and everything to do with following the law. If the people living the cjas v'sholom get sick because the environmental study wasn't done properly would you call Rabbi Zachs an antisemite for endangering yidden?

So it's avoiding taxes, or endangering the "safety" of its residents?
You're so full of hate, go get a life!

17

 Jul 14, 2010 at 08:08 PM Oiber Chuchem Says:

If you knew the whole story you would see that this is not antisemitism. This property acquisition over 10 years ago started in an underhanded fashion and every move that was made was not done without a legal fight or threat. It is not in any village because they built illegally when they purchased it and the village tried to stop them and they sued. They were cut out of the village so that the village would not be bankrupted trying to enforce their laws. They then built non conforming buildings completely out of character with the area. I would only hope that they are forced to raze the area to set an example that you cannot do as you please and the hell with your neighbors L'maan yishmiu v'yirau. Let it be a lesson to all people who buy property with the intention of building or using the property in an illegal fashion because it is cheaper than doing it right. This has been a huge chillul Hashem from day one.The shtick that has been pulled with this property is embarrassing to every frum yid that lives in the area and harms those who want to do things right but will have to deal with an ever growing bureaucracy that makes things increasingly difficult to do.

18

 Jul 14, 2010 at 08:15 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #1  
Anonymous Says:

These people are not capable of living in peace with their neighbors according to the rules of law. Everything has to be SHTICK.

Did you ever hear of those 2 words that are out of use today, it used to be in the 19th century in Europe. Here in the US its outdated. Those 2 words is "anti-samitisim". You are from those people still thinking that in the us anti-semitisim is in existence. Wake up shefele.

19

 Jul 14, 2010 at 08:16 PM meir Says:

Anyone notice a pattern of zoning violations? Nah must be antisemistism

20

 Jul 14, 2010 at 08:19 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #8  
Anonymous Says:

Please stop using the word anti semitism, you can say they're wrong, bad vicious whatever to support your side. Using this word just doesn't do anything good to anyone.

You're wrong. Anti-semitisim is here and its in place. B"h most of Monsey area is Jewish today, I remember Monsey 25 years ago. Anti-samitisim was an understatement. We're slowly getting rid of these freiye yiden who use to teil ois tzures for all shuls & developments. We still got some of them there.

21

 Jul 14, 2010 at 08:36 PM Unter Chochom Says:

Reply to #17  
Oiber Chuchem Says:

If you knew the whole story you would see that this is not antisemitism. This property acquisition over 10 years ago started in an underhanded fashion and every move that was made was not done without a legal fight or threat. It is not in any village because they built illegally when they purchased it and the village tried to stop them and they sued. They were cut out of the village so that the village would not be bankrupted trying to enforce their laws. They then built non conforming buildings completely out of character with the area. I would only hope that they are forced to raze the area to set an example that you cannot do as you please and the hell with your neighbors L'maan yishmiu v'yirau. Let it be a lesson to all people who buy property with the intention of building or using the property in an illegal fashion because it is cheaper than doing it right. This has been a huge chillul Hashem from day one.The shtick that has been pulled with this property is embarrassing to every frum yid that lives in the area and harms those who want to do things right but will have to deal with an ever growing bureaucracy that makes things increasingly difficult to do.

The Property was purchased by a Yeshiva from the US army. The village of New Hempstead tried to stop that Yeshiva from moving in using illegal tactics and got caught in front of a Federal judge. As part of the settlement (besides paying for all the legal fees) the court agreed that the property was not part of New Hempsted but part of Ramapo.
They built a project under all required Ramapo laws and received a building permit without any "SHTICK". Several surrounding villages who are afraid of the growth of the Yeshiva community went to court with the Town that the law allowing the project was faulty. the Court found the law is valid but the Yeshiva requires a further review due to possible traffic issue.
Additionally Only the VILLAGE OF WESLEY HILLS was found to have any standing to sue the Yeshiva. So we have a properly built Yeshiva that is being chased by the Village of Wesley hills and now must pay 75000 within 30 days.
NU so whats the big news?

22

 Jul 14, 2010 at 08:49 PM Oiber Chuchem Says:

Reply to #11  
to#8 Says:

o yes it does!!! all that the people who are saying all these comments just don't want a place thats filled with kidusha and with such gidolim b'torah--SHAME ON ALL OF YOU!!!

