Washington – Clapper Apologizes For ‘Erroneous’ Answer On NSA

    7

    FILE - This April 18, 2013 file photo shows National Intelligence Director James Clapper testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington.  Clapper is apologizing for telling Congress earlier this year that the National Security Agency does not collect data on millions of Americans. In a letter to Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., Clapper says his answer was "clearly erroneous." (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)Washington – Director of National Intelligence James Clapper has apologized for telling Congress earlier this year that the National Security Agency does not collect data on millions of Americans, a response he now says was “clearly erroneous.”

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Clapper apologized in a letter to Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein. His agency posted the letter Tuesday on its website.

    Leaks by former NSA systems analyst Edward Snowden have revealed the NSA’s sweeping data collection of U.S. phone records and some Internet traffic every day, though U.S. intelligence officials have said the programs are aimed at targeting foreigners and terrorist suspects mostly overseas.

    Clapper was asked during a hearing in March by Sen. Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, if the NSA gathered “any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans.”

    At first, Clapper answered definitively: “No.”

    Pressed by Wyden, Clapper changed his answer. “Not wittingly,” he said. “There are cases where they could inadvertently perhaps collect, but not wittingly.”

    Last month, in an interview with NBC News after revelations about the program, Clapper said: “I responded in what I thought was the most truthful, or least untruthful, manner” — because the program was classified.

    In his letter to Feinstein, Clapper wrote that he was thinking about whether the NSA gathered the content of emails, rather than the metadata of the phone records — the record of calls to and from U.S. citizens and the length of those phone calls.

    “I realized later Sen. Wyden was asking about … metadata collection, rather than content collection,” Clapper wrote. “Thus, my response was clearly erroneous, for which I apologize.”

    Feinstein said in a statement Tuesday: “I have received Director Clapper’s letter and believe it speaks for itself. I have no further comment at this time.”

    Wyden spokesman Tom Caiazza said Tuesday that when Wyden staffers contacted Clapper’s office shortly after the hearing, his staffers “acknowledged that the statement was inaccurate but refused to correct the public record when given the opportunity.”

    “Sen. Wyden is deeply troubled by a number of misleading statements senior officials have made about domestic surveillance in the past several years. He will continue pushing for an open and honest debate,” Caiazza said.

    In the letter, Clapper said he could now publicly correct the record, because the existence of the metadata collection program has been declassified since the deluge of leaks from Snowden. A copy of the letter posted on the DNI website was stamped June 21 but made public on Tuesday.

    Snowden is believed to be in a Moscow airport transit area, seeking asylum from one of more than a dozen countries.

    Since the revelations, the Obama administration has said the leaks have caused damage to national security, including tipping off al-Qaida and other terrorist groups to specific types of U.S. electronic surveillance.

    But under pressure from lawmakers and privacy activists, the administration took the extraordinary step of declassifying many of the details surrounding the surveillance programs and how they work, to explain to Americans that NSA is not spying directly on them, which would violate its charter.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    7 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    PaulinSaudi
    PaulinSaudi
    10 years ago

    Oh, how I love that lawyer’s question, “So you lied then, are you lying now?”

    The man is unfit for any public office.

    10 years ago

    Sorry you broke the law you do the crime you do the time

    10 years ago

    if he LIED he should punished for PERJURY and go to JAIL. the whole current administration is a BUNCH OF LIARS from the TOP DOWN.

    10 years ago

    I love the double standard!! Where I come from its called Lying! Somehow politicians and government officials can’t possibly lie. They ‘misspeak’.

    savtat
    savtat
    10 years ago

    Why could he not just say “it’s classified?” Also, why weren’t the senators and congressmen “read in” if it was classified? Anyone who has read 1984 is nervous. Yet, we are told that it is the least of the intrusive choices the government has to keep us safe. Look at what we have to put up with at the airports!

    Facts1
    Facts1
    10 years ago

    He will be prosecuted when Eric Holder will be held accountable for the contempt of court on the fast and furious saga and perjury on the persecution of journalist saga, when Geitner and Charlie Rangle will be held accountable for tax evasion, when Clinton will be held accountable for perjury.

    It’s about who you know not what you do.

    I_Am_Me
    I_Am_Me
    10 years ago

    The American people are a strange lot! When Clinton lied, I refused to vote him in for another 4 years & believed he should have been thrown out of the presidency like Nixon (almost) was. However, most Americans forgave his lying *** & took him back for another 4 years. Now, we are talking about our safety, in a world that is so chaotic, a lot more than it was in Clinton’s days & yet now… NOW we are worried about perjury, now we are worried about lies?! Where were these same Americans when Clinton lied? Oh, maybe it’s because his lies were personal, ok fine I’ll give you that. However, if I give you that, you must give me the fact that Clapper & the rest lied to protect us! Therefore, what Clapper & the rest did is so tremendously benign to what Clinton did. I’m sorry, but if it were my safety vs. a presidents personal life, I thing the former is a more valid reason to lie.