Washington – US Media Pays Little Notice Of Israeli Elections

    6

    View of the Central Election Committee's Control Room in the Israeli parliament on january 22, 2013, when Israelis go to the polling stations to vote in the general elections for Israel's 19th parliament. January 22, 2013. Photo by Isaac Harari/FLASH90Washington – It is possible that the American press would have paid more attention to the Israeli election had it not coincided with the installation of its own executive leadership.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    But it is unlikely.

    The vote in Israel falls one day after United States President Barack Obama’s second inauguration, which has dominated US media coverage over the past week. What space has been devoted to the race in Israel, has emphasized the lackluster nature of the campaign and its foregone conclusion – not exactly stop-the-presses kinds of stories.

    In perhaps the clearest sign that the elections have been viewed as less-than-gripping news cycle fodder, a recurrent theme in the relatively few stories that have been published here is what’s not being discussed in the campaign, rather than what is.

    Both The New York Times and Washington Post on Monday ran stories, well inside the paper, about the lack of debate on certain topics.

    In a Memo from the Middle East titled “An Unusual Election for Its Non-issues,” The Times detailed the lack of details being provided on policies, noting that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu hadn’t even produced a formal platform.

    The Washington Post summed up its story with the headline: “In Israeli election, Iran issue avoided.”

    And if Israeli politicians aren’t tackling big issues with global implications, why would the media an ocean away pay them much heed? Iran, Syria, Al-Qaida remain major concerns in America.

    But in contrast to all these actors, who are driving new developments each day, Israel has remained static on these issues during the course of the election, and there is no sense that the elections have provided clues to what course the next government could take on these subjects.

    With Obama re-taking his place in the Oval Office and Netanyahu all-but-certain to remain prime minister, even the popular storyline of dysfunction and disagreement between the two leaders only makes for well-trod ground.

    Though the discord could well continue – and certainly the tensions over the announcement of construction plans in E-1, put forward by Netanyahu, at least in part to neutralize a political challenge on his right, point in that direction – it is also the case that after four years of sparring, the two wearied men could instead opt for accommodation.

    Then the media would have even fewer stories to write on the US-Israel relationship.

    Content is provided courtesy of the Jerusalem Post


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    6 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Butterfly
    Butterfly
    11 years ago

    They don’t care. They will make all their comments when the results are in! Then, they wake up!!

    Liepa
    Liepa
    11 years ago

    It’s far better for the US media NOT to notice the Israeli elections.

    The less Israel is in the news the better it is for Israel!

    Believe me , out of sight, out of mind!

    AlbertEinstein
    AlbertEinstein
    11 years ago

    Newspapers are so 20th century. The Israeli elections are the number one story on Yahoo! News

    11 years ago

    Israeli elections are way too complex to cover on a 4 minute CNN segment and yes I have seen some coverage.

    marcia
    marcia
    11 years ago

    Why cover the future of the possible change in the balance of power in the M.E? We SHOULD be concentrating on Michelle Obama’s messages about healthy EATING!!!!