Jerusalem – Newly found coins underneath Jerusalem’s Western Wall could change the accepted belief about the construction of one of the world’s most sacred sites two millennia ago, Israeli archaeologists said Wednesday.
Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
It was long thought that the compound known to Jews as the Temple Mount and to Muslims as the Noble Sanctuary was built in its entirety by Herod, a Jewish ruler who died in 4 B.C.E. The compound replaced and expanded a much older Jewish temple complex on the same site.
But archaeologists with the Israel Antiquities Authority now say diggers have found coins underneath the massive foundation stones of the compound’s Western Wall that were stamped by a Roman proconsul 20 years after Herod’s death.
That indicates that Herod did not build the wall — part of which is venerated as Judaism’s holiest prayer site — and that construction was not close to being complete at the time of his death.
“The find changes the way we see the construction, and shows it lasted for longer than we originally thought,” said the dig’s co-director, Eli Shukron.
The four bronze coins were stamped around 17 A.D. by the Roman official Valerius Gratus.
The coins were found inside a ritual bath (mikveh) that predated construction of the renovated Temple Mount complex and which was filled in to support the new walls, Reich said.
The coins show that construction of the Western Wall had not even begun at the time of Herod’s death and was likely completed only generations later by one of his descendants.
The coins confirm a contemporary account by Josephus Flavius, a Jewish general who became a Roman historian. Writing after the destruction of the Temple by Rome in 70 A.D., he recounted that work on the Temple Mount was completed only by King Agrippa II, Herod’s great-grandson.
Two decades later the entire compound was burned by Roman legionnaires who were putting down a Jewish revolt.
Today, the compound houses the Al-Aqsa mosque and the golden-capped Muslim shrine known as the Dome of the Rock.
The fact that the compound is holy both to Jews and Muslims makes it one of the world’s most sensitive religious sites.
Why would they build the wall around the Bais HaMikdosh years after it was destroyed? What about the gemora – which should be believed far more than the archaeologists – that talks about the Roman generals that broke the walls except for the one general who didn’t break his wall in order to show the power of Rome?
I am sorry but this one, I am skeptical about. It sounds it the IAA is working for the Yishmaelim with this one.
It is important to remember that all of the Herodian dynasty took the name Herod (Hurdus or Herodus) in addition to any given name. So it would not be surprising to see a descendant called Herod as well. Further, since the earlier Herod started the project it would fit the style of Chazal to call it after his name even if he did not complete it.
Herod (hoordus) was no tzaddik, but a cold blooded psychopathic murderer.(see bava basra 3b)
Nothing wrong with taking some of the credit away from him.
#1 ,
No, they didn’t build it after the destruction of the beis hamikdash…
The beis hamikdash was destroyed in 70 ce. Herod died 75 years earlier, the complex was finished 20 years after his death. That means it only stood for a little over 50 years!