To be a Gadol you need to follow the laws of the land you live in and have sensitivity to your neighbors. This property violates both. No Gadol would ever dream of living in a home that was established in an underhanded fashion. The chillul Hashem that was created when building this project will chase away any kedusha that you think could exist here. Shame on the owners of this property. They have been an embarrassment to this town. The Chofetz Chaim is rolling in his grave.

23

 Jul 14, 2010 at 09:03 PM Unter Chochom Says:

Reply to #22  
Oiber Chuchem Says:

To be a Gadol you need to follow the laws of the land you live in and have sensitivity to your neighbors. This property violates both. No Gadol would ever dream of living in a home that was established in an underhanded fashion. The chillul Hashem that was created when building this project will chase away any kedusha that you think could exist here. Shame on the owners of this property. They have been an embarrassment to this town. The Chofetz Chaim is rolling in his grave.

Oiber Chachom sounds like he has a problem with the growth of Torah.
Are you a Posek on Chillul Hashem? A project that was built to house Kollel families done properly following all the local zoning laws of the Township is not a Chillul Hashem. Attacking the yeshiva and using the name of the Chofetz Chaim to boot is disingenuous and a transparent attempt to be Mivazeh the entire Mosad Hatorah.

24

 Jul 14, 2010 at 09:08 PM New Hempstead Says:

As a long-term New Hempstead resident "in the know" about what is going on, keep in mind that his housing project is based on a lie and a fraud. The developer claimed he had a community of Torah scholars who would move in, hence the "adult student housing" claim. IN fact, there is no community of scholars. This is a building project, pure and simple. The developer put ads in Jewish newspapers looking for tenants. It is designed to make MONEY for the developer. Furthermore, the dense housing does not belong on Grandview Avenue, next to New Hempstead. The entire area all around is single family, quiet neighborhoods. The project is a monstrosity that does not belong and does fit in and no one in the area wants it, with good reason. It is offensive to use Torah as an excuse to do dirty business.

25

 Jul 14, 2010 at 09:20 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #24  
New Hempstead Says:

As a long-term New Hempstead resident "in the know" about what is going on, keep in mind that his housing project is based on a lie and a fraud. The developer claimed he had a community of Torah scholars who would move in, hence the "adult student housing" claim. IN fact, there is no community of scholars. This is a building project, pure and simple. The developer put ads in Jewish newspapers looking for tenants. It is designed to make MONEY for the developer. Furthermore, the dense housing does not belong on Grandview Avenue, next to New Hempstead. The entire area all around is single family, quiet neighborhoods. The project is a monstrosity that does not belong and does fit in and no one in the area wants it, with good reason. It is offensive to use Torah as an excuse to do dirty business.

In the Know?
Where were you at the public hearing where no neighbors opposed the project.
The families living there are all members of the Yeshiva Chofetz Chaim Kollel.
The purported advertisement for kollel men back in 2005 said clearly they were looking for Kollel students only!
As a neighbor i am sick of the lies and twisted comments. The boys living there with their families are real nice. The site looks great. And dont forget it is surrounded on three sides by a old public school campus and the East Ramapo central Kitchens.

By the way you cant make any money off Kollel families, they cost more than they can pay by far!

26

 Jul 14, 2010 at 09:35 PM Oiber Chuchem Says:

Reply to #21  
Unter Chochom Says:

The Property was purchased by a Yeshiva from the US army. The village of New Hempstead tried to stop that Yeshiva from moving in using illegal tactics and got caught in front of a Federal judge. As part of the settlement (besides paying for all the legal fees) the court agreed that the property was not part of New Hempsted but part of Ramapo.
They built a project under all required Ramapo laws and received a building permit without any "SHTICK". Several surrounding villages who are afraid of the growth of the Yeshiva community went to court with the Town that the law allowing the project was faulty. the Court found the law is valid but the Yeshiva requires a further review due to possible traffic issue.
Additionally Only the VILLAGE OF WESLEY HILLS was found to have any standing to sue the Yeshiva. So we have a properly built Yeshiva that is being chased by the Village of Wesley hills and now must pay 75000 within 30 days.
NU so whats the big news?

They renovated the barracks without a permit during the purchase prior to conveying the deed to the village claiming it was federal property and it is not subject to the village laws. They changed the usage of the property illegally. They were never single family houses and were converted illegally. It was non conforming usage based on the number of buildings to the size of the lot. The village has an obligation to its residents to uphold their zoning laws. The village knew that fighting it win or lose would bankrupt them and were more than happy to avoid this by having them secede from the village. The property is smack dab in the middle of New Hempstead. They then knocked down the former barracks and built a multifamily housing complex. The permit was issued by claiming RLUIPA exeption. A judge found that the permit to build was not properly granted which brings them to the mess they are presently in. Nothing was ever done properly with this property. I stand by my prior post #17. All illegal tactics were on the part of the property owners.

