Jerusalem – Israeli Official ‘shocked’ At Surprise Schalit Interview

    7

    In this image from Egypt TV Tuesday Oct 18 2011 Israeli soldier Gilad Schalit is seen at an undisclosed location, during a pre-recorded interview released Tuesday.  Schalit was moved in to Egypt from captivity in Gaza beginning an elaborate prisoner swap deal in which hundreds of Palestinian inmates are to be freed in return for the captured tank crewman. (AP Photo/ Egypt TV)Jerusalem – Israeli officials harshly criticized an Egyptian television interview with soldier Gilad Schalit minutes after Hamas militants freed him in a prisoner swap Tuesday, saying the questioning was inappropriate and insensitive.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    In the interview aired on Egyptian state television, a gaunt, sallow and uncomfortable looking Schalit appeared to struggle to speak at times, and his breathing was noticeably labored as he awkwardly answered questions. The footage, along with earlier Egyptian TV video showing Schalit being transferred to Egypt, were the first images seen of the soldier after more than five years in Hamas captivity.

    Armed Hamas militants were in the area during the interview. One of them stood behind Schalit’s chair, wearing a a black face mask, a green headband of the Qassam brigades — Hamas’ military wing — and a video camera in his hand.

    “You have known what it is like to be in captivity,” the interviewer Shahira Amin said to Schalit. “There are more than 5,000 Palestinians in Israeli jails. Will you help campaign for their release?” she asked.

    “What has the experience brought you? Has it made you stronger?” she asked at another point. And, brushing aside the fact Hamas had barred anyone from visiting Schalit, she asked him why he only gave one interview while held captive.

    An Israeli official questioned the ethics of the journalists involved.

    “We are all shocked that a so-called interview was forced on (Schalit) before he could even talk to his family or set foot on Israeli soil,” the official said. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was discussing a sensitive diplomatic matter, but said the sentiment was widely shared in official Israeli ranks.

    Israeli security officials told Israeli YNet News that the interview was a violation of the deal for Schalit’s release.

    However, an Egyptian security official said the Egyptian information minister asked the intelligence chief for an exclusive interview with Schalit. According to the official, Israel allowed only one cameraman from Egyptian TV to film inside the tent where Egyptian and Israeli intelligence officials were meeting with Schalit. It was not a condition in the deal but a request from Egypt. The interviewer said it was not coerced.

    An ashen-faced Schalit answered a range of questions on his captivity and what he thought of the 1,027 Palestinian prisoners released for his freedom.

    He was then handed over to Israeli officials and only then given a medical examination, where doctors determined he showed signs of malnutrition and lack of exposure to sunlight.

    He called his family shortly afterwards.

    Israeli media discussed the interview at length, with commentators calling it insensitive.

    Channel 10 commentator and presenter Raviv Drucker said her questions would “likely win the title of the stupidest questions of the past 100 years.”

    “It wasn’t the most sensitive thing to do. An interview forced on a prisoner just released is a low thing to do,” Drucker said.

    Israeli TV anchor Yonit Levy called the interview “borderline torture”

    Amin, who conducted the interview, told Israel’s Channel 10 TV that she would not have forced Schalit to speak if he didn’t want to, and he seemed willing to do so.

    Nonetheless, “he seemed extremely tired, thin and pale, voice very faint, very difficult to concentrate. I had to repeat the questions several times,” Amin told The Associated Press. She acknowledged that he was accompanied by Hamas gunmen when he arrived for the interview.

    Earlier this week, major Israeli media outlets agreed not to disseminate new video or photos of the Schalits for 10 days following the release.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    7 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    stamm
    stamm
    12 years ago

    I heard that the Egyptian interpreter did not translate his answers accurately at all at all but actually said the opposite.

    Shlomtzy
    Shlomtzy
    12 years ago

    This is no surprise. Everything today including what happened on the Israeli side is one big publicity stunt. The politicians get their photo-op and the Schalits get their son back. And the rest of us? We get to live in a more dangerous world now. Other sons will be killed because of this. But at least they get their son back. Hashem yishmor.

    MosheM
    MosheM
    12 years ago

    It was disgusting. Typical Egyptian rishis.

    12 years ago

    Israel should hold back some terrorists until Egypt apologizes

    Sammy12
    Sammy12
    12 years ago

    Israeli Official shocked?! Dont you know by now who the Arabs are?

    DRSLZ
    DRSLZ
    12 years ago

    What was done was an outrage. He was clearly short of breath and under duress, with a masked gunman (not shown in the camera) hovering over him. Furthermore, as noted in an article in the Jerusalem Post, his answer to a question about his view on releasing Palestinian terrorists (he said he was in favor lF they were to stop fighting lsrael) was changed to an answer that he favored the release of all such prisoners unconditionally to return to their “territories.” The BBC translator also participating in this outrageous misquote.

    DRSLZ
    DRSLZ
    12 years ago

    What was done was an outrage. He was clearly short of breath and under duress, with a masked gunman (not shown in the camera) hovering over him. Furthermore, as noted in an article in the Jerusalem Post, his answer to a question about his view on releasing Palestinian terrorists (he said he was in favor lF they were to stop fighting lsrael) was changed to an answer that he favored the release of all such prisoners unconditionally to return to their “territories.” The BBC translator also participating in this outrageous misquote.