Welcome, Guest! - or
Easy to remember!  »  VinNews.com

Jerusalem - Zealot Arrested For Telling Girl To Move To The Back Of Bus

Published on:   December 28, 2011 09:43 AM
News Source:  Jerusalem Post
Change text size Text Size  
Bookmark and Share
 Israelis participate in a protest in the central Israeli town of Beit Shemesh, 27 December 2011. More than 10,000 Israelis protested against religious fanaticism and discrimination of women, organizers said, after two days of rioting by ultra-Orthodox extremists near Jerusalem.  EPA/ABIR SULTAN Israelis participate in a protest in the central Israeli town of Beit Shemesh, 27 December 2011. More than 10,000 Israelis protested against religious fanaticism and discrimination of women, organizers said, after two days of rioting by ultra-Orthodox extremists near Jerusalem.  EPA/ABIR SULTAN

Jerusalem-  Police arrested a 45-year-old haredi man who yelled “whore!” at a female soldier on an Egged bus, the latest in a series of incidents of discrimination against women ultra-Orthodox areas. According to the police, the solider was sitting towards the front of Bus Line 49, which runs from Neve Yaakov through Ramat Eshkol towards the haredi Sanhedria neighborhood.

Advertisement:

A man in haredi dress asked the soldier to move to the back of the bus, and called her a whore. The soldier reportedly refused to move, and when the man continued to harass her to force her to move to the back of the bus, the bus driver called the police. The man was arrested and removed from the bus, which continued on its route. The man will come before the court on Thursday when police will ask for an extension of his detainment until the end of their investigation.

Because it serves primarily religious neighborhoods, the bus in one of the lines which is considered “de facto mehadrin” meaning men sit in the front and women sit in the back.


More of today's headlines

Pyongyang, North Korea - North Korea's next leader escorted his father's hearse in an elaborate state funeral on a bitter, snowy day Wednesday, bowing somberly and... Long Island, NY - The winning Mega-Millions lottery ticket was sold on Long Island. Officials say the sole winning ticket, worth more than $206 million, was sold at...

 

Total83

Read Comments (83)  —  Post Yours »

1

 Dec 28, 2011 at 08:49 AM Anonymous Says:

If this man really had a problem spending so much time and focus on a woman because "women are obviously the root of all evil in men" then why is he spending so much time harassing her? It seems he should just move past her without acknowledging her and find himself another seat and stare at his palms.

2

 Dec 28, 2011 at 08:53 AM ayzee Says:

i'm just curious, IF it really is a breach of tznius for men and women to sit together on a bus, wouldn't it make more sense for the women to sit in the front instead of walking through the men to get to the back? how tznius are these people really, sounds like they just want the front spot to check out all the women coming on...or do they make them go on the bus from the back as well????

3

 Dec 28, 2011 at 09:02 AM Anonymous Says:

its sad it has come to this
on some level i feel i should say shechyianu

4

 Dec 28, 2011 at 09:03 AM Trolly_McTrollerston Says:

the modifiers in this sentence highlight the core issues of this problem!

"Because it serves **primarily ** religious neighborhoods, the bus in one of the lines which is considered **de facto ** mehadrin” meaning men sit in the front and women sit in the back."
1) If the bus serves *only* the religious neighborhoods, then maybe you might be able to support an argument to make it mehadrin. BUT obviously other neighborhoods are served so how can you force those who aren't from your neighborhood to move to the back?
2) de facto mehadrin means that the bus driver won't enforce the separation of genders, so if anyone is going to do it, it'll be the mentally unstable hooligans who have no filter between their mind and their mouth.
3) I once heard a rav speak true wisdom when he said that diarrhea of the mouth is indicative of constipation of the mind -- only those who can't think, or can't control their speech, will create these disturbances....

5

 Dec 28, 2011 at 09:10 AM mrsanity Says:

Where are the "Gedolim" of our generation? Why are they letting this continue unabated? Perhaps they are in agreement with these reshaim and see no need to intervene. We have not heard any forceful words from any of them, unless they have been filtered by their handlers and we are not getting the truth.

Doesn't this make you all sick to your stomach?

6

 Dec 28, 2011 at 09:29 AM shvigger Says:

Reply to #2  
ayzee Says:

i'm just curious, IF it really is a breach of tznius for men and women to sit together on a bus, wouldn't it make more sense for the women to sit in the front instead of walking through the men to get to the back? how tznius are these people really, sounds like they just want the front spot to check out all the women coming on...or do they make them go on the bus from the back as well????

Contrary to western culture's "ladies first" halacha is that men NOT walk behind women.

7

 Dec 28, 2011 at 09:30 AM BLONDI Says:

it's interesting how in the nyc subways and buses there are labels on the front seats; they should be given to the elderly or handicapped. if there be an elderly or handicapped woman getting on a 'mehadrin' bus, what would be the protocol? pregnant women need the seat in the front too, not a young male to watch the road or whatever....

8

 Dec 28, 2011 at 09:35 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #5  
mrsanity Says:

Where are the "Gedolim" of our generation? Why are they letting this continue unabated? Perhaps they are in agreement with these reshaim and see no need to intervene. We have not heard any forceful words from any of them, unless they have been filtered by their handlers and we are not getting the truth.

Doesn't this make you all sick to your stomach?

“Where are the "Gedolim" of our generation? Why are they letting this continue unabated?"

Sadly, our so-called "Gedolim" have been missing in action on this and other similiar episodes where their followers run around like vilde chayas in the name of some distorted notion of daas torah. Is it no wonder that the reputation and respect that many of these rabbonim had once held is gone and rightfully so. A gadol who remains quiet in the face of these incidents loses any credibility as a leader of the tzibur.

9

 Dec 28, 2011 at 09:43 AM ayzee Says:

Reply to #6  
shvigger Says:

Contrary to western culture's "ladies first" halacha is that men NOT walk behind women.

rite, because they shouldn't be looking at them from behind! so they also shouldn't have women walking past them so they can look them up and down. if they're REALLY so tznius conscious, they would realize that they shouldn't tempt themselves by having women walk past them on the bus

10

 Dec 28, 2011 at 09:43 AM SherryTheNoahide Says:

Reply to #4  
Trolly_McTrollerston Says:

the modifiers in this sentence highlight the core issues of this problem!

