Jerusalem – An anti-hijack code system that Israel had planned to require of all incoming planes has been bogged down by protests from pilots who argue it would raise new risks, including being shot down by accident.
Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
Israel issued the Security Code System (SCS), a customised “smart” keypad, to pilots of five foreign carriers in 2008 in what it called a trial run for the credit card-sized device’s general distribution among planes that enter its airspace.
But various global aviation groups have voiced misgivings about the SCS, which purports to point out planes that have been commandeered for al Qaeda-style kamikaze attacks.
Among those reluctant to accept the Israeli innovation has been the European Union, the source of most flights to Tel Aviv. The currently SCS-compliant carriers are non-European: Delta, Continental, U.S. Airways, Air Canada and Ethiopian Airlines.
“It’s on hold,” a spokesman for Israeli Transportation Minister Yisrael Katz said when asked about SCS distribution.
Under the system, pilots approaching Israel have to type in a code, on the assumption hijackers would fail the verification. A pilot being threatened by a hijacker is expected to enter a bogus code. Either way, Israel would have time to respond.
Complaints against the SCS include that it could create a privileged class of pilots who pass Israeli vetting, that loss or malfunction of the device would cause costly midair delays; and that Israel would be rendering its airports off-limits to pilots from other routes who need to make emergency landings.
Some aviation groups say any security benefit would be off-set by the possibility of pilots mistakenly entering wrong codes or, in a hijacking, entering the right code in hope of buying time before Israeli warplanes mount an interception.
PRIORITIES
“The first priority of pilots is to ensure the safe arrival of their passengers and crew. Therefore, the threat of action by the IDF (Israel Defence Forces) may also act as a strong deterrent to pilots to enter a stress code when the situation may suggest that they should,” the International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations said in a July 26 statement.
The idea that a country would authorise the shooting down of a civilian airliner suspected of being on a crash course has received currency since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the United States.
For Israel, there is a precedent in its downing of a Libyan passenger plane over the then-occupied Egyptian Sinai in 1973.
Among those lobbying against the SCS has been the Israel Air Line Pilots Association, which counts many former fighter pilots among its members.
“Fear (of an accidental shootdown) is definitely a major motivation,” said a person familiar with the Israeli association’s involvement in the campaign.
Israeli jets are nowadays scrambled against perceived aerial threats as often as once a month, a security official said.
Another Israeli official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the SCS is intended to work as part of a multi-layered defence system, and would prove its worth.
“This will make Israel proud yet,” the official said, adding that the SCS could undergo upgrades to address shortcomings.
Responding to the European objections, Giora Romm, director of Israel’s Civil Aviation Authority, wrote back on Sept. 1 to say that SCS distribution among European airlines would be suspended while the sides meet “in order to address and resolve any concerns the EC (European Commission) might have regarding the implementation of the SCS system in EC Carriers”.
Those meetings have yet to take place.
If the pilots of those EU airlines do not wish to comply, their airlines should be banned from landing in Israel. When they are hit in the pocketbook, with a loss of revenue, they will soon change their mind.
“If the pilots of those EU airlines do not wish to comply, their airlines should be banned from landing in Israel. When they are hit in the pocketbook, with a loss of revenue, they will soon change their mind.”
I suppose, Anonymous #1 , that US flag carriers that would “not wish to comply” would be exempt from your strictures?
After all, it would not do for an American carrier to be “hit in the pocketbook”, as you so charmingly put it, would we? That would prevent American yiddn from traveling to EY, wouldn’t it?
Please put your brain in gear before you put your fingers on your keyboard.
Let’s have all American carriers take over those flights from Europe to Israel.
To #3- Before typing sarcastic, rude, and abrasive comments, you should READ what the article stated. It specifically stated that American carriers (i.e. Delta, Continental, and U.S. Airways) are in compliance with the Israeli request.
let me add #5 that it does not state ALL u.s. airlines agree to this.further rmore the pocketbook it hurts would be our own and furthermore and most important sarcastic,rude,and abrasive comments are the bread and butter of this blog.
To Cowfy #6 - Evidently, you are not familiar with the American carriers why fly to Israel; only Delta, Continental, and U.S. Airways fly to Israel from the USA. Regarding the nasty comments which I referred to, they are a violation of the rules of this board; kindly check the rules.