Hartford, CT – Judge Blasts Agency for Hiring Caregiver Without Checking Criminal Record

    1

    Hartford, CT – A former caregiver with a history of arrests has been sentenced to a year behind bars for stealing from an elderly couple, but not before the judge lashed out at the agency that endorsed her without conducting a criminal background check.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Enfield Superior Court Judge Howard Scheinblum sentenced the former caregiver, Elizabeth Arter, 45, of Hartford to a year behind bars for cheating the elderly Granby couple out of $800 while she provided medical care for them.

    Arter was convicted of fourth-degree larceny in the case.

    But what perturbed Scheinblum more than Arter's crime was that Jewish Family Services of Hartford, a referral agency with a bank of caregivers, had endorsed Arter even though she harbored a lengthy criminal history.

    "Health care providers need to do a better job on background checks," Scheinblum said in Superior Court.

    Arter's criminal history includes multiple charges of larceny, possession of marijuana, and breach of peace.

    During the sentencing hearing, Arter's lawyer, Carmine Giuliano, told Scheinblum that Arter had a drug problem and should be commended for seeking treatment and "trying to straighten herself out." "She never had any self-esteem," he said of Arter. "She deserves another chance, despite her record."

    But Scheinblum stood behind his decision.

    "I give you credit for trying to turn yourself around," he told Arter in court. "But I can't ignore your offense."

    Officials at Jewish Family Services said they take the matter "very seriously," and have since implemented criminal background checks for the caregivers they refer. [journalinquirer]


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    1 Comment
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    16 years ago

    I hope all those that defended the 2 men found guilty recently in the home-aide business, will rethink their view. These agencies have a responsiblity to send RELIABLE aides to our homes. This outcome was still “good”, she could’ve murdered, assaulted or abused the patient, not just stolen the money.