"Because it serves **primarily ** religious neighborhoods, the bus in one of the lines which is considered **de facto ** mehadrin” meaning men sit in the front and women sit in the back."
1) If the bus serves *only* the religious neighborhoods, then maybe you might be able to support an argument to make it mehadrin. BUT obviously other neighborhoods are served so how can you force those who aren't from your neighborhood to move to the back?
2) de facto mehadrin means that the bus driver won't enforce the separation of genders, so if anyone is going to do it, it'll be the mentally unstable hooligans who have no filter between their mind and their mouth.
3) I once heard a rav speak true wisdom when he said that diarrhea of the mouth is indicative of constipation of the mind -- only those who can't think, or can't control their speech, will create these disturbances....

"I once heard a rav speak true wisdom when he said that diarrhea of the mouth is indicative of constipation of the mind -- only those who can't think, or can't control their speech, will create these disturbances...."


I love it!

LOL!!! (:-D

G-d bless that Rav!

11

 Dec 28, 2011 at 09:46 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #5  
mrsanity Says:

Where are the "Gedolim" of our generation? Why are they letting this continue unabated? Perhaps they are in agreement with these reshaim and see no need to intervene. We have not heard any forceful words from any of them, unless they have been filtered by their handlers and we are not getting the truth.

Doesn't this make you all sick to your stomach?

You should invent/create new gedoilim. Ones who will cater to your likes and opinions.
Come on you wise guy. If you think the gedoilim if today think segreation is right, then that's it. Don't like it?

12

 Dec 28, 2011 at 09:48 AM shredready Says:

Reply to #5  
mrsanity Says:

Where are the "Gedolim" of our generation? Why are they letting this continue unabated? Perhaps they are in agreement with these reshaim and see no need to intervene. We have not heard any forceful words from any of them, unless they have been filtered by their handlers and we are not getting the truth.

Doesn't this make you all sick to your stomach?

they agree i think on some level

what chupzha at a soldier who risks her live to protect jews including him send him to the front to see how hard it is then maybe he will have some respect

13

 Dec 28, 2011 at 09:57 AM amicable Says:

This would be a much smaller issue if the women sat in FRONT of the bus. Then it's clear that it's not a derogatory thing for women.

Why should men sit in front?

You want a separation let it be seperate but let women be in front

14

 Dec 28, 2011 at 10:07 AM Anonymous Says:

The tide is clearly turning on the fanatics. Your days of doing what you like are over.

15

 Dec 28, 2011 at 10:08 AM Anonymous Says:

is it a crime in israel to call someone a whore? I thought its a free country.

16

 Dec 28, 2011 at 10:11 AM Avi Says:

"Hate knows no boundaries".
We all, must learn, to truly respect every Human Being, Yid or Non-Yid, born to Yid or born to a Non-Yid.
Only then we can hope that there will be love and respect amongst chareidim and families.

17

 Dec 28, 2011 at 10:11 AM Mordechai Says:

Reply to #5  
mrsanity Says:

Where are the "Gedolim" of our generation? Why are they letting this continue unabated? Perhaps they are in agreement with these reshaim and see no need to intervene. We have not heard any forceful words from any of them, unless they have been filtered by their handlers and we are not getting the truth.

Doesn't this make you all sick to your stomach?

It is common knowledge that the only way to have an effect on people is through Ahavas Yisroel.
It is a Shame that the "Gedolim" are to busy talking about the "dangers" of the internet (I am not saying there are no dangers, but banning it, is not the answer, especially when there are other equally important).
If you look at the pictures of the protesters, you can see that the are far from, Yiras Shomayim, to care about Tznius.

18

 Dec 28, 2011 at 10:23 AM protest? Says:

The picture claims a protest against the charedim had 10,000 participants.. what a big joke! there were hardly 200 secular and "religious" rioters all in all, yelling and cursing, and didn't forget to throw eggs in charedi direction, but as much as they tried to provocate the charedim, they remained calm, and there were not to many charedim in sight at all.. what a flop!

19

 Dec 28, 2011 at 10:24 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #12  
shredready Says:

they agree i think on some level

what chupzha at a soldier who risks her live to protect jews including him send him to the front to see how hard it is then maybe he will have some respect

"Procting jews".. since when are u so in love with jews?? your comments basically advise otherwise.

20

 Dec 28, 2011 at 10:24 AM shvigger Says:

I'm just curious. Where was this soldier coming from and where was she headed on this Mehadrin bus?

Men sit in front, dummy, because halachically men should not stand, sit, walk, behind women. Many posters seem to have a problem with halacha. You seem to have a problem with "front." Newsflash: If you prefer to separate genders then somebody's gotta sit in the front, and if you're separating genders because you wanna be "mehadrin," you might as well be mehadrin all the way which is women behind men. It's too bad that the back is uncomfortable. There's no halacha that says "women behind men except when it's uncomfortable." A healthy man and healthy woman are equal under halacha.

21

 Dec 28, 2011 at 10:26 AM Shlomo2 Says:

Imagine someone walking up to a soldier in any other country, insulting them to their face, and not thinking that they are going to walk away with a broken nose and missing a few teeth!

The Charedim, more than any one else, know that this is a Jewish army. Otherwise they would never have a havva amina to insult a soldier and think they won't be assaulted in response.

22

 Dec 28, 2011 at 10:29 AM Anonymous Says:

how can u arrest & detain someone for calling someone else a whore??

23

 Dec 28, 2011 at 10:44 AM CommonSense Says:

Reply to #6  
shvigger Says:

Contrary to western culture's "ladies first" halacha is that men NOT walk behind women.

That halacha is strictly regarding walking..see rashi there..
IT has no bearing on on sitting in seats.

24

 Dec 28, 2011 at 10:46 AM agiddacup Says:

All I can say is, the Haredi men are behaving no different than the extremist muslim men. We live in the 21st century and we're still fighting for women's rights? Shame on the Haredi community, shame on their Rebbi's for allowing this situation to continue and shame on the mothers who bring their young son's up to believe this way.

25

 Dec 28, 2011 at 10:48 AM agiddacup Says:

Reply to #2  
ayzee Says:

i'm just curious, IF it really is a breach of tznius for men and women to sit together on a bus, wouldn't it make more sense for the women to sit in the front instead of walking through the men to get to the back? how tznius are these people really, sounds like they just want the front spot to check out all the women coming on...or do they make them go on the bus from the back as well????

lol, how true. Unfortunately though ,when you think about it, it's all about sex.

