Brussels, Belgium – DNA Tests Reveal Hitler YM”Sh Descended of Jews, Blacks

    14

    Brussels, Belgium – DNA tests have revealed Adolf Hitler may have been related to both Jews and black people that he earmarked for extermination.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Brussels news magazine Knack has claimed that DNA obtained from the Nazi leader’s relatives living in America led to the discovery.

    Journalist Jean-Paul Mulders garnered the DNA from a serviette dropped by one of three known Hitler descendants who live on Long Island, New York.

    That led earlier this year to the tracking down in Austria of a farmer known only as Norbert H. who was found to be a cousin of the German dictator.

    Mulders used the services of historian Marc Vermeeren to find the cousin, in the Waldviertel region, and another 39 distant relatives of Hitler, who killed himself in his bunker in Berlin in April 1945.

    Norbert H. gave Vermeeren and Mulders a sample of his saliva.

    Vermeeren in particular wanted to see if rumours of Hitler fathering a child to a French peasant woman during World War I were true.

    Using both the Austrian sample and the serviette DNA, Mulders claims the link between the two men was ‘irrefutable – the Y-chromosome was identical’.

    But the particular form of the DNA – Haplopgroup E1b1b (Y-DNA) – is rare in Germany and indeed western Europe. 

    ‘It is most commonly found in the Berbers of Morocco, in Algeria, Libya and Tunisia as well as among Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews,’ he said.

    ‘One can from this postulate that Hitler was related to people whom he despised,’ said Mulders in the magazine.

    Haplogroup E1b1b1, which accounts for approximately 18 to 20 per cent of Ashkenazi and 8.6 to 30 per cent  of Sephardic Y-chromosomes, appears to be one of the major founding lineages of the Jewish population.

    ‘This is a surprising result,’ said Ronny Decorte, a genetic specialist.

    He confirmed the test outcome and stressed the probability that Hitler did have some roots in North Africa.

    ‘It is difficult to predict, what happens with this information, both to opponents and supporters of Hitler,’ he added.

    The magazine says the DNA was tested under stringent laboratory conditions to obtain the results.

    The original DNA on the serviette in America came from Alexander Stuart-Houston, 61, a grand-nephew of Hitler.

    He was trailed for seven days before he dropped the litter which Mulders said led him to the relation in Austria – and now to this link with Hitler‘s sworn enemies.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    14 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    shredready
    shredready
    13 years ago

    no big deal it was maybe from who knows how many genarations ago. Nobody is pure anything I would say

    Paskunyak
    Paskunyak
    13 years ago

    Hitler was a MUTT. Someone should have taken him to the pound years earlier.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    Take his pic off this site Fio feh uhh I can’t look   him he killed my great grand parents

    13 years ago

    These is too silly to comment upon. Next thing you know, Ahmadinijad is going to be Jewish too.

    13 years ago

    remember – esav was the son of yitzchak.

    Menashe
    Menashe
    13 years ago

    I’d be skeptical—too many assumptions. But even if true, it would be a useless fact; All the evil perpetrated by this devil in human form was in the past and unfortunately can’t be undone.

    AlbertEinstein
    AlbertEinstein
    13 years ago

    Everyone is related to everyone.

    It’s called Odom HoRishon.

    Get over it.

    enlightened-yid
    enlightened-yid
    13 years ago

    There are no pure races, science doesn’t lie. We are all interrelated and our ancestors come from first people in Africa.

    Anon Ibid Opcit
    Anon Ibid Opcit
    13 years ago

    #10 , you are right. And “race” is a scientifically worthless concept when applied to humans. But IF – big if – the research is correct and IF this evil man was descended from Jews and Mahgrebis, so what? It doesn’t add or detract from the evil he did.

    Anon Ibid Opcit
    Anon Ibid Opcit
    13 years ago

    #2 What’s wrong with mutts? They don’t win dog shows, but they live longer and are healthier. One of the prices we Jews and other groups like the Amish pay for not intermarrying is increased rates of genetic diseases like Tay Sachs.

    HaNavon
    HaNavon
    13 years ago

    Wait a second, the e1b1b haplogroup doesn’t include blacks at all! It’s found all around the Mediterranean, specifically in north africans, Jews and other semitic peoples in western Asia.
    It extends mainly as far south as Ethiopia, but the people that inhabit the horn of Africa are not historically referred to as ‘black’, as we can see in the writings of Pliny the elder, Naturalis Historia, book V, where he discusses them as being darker, (he does distinguish between the lighter Ethiopians and the darker ones, in quoting Homer’s Oddyssey he says “αἰθίοπας τοὶ δίχθα δεδαιάται, ἔσχατοι ἄνδρων̓ οἱ μὲν δυσομένου ῾υπερίονος, οἱ δ̓ ἀνιόντος” There are two types of Ethiopians, those to one side of the setting of Hyperion, the sun, and those on the other side)
    but earlier in his work he discusses the people who live south of the Atlas mountain range that separates north africa from sub-saharan africa and describes the people there as being very primitive, and says “who would believe that such people exist if we would not have seen them”, and then ends his chapter on Africa by saying “other than that, there is nothing worth mentioning in Africa”

    Anon Ibid Opcit
    Anon Ibid Opcit
    13 years ago

    #13 , “Black” is a cultural term, not a scientifically useful one. Dark skinned, nappy haired native New Guineans are more closely related to Asians than they are to Africans, but people call them “Black”. You and I are more closely related to Iraqis than we are to Europeans, but we’re considered “White”. The Maasai are Nilotic, not sub-Saharan Africans, but they put down “Black” on census forms.

    If you want to look at it genetically there are three or four groups of humans which make any sense. There are the KhoiKhoi sometimes called “Hottentots”. There are the San, the “Kalahari Bushmen”. The Basque may possibly might be kind of another. And there’s everyone else. The genetic variation between our groups is no more than the variation within the groups. The Khoi and the San are different in that they have a greater genetic diversity than any other population.

    In other words, ‘Dolf Shickelgruber was a fanatic madman, not a scientist. His parentage doesn’t matter. But we knew that already.

    HaNavon
    HaNavon
    13 years ago

    Anon Ibid Opcit,

    It is always good to know that there is someone out there with a thinking head on his shoulders…

    I don’t have much time to write this evening, but yes, you are correct, ‘black’ is a cultural term.
    I was addressing the aspect of the title that was somewhat misleading, being that most of the readers of VIN associate african parentage with sub-saharan, heart of darkness, Democratic Republic of Congo blackness…