27

 Jul 14, 2010 at 09:41 PM formally Says:

Reply to #20  
Anonymous Says:

You're wrong. Anti-semitisim is here and its in place. B"h most of Monsey area is Jewish today, I remember Monsey 25 years ago. Anti-samitisim was an understatement. We're slowly getting rid of these freiye yiden who use to teil ois tzures for all shuls & developments. We still got some of them there.

there are some mainly because of the acts of knuckleheads like this developer and many other yeshivas recently in the news and of course laundering ,money. In addition the response from the frummies about the criminal they did nothing wrong blah blah blah never ever owning up to the crime. and of course the public out cry that their members should not face justice of prison time as opposed to every other USA citizen

seems the people who always are screaming antisemitism are involved in doing something wrong illegal or schtick.

There are zoning laws and rules, whenever their development that is different than was was there need to do studies. A yeshiva is no different.

28

 Jul 14, 2010 at 09:51 PM Oiber Chuchem Says:

Reply to #25  
Anonymous Says:

In the Know?
Where were you at the public hearing where no neighbors opposed the project.
The families living there are all members of the Yeshiva Chofetz Chaim Kollel.
The purported advertisement for kollel men back in 2005 said clearly they were looking for Kollel students only!
As a neighbor i am sick of the lies and twisted comments. The boys living there with their families are real nice. The site looks great. And dont forget it is surrounded on three sides by a old public school campus and the East Ramapo central Kitchens.

By the way you cant make any money off Kollel families, they cost more than they can pay by far!

Well they are members now that they live there.

29

 Jul 14, 2010 at 10:01 PM Oiber Chuchem Says:

Reply to #23  
Unter Chochom Says:

Oiber Chachom sounds like he has a problem with the growth of Torah.
Are you a Posek on Chillul Hashem? A project that was built to house Kollel families done properly following all the local zoning laws of the Township is not a Chillul Hashem. Attacking the yeshiva and using the name of the Chofetz Chaim to boot is disingenuous and a transparent attempt to be Mivazeh the entire Mosad Hatorah.

Not opposed to the growth of torah in the least. I live here. It was and still is a chillul Hashem. You don't need someone to pasken that something is a chillul Hashem. When people say "the Rabbi feels that he is above the law" it constitutes a bizayon Hatorah which is certainly a chillul Hashem. The owner who is a descendant of the Chofetz Chaim is mevazeh the Torah with this project. You cannot run roughshod over your neighbors in the name of Torah growth. The end does not justify the means.

30

 Jul 14, 2010 at 10:23 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #12  
Shaul in Monsey Says:

The biggest joke of this entire story is that if C'V a fire broke out and the town couldn't respond in time because zoning laws were broken, and someone died, these same frummocks would be crying antisemitism over the town abandoning them.

These apartments are illegal. The judge allowed them to live there for over a year. That was a chesed on his part, he didn't have to do that.

Newsflash: It ain't antisemitism if a yid gets shot in the back as he's leaving the bank he just robbed at gunpoint.

The villages have every right to demand that Ramapo follow the law. The streets and the infrastructure are overburdened, and Monsey is looking more and more like Lodz every day. We all know whose ainikel is involved here and he's a crook shebecrook. Let him pay to relocate whatever idiots moved in there to begin with.

I have lived in Rockland for 38 years in the same house. I now have 2 illegal Yeshivas with busses and noisy kids on my street. The Yeshivas are in 4 bedroom homes with 3 baths. I have counted between 40-60 kids there daily. If there is a fire, none of these kids would be able to get out. Why can't Yeshivas be built legally and have permits? We are older Yidden who like to take a cap nap daily, but when the kids are outside, it's like a circus.

31

 Jul 14, 2010 at 10:46 PM Anonymous Says:

Your all a bunch of fools.....take it slow no one is getting evicted....I live very close and its all peacful and quiet-I don't know what your hocking!!!

32

 Jul 14, 2010 at 11:11 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #27  
formally Says:

there are some mainly because of the acts of knuckleheads like this developer and many other yeshivas recently in the news and of course laundering ,money. In addition the response from the frummies about the criminal they did nothing wrong blah blah blah never ever owning up to the crime. and of course the public out cry that their members should not face justice of prison time as opposed to every other USA citizen

seems the people who always are screaming antisemitism are involved in doing something wrong illegal or schtick.

