New York, NY – Photographer: I Was Too Far to Rescue Man from Upcoming Subway

    9

    New York, NY – The tabloid news photographer whose pictures of a man thrown into the path of a New York City subway train unleashed a maelstrom of criticism said on Wednesday that he was too far from the victim to offer help.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    R. Umar Abbasi, a freelance photographer for the New York Post, said he rapidly shot dozens of frames using his flash in a vain effort to alert the train driver to the presence of the stunned victim on the tracks on Monday afternoon.

    Seconds later the train struck and killed Ki Suk Han, 58, as he tried to pull himself back up to the platform at the 49th Street station, an incident that has struck a nerve in a city where getting jostled by strangers on crowded subway platforms is a daily occurrence. Han lived in the New York City borough of Queens.

    “My condolences to the family, and if I could have, I would have pulled Mr. Han out,” Abbasi said on NBC’s “Today” show.

    The Post, no stranger to controversy over headlines and stories, sparked greater outrage than usual on Tuesday when it featured one of Abbasi’s photographs on its front page.

    It showed Han trying to pull himself from the tracks and looking into the lights of the oncoming train with the headlines “DOOMED” and “Pushed on the subway track, this man is about to die.”

    Police were investigating a suspect brought in for questioning on Tuesday who “implicated himself in the incident,” according to New York City Police Department spokesman Paul Browne. Police have not identified the suspect, but the Post identified him as Naeem Davis, a 30-year-old street vendor also from Queens.

    In a first-person account the Post published on Wednesday, Abbasi said the incident “was one of the most horrible things I have ever seen, to watch that man dying there.

    “I didn’t even know at all that I had even captured the images in such detail.”

    Abbasi also took a New York Times reporter back to the scene to re-enact his movements after Han was thrown to the tracks after what appeared to be an argument with another passenger.

    Abbasi told The Times that he held his camera outstretched in front of the train, snapping his flash 49 times in a vain attempt to get the train conductor to slow down.

    The conductor has been hospitalized for trauma after the incident, the Post and New York Daily News reported.

    “People think I had time to set the camera and take photos, and that isn’t the case,” Abbasi wrote in the Post story.

    “The sad part is, there were people who were close to the victim, who watched and didn’t do anything,” he said. “You can see it in the pictures.”

    Still, criticism of Abassi and The Post was rife in social media.

    “disappointed & disgusted by #NYPost decision to print photo of mans last moment alive, b4 being squished by train,” read a tweet from a California Twitter account.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    9 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    BuckyinWisconsin
    BuckyinWisconsin
    11 years ago

    I found the picture to be absolutely appalling. The fact that no one went to help this man is also appalling. R. Umar Abassi. figures.

    Tzi_Bar_David
    Tzi_Bar_David
    11 years ago

    First the picture was in perfect focus, therefore he had time to pull out and adjust and focus the camera.

    Second, the allegation that he was too far away to help, does not justify not even trying. As for others who may (or may not) have been closer, the issue is not about them, it’s about the photographer who clearly did nothing to help. As Yidden we should all be particularly horrified by the claim, “well, no one else tried to help, so why should I? What could I have done?” You sir, could sleep well at night knowing that you at least TRIED to help.

    I submit that when it comes down to it, all he really cared about was a good gruesome picture that he could sell for a lot of money.

    DRE53
    DRE53
    11 years ago

    I figured so from the first moment I read the story.
    Hevy Don Es Kol Odom l’kaf Zechus.

    mewhoze
    mewhoze
    11 years ago

    and the baloney about him making his camera flash to alert the motorman is exactly that…baloney. the flash kept going off as he took the grusome photos. the only thing the flash would have done for the motorman was distracted him from seeing the poor guy on the tracks.
    give me a break…all done for the moghty buck

    Liepa
    Liepa
    11 years ago

    It does seem like he could’ve done more that he did, which is nothing, except of course, if you include a well focused picture!

    curious
    curious
    11 years ago

    I don’t know if he could have helped or not. I certainly don’t believe he meant to alert the engineer. Hoever, the poor victim shouldn’t have had his dying thoughts to be about how he was being photographed as a story when he was in the struggle of his life. Shame on that cameraman!

    SandraM
    SandraM
    11 years ago

    The photographer has no morals. End of story.

    MarkTwain2
    MarkTwain2
    11 years ago

    Let him donate all proceeds from pic sales to victims family and put his money where his mouth is.

    PashutehYid
    PashutehYid
    11 years ago

    I agree with all comments so far (1-8).