West Bank – Palestinian Official: Kerry Guarantees 1967 Borders For New Peace Talks

    27

     US Secretary of State John Kerry (L) meets with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the West Bank city of Ramallah, 19 July 2013.  EPAWest Bank – Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas agreed to resume peace talks with Israel only after U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry gave him a letter guaranteeing that the basis of the negotiations will be Israel’s pre-1967 borders, two senior Palestinian officials said Saturday.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    The officials, both of whom are close to the Palestinian leader and privy to internal discussions, said the U.S. letter also stipulated that both sides are to refrain from taking any steps that would jeopardize the outcome of the talks. Israel is not to issue new tenders for Jewish settlements in the West Bank, while the Palestinians are not to pursue diplomatic action against Israel at any international organizations, the officials said on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to brief the media.

    “The talks with Kerry were about to collapse, and the letter came as a lifeline in the last minute bargaining,” one of the Palestinian officials said.

    There was no immediate comment from the State Department, but U.S. officials have said in the past that Kerry would reiterate standing American positions on the goals for renewed talks, including that a Palestinian state should be negotiated on the basis of Israel’s borders before the 1967 Mideast war, when Israel captured the Gaza Strip, West Bank and east Jerusalem.

    After a round of intense shuttle diplomacy, Kerry announced on Friday that Israel and the Palestinians had agreed on a basis for returning to the peace process, which broke down five years ago. The two sides are to meet — likely in the coming week — to work out final details on actually resuming their negotiations on the toughest issues of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    Kerry would not give details on the agreement on the negotiations’ framework. “The best way to give these negotiations a chance is to keep them private.” he said. “We know that the challenges require some very tough choices in the days ahead. Today, however, I am hopeful.”

    The Palestinians long refused to return to the negotiating table unless Israel agreed to several preconditions, including that the talks be based on Israel’s pre-1967 borders. Israel frequently called for talks to resume without preconditions, insisting that all core issues should be resolved through dialogue.

    Speculation has been rife for weeks that the sides would find a way to sidestep Israel’s reluctance to offer assurances of the 1967 lines as the framework for talks by having the guarantee provided by the United States.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces sharp opposition from within his majority coalition to such a move. One key ally, Economics Minister Naftali Bennett, has threatened to pull his Jewish Home Party out of the government altogether if the prime minister agrees to the border conditions.

    The basis of the negotiations themselves — not the core issues at the heart of the conflict — has been a major impediment to resuming talks. On Thursday evening, the Palestinian leadership balked at dropping a main condition: They demanded a guarantee that negotiations on borders between a Palestinian state and Israel would be based on the cease-fire line that held from 1949 until the 1967 war.

    Kerry’s announcement late Friday suggested that the question had been resolved, although the top U.S. diplomat offered no details.

    Netanyahu issued a statement Saturday evening welcoming Kerry’s announcement and thanking him for his efforts, saying he “views the resumption of the political process at this time a vital strategic interest.”

    Earlier Saturday, Israel’s intelligence and strategic affairs minister offered a few details on the framework. He confirmed that Israel would release some Palestinian prisoners, but said it will not meet other long-standing Palestinian demands before negotiations resume, such as a settlement freeze or defining the 1967 borders as the basis for talks.

    Yuval Steinitz told Israel Radio that prisoners Israel has agreed to release include some who “have been sitting in jail for dozens of years,” He did not say how many would be freed, adding only that they would be released in phases.

    The fate of the prisoners is extremely sensitive in Palestinian society. After decades of fighting Israel, many families have had a member imprisoned and the release of prisoners has been a longstanding demand. The Palestinians are held on a range of charges, from rock throwing to deadly assaults like shooting attacks or bombings targeting Israeli soldiers and civilians. The Palestinians mostly view the prisoners as heroes while Israelis tend to see them as terrorists.

    In a sign of the opposition Netanyahu faces even within his own government, deputy defense minister Danny Danon issued a statement condemning the prisoner release, saying “these murderers must not be released as an ‘act of good will’ or as a prize for returning to the negotiating table.”

    Steinitz said it a nine-month timetable was agreed to for the talks to prevent them from collapsing along the way. He also said the Palestinians agreed to refrain from taking action against Israel at the United Nations while the talks are taking place — echoing the statement from the Palestinian officials.

    Israel’s chief negotiator with the Palestinians, Tzipi Livni, welcomed the revival of the peace process. She said it was difficult to restart talks after years of mistrust between the sides, but that she is “hopeful” about them.