There are zoning laws and rules, whenever their development that is different than was was there need to do studies. A yeshiva is no different.

And so far this Yeshiva has won in court numerous times. Many people in the neighborhood are furious with the town. Every time they sue they end up losing because the law is not on the side f the town rather it is on the side of the Yeshiva. The town has had to pay lawyers fees and damages and you know where that comes from? The real estate taxes. They are willing to waste everyone's money just to give the Yeshiva a hard time when they have lost so often. Do you not think that is an indication of discrimination?

33

 Jul 14, 2010 at 11:24 PM formally Says:

Reply to #30  
Anonymous Says:

I have lived in Rockland for 38 years in the same house. I now have 2 illegal Yeshivas with busses and noisy kids on my street. The Yeshivas are in 4 bedroom homes with 3 baths. I have counted between 40-60 kids there daily. If there is a fire, none of these kids would be able to get out. Why can't Yeshivas be built legally and have permits? We are older Yidden who like to take a cap nap daily, but when the kids are outside, it's like a circus.

it is because every tom dick and harry wants to open a yeshiva and many just do not have the support/money they need to build a yeshiva correctly.

therefore many of these issues is not about Torah growth just power and someone wants to run a yeshiva

34

 Jul 14, 2010 at 11:28 PM Anonymous Says:

This is actually amusing - some people out there proporting knoledge of what legally went on, everyone know that BH its a thriving makom torah, and as usual there are the jealous ones who love to make sick comments......

35

 Jul 14, 2010 at 11:32 PM Emes Says:

Reply to #26  
Oiber Chuchem Says:

They renovated the barracks without a permit during the purchase prior to conveying the deed to the village claiming it was federal property and it is not subject to the village laws. They changed the usage of the property illegally. They were never single family houses and were converted illegally. It was non conforming usage based on the number of buildings to the size of the lot. The village has an obligation to its residents to uphold their zoning laws. The village knew that fighting it win or lose would bankrupt them and were more than happy to avoid this by having them secede from the village. The property is smack dab in the middle of New Hempstead. They then knocked down the former barracks and built a multifamily housing complex. The permit was issued by claiming RLUIPA exeption. A judge found that the permit to build was not properly granted which brings them to the mess they are presently in. Nothing was ever done properly with this property. I stand by my prior post #17. All illegal tactics were on the part of the property owners.

WRONG ! they were always single family houses as part of the army, then they were uses as single family homes for the homeless, then it was purchased by a Yeshiva and used once again for single family homes.
No change was made illegally back in 97-98 and everything was done according
the law since. Yes " They Knocked down the former barracks" but only after getting a demolition permit. Once again that how it is supposed to be done.
Wrong! the permit was based on the Town of Ramapo Adult Student Housing law, that was found to be legal by the court.

Wrong! nevertheless RLUIPA is the law of the land and using the law to build is legal in my book.
Yes it is a religious campus for educational religious student use, and it looks great too!

36

 Jul 14, 2010 at 11:32 PM The Magid Says:

#1 IS A JEW EVER RIGHT?

37

 Jul 14, 2010 at 11:33 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #30  
Anonymous Says:

I have lived in Rockland for 38 years in the same house. I now have 2 illegal Yeshivas with busses and noisy kids on my street. The Yeshivas are in 4 bedroom homes with 3 baths. I have counted between 40-60 kids there daily. If there is a fire, none of these kids would be able to get out. Why can't Yeshivas be built legally and have permits? We are older Yidden who like to take a cap nap daily, but when the kids are outside, it's like a circus.

Hey this one was built legally with permits and look were it got them!

38

 Jul 14, 2010 at 11:34 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #27  
formally Says:

there are some mainly because of the acts of knuckleheads like this developer and many other yeshivas recently in the news and of course laundering ,money. In addition the response from the frummies about the criminal they did nothing wrong blah blah blah never ever owning up to the crime. and of course the public out cry that their members should not face justice of prison time as opposed to every other USA citizen

seems the people who always are screaming antisemitism are involved in doing something wrong illegal or schtick.

There are zoning laws and rules, whenever their development that is different than was was there need to do studies. A yeshiva is no different.

I poshut don't understand these words of yours, even though they seem to be written in English: "...whenever their development that is different than was was there need to do studies." Voss meint doss. Just give me the plain p'shat.