26

 Dec 28, 2011 at 10:59 AM Heather Says:

On many of these bus lines, the woman do go on from the back door and either send a young child to pay the fare and/or they have these "hole punchers" attached to one of the seats so they can punch their cards....
On the buses that women do go on from the front, they have to sqeeze their way through the men along with their children and plenty of bags. Not very convienient for them AT ALL, besides the men probably enjoy every minute of all the squeezing. Then they go and yell should a woman dare sit down in the front.
Oh and by the way, there's always that "ify" situation when one doesnt know exacly where the cut off area is, which happened to me and I was told to get up. There wasn't an extra seat anywhere else and i was sure that i WAS sitting in the woman's section. I DID NOT MOVE, just kept looking out the window and ignoring those men. I wasn't going to stand the 45 minute bus ride. I got away with it only bec that seat was in a "questionable" area. But you can be sure, I certainly felt degraded and humiliated, like i was commiting such a horrible crime.

27

 Dec 28, 2011 at 11:08 AM Yeshivish Says:

Reply to #24  
agiddacup Says:

All I can say is, the Haredi men are behaving no different than the extremist muslim men. We live in the 21st century and we're still fighting for women's rights? Shame on the Haredi community, shame on their Rebbi's for allowing this situation to continue and shame on the mothers who bring their young son's up to believe this way.

I have good news to tell you, the hype the news is making now over an isolated incident where a single person (did or did not) spit a child, and about 20-30 ppl protesting the removal of a sign inside frum area sitting there for years without complaints, and they're yelling at the jew hating media reporters.
There are numerous incidents daily in Beit shemesh where frummies are being insulted and cursed at for no good reason, just out of hate to the observant!
I was visiting my brother in Bet shemesh, I walked down in "Kirya", a place where only frum charedim live, and a "couple" passed by yelling slurs at us, and walked off laughing.. I told my brother, I thought i was in bet shemesh, not in east New York.
What a shame! and they're still crying foul..

28

 Dec 28, 2011 at 11:09 AM esther Says:

Reply to #20  
shvigger Says:

I'm just curious. Where was this soldier coming from and where was she headed on this Mehadrin bus?

Men sit in front, dummy, because halachically men should not stand, sit, walk, behind women. Many posters seem to have a problem with halacha. You seem to have a problem with "front." Newsflash: If you prefer to separate genders then somebody's gotta sit in the front, and if you're separating genders because you wanna be "mehadrin," you might as well be mehadrin all the way which is women behind men. It's too bad that the back is uncomfortable. There's no halacha that says "women behind men except when it's uncomfortable." A healthy man and healthy woman are equal under halacha.

what is your point?are you insinuating that she was trying to provoke an incident? well if that's the case the idiot who called her THAT and harrased her,a soldier who is there to protect him,sure gave her what she wanted but that's on him. i see your very isolated in your thoughts re religious observance. you can't force that on every one else and you and your ilk really need to be clear that that soldier is also a jew!

29

 Dec 28, 2011 at 11:11 AM esther Says:

Reply to #22  
Anonymous Says:

how can u arrest & detain someone for calling someone else a whore??

the article cleaarly says he continued to harass her.

30

 Dec 28, 2011 at 11:19 AM BaalMussar Says:

I live in an area that have all buses divided men from women, it never occurred to me that the women sitting in the back is some sort of embarrassment to the women, it's nowhere similar to the Rosa Park situation where blacks were told to sit in the back with derogatory. If there would be some way that you can put a fare collector at the back door, and a curtain i as a man would have no problem to sit in the back. But if there are men that think that women have to sit in the back because they are second class citizens they have a much bigger problem than this.

31

 Dec 28, 2011 at 11:25 AM FredE Says:

I am not fan of this nonsense, but it seems to me that the Charedim into this should advocate for side to side to separation. As in men on the right, women on the left, or vice versa. That wouldn't have the bad vibes of ordering people to the back. Unless, of course, they want the women davka in back, to, you know, deliver a message.
(Wouldn't surprise me..)

That would alleviate a lot of tension. The downside though is that we normal people would be accomodating this mishegas.

32

 Dec 28, 2011 at 11:28 AM OBSERVATION Says:

Funny thing is while I'm traveling with the Metro North trains, if I'm sitting in one of the rows first, not a single man or woman will come in sit next to me, beard, hat, and all. And don't even dare mention that I stink, it happens in the morning right out of shower fresh clothing. My suggestion to the frum people in ISRAEL go ahead sit next to the women, they will leave sooner rather than later, they can't stand you.

33

 Dec 28, 2011 at 11:35 AM wondering Says:

Reply to #20  
shvigger Says:

I'm just curious. Where was this soldier coming from and where was she headed on this Mehadrin bus?

Men sit in front, dummy, because halachically men should not stand, sit, walk, behind women. Many posters seem to have a problem with halacha. You seem to have a problem with "front." Newsflash: If you prefer to separate genders then somebody's gotta sit in the front, and if you're separating genders because you wanna be "mehadrin," you might as well be mehadrin all the way which is women behind men. It's too bad that the back is uncomfortable. There's no halacha that says "women behind men except when it's uncomfortable." A healthy man and healthy woman are equal under halacha.

Are you implying that she was there just to make trouble? Then I ask, "I'm, just curious but why was this man on the bus and not learning in a Beis Medrash instead of hounding others on a bus?" If you ask on one, then you have to ask on the other.
More importantly though, you keep posting "the halachah" without any sources or references. As many comments (and Rabbis i might add) have pointed out in this ongioing saga - the story in the Gemarah about walking behind a lion rather than a woman is not halacha. If you actually cared about the halacha and not just rhetoric you would know that it does not apply to public transport to sitting to sitting and not looking etc. if you want it as a chumra thats another story but stop claiming it is halacha

34

 Dec 28, 2011 at 11:40 AM Bezalel Says:

I'm surprised that she didn't punch him. I think a U.S. servicewoman would have done so if anyone had spoken to her in that way.

35

 Dec 28, 2011 at 11:40 AM Queenbee Says:

Reply to #20  
shvigger Says:

I'm just curious. Where was this soldier coming from and where was she headed on this Mehadrin bus?

