Jerusalem – The office of Sephardi Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar expressed its concern Wednesday with the impression given by a bill proposed by MK Uri Orbach last week.
Join our WhatsApp groupSubscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
The bill seeks to amend a law pertaining to marriage, which would legally prevent rabbis from taking money for performing weddings, except for travel expenses.
Orbach proposed the law against the background of the recent dispute between the religious- Zionist organization Tzohar and the Religious Services Ministry earlier this month.
Tzohar claims rabbis from local religious councils illegally charge money for conducting weddings, and the Religious Services Ministry and the chief rabbinate have sought to stymie Tzohar’s flagship free wedding service program, to protect the income of rabbis employed by the religious councils.
In response to Orbach’s bill, Amar’s office again denied there was any widespread phenomenon of local religious council rabbis charging money for their services.
“The situation today is that rabbis from local religious councils do not charge any money for weddings, apart from travel expenses,” Amar’s office said. “This bill, which will be brought onto the [public] agenda, gives the erroneous impression that rabbis have illegally charged money until now.”
Amar’s office said if it became clear there had been “one or two” instances of rabbis charging money for conducting weddings, they would be disciplined and, if necessary, suspended.
“Certainly, however, one cannot extrapolate from these individual cases to imply [the same is true] for the entire system, which works with efficiency and dedication,” his office said. “All legislation that benefits the public to provide it with the appropriate service and that will improve and streamline that service without infringing Halacha and its requirements will be warmly welcomed.”
Content is provided courtesy of the Jerusalem Post
I was under the impression that this was how Rabbi’s traditionally supported themselves.
I really don’t understand this. Of course they should charge money. Why shouldn’t they? If, here in Chicago, I go to a judge to get married, I imagine there is a fee for that. There is a fee for any state service, even though the judge is salaried. If I go to secular court on some issue, there is a fee for that too. Why should rabbis be any different? I must have missed something.. But, given there are some people who will do it for free, they should be allowed to do so.