Sanford, FL – Four of the jurors at the George Zimmerman trial distanced themselves late Tuesday from statements that another juror made in a televised interview.
Join our WhatsApp groupSubscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
The four jurors issued a brief statement on court stationary saying that the opinions expressed by Juror B37 to CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Monday night are not representative of their views.
“The opinions of Juror B-37, expressed on the Anderson Cooper show were her own, and not in any way representative of the jurors listed below,” said the statement, signed by Jurors B51, B76, E6 and E40..
Juror B37 said the actions of Zimmerman, a former neighborhood watch volunteer, and Trayvon Martin both led to the teenager’s fatal shooting last year, but that Zimmerman didn’t actually break the law. The juror has said she plans to write a book about her experience.
The four other jurors said in their statement that Martin’s death weighed on them.
“Serving on this jury has been a highly emotional and physically draining experience for each of us,” the statement said. “The death of a teenager weighed heavily on our hearts but in the end we did what the law required us to do.”
They also made a request for privacy. The court has not released the names of the six-woman jury, which included five whites and one woman who appeared to reporters to be Hispanic.
The interview came two days after the jury acquitted Zimmerman, a former neighborhood watch volunteer, of second-degree murder in the shooting death of Martin in a gated community in Sanford, Fla. Martin was black, and Zimmerman identifies himself as Hispanic. Zimmerman was not arrested for 44 days, and the delay in charging him led to protests from those who believed race was a factor in the handling of the case.
While prosecutors accused Zimmerman of profiling Martin, Zimmerman maintained he acted in self-defense.
In the CNN interview, Juror B37 said she didn’t believe that Zimmerman followed Martin, 17, because of his race. She said Zimmerman made some mistakes, but that she believed Martin struck Zimmerman first and that the neighborhood watch volunteer had a right to defend himself. She repeatedly referred to Zimmerman as “George” in the interview, stating at one point, “I have no doubt George feared for his life in the situation he was in at the time.”
Juror B37 said the jurors were initially divided on Zimmerman’s guilt, with three jurors believing he was guilty of either manslaughter or second-degree murder, but that the jury agreed to acquit the 29-year-old Zimmerman after studying the law.
You yutzes at the AP, Zimmerman IS hispanic!! Get over the fact that you were trying your darndest to make this into a white on black crime!
If you could say “Zimmerman identifies himself as hispanic” then we could honestly say Barack Hussein Obama mmmmm mmmmmm mmmmmmm identifies himself as black!
The Juror on Television was well within her true rights to speak as she did, but the reality is that she is not entirely good in terms of her own discretion and it should have been cleared (if not) with all jurors. And a book should also be cleared with not just the jury but the justice of peace as well. I think that she is completely out of her mind to be engaging in this type of discourse in such a very accelerated fashion. It does not do justice for the trial, it does not do justice for the parties involved and it does seem a bit like a vampirish goal.
Which part of her statements didn’t they agree with?
The one juror, B-37 should not have appeared on CNN, without the other five jurors, present. Either they should have all appeared, or none should have appeared. I think that this one juror made matters worse, especially when she referred to Rachel Jeantel, and stated “those people”. It didn’t come out very well on the air. Incidentally, there was a report which appeared in the Daily News, which stated that a 46 year old White man, Mr. Mahaney of the Cincinnati area, just died from an unprovoked beating which he suffered from four 13 and 14 year old Blacks. The perpetrators admitted that they were bored. Also, a 20+ White jogger in Mississippi was also beaten yesterday by three Black men in a car. They stated after beating him that “this was payback for Trayvon”. Yet, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton will never discuss the two victims above, nor will the majority of the news media!
It amazes me how jurors think they can turn their six-week gig into a book. Does anyone here own a book by a juror? Has anyone here even read a book by a juror? Does anyone here know someone who read a book by a juror?
This person’s fifteen minutes are up.
i watched the entire interview, and its absolutely fascinating how in the end, they considered the dry law,
These rabble rousers “No Justice,No Peace” are the new Wall Street Occupiers, same crap,different day.