Men sit in front, dummy, because halachically men should not stand, sit, walk, behind women. Many posters seem to have a problem with halacha. You seem to have a problem with "front." Newsflash: If you prefer to separate genders then somebody's gotta sit in the front, and if you're separating genders because you wanna be "mehadrin," you might as well be mehadrin all the way which is women behind men. It's too bad that the back is uncomfortable. There's no halacha that says "women behind men except when it's uncomfortable." A healthy man and healthy woman are equal under halacha.

The halacha is walking, bring a source of where it says about sitting.

If they want to segregate they can divide it side by side, like they do on some buses in NY (KJ) so it doesn't have such a negative connotation.

You say a healthy man and healthy woman are equal. Well the thing is that according to Torah a pregnant woman can be considered a choleh she'ain bo sakana (unless ch"v there is actual danger) and the chances of women in meah Shearim or the likes being pregnant are pretty high and you know it, so extra courtesy should be extended to women, not the opposite.

36

 Dec 28, 2011 at 11:43 AM ayzee Says:

Reply to #20  
shvigger Says:

I'm just curious. Where was this soldier coming from and where was she headed on this Mehadrin bus?

Men sit in front, dummy, because halachically men should not stand, sit, walk, behind women. Many posters seem to have a problem with halacha. You seem to have a problem with "front." Newsflash: If you prefer to separate genders then somebody's gotta sit in the front, and if you're separating genders because you wanna be "mehadrin," you might as well be mehadrin all the way which is women behind men. It's too bad that the back is uncomfortable. There's no halacha that says "women behind men except when it's uncomfortable." A healthy man and healthy woman are equal under halacha.

sorry "dummy" (if we're going to be juvenile about this), but you're totally missing my point. i don't care where the women sit, i'm just stating the obvious, that by telling them to go to the back, the men are having a fine time ogling them on their walk there. they don't care about tznius, they're just a bunch of idiots who don't know how to practice our religion...
your name says it all-what a shvigger! good luck to your daughters in law!!!

37

 Dec 28, 2011 at 11:44 AM Anonymous Says:

I have no problem with the segregartion but let the men go through the back door and sit in the back. That would solve the problem since all the men are looking at the floor and wont see the women at the fron t of the bus, right?

38

 Dec 28, 2011 at 11:44 AM joek212 Says:

What happened to free speech ?

39

 Dec 28, 2011 at 11:46 AM busy Says:

I used to take the 49 aleph (mehadrin) weekly from Sandhedria to Neve Yaakov for a shiur. There were times when I needed to talk to the driver, purchase something, or for whatever reason needed to get on in the front, but no, a 15 year old Israeli boy thought it was within his place to tell me, a married lady with a snood with a son his age where to go and where to sit. So TELL ME PLEASE how forcing me to a) get on in the BACK of the bus, b) then walking THROUGH THE MEN to the front of the bus so I can conduct my business with the driver, and then c) walking back to "where I belong in the back" is so wonderfully tznius?? If it's the worst thing EVER to even SEE a woman you would think I shouldn't be forced to walk up and down the aisle TWICE, no? And the biggest issue, of course, is the SHEER CHUTZPAH of boys ordering women, some even 80 year old grandmothers, around. We live in an olam hafuch - where an avierah is perceived as a mitzva and vice versa. We certainly live in the dor mashiach because CHUTZPAH YASGEE. If my son behaved this way I will have failed as a mother.

40

 Dec 28, 2011 at 11:47 AM Anonymous Says:

Maybe Netanyahu can divide the bus lines-one for haredim, one for secular, like he wnats to divide Beit Shemesh.

41

 Dec 28, 2011 at 11:48 AM joek212 Says:

Reply to #2  
ayzee Says:

i'm just curious, IF it really is a breach of tznius for men and women to sit together on a bus, wouldn't it make more sense for the women to sit in the front instead of walking through the men to get to the back? how tznius are these people really, sounds like they just want the front spot to check out all the women coming on...or do they make them go on the bus from the back as well????

1St of all you are clearly a am haretz because to sit behind a women is assur " meiachorei isha" and yes they are supposed to get on from the back door why is that so terrible next you feminists are going to complain against the ezras noshim because women sit in the back of the bais medrash

42

 Dec 28, 2011 at 11:58 AM Butterfly Says:

It is a shame that our g'dolim have not heard or read what has been said in the media. Maybe they would have DONE something?? ANYTHING!!!

43

 Dec 28, 2011 at 12:07 PM Assualt and Battery Says:

Reply to #15  
Anonymous Says:

is it a crime in israel to call someone a whore? I thought its a free country.

Shouting at someone or calling them names especially a man doing that to a women in the close confined quarters of a bus would probably meet the legal definition of harrasment and assault and would certainly constitute threatening behaviour.

44

 Dec 28, 2011 at 12:08 PM Chaim Says:

Draft him to the army.

45

 Dec 28, 2011 at 12:34 PM Eagle Says:

umm...not every soldier risks her life, especially female soldiers who primarily do office duties.

46

 Dec 28, 2011 at 12:41 PM Talmid of Grashaz Auerbach Zatzal Says:

It is first and foremost the responsibility of the RABBINIC LEADERSHIP to forcefully and explicitly denounce this Colossal Chilul Hashem. It is not enough for them to denounce it because it is a chilul Hashem, but to denounce it because the whole hashkafa of Extreme Tznius and imposing anything on another person, is just as treif as eating Chazir and this approach to Yiddishkeit is against Halacha on all levels. The Rabbonim and specifically the Gedolim and we all know who they are, need to come out and say meforash that
1. There is no issur to sit next to a woman on a bus
2. It is Assur to ask women to move to the back of the bus
3. It is Assur to put up signs asking women to only walk on certain sides of a street
4. It is Assur to spit on another human being and Ain Lo Chelek Lolam Haba to one who does so
5. It is Assur to call another Jew a “Nazi” and Ain Lo Chelek Lolam Haba to one who does so
6. It is ossur to call a women any derogatory name such as "Zona", "Shiksa", "Prutza", and So on and one who does so Ain Lo Chelek L'olam Haba regardless of how the woman is dressed.
7. It is Assur to assault or harrass another human being including shouting at someone.

47

 Dec 28, 2011 at 12:50 PM Kolemes Says:

As someone that follows the israeli media let me try to to cut thru the fog of war (against the orthodox).
We are in the midst of an anti jewish (Belief) incitment campagin

48

 Dec 28, 2011 at 12:59 PM Anonymous Says:

painful to see how most commentators are jumping to take the word of a secular woman against a word of a religious man. He claims he asked her politely if she would't mind going in the back, she immediately called police, according to "Kol chai" radio, eyewitnesses told police the story is not true and she's lying, they ignored all witnesses, and took her word against all witnesses.

