New York, NY – 680,000 Stop-and-Frisked in 2011

    6

    Protestors march along Third Avenue on Jan. 27, 2012, to denounce the police policy of stop, frisk and question. PHOTO CREDIT DNAinfo/Patrick Wall New York, NY – New York Police Department officers last year stopped and questioned more than 680,000 people on the street.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    The so-called stop-and frisks totaled 684,330, a record since the NYPD began yearly tallies of the tactic in 2002.

    It’s a 14 percent increase over 2010.

    The Wall Street Journal (http://on.wsj.com/yF0Re4 ) reports that it couldn’t be determined how many people were patted down during the encounters. Typically, half of the potential suspects who are stopped are frisked or searched.

    Of those stopped last year, about 12 percent were arrested or received summonses. The rest were not charged.

    Civil rights advocates claim the practice unfairly targets innocent blacks and other minorities, and that many stops are made without proper cause. The department calls it an essential crime-fighting tool.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    6 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Anon Ibid Opcit
    Anon Ibid Opcit
    12 years ago

    Great. Two thirds of a million searches with no probable cause. Two thirds of a million “Just ’cause I’m a cop and a want to” violations of people’s civil rights.

    Two thirds of a million more reasons not to live in the decaying cess-pit that is New York

    concerned_Jew
    concerned_Jew
    12 years ago

    What about the Constitutional protection about unreasonable search and seizure? How are they getting around that?

    concerned_Jew
    concerned_Jew
    12 years ago

    Sounds illegal to me. Unfortuantely the people who are being targeted are probably too poor to afford a lawyer to fight it but is sounds like a civil rights violation to me, the right of a person to be reasonable safe and secure in his/her person and not be subjected to unreasonable searches without probable cause.