39

 Jul 14, 2010 at 11:35 PM Anonymous Says:

i see voz iz nayis is biased against this mosad, as all my positive comments are not getting through the mods.... interesting to note

40

 Jul 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #29  
Oiber Chuchem Says:

Not opposed to the growth of torah in the least. I live here. It was and still is a chillul Hashem. You don't need someone to pasken that something is a chillul Hashem. When people say "the Rabbi feels that he is above the law" it constitutes a bizayon Hatorah which is certainly a chillul Hashem. The owner who is a descendant of the Chofetz Chaim is mevazeh the Torah with this project. You cannot run roughshod over your neighbors in the name of Torah growth. The end does not justify the means.

A psak of chillul hashem by you is like a rabbi doing bypass surgery, it is just as wrong and just as dangerous.
You dislike the project fine! but disparaging the rabbis is low. Frankly I am surprised that the moderator allows your junk.

41

 Jul 15, 2010 at 08:30 AM Anonymous Says:

This Kollel is fantastic. They are serious about learning and the funds are privately collected. These families live in our community and spend money at our merchants.
Don't be so fast to condemn them as the "shmira" they provide protects us all

42

 Jul 15, 2010 at 08:17 AM Former Pleasant Ridger Says:

Reply to #23  
Unter Chochom Says:

Oiber Chachom sounds like he has a problem with the growth of Torah.
Are you a Posek on Chillul Hashem? A project that was built to house Kollel families done properly following all the local zoning laws of the Township is not a Chillul Hashem. Attacking the yeshiva and using the name of the Chofetz Chaim to boot is disingenuous and a transparent attempt to be Mivazeh the entire Mosad Hatorah.

Your name says it all..... As a former resident of this neighborhood I don't need to be a posek on chillul hashem to know that when a once cohisive jewish neighborhood is splintered, Hashem himself is crying. Before people comment back that the MO just don't like the "frum" world..... know that Chofetz Chaim was there for a while & the was a shul that EVERYONE davened in. Then came the underhanded ways & bullying tactics and when true decent G-d fearing jews didn't with join lock step with what the Rabbi was doing, it divided the neighbors. When the "village" sees what jews are doing to other jews why should they go above & beyond the letter of the law?

43

 Jul 14, 2010 at 11:43 PM ac nussbaum Says:

The alleged failure to conduct a proper enviromental review: the reason for the evictions, sounds awfully suspicious A) I know the developer well, he is a man of high moral character. In no way would he violate a court injunction B) This so-called transgression is occuring while an appeal is pending C) As this is essentially a matter of legality, why and how did the judge permit the families to remain for a year.

44

 Jul 14, 2010 at 11:55 PM Anonymous Says:

FYI: This same judge held up the Adult Student Housing part. (the villages are appealing) This same judge ruled that all the Zacks have to do is go back to the planning board. (Dont the forget that it is the same planning board that approved it to begin with) For all the above comment who know it all lets talk facts:
Environment study: does not equal dangerous no judge would've allowed temporary dwelling if it was a danger. The only thing that you can sue on construction to stop it is for environment.
The Judge gave permission prior to the people moving in, If t was don illegally then wouldn't the zacks have put in allot more then just 16???

45

 Jul 15, 2010 at 12:27 AM Country Living Says:

Reply to #35  
Emes Says:

WRONG ! they were always single family houses as part of the army, then they were uses as single family homes for the homeless, then it was purchased by a Yeshiva and used once again for single family homes.
No change was made illegally back in 97-98 and everything was done according
the law since. Yes " They Knocked down the former barracks" but only after getting a demolition permit. Once again that how it is supposed to be done.
Wrong! the permit was based on the Town of Ramapo Adult Student Housing law, that was found to be legal by the court.

Wrong! nevertheless RLUIPA is the law of the land and using the law to build is legal in my book.
Yes it is a religious campus for educational religious student use, and it looks great too!

I don't think it looks great. It is an apartment complex. Those of us who did not grow up in Brooklyn understand that a village or town can and should have zoning laws. Many communities out of town have Shuls and businesses on main streets and the people live on quiet residential streets. If you want to go to Shul, you walk 2 blocks or you get into a car. Why you people feel you have a right to pave over a whole Town is beyond me....oh, I forgot, you are New Yorkers and feel you can do whatever you feel like doing. And anyone who disagrees is an anti-Semite. Do us a favor, and stay below Viola.