49

 Dec 28, 2011 at 01:08 PM Kolemes Says:

As someone that follows the israeli media let me try to to cut thru the fog of war (against the orthodox).
We are in the midst of an anti jewish (Belief) incitment campagin the like's we hadn't seen since the 1930's.
Their mode of operation is: take 5% truth add the rest and let the hate continue!!.
In this particular case there are numerous witness that claim that this women sat down smack in middle of a group of men and that someone asked her politely to change seats that's all!
I would rather believe my fellow frum jews that a bunch of Anti anti orthodox/settler/chreidi/Torah reporters bent on slandering the frum jews in front of the whole world!!!
Does anybody know that in the last day their were over 5 incidents where chreidi kids and adults were spat on and even hit by "peace loving" seculars? You didn't hear about it? I guess the Shtrumer (sorry Ynet) didn't have room in the paper to include it.
So Please fellow readers don't jump on the hate wagon untill you verify every story.

50

 Dec 28, 2011 at 01:14 PM BLONDI Says:

guess the soldier was used to being in the front--front lines that is ; protecting the borders etc. concerned about this guys safety....

51

 Dec 28, 2011 at 01:14 PM Robert Says:

Reply to #20  
shvigger Says:

I'm just curious. Where was this soldier coming from and where was she headed on this Mehadrin bus?

Men sit in front, dummy, because halachically men should not stand, sit, walk, behind women. Many posters seem to have a problem with halacha. You seem to have a problem with "front." Newsflash: If you prefer to separate genders then somebody's gotta sit in the front, and if you're separating genders because you wanna be "mehadrin," you might as well be mehadrin all the way which is women behind men. It's too bad that the back is uncomfortable. There's no halacha that says "women behind men except when it's uncomfortable." A healthy man and healthy woman are equal under halacha.

why not just have totally seperate buses
female only buses and male only buses
it solve sthe fron and back issue and all the other possible issues

52

 Dec 28, 2011 at 01:22 PM Avreich1 Says:

Reply to #22  
Anonymous Says:

how can u arrest & detain someone for calling someone else a whore??

We read your inflammatory question the first time (#15) and we read it again here (#22).

Are you really asking a serious question, or are we all supposed to roll on the floor, laughing our tucheses off at your rank stupidity?

Call in again and let us know.

53

 Dec 28, 2011 at 01:25 PM grandpajoe Says:

Aside from the fact that the 'SOLDIER" male or female protects this fool - the bigger chillul hashem is that this anti Haredi incident and others like are coming into the mass media - in this world of Anti-Semitism it is not a good thing.
And if the individual did not want to sit with the woman - GET OFF THE BUS.
(By the way you won't print this beciase you never print modern religious jews viewpoints anyway.)

54

 Dec 28, 2011 at 01:30 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #27  
Yeshivish Says:

I have good news to tell you, the hype the news is making now over an isolated incident where a single person (did or did not) spit a child, and about 20-30 ppl protesting the removal of a sign inside frum area sitting there for years without complaints, and they're yelling at the jew hating media reporters.
There are numerous incidents daily in Beit shemesh where frummies are being insulted and cursed at for no good reason, just out of hate to the observant!
I was visiting my brother in Bet shemesh, I walked down in "Kirya", a place where only frum charedim live, and a "couple" passed by yelling slurs at us, and walked off laughing.. I told my brother, I thought i was in bet shemesh, not in east New York.
What a shame! and they're still crying foul..

"There are numerous incidents daily in Beit shemesh where frummies are being insulted and cursed at for no good reason, just out of hate to the observant!"

@ Yeshivish:

There is an old American Indian proverb that translates roughly as "there is no smoke without fire".

Spitting at anyone, let alone an 8-year old girl, is not a way for a charedi Jew to make friends and influence people. What happened to קירוב לבבות ועוד אהבת ישראל? Not in Ramat Beit Shemesh, that's for sure.

An oh-so-clever charedi Jew calling a female soldier a זונה ופירצה is a sure-fire way of getting a broken jaw at the very least. The butts of those rifles they carry can do real damage, you know.

55

 Dec 28, 2011 at 01:38 PM Adam Sway Says:

Reply to #30  
BaalMussar Says:

I live in an area that have all buses divided men from women, it never occurred to me that the women sitting in the back is some sort of embarrassment to the women, it's nowhere similar to the Rosa Park situation where blacks were told to sit in the back with derogatory. If there would be some way that you can put a fare collector at the back door, and a curtain i as a man would have no problem to sit in the back. But if there are men that think that women have to sit in the back because they are second class citizens they have a much bigger problem than this.

"If there would be some way that you can put a fare collector at the back door .. "

Your idea is excellent in principle but flawed in its detail.

What gender should the fare collector be? Will he/she have halachic authority to collect fares from passengers of the opposite gender?

I am sure there are other סוגיות וקשיים to be solved, but as I do not even have סמיכה לרבנות, let alone being one of גדולי ק"ק ישראל, I will leave them to other correspondents who doubtless will consider themselves qualified to throw in their two agorot's worth.

56

 Dec 28, 2011 at 01:39 PM Anonymous Says:

Chareidi bashing is going too far reading some comments just makes your stomach turn.this was a mehadrin bus wherever there is a mehadrin bus route there are regular busses in front or behind within a few minutes apart.this female boarded the bus to provoke if she did not know she was told by the chareidy then she was asked to move to the back and refused she got what she was looking.Next they will go to chareidy weddings sit at the men's section start dancing call the leftist media and the chareidy bashers from vin and yell women are mistreated and discriminated because she was asked to go to the ladies section.

57

 Dec 28, 2011 at 01:43 PM Anonymous Says:

2 big Questions
1st Why did she purposely sit in front when she knows it is a mehadrin line
Was she sent to cause trouble and by who.
2nd. Did he call her a whore
3rd Did it actually happen.
If it was an avreich; I do not believe he called her a whore or spat on her
If he was 15-21 years olds I would believe it could happen. And I said could not did

58

 Dec 28, 2011 at 01:45 PM DavidCohen Says:

Here's a novel idea, if you don't like who is on the bus, DON'T USE THE BUS! Get a car, or use a taxi, or walk, or start your own darned bus service! Access to busing is not some divinely given right. Either respect the use and go along, and get off!