    “This is a very heavy responsibility,” Livni told Israel’s Channel 2 TV of the talks. “All the issues will be on the table.”

    Final status negotiations aim to reach a deal on the core issues of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including Jerusalem, borders, the fate of Palestinian refugees and security arrangements. Talks ground to a halt five years ago, and previous efforts to revive them have stalled, particularly over Palestinian demands that Israel announce a freeze in construction of Jewish settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, which they claim as part of a future state along with Gaza. Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005.

    In Gaza, Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri said his group rejects Kerry’s announcement, saying it does not recognize Abbas’ ”legitimacy to negotiate” on their behalf. The militant Hamas group rules Gaza, and has been at odds with Abbas since taking over the seaside strip in 2007.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    27 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    10 years ago

    These ‘talks’ are doomed from the get go.

    ayoyo
    ayoyo
    10 years ago

    Sounds good just return to the pre 1948 borders and take back all of the refugees and their children and grand children and great grand children, send back all of the European settlers and their extended families and there will be peace in our time.

    victorg
    victorg
    10 years ago

    Yes, give back the Palestinians East Jerusalem so they can again turn the kotel into a garbage dump and ban Jews from visiting, just as they did before 1967. Brilliant!

    murray059
    murray059
    10 years ago

    As bad, and stupid, one sided this is….it still would never satisfy the Arab murderers…..so what is the point of this dribble?

    sissel613
    sissel613
    10 years ago

    I want to know what Kerry is smoking

    5TResident
    Noble Member
    5TResident
    10 years ago

    I’m sure Kerry did nothing of the sort. If he did, Israel should just wait until Obama is out of office and a new Sec of State is put in.

    maxedout
    maxedout
    10 years ago

    This would make alterg and rebbe123 very happy. perhaps we can throw them in as part of the deal.

    charliehall
    charliehall
    10 years ago

    Actually Israel agreed that the 1967 borders would be the foundation for negotiations ten years ago.

    pbalaw
    pbalaw
    10 years ago

    So let’s get this straight , we currently control land that they want for a future state, and we are willing to sit down and talk about it, but that is not enough? They want us to agree to something before we sit down?

    RebKlemson
    RebKlemson
    10 years ago

    I’m just curious what negotiating with a government that is relatively broke, and not even representing half the people they are negotiating for is going to do.

    pbalaw
    pbalaw
    10 years ago

    How about this, we can agree to this, AFTER, there is first peace amongst the Arabs, why should we trust them when they are killing themselves in All the surrounding countries , if they don’t care for peace in their own countries who actually believes that they will keep peace with Jews???

    TexasJew
    TexasJew
    10 years ago

    Who gets the Woman Of the Wall?

    victorg
    victorg
    10 years ago

    Reply to 15
    The Palis have world opinion on their side. They will be particularly brazen in their demands. You can be sure that returning Jerusalem will be a non negotiable item for them.

    Of course returning Jerusalem won’t happen and could be the deal breaker; but be sure the Palis will demand it!

    Chelmite
    Chelmite
    10 years ago

    I think Kerry should show us how to do it right.
    Give back the US land to the American Indian
    tribes- and start with giving Kerrys personal property
    as a measure of good faith. Then we will know how it works

    Shlomo-1
    Shlomo-1
    10 years ago

    Important point: those were borders before 1967, they were armistice lines.
    If Israel has agreed to call them borders, that is an important psychological win for the PA.

    tehillim_119_72
    tehillim_119_72
    10 years ago

    I think Israel should just offer the Palestinians every single part of Israel which voted for Meretz in the last election, since Meretz loves Terrorists so much let the Palestinians have them.

    naisgal
    naisgal
    10 years ago

    Back to 1967 borders? Umm so why were the wars fought? Those borders did not bring peace then and would not now. Take away ( with compensation, of course) all of East Jerusalem and there will be peace. Forget a two state solution, except in Jordon, and there will be peace. The more you give the less peace you will have.
    And guess what, we may not need any soldiers rather than an increase of them via Chareidi. Stand your ground.

    naisgal
    naisgal
    10 years ago

    Kerry is married to the owner of Heinz dynasty( which I use as I like ketchup). Is he a neutral representative? One never can know what truly lurks in the heart of leaders, but God’s will shall prevail. Kerry is WRONG! But being right never mattered anyway. It is not about being right. Never was.