46

 Jul 15, 2010 at 07:43 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #35  
Emes Says:

WRONG ! they were always single family houses as part of the army, then they were uses as single family homes for the homeless, then it was purchased by a Yeshiva and used once again for single family homes.
No change was made illegally back in 97-98 and everything was done according
the law since. Yes " They Knocked down the former barracks" but only after getting a demolition permit. Once again that how it is supposed to be done.
Wrong! the permit was based on the Town of Ramapo Adult Student Housing law, that was found to be legal by the court.

Wrong! nevertheless RLUIPA is the law of the land and using the law to build is legal in my book.
Yes it is a religious campus for educational religious student use, and it looks great too!

Wrong! They were army barracks. There were no single families living there when the army owned it. No kitchens. Looked like camp bunkhouses. They converted them to homes by building kitchens and making rooms. RLUIPA is very specific and building a apartment complex for rent is not covered under that law. Everyone knows that "adult student housing" is a scam to avoid zoning laws and property taxes. How long have you lived in the area? That is if you live here. I have lived in a 5 mile radius of this barracks for close to 40 years and have lived about 1 mile away for the last 15 years. I am VERY familiar with this property.

47

 Jul 15, 2010 at 09:39 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #46  
Anonymous Says:

Wrong! They were army barracks. There were no single families living there when the army owned it. No kitchens. Looked like camp bunkhouses. They converted them to homes by building kitchens and making rooms. RLUIPA is very specific and building a apartment complex for rent is not covered under that law. Everyone knows that "adult student housing" is a scam to avoid zoning laws and property taxes. How long have you lived in the area? That is if you live here. I have lived in a 5 mile radius of this barracks for close to 40 years and have lived about 1 mile away for the last 15 years. I am VERY familiar with this property.

By the way they were single family homes for officers and their families with kitchens bathrooms and bedrooms. Your lack of knowledge seems deliberate to paint the Yeshiva in a bad light.

48

 Jul 15, 2010 at 10:16 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #5  
Anonymous Says:

What Israeli families? I live near this place. They are American Kollel families.

They were living in Israel previously. They are American, though.

49

 Jul 15, 2010 at 10:19 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #10  
Anonymous Says:

The housing is a scam to avoid paying taxes. This has nothing to do with antisemitism and everything to do with following the law. If the people living the cjas v'sholom get sick because the environmental study wasn't done properly would you call Rabbi Zachs an antisemite for endangering yidden?

You are rudely mistaken! You obviously don't know anything. I happen to be an "insider" and this has everything to do with antisemitism. From the start, the villages (not only Ramapo) has caused problems for this housing project which has nothing to do with avoiding taxes! They just don't want Jews building more houses! This has nothing to do with the law! The houses were being built to give Frum Kollel families the opportunity to affordable housing! You really should watch what you say! By the way - this whole article is Motzei Shem Ra - what's it doing on a Frum website???

50

 Jul 15, 2010 at 10:23 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #27  
formally Says:

there are some mainly because of the acts of knuckleheads like this developer and many other yeshivas recently in the news and of course laundering ,money. In addition the response from the frummies about the criminal they did nothing wrong blah blah blah never ever owning up to the crime. and of course the public out cry that their members should not face justice of prison time as opposed to every other USA citizen

seems the people who always are screaming antisemitism are involved in doing something wrong illegal or schtick.

There are zoning laws and rules, whenever their development that is different than was was there need to do studies. A yeshiva is no different.

It's amazing - I wouldn't think you're even Jewish the way you talk!! You know nothing about this so maybe keep your filthy lashon hara comments to yourself! I know this situation personally - and they did nothing wrong - except if you call trying to give Kollel famillies an affordable place to live something wrong. Yes it is antisemitism - the villages just don't want the Jews to build more housing. If the goyim build they have no problem with that! There is nothing "illegal or shtick" about this whole situation! Learn your facts before you start spewing hatred on your fellow Jews!

51

 Jul 15, 2010 at 10:25 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #33  
formally Says:

it is because every tom dick and harry wants to open a yeshiva and many just do not have the support/money they need to build a yeshiva correctly.

therefore many of these issues is not about Torah growth just power and someone wants to run a yeshiva

You have absolutely NO idea what you're talking about! Go pick on someone your own size!!!

52

 Jul 15, 2010 at 10:27 AM Luke Says:

The problem stems from our esteemed Supervisor's need to rush the approval of this project by skirting the SEQRA laws and allowing the environmental review to consist of just a long form EAF instead of a full DEIS. Well it came back to bite him big time and he knows it because he handled SEQRA totally different with the Patrick Farm property and the baseball stadium. So if anyone is to be thanked for this mess it is the pander politician informally known a CSL. Sad.