59

 Dec 28, 2011 at 01:46 PM AP Says:

Anybody read the full article on ynet news? Let me fill you in a little. The media reports that the father of the soldier stated his daughter called him up crying after being called a shiksa. No, you read it correct "soldier cries to father for being called a shiksa" is what the artcile should have read. Those headlines would not make good news for the secularist media, would it? Anyone smell a rat here?
Let me be more specific. A secularist zionist soldier with an agenda against charedim uses her wile to purposely instigate a charedi man (who had misplaced hashkofas written all over his face) in order to get media coverage. The lioness got her prey and the secularist media sponsored ticker-tape parade. I don't condone verbal or physical violence, I just like to call a spade a spade.

60

 Dec 28, 2011 at 02:01 PM AP Says:

Reply to #46  
Talmid of Grashaz Auerbach Zatzal Says:

It is first and foremost the responsibility of the RABBINIC LEADERSHIP to forcefully and explicitly denounce this Colossal Chilul Hashem. It is not enough for them to denounce it because it is a chilul Hashem, but to denounce it because the whole hashkafa of Extreme Tznius and imposing anything on another person, is just as treif as eating Chazir and this approach to Yiddishkeit is against Halacha on all levels. The Rabbonim and specifically the Gedolim and we all know who they are, need to come out and say meforash that
1. There is no issur to sit next to a woman on a bus
2. It is Assur to ask women to move to the back of the bus
3. It is Assur to put up signs asking women to only walk on certain sides of a street
4. It is Assur to spit on another human being and Ain Lo Chelek Lolam Haba to one who does so
5. It is Assur to call another Jew a “Nazi” and Ain Lo Chelek Lolam Haba to one who does so
6. It is ossur to call a women any derogatory name such as "Zona", "Shiksa", "Prutza", and So on and one who does so Ain Lo Chelek L'olam Haba regardless of how the woman is dressed.
7. It is Assur to assault or harrass another human being including shouting at someone.

8. It is assur to be motzei shem ra before any non biased investigational outcome to this incident, and to believe the secularist zionist leftist media and this chiloni sodier's complaint as fact.
Are you so certain she is not making all this up in order to get her 5 minutes of fame?
Of course you believe it "you read it in the leftist media tabloids, it must be true".

61

 Dec 28, 2011 at 02:05 PM Mordechai Says:

Reply to #47  
Kolemes Says:

As someone that follows the israeli media let me try to to cut thru the fog of war (against the orthodox).
We are in the midst of an anti jewish (Belief) incitment campagin

You may be correct, however, we must not give the secular media fodder to continue attacking charedim.
I saw the videos. from the look of things, the people attending the demonstrations are not Yirei Shomayim, people who are so bothered by Tznius.
However, i reserve the most blame on the so-called "Gedolim", who are Msayaya Lidvar Aveira, by them not speaking out that this is not the Derech of the Torah, or Yiddishkiet.
Someone BIG from the Torah world has to stand up and say, this is has to top.
What is going on EY right now, is not bringing respect to Torah, and many decent Charedim.

62

 Dec 28, 2011 at 02:10 PM Halaivy Says:

What a shame that the so called (modern) Orthodox have such hate to their fellow jews. What about the issur of Lo sisnah es achicho bilvovecho and Loshen Horah, where are the so called rabonim in the modern orthodox community that always speak up on the sins of the chareidim why arn't they protesting against such a chilul hashem done by their people.
no wonder the chareidim are more successful with chinuch of their children and 99% of our gedolim come from the chareidy community.
It's time for the modern orthodox community to start respecting therights of the orthodox and stop bashing them.
Sorry the chareidy gedolim are busy learning the torah yomom volailoh and have no time but to pasken what they see written in it.

63

 Dec 28, 2011 at 02:15 PM orig orthodox Says:

Reply to #53  
grandpajoe Says:

Aside from the fact that the 'SOLDIER" male or female protects this fool - the bigger chillul hashem is that this anti Haredi incident and others like are coming into the mass media - in this world of Anti-Semitism it is not a good thing.
And if the individual did not want to sit with the woman - GET OFF THE BUS.
(By the way you won't print this beciase you never print modern religious jews viewpoints anyway.)

By the way just count the comments and you will find that there are more modern religious views on VIN then chareidy.
Maybe because the chareidim are not on the internet that much.
Please don't accuse VIN on not being fair to you

64

 Dec 28, 2011 at 03:03 PM you idiot Says:

Reply to #48  
Anonymous Says:

painful to see how most commentators are jumping to take the word of a secular woman against a word of a religious man. He claims he asked her politely if she would't mind going in the back, she immediately called police, according to "Kol chai" radio, eyewitnesses told police the story is not true and she's lying, they ignored all witnesses, and took her word against all witnesses.

It is inherently impolite to ask anyone to get up from any seat whether it be a woman on a bus or a man in shul who unknowingly sits in in someones Makom Kavua.

65

 Dec 28, 2011 at 03:11 PM A Says:

Reply to #48  
Anonymous Says:

painful to see how most commentators are jumping to take the word of a secular woman against a word of a religious man. He claims he asked her politely if she would't mind going in the back, she immediately called police, according to "Kol chai" radio, eyewitnesses told police the story is not true and she's lying, they ignored all witnesses, and took her word against all witnesses.

It appears you're twisting the facts to suit your own purposes. Please read the article again so you can see that it was the bus driver who called the police. I highly doubt he would have done so if someone merely spoke politely to the soldier.
This has nothing to do with secular vs religious, it is only people such as you who want to make it so. The rest of us don't care, we only care that it is vile behavior for ANYONE to call a woman a whore because she refuses to listen to someone who tells her to move to the back of the bus.

66

 Dec 28, 2011 at 03:14 PM FredE Says:

Reply to #52  
Avreich1 Says:

We read your inflammatory question the first time (#15) and we read it again here (#22).

Are you really asking a serious question, or are we all supposed to roll on the floor, laughing our tucheses off at your rank stupidity?

Call in again and let us know.

Sounds like a reasonable question to me. If we threw everyone who called someone else a name into jail, we'd have to build many more prisons. Not that I have any sympathy for such a creature.. Why are you so hostile?

