Jerusalem – Israeli government minister Michael Oren, a former ambassador to the United States, rejected a report that Israel was prepared to detonate a nuclear bomb in the Sinai to turn the tide of the 1967 war with its Arab neighbors if necessary.
Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
The New York Times published a report on Saturday about the existence of the “doomsday” plan, based on an interview by leading Israeli nuclear scholar Avner Cohen with retired IDF Brig.-Gen. Itzhak Yaakov, who allegedly oversaw the plan.
Yaakov, who oversaw weapons development for the Israeli military, detailed the plan to Cohen in interviews in 1999 and 2000; he died in 2013 at the age of 87.
He said the plan was codenamed Shimshon, or Samson, the biblical hero of immense strength, who in a last burst of strength brought down a Philistine temple killing himself along with his enemies.
Oren, who wrote a comprehensive history of the Six Day War, responded to the Times report on Sunday, saying that thousands of declassified documents from the war do not support a plan to detonate a nuclear bomb in Egypt’s Sinai.
He noted that basing such a report on one source is unacceptable.
“I also interviewed Yitzhak Yaakov, and I was not convinced that the story holds water,” he told the Times of Israel. “They released tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of classified documents from the Six Day War, the government discussions of our defense establishment and foreign intelligence organizations, and there is not even half a hint that supports Avner Cohen’s version. If there was something there, we would find more evidence.”
Yaakov was arrested in 2001, at the age of 75, for discussing the country’s nuclear program with Ronen Bergman, a reporter for the Israeli daily Yediot Acharonot.
Israel maintains “nuclear ambiguity,” neither confirming nor denying that it has nuclear weapons.
On Monday, the Nuclear Proliferation International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington is releasing on a special website a series of documents related to the atomic plan. Cohen is a global fellow of the Center.
Here is a lay person’s view. Just on the surface of it it seems strange to claim that with 20th century technology cash-strapped Israel so readily (or potentially so) prepared a nuclear device on short notice while with 21st century technology oil-rich Iran has spent years and is yet to produce results.
I just skimmed the NYT article. To say the least, it is weird. Some sentences are awkward, as if it was poor translation from another language (or the English language has really changed since by school days). As example:
> With it clear that war was imminent, Mr. Yaakov said, he initiated, drafted and promoted a plan
Then there is the over-dramatic sentences like:
> Mr. Yaakov said he feared … the .. nuclear blast … could have killed him and his commando team.
And the very plan itself was built with internal absurdity. During the alleged reconnaissance of the proposed site we have the following:
> Mr. Yaakov described a helicopter reconnaissance flight … The helicopter had to turn back after the pilots learned that Egyptian jets were taking off, perhaps to intercept them
Yet they felt it made sense to plant an alleged atomic device just at that spot?
NYT is Fake News
The failing NYT do its best to spread twisted facts again.
So Sad