53

 Jul 15, 2010 at 12:39 PM awacs Says:

Reply to #32  
Anonymous Says:

And so far this Yeshiva has won in court numerous times. Many people in the neighborhood are furious with the town. Every time they sue they end up losing because the law is not on the side f the town rather it is on the side of the Yeshiva. The town has had to pay lawyers fees and damages and you know where that comes from? The real estate taxes. They are willing to waste everyone's money just to give the Yeshiva a hard time when they have lost so often. Do you not think that is an indication of discrimination?

Can you give cites to the court battles which the Yeshiva has won 'numerous times', Mr. Anonymous?

54

 Jul 15, 2010 at 01:53 PM actual Jew Says:

if they did not follow the rule of law and the courts, they need to be evicted. Rabbi Akiva, Rambam, Rashi - read them on rules of secular law.
also, "Israeli families?" what are they doing here? or do they all speak English as third language and so reporter assumed that they are not American?

55

 Jul 15, 2010 at 02:01 PM Shalom Says:

Reply to #50  
Anonymous Says:

It's amazing - I wouldn't think you're even Jewish the way you talk!! You know nothing about this so maybe keep your filthy lashon hara comments to yourself! I know this situation personally - and they did nothing wrong - except if you call trying to give Kollel famillies an affordable place to live something wrong. Yes it is antisemitism - the villages just don't want the Jews to build more housing. If the goyim build they have no problem with that! There is nothing "illegal or shtick" about this whole situation! Learn your facts before you start spewing hatred on your fellow Jews!

There is no objection to new housing. There is no objection to Jewish housing. There IS an objection to dense apartment housing in a quiet suburban neighborhood that people moved to for a higher quality of life.

56

 Jul 15, 2010 at 02:43 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #54  
actual Jew Says:

if they did not follow the rule of law and the courts, they need to be evicted. Rabbi Akiva, Rambam, Rashi - read them on rules of secular law.
also, "Israeli families?" what are they doing here? or do they all speak English as third language and so reporter assumed that they are not American?

Read posts #48, 49, 50 - I hope that answers your questions!

57

 Jul 15, 2010 at 03:36 PM shocked!! Says:

this whole thing is just a way to be mevaze this esteemed Mosad HaTorah and its Choshive Roshei Yeshiva. Shame on you post #22 Just remember for motzei shame ra there is NO mechila [Rambam:hilchas teshuva]

59

 Jul 15, 2010 at 03:59 PM formally Says:

Reply to #50  
Anonymous Says:

It's amazing - I wouldn't think you're even Jewish the way you talk!! You know nothing about this so maybe keep your filthy lashon hara comments to yourself! I know this situation personally - and they did nothing wrong - except if you call trying to give Kollel famillies an affordable place to live something wrong. Yes it is antisemitism - the villages just don't want the Jews to build more housing. If the goyim build they have no problem with that! There is nothing "illegal or shtick" about this whole situation! Learn your facts before you start spewing hatred on your fellow Jews!

first why attack me, i just made a general statement and there are numerous other statements saying that they know this was done illegally.

The reason why you attack is because a hit a nerve. Do a search and see how many yeshivas are in trouble with their neighbors. One thing they all had in common was not following zoning rules

"If the goyim build they have no problem with that!"

Please inform the board some projects goyim did in this are and they had no problem. Since you are in the know. If you can't you statement is useless since you really are just guessing.

One or two would be enough, street address and the year the project was completed

60

 Jul 15, 2010 at 04:01 PM Oiber Chuchem Says:

Reply to #57  
shocked!! Says:

this whole thing is just a way to be mevaze this esteemed Mosad HaTorah and its Choshive Roshei Yeshiva. Shame on you post #22 Just remember for motzei shame ra there is NO mechila [Rambam:hilchas teshuva]

There is also no teshuva for chillul Hashem. I stand by my post.

61

 Jul 15, 2010 at 04:34 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #54  
actual Jew Says:

if they did not follow the rule of law and the courts, they need to be evicted. Rabbi Akiva, Rambam, Rashi - read them on rules of secular law.
also, "Israeli families?" what are they doing here? or do they all speak English as third language and so reporter assumed that they are not American?

Can you tell me which Rabbi Akiva, Rambam and Rashi your are referring to? I would like to read them.