67

 Dec 28, 2011 at 03:17 PM And The Band Played On Says:

Reply to #48  
Anonymous Says:

painful to see how most commentators are jumping to take the word of a secular woman against a word of a religious man. He claims he asked her politely if she would't mind going in the back, she immediately called police, according to "Kol chai" radio, eyewitnesses told police the story is not true and she's lying, they ignored all witnesses, and took her word against all witnesses.

All of this is the result of adding on Issurim that are not found in the Torah. See Rashi on how the whole Chet of the Eitz Hadaas came about because Chava added on her own Issur of not touching the tree when HKBH only said Don't eat from the tree. Just as it is wrong to not keep things in the Torah so to it is wrong to add things onto the torah that are not in compliance with Halacha. There is no halachic basis for seperate seating anywhere except in a shul. If you as a man have such a level of physical desire that sitting next to a woman on a bus will cause you to have improper thoughts then you are not allowed to ride on a bus. The problem is with you and your thoughts, not with the women and the seating arrngements. Rav Volbe Zatzal used to quote, I think from the BAAl Shem To,v that the thoughts of a person are the person. He said if you have a problem walking in the streets because of immodesty then it means your thoughts are not sufficiently engrossed in Torah. If your thoughts are engrossed in Torah, you will not even see or notice immodestly dressed people next to you. If you are noticing these things it is a message to you about your self and what you have work on.

68

 Dec 28, 2011 at 03:20 PM A Says:

Reply to #49  
Kolemes Says:

As someone that follows the israeli media let me try to to cut thru the fog of war (against the orthodox).
We are in the midst of an anti jewish (Belief) incitment campagin the like's we hadn't seen since the 1930's.
Their mode of operation is: take 5% truth add the rest and let the hate continue!!.
In this particular case there are numerous witness that claim that this women sat down smack in middle of a group of men and that someone asked her politely to change seats that's all!
I would rather believe my fellow frum jews that a bunch of Anti anti orthodox/settler/chreidi/Torah reporters bent on slandering the frum jews in front of the whole world!!!
Does anybody know that in the last day their were over 5 incidents where chreidi kids and adults were spat on and even hit by "peace loving" seculars? You didn't hear about it? I guess the Shtrumer (sorry Ynet) didn't have room in the paper to include it.
So Please fellow readers don't jump on the hate wagon untill you verify every story.

You're right, I didn't hear anything about secular Jews spitting at chareidim. If I had, and I imagine if most of the readers here at VIN had read or heard such stories we would also be appalled at that behavior. There is no anti-chareidi slant here, especially since most of VIN's readers are also frum, but we are also open-minded enough that we don't believe someone is lying or telling the truth merely because he or she is frum or secular. Both lie.

69

 Dec 28, 2011 at 03:23 PM Avreich1 Says:

Reply to #59  
AP Says:

Anybody read the full article on ynet news? Let me fill you in a little. The media reports that the father of the soldier stated his daughter called him up crying after being called a shiksa. No, you read it correct "soldier cries to father for being called a shiksa" is what the artcile should have read. Those headlines would not make good news for the secularist media, would it? Anyone smell a rat here?
Let me be more specific. A secularist zionist soldier with an agenda against charedim uses her wile to purposely instigate a charedi man (who had misplaced hashkofas written all over his face) in order to get media coverage. The lioness got her prey and the secularist media sponsored ticker-tape parade. I don't condone verbal or physical violence, I just like to call a spade a spade.

"A secularist zionist soldier with an agenda against charedim uses her wile to purposely instigate a charedi man (who had misplaced hashkofas written all over his face) in order to get media coverage."

Paranoid nonsense! Just do not forget to take your medications tonight and every night, AP #59, and everything will be all right.

70

 Dec 28, 2011 at 04:54 PM ShmuelG Says:

Reply to #21  
Shlomo2 Says:

Imagine someone walking up to a soldier in any other country, insulting them to their face, and not thinking that they are going to walk away with a broken nose and missing a few teeth!

The Charedim, more than any one else, know that this is a Jewish army. Otherwise they would never have a havva amina to insult a soldier and think they won't be assaulted in response.

“ Imagine someone walking up to a soldier in any other country, insulting them to their face..."

Ok, I just imagined that if in Japan, to pick a place randomly, they were at the same time stupid and immoral enough to dress a girl who just graduated from high school in some buffoonish “soldier’s” costume and told her to pretend to be a soldier, and then this girl would provocatively deposit herself in the midst of some group of traditional Japanese men. What do you think would happen to her?

71

 Dec 28, 2011 at 07:13 PM clear-thinker Says:

Reply to #59  
AP Says:

Anybody read the full article on ynet news? Let me fill you in a little. The media reports that the father of the soldier stated his daughter called him up crying after being called a shiksa. No, you read it correct "soldier cries to father for being called a shiksa" is what the artcile should have read. Those headlines would not make good news for the secularist media, would it? Anyone smell a rat here?
Let me be more specific. A secularist zionist soldier with an agenda against charedim uses her wile to purposely instigate a charedi man (who had misplaced hashkofas written all over his face) in order to get media coverage. The lioness got her prey and the secularist media sponsored ticker-tape parade. I don't condone verbal or physical violence, I just like to call a spade a spade.

Who knows if she had an agenda. Why should the soldier be called a shiksa? Specifically the man was wrong. You say you like to call a spade a spade. Without bothering to argue the definition of that saying, lets face it...words hurt. Actions hurt. In this case the man was obviously wrong and should not be defended.
Lets even say for arguments sake that you are correct in why the soldier sat where she sat. What moron continues attacking until the police are called. A person who has no sense, or a person who has no respect. A person who believes that he can get away with anything. I know that you want to give this man a ticker tape parade, but I for one smell a rat. Just calling a spade a spade

72

 Dec 28, 2011 at 08:14 PM ayzee Says:

Reply to #41  
joek212 Says:

1St of all you are clearly a am haretz because to sit behind a women is assur " meiachorei isha" and yes they are supposed to get on from the back door why is that so terrible next you feminists are going to complain against the ezras noshim because women sit in the back of the bais medrash

"am haretz"-me?? thanks for the good laugh. i have SO much to say but it's not even worth it. you either have poor comprehension or you are one of those awful people who try to make others feel stupid for simply asking a question, which is exactly what i did. people like you are not worth my time.

