Manhattan, NY – The editor-in-chief of the New York Post, Col Allan, can no longer invoke so-called “editorial privilege” to avoid revealing details of conversations between himself and the newspaper’s owner, Rupert Murdoch, after it published a cartoon in early 2009 that appeared to liken President Barack Obama to a chimpanzee, a New York judge has ruled.
Join our WhatsApp groupSubscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
Delivered by Judge Ronald Ellis, the ruling threatens potential embarrassment to Mr Murdoch in a long-running employment discrimination and harassment lawsuit filed against the tabloid and Mr Allan by former associate editor, Sandra Guzman, who is black and from Puerto Rico. She sued in late 2009 after being fired.
Ms Guzman, who was originally hired to boost Latino readership, alleges that she was let go because she complained about being harassed at the paper on the basis of race and gender. Her suit also suggests that she was being punished because she also spoke up about the cartoon.
Inspired by an actual incident, the caricature showed two policemen shooting a rabid chimpanzee. It sparked outrage and Mr Murdoch was forced to apologise because of the apparent reference to Mr Obama and his $787bn stimulus package. Holding a smoking gun, one cop said: “They’ll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill.”
C’mon, editorial privilege! If they can’t make jokes or say what they want in comics, then what is the point of a newspaper! If you don’t like it, stop reading it! Enough people do that and they will stop making those comments/comics. Easy enough without bringing the court into it!
The New York Post is an embarrassment to Democracy.
The testimny about the cartoon is relevant to show whether there was a climate of racial bigotry at the paper that affected the reporter. There is no suggestion that the paper could not publish the cartoon.
Look…. there is no doubt that the cartoon was in VERY poor taste and was designed to express a racist idea.
However, half this country is made of up stupid people. They love to watch train-wrecks, they bathe in the tears of celebrities when they fall from grace, they hold tight to their “beliefs” regardless of the FACTS, and they buy into the most ridiculous propaganda and spin. They idolize people like Howard Stern and Rush Limbaugh who are in both in the same business: saying ANYTHING (true, false, vulgar) to keep the idiot masses listening long enough to hear the next batch of advertisements (because that’s how they get paid).
This cartoon falls into the same category. Clearly SOME people were offended. Clearly SOME people understood the clear racist tone of it. BUT, most people either don’t care, are numb to it, or actually agree with racist stereotyping.
I believe in the free market. If everyone found racism offensive, we would stop buying the paper and they would make changes to win us back as customers. Since there was no hit to their sales, they will ratchet up the rhetoric next time in order to get more publicity. Next time, it could be US who gets hit.
President Bush was mocked way out of proportion compared to obama. Monkeys and all. You name it.
And the AP, liberal leaders, civil babblemouths would not tweet.
What has changed?!