62

 Jul 15, 2010 at 04:46 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #59  
formally Says:

first why attack me, i just made a general statement and there are numerous other statements saying that they know this was done illegally.

The reason why you attack is because a hit a nerve. Do a search and see how many yeshivas are in trouble with their neighbors. One thing they all had in common was not following zoning rules

"If the goyim build they have no problem with that!"

Please inform the board some projects goyim did in this are and they had no problem. Since you are in the know. If you can't you statement is useless since you really are just guessing.

One or two would be enough, street address and the year the project was completed

formally,

He does not "attack" you because you hit a nerve, rather, he is probably just irked by how you always have such a poor attitude about Jews. It happens, that besides your statements which are almost always incomprehensible and illogical, you also come across as a very farbissne person. It must be something along those lines or else it it difficult to understand how you consistently make such ridiculous comments. Almost every single one makes absolutely no sense. And they are never based on fact, rather you make things up as you go along. (If you think I am calling you a liar, must be because it hits a nerve)

But using your logic, that it bothers you when someone points out your inanities must mean that is has hit a nerve by you.

63

 Jul 15, 2010 at 10:10 PM Chacham Mikulam Says:

The Developers moved the couples in against the judges orders, the judge was compassionate enough to give a 10 month grace.
I can't understand why Klugman/Bodners Kollel are renting these houses and joining in this chilul hashem.

64

 Jul 15, 2010 at 11:56 PM Anonymous Says:

A catastrophe? Its probably wise for everyone not to be so smug and assume that we will be loved more by those who oppose us if we maintain larger green lawns, rather than living in multi-dwelling houses. In Hashem's eyes both are equal and unfortunately in our enemies eyes they are also equal, as history as proven. (No matter the size, shape of their hat, or lack thereof.)
I'd like to invite all those who feel qualified to judge, to spend a day or even an hour to join in this small community. The kollel men learn, pray and share with all the people of the community around them, be they black hatters or kipah serugahs. The community is one filled with simplicity, love, and are self supporting. The only way to bring an end to this Golus is to join hands with our brethren and not with those who seek to destroy us.

65

 Jul 16, 2010 at 09:20 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #63  
Chacham Mikulam Says:

The Developers moved the couples in against the judges orders, the judge was compassionate enough to give a 10 month grace.
I can't understand why Klugman/Bodners Kollel are renting these houses and joining in this chilul hashem.

Once again a Posek on Chillul Hashem!
It is a Chillul Hashem when a yid cant find in himself to support one of the the greatest Kollels and Mokom Torah in Monsey

It is a Yeshiva not a developer that built the campus and as I have a family member learning in the Chofetz Chaim Kollel ( In the Kollel Zichron Mishulam Chaburah in the name of a family member of Klugman Mishpacha) I a well aware that Reb Dovid Bodner who is a great machzik Torah is only a small donor to the Kollel. In addition The Yeshiva Chofetz Chaim carries a major part (somewhere around 60%) of the Kollel budget through Housing allowances and direct cash support.

This is in addition to the other groups of Kollel students that the Yeshiva has learning in the Yeshiva.
Come and visit and you will see the Ultimate Kiddush Hashem !!!

66

 Jul 16, 2010 at 09:44 AM Anonymous Says:

I think the entire Village of Wesley Hills should be dissolved. It was made by Robert Rhodes and his Anti Semitic friends to keep the frum Jews out and its time to get rid of it. They only raise our taxes with another level of government and use our money against our Yeshivas.
Lets put this to a referendum, before someone wins a lawsuit against the village and our taxes have to pay for their actions.

67

 Jul 18, 2010 at 07:01 PM Monsey Anonymous Says:

Reply to #33  
formally Says:

it is because every tom dick and harry wants to open a yeshiva and many just do not have the support/money they need to build a yeshiva correctly.

therefore many of these issues is not about Torah growth just power and someone wants to run a yeshiva

Chofetz Chaim just recently saw its federal civil rights lawsuit thrown out. Chofetz Chaim claimed anti-Semitism Judge responded you got to provide some proof. No anti-Semitism... The Zaks brother were involved with Rabbi Helbran convicted of kidnapping a 13 yearold boy who was missing for 18 months before turning up with the Zaks brothers.. The Zakses then tried to take the boy away from his mother in Rockland Family Court.

68

Sign-in to post a comment

Scroll Up
Advertisements:

Sell your scrap gold and broken jewelry and earn hard cash sell gold today!