73

 Dec 28, 2011 at 08:18 PM ayzee Says:

Reply to #41  
joek212 Says:

1St of all you are clearly a am haretz because to sit behind a women is assur " meiachorei isha" and yes they are supposed to get on from the back door why is that so terrible next you feminists are going to complain against the ezras noshim because women sit in the back of the bais medrash

ok i decided i can deal with you for one more second because i'm just so thrilled to point out how stupid you are (remember who called who an am "haretz"-not HAARETZ which is the correct pronunciation)- it is so clear that i have no problem if the women board the bus from the back-i was asking if my question doesn't apply, because if the women board the bus from the back, they aren't passing by the men!!

74

 Dec 28, 2011 at 08:33 PM Avreich1 Says:

Reply to #70  
ShmuelG Says:

“ Imagine someone walking up to a soldier in any other country, insulting them to their face..."

Ok, I just imagined that if in Japan, to pick a place randomly, they were at the same time stupid and immoral enough to dress a girl who just graduated from high school in some buffoonish “soldier’s” costume and told her to pretend to be a soldier, and then this girl would provocatively deposit herself in the midst of some group of traditional Japanese men. What do you think would happen to her?

For a man who considers himself so highly educated ("two PhD degrees from two different countries") you do write a lot of cr*p.

75

 Dec 28, 2011 at 08:41 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #2  
ayzee Says:

i'm just curious, IF it really is a breach of tznius for men and women to sit together on a bus, wouldn't it make more sense for the women to sit in the front instead of walking through the men to get to the back? how tznius are these people really, sounds like they just want the front spot to check out all the women coming on...or do they make them go on the bus from the back as well????

grate point were doomed ether way to sit behind a lady or let the lady pass ha so i think taxis are the best solution spend some money for Judaism

76

 Dec 28, 2011 at 08:42 PM TzviB Says:

Reply to #70  
ShmuelG Says:

“ Imagine someone walking up to a soldier in any other country, insulting them to their face..."

Ok, I just imagined that if in Japan, to pick a place randomly, they were at the same time stupid and immoral enough to dress a girl who just graduated from high school in some buffoonish “soldier’s” costume and told her to pretend to be a soldier, and then this girl would provocatively deposit herself in the midst of some group of traditional Japanese men. What do you think would happen to her?

When did sitting in a bus seat become provocative? Don't you see we are making it so that every normal human action done by a female is now interpreted as sexual behavior.

77

 Dec 28, 2011 at 08:53 PM TzviB Says:

Does anyone suspect that all this gender segregation, makes men hyper-aware about women's sexuality? I keep hearing about 'healthy men and women' not being able to resist immoral thoughts (i.e. Sexual fantasizing). I am someone that doesn't live in a gender separated environment and I am perfectly capable of keeping my thoughts out of the gutter. Sexual thoughts (a.k.a. Hirhurim) are a part of life, whether you live in Beit Shemesh or not. You are meant to learn to manage them and rise above this natural urge but not at the expense of the dignity of others.

78

 Dec 28, 2011 at 08:56 PM TzviB Says:

Reply to #71  
clear-thinker Says:

Who knows if she had an agenda. Why should the soldier be called a shiksa? Specifically the man was wrong. You say you like to call a spade a spade. Without bothering to argue the definition of that saying, lets face it...words hurt. Actions hurt. In this case the man was obviously wrong and should not be defended.
Lets even say for arguments sake that you are correct in why the soldier sat where she sat. What moron continues attacking until the police are called. A person who has no sense, or a person who has no respect. A person who believes that he can get away with anything. I know that you want to give this man a ticker tape parade, but I for one smell a rat. Just calling a spade a spade

This is a horrible term because it implies that they are not part of Klal Yisrael. A shiksa is a non-Jew. We all know that even an apostate Jew is still our brother or sister.

79

 Dec 28, 2011 at 10:37 PM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #6  
shvigger Says:

Contrary to western culture's "ladies first" halacha is that men NOT walk behind women.

You can have the men in the back. They can get on the bus in the back and have a curtain separating them from the women. In this way they don't have to see the women at all.

81

 Dec 29, 2011 at 09:01 AM anonymous Says:

The individual reflects his parents' upbringing and reinforces the negative behavior of certain religious persons. It is sad that this passes for yiras shomayim

82

 Dec 29, 2011 at 11:34 AM ShmuelG Says:

Reply to #76  
TzviB Says:

When did sitting in a bus seat become provocative? Don't you see we are making it so that every normal human action done by a female is now interpreted as sexual behavior.

Of course simply "sitting on a bus" is not. But for a girl wearing a stupid costume to plump herself in the middle of what is widely regarded as men’s section, and where theretofore only men were at hand, is highly provocative.

Would you describe some girl who parked herself in the middle of your beis medrash and refused to budge as merely “sitting in shul?” I doubt it.

This pretend soldier knew what she was doing. As did r'shoim who sent her.

83

 Dec 30, 2011 at 06:54 AM qwe123 Says:

Reply to #82  
ShmuelG Says:

Of course simply "sitting on a bus" is not. But for a girl wearing a stupid costume to plump herself in the middle of what is widely regarded as men’s section, and where theretofore only men were at hand, is highly provocative.

Would you describe some girl who parked herself in the middle of your beis medrash and refused to budge as merely “sitting in shul?” I doubt it.

This pretend soldier knew what she was doing. As did r'shoim who sent her.

Of COURSE simply sitting somewhere can be provocative!!!!!
Any girl, woman or lady who sits on a plane, is being extremely provocative, if she is not paying for her ticket. It's alot of money to steal!!! But she was only sitting there.

84

 Dec 30, 2011 at 07:01 AM Anonymous Says:

Reply to #77  
TzviB Says:

Does anyone suspect that all this gender segregation, makes men hyper-aware about women's sexuality? I keep hearing about 'healthy men and women' not being able to resist immoral thoughts (i.e. Sexual fantasizing). I am someone that doesn't live in a gender separated environment and I am perfectly capable of keeping my thoughts out of the gutter. Sexual thoughts (a.k.a. Hirhurim) are a part of life, whether you live in Beit Shemesh or not. You are meant to learn to manage them and rise above this natural urge but not at the expense of the dignity of others.

If all your blessings and t'fillas are not fulfilled, then you are probably sick-minded over women, but you may be so deep into it that you are unaware!
Do you say tikun chatzois? Are you a merkovo to the sh'china yet?
If you answered no, to any of this, then you cannot justly write what you are writing.

85

Sign-in to post a comment

Scroll Up
Advertisements:

Sell your scrap gold and broken jewelry and earn hard cash sell gold today!