New York – NYT Editorial: Snowden ‘Justified,’ Deserves Lighter Punishment

    12

    FILE - The signature on the letter of fugitive former U.S. spy agency contractor Edward Snowden is pictured during a news conference in Berlin, November 1, 2013. ReutersNew York – The U.S. government should grant former NSA contractor Edward Snowden clemency or a plea bargain given the public value of revelations over the National Security Agency’s vast spying programs, the New York Times editorial board said on Thursday.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    In its lead editorial, the newspaper said Americans now more fully understand how widely their phone calls, emails and other information are tracked. Information provided to journalists by Snowden has also prompted needed legal review of the intelligence gathering and led a presidential panel to call for a major overhaul of the agency, it said.

    “Considering the enormous value of the information he has revealed, and the abuses he has exposed, Mr. Snowden deserves better than a life of permanent exile, fear and flight. He may have committed a crime to do so, but he has done his country a great service,” the New York Times’ editorial board wrote.

    The Guardian, a British newspaper that along with The Washington Post received Snowden’s leaked documents, also called for President Barack Obama to pardon Snowden in its own editorial published on Wednesday.

    “We hope that calm heads within the present administration are working on a strategy to allow Mr Snowden to return to the U.S. with dignity, and the president to use his executive powers to treat him humanely and in a manner that would be a shining example about the value of whistleblowers and of free speech itself,” The Guardian wrote.

    Snowden, living in Russia with temporary asylum, last year leaked documents he collected while working for the NSA. The United States has charged him with espionage, and more charges could follow.

    The disclosures have sparked a debate over how much leeway to give the U.S. government in gathering information to protect Americans from terrorism, and have prompted numerous lawsuits.

    Last week, a federal judge ruled that the NSA’s collection of phone call records is lawful, while another judge earlier in December questioned the program’s constitutionality. The issue is now more likely to move before the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Snowden’s Russian amnesty is due to expire in August. He could face at least 30 years in prison over current charges but is more likely to face up to life in prison, the Times said.

    NSA’s incoming deputy director, Rick Ledgett, recently told CBS News he would favor negotiating an amnesty with Snowden in exchange for securing the documents in his possession, but the White House has dismissed that suggestion.

    The New York Times editorial board said Snowden “was clearly justified” in his leaks given that current whistleblower laws do not cover private contractors.

    The editorial listed several ways the NSA had violated the public trust, saying it broke federal privacy laws “thousands of times a year,” undermined the Internet’s basic encryption system and breached the communications links of data centers around the world.

    Obama, who has called on Snowden to return to the United States, should instead give him “an incentive to return home,” it said.

    “When someone reveals that government officials have routinely and deliberately broken the law, that person should not face life in prison at the hands of the same government,” the newspaper wrote.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    12 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    bennyt
    bennyt
    10 years ago

    The liberal trash anti-semitic and anti-Israel New York Times will soon disappear off the face of the planet so let them have their last licks.

    charliehall
    charliehall
    10 years ago

    I guess if Jewish rags can claim that Pollard’s espionage was justified, then the NY Slimes can claim that Snowden’s espionage was justified. (That is the first time I’ve ever used that derogatory term, but it fits in this case.)

    10 years ago

    Gelt makes the simple jealous

    10 years ago

    And what of Pollard?

    10 years ago

    I agree with NYT

    Liepa
    Liepa
    10 years ago

    The NYT editorial board (bored), please don’t make me cry from laughter. In order for the USA to possibly prevent another 9/11 the NSA needs to do what it needs to do. Yes, the methods might be ugly at times but terrorism on innocent people isn’t pretty and is in fact uglier when compared to what the NSA has ever done.
    Snowden is a traitor, nothing less and deserves the book thrown at him for the untold damage he’s caused this country.

    10 years ago

    Snowden is such a hero? Let him run for President of the United States. Can’t do much worse than the current liberal in office.

    Ray_from_PA
    Ray_from_PA
    10 years ago

    The NYT is again for anything that weakens the US. If he was so interested in safeguarding US citizens, he could have spoken with Rand Paul, Darrel Issa, Mike Lee, and others. They understand the meaning of personal liberty. By revealing our secrets to our enemies, he is an enemy of the state.