London – In Unprecedented Rebuke, UK Government Harshly Criticizes Kerry’s Israel Speech

    18

    FILE -  Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May leaves at the end of an European Summit in Brussels, Belgium, 15 December 2016. ReutersLondon – UK Prime Minister Theresa May came out against US Secretary of State John Kerry’s address criticizing Israel, with a spokesman saying Thursday that disproportionately focusing on settlements and criticizing the composition of the Israeli government is not a constructive way to work towards solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    “We do not believe that the way to negotiate peace is by focusing on only one issue, in this case the construction of settlements, when clearly the conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians is so deeply complex,” the spokesman said.

    Kerry said “settlements” or “settlers” 62 times in his 72-minute speech Wednesday, and “terror” or “terrorism” 14 times. As reflected by those numbers, the focus of the address was on communities beyond the 1949 armistice line and their expansion, which he said was a major obstacle to peace. Israel can only be Jewish and democratic if there is a two-state solution, Kerry posited, and a two-state solution is not possible if any new homes are constructed beyond those lines.

    The US Secretary of State also called the coalition “the most right-wing in Israel history, with an agenda driven by the most extreme elements…more committed to settlements than any in Israel’s history…leading towards one state.”

    On that, May’s spokesman commented: “We do not believe that it is appropriate to attack the composition of the democratically-elected government of an ally.”

    The UK government believes negotiations must take place between Israel and the Palestinians, with backing from the international community, the spokesman added.

    The comments came less than a week after the UK voted in favor of UN Security Council Resolution 2334 condemning Israel for settlement activity, the first resolution critical of Israel not vetoed by the US since 2009.

    May’s spokesman defended the vote for resolution 2334 by saying the UK government “continue[s] to believe that the construction of settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories is illegal.

    “But we are also clear that the settlements are far from the only problem in this conflict. In particular, the people of Israel deserve to live free from the threat of terrorism, with which they have had to cope for too long.”

    Jerusalem expressed outrage at the resolution, pointing out that its parameters call Israel’s presence at the Western Wall a war crime.

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who also holds the foreign affairs portfolio, had ministers cancel planned meetings with officials from any of the countries involved with the resolution with which Israel has diplomatic relations, and ambassadors from those countries were summoned for censure. Contrary to what was broadly reported, the Prime Minister’s Office said it did not cancel a meeting with May following the UNSC vote.

    Earlier in December, May praised Israel as a “thriving democracy, beacon of tolerance, an engine of enterprise and an example to the rest of the world for overcoming adversity and defying disadvantages,” in a speech to the Conservative Friends of Israel.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    18 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    jack25
    jack25
    7 years ago

    I’m confused, didn’t the U.K. Support the UN resolution. They are on the same boat with Kerry, no?

    SammyPos
    SammyPos
    7 years ago

    Kol hakovoid!

    Buchwalter
    Buchwalter
    7 years ago

    Kerry should have visited Yad Vashem and would have given a different speech

    7 years ago

    I wonder what is the catalyst of their statements. Why would a great country as the UK oppose the sagacious words of an official that decried Israel’s heedless actions?

    And, Israel is a mere drop in the bucket of a tremendous worldwide arena. Their impudence and tough talk is old fashioned comical.

    7 years ago

    It’s both “too little, too late” And “the pot, calling the kettle, black”.

    7 years ago

    It isn’t just “support,” although they did vote for it while the US “abstained.” Britain is a permanent member of the UN Security Council, and has the same veto power as does the US. Something is a bit screwy here.

    HankM
    HankM
    7 years ago

    Rather schizophrenic

    PaulinSaudi
    PaulinSaudi
    7 years ago

    Exactly. She directed her ambassador to vote for the resolution.

    ayoyo
    ayoyo
    7 years ago

    What is the reason for obama to support abbas and the palestinians,what have they got for the world besides war.?

    Butterfly
    Butterfly
    7 years ago

    Maybe now they need something